Search

ObjectiveTo evaluate risankizumab, a biological therapy that inhibits interleukin 23, in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who have responded inadequately or are intolerant to ≥1 conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD).MethodsIn the randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind KEEPsAKE 1 trial, 964 patients with active PsA were randomised (1:1) to receive risankizumab 150 mg or placebo at weeks 0, 4 and 16. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving ≥20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at week 24. Here, we report the results from the 24-week double-blind period; the open-label period with all patients receiving risankizumab is ongoing.ResultsAt week 24, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving risankizumab achieved the primary endpoint of ACR20 (57.3% vs placebo, 33.5%; pConclusionsRisankizumab treatment results in significantly greater improvement of signs and symptoms of PsA compared with placebo and is well tolerated in patients with active PsA who have responded inadequately or are intolerant to ≥1 csDMARD.Trial registration numberNCT03675308.

Moderate to severe plaque psoriasis can be treated effectively with immunomodulating biologicals such as the interleukin-17A inhibitor secukinumab. In practice, however, questions often arise as to how to proceed in special situations, such as infections, comorbidity, pregnancy, or surgery.To address frequent questions about the treatment of plaque psoriasis with secukinumab in a consensus document of German psoriasis experts that supplements current guidelines.In a virtual expert meeting in May 2020, practical aspects of the treatment of psoriasis were discussed based on the experience of the participants and on current literature. The results of this discussion were summarized in the present consensus document.This article provides practical guidance on case history, documentation of previous therapies, severity of psoriasis, and comorbidities before starting therapy with secukinumab. For patients treated with secukinumab, the course of action in case of vaccinations, chronic or acute infections, surgical interventions, special manifestations of psoriasis, and comorbidities including history of cancer and autoimmune disorders is discussed. Questions regarding family planning and health policy regulations are also addressed.The recommendations for the treatment of psoriasis with secukinumab summarized in this consensus document may contribute to achieve optimal therapy for patients and to improve their quality of life.HINTERGRUND: Die mittelschwere bis schwere Psoriasis vulgaris kann wirksam mit immunmodulierenden Biologika wie dem Interleukin-17A-Inhibitor Secukinumab behandelt werden. In der Praxis stellt sich jedoch oft die Frage nach dem Vorgehen in besonderen Situationen, beispielsweise bei Infektionen, Komorbidität, Schwangerschaft oder operativen Eingriffen.In diesem Konsensdokument deutscher Psoriasisexperten sollen in Ergänzung zu den aktuellen Leitlinien häufige Fragen aus dem Therapiealltag zur Behandlung der Psoriasis mit Secukinumab beantwortet werden.In einem virtuellen Expertentreffen im Mai 2020 wurden auf Grundlage von Erfahrungen der Teilnehmer und aktueller Literatur praxisrelevante Aspekte der Behandlung der Psoriasis erörtert. Darauf basierend wurde ein Konsensdokument verfasst.Die vorliegende Arbeit bietet praktische Hinweise zur Anamnese einschließlich der Erfassung von Vortherapien, Schweregrad der Psoriasis und Begleiterkrankungen vor Beginn einer Therapie mit Secukinumab. Ferner wird auf das Vorgehen bei Impfungen, Infektionen, operativen Eingriffen, Sondermanifestationen der Psoriasis und Komorbiditäten einschließlich vorbestehenden Autoimmunerkrankungen und Tumorerkrankungen unter Therapie mit Secukinumab eingegangen. Auch Fragen zur Familienplanung und zu gesundheitspolitischen Regularien werden diskutiert.Die in diesem Konsensdokument zusammengefassten unterstützenden Empfehlungen zur Behandlung der Psoriasis mit Secukinumab sollen dazu beitragen, für die Patienten eine optimale Therapie zu erreichen und ihre Lebensqualität zu verbessern.

The definitive diagnosis and early treatment of many immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) is hindered by variable and overlapping clinical manifestations. Psoriatic arthritis (PsA), which develops in ~30% of people with psoriasis, is a key example. This mixed-pattern IMID is apparent in entheseal and synovial musculoskeletal structures, but a definitive diagnosis often can only be made by clinical experts or when an extensive progressive disease state is apparent. As with other IMIDs, the detection of multimodal molecular biomarkers offers some hope for the early diagnosis of PsA and the initiation of effective management and treatment strategies. However, specific biomarkers are not yet available for PsA. The assessment of new markers by genomic and epigenomic profiling, or the analysis of blood and synovial fluid/tissue samples using proteomics, metabolomics and lipidomics, provides hope that complex molecular biomarker profiles could be developed to diagnose PsA. Importantly, the integration of these markers with high-throughput histology, imaging and standardized clinical assessment data provides an important opportunity to develop molecular profiles that could improve the diagnosis of PsA, predict its occurrence in cohorts of individuals with psoriasis, differentiate PsA from other IMIDs, and improve therapeutic responses. In this review, we consider the technologies that are currently deployed in the EU IMI2 project HIPPOCRATES to define biomarker profiles specific for PsA and discuss the advantages of combining multi-omics data to improve the outcome of PsA patients. ispartof: BIOMEDICINES vol:10 issue:10 ispartof: location:Switzerland status: published

Objective: To investigate the imaging characteristics and clinically assess heel enthesitis in spondyloarthritis (SpA) by applying in a post hoc analysis the Heel Enthesitis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring system (HEMRIS) in blinded and centrally-read MRI data from the ACHILLES trial (NCT02771210). Methods: ACHILLES included patients (≥18 years) with active psoriatic arthritis or axial SpA with clinical and MRI-positive heel enthesitis refractory to standard treatment. Patients were randomized to receive subcutaneous secukinumab 150/300 mg or placebo. At week 24, patients on placebo were switched to secukinumab treatment. MRI-positive heel enthesitis was confirmed in all patients by local investigators. MRIs were performed at 3 timepoints: screening and weeks 24 and 52. In the present analysis, all MRIs were re-evaluated by 2 blinded central readers in a consensus read fashion for a priori defined MRI parameters based on HEMRIS. Results: At screening, 171/204 (83.8%) of patients presented with entheseal inflammation and/or structural damage, considering both the Achilles tendon and plantar fascia. Pathologies were more evident in the Achilles tendon area compared to the plantar aponeurosis. The most frequent pathologies were intra-tendon hypersignal and retrocalcaneal bursitis. The mean total entheseal inflammation score at screening in the Achilles tendon area was 2.99 (N=204) and the mean change (standard deviation [SD]) from screening to weeks 24 and 52 was − 0.91 (1.99) and − 0.83 (2.12) in the secukinumab group vs − 0.48 (1.86) and − 0.80 (1.98) in the placebo-secukinumab group, respectively. The mean total structural damage score at screening was 1.36 (N=204) and the mean change (SD) from screening to weeks 24 and 52 was 0.00 (0.65) and − 0.06 (0.56) in the secukinumab group vs 0.08 (0.48) and 0.04 (0.75) in the placebo-secukinumab group, respectively. Conclusions: Based on the newly developed HEMRIS, entheseal inflammation and/or structural damage was confirmed in 83.3% of ACHILLES patients. Pathologies were more evident in the Achilles tendon area compared to plantar fascia, with the inflammatory parameters being more responsive with secukinumab treatment compared to placebo. The present analysis, with detailed information on individual MRI parameters, contributes to the scientific debate on heel enthesitis. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02771210.

Background: Many patients with psoriatic arthritis do not reach minimal disease activity (MDA) on methotrexate alone. This phase 4 open-label study aimed to compare attainment of MDA following introduction of adalimumab with methotrexate escalation in patients with psoriatic arthritis who do not reach MDA after an initial methotrexate course (≤15 mg every week). Methods: CONTROL was a phase 4, randomised, two-part, open-label study conducted in 14 countries and 46 sites. We recruited patients with confirmed active psoriatic arthritis, naive to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, with an inadequate response to 15 mg or less of methotrexate. In part 1, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either methotrexate 15 mg (oral or subcutaneous) every week with the addition of adalimumab 40 mg (subcutaneously) every other week (adalimumab plus methotrexate group) or methotrexate (oral or subcutaneous) escalation up to 25 mg every week (escalated methotrexate group). Randomisation was done using Interactive Response Technology and stratified by the duration of methotrexate treatment (≤3 months and >3 months). In this open-label study there was no masking; participants, people giving the interventions, those assessing outcomes, and those analysing the data were aware of group assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who reached MDA at 16 weeks. After 16 weeks (part 2), patients who reached MDA (responders) had their current therapy maintained or modified, wheras patients who did not reach MDA (non-responders) had their therapy escalated until 32 weeks. The primary endpoint in part 2 was the proportion of patients who reached MDA at 32 weeks, analysed in all patients who received one or more doses of study drug. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02814175. Findings: Between Aug 5, 2016, and March 19, 2020, 245 of 287 patients initially assessed were enrolled in the study (50% men and 50% women; 92% of patients were White). 123 patients were randomly assigned to receive adalimumab plus methotrexate and 122 patients to receive escalated methotrexate. All 245 patients were included in the primary analysis, and 227 completed part 1 and entered part 2. A significantly higher proportion of patients reached MDA at 16 weeks in the adalimumab plus methotrexate group (51 [41%] patients) compared with the escalated methotrexate group (16 [13%] patients; p

Introduction: The objective of this work was to assess the efficacy and safety of risankizumab in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) over 76 weeks. Methods: In this double-blind, dose-ranging phase 2 study, adults with active PsA were randomized 2:2:2:1:2 to risankizumab 150 mg at weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 (arm 1), 150 mg at weeks 0, 4, and 16 (arm 2), 150 mg at weeks 0 and 12 (arm 3), 75 mg at week 0 (arm 4), or placebo (arm 5). Patients completing week 24 could receive risankizumab 150 mg in a 52-week open-label extension study. Efficacy assessments included American College of Rheumatology (ACR) responses, Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) responses, minimal disease activity (MDA), and 28-joint Disease Activity Score based on C-reactive protein (DAS28[CRP]). Results: Of 185 randomized patients, 173 (93.5%) completed week 16 and 145 (78.4%) entered the open-label extension. Significantly more patients in each risankizumab arm achieved ACR20 at week 16 versus placebo (primary endpoint: pooled arms 1 + 2 [59.5%] versus placebo [35.7%]; treatment difference [90% CI] 24.0 [9.3, 38.7]; P = 0.007). Similarly, significantly more patients in most risankizumab arms achieved ACR20/50/70, PASI75/90/100, MDA, and greater improvements in DAS28(CRP) versus placebo at week 16. These benefits of risankizumab were maintained long term. Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable across treatment arms. Risankizumab 150 mg was well tolerated over 76 weeks. Conclusions: Risankizumab improved joint and skin symptoms versus placebo in patients with active PsA over 16 weeks; improvements were sustained long term. Risankizumab was well tolerated over the long term with no new safety findings. Trial Registration Numbers: NCT02719171 and NCT02986373.

Introduction: Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory joint disease affecting about 1% of the European adults. Fluorescence-optical imaging (FOI) technique is an indocyanine-green (ICG) based procedure to assess changes of microvascularization in the hands. Purpose of the study was [for full text, please go to the a.m. URL], Deutscher Rheumatologiekongress 2021, 49. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh), 35. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Orthopädische Rheumatologie (DGORh), Wissenschaftliche Herbsttagung der Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendrheumatologie (GKJR)

Qualitätsstandards (QS) sind messbare Konstrukte, die helfen sollen, Versorgungslücken quantitativ zu erfassen, um langfristig die Versorgungsqualität zu verbessern. Die Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) hat kürzlich erstmals internationale QS für das Management von Patient*innen mit axialer Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) konsentiert und veröffentlicht. Die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh) hat daraufhin beschlossen, diese Standards durch eine Gruppe von Expert*innen aus unterschiedlichen Versorgungsbereichen zu übersetzen, zu prüfen und ggf. zu übernehmen. Vor diesem Hintergrund wurden erstmals nationale QS für das Management von Patient*innen mit axSpA für Deutschland entwickelt. Hierbei wurde v. a. auf Machbarkeit und Praxisrelevanz geachtet. Letztlich wurden 9 QS definiert, mit denen die Qualität der Versorgung in Deutschland gemessen und verbessert werden kann bzw. soll. Quality standards (QS) are measurable constructs designed to quantify gaps in care and subsequently to improve quality of care. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) recently generated and published international QS for the management of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) for the first time. The German Society of Rheumatology (DGRh) then decided to translate, review and possibly adopt these standards by a group of experts from different care settings. Against this background, national QS for the management of patients with axSpA for Germany were developed for the first time. The main focus was on feasibility and practical relevance. Ultimately, nine QS were defined with which the quality of care in Germany can and should be measured and improved.

Additional file 1: Detailed description of the monitoring process in RABBIT-SpA.