Search

Background. In hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), late hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) has been associated with BK virus (BKV) infection. We assessed the value of plasma BKV load in predicting HC. Methods. Plasma and urine BKV-DNA load were assessed prospectively in 107 pediatric patients. Results. Twenty patients developed grade II and III HC, with 100-day cumulative incidence of 18.8%. At diagnosis of HC, the median load of BKV DNA was 2.3 × 10³ copies/mL. A plasma BKV-DNA load of 10³ copies/mL had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 86% with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 39% for HC. A urine BKV-DNA load of >107 copies/mL had a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 60% with a NPV of 98% and a PPV of 14% for HC. A BKV load of 10³ copies/mL on plasma was significantly associated with HC in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 6.1; P = .0006). Patients with HC had a significantly higher risk of mortality than patients who did not have HC (HR, 2.6; P = .018). Conclusions. The above values were used to monitor plasma BKV-DNA load, and they provided a better prediction of patients at risk of HC than urine BKV-DNA load. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Infections are the main reason for mortality during acute leukaemia treatment and invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a major concern. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is a standard therapy and often is the only live-saving procedure in leukaemia patients. The profound immunodeficiency occurring after alloSCT led to high IA-associated mortality in the past. Therefore, patients with IA were historically considered transplant-ineligible. Recently, there has been improvement of anti-fungal management including novel anti-fungal agents. As a result, more leukaemia patients with IA are undergoing alloSCT. Outcome has not been prospectively assessed., Methods: We performed a prospective study in acute leukaemia patients undergoing alloSCT to analyse the impact of a prior history of probable or proven IA (pre-SCT IA). The primary endpoint was 1-year non-relapse mortality (NRM). Relapse free survival and overall survival were analysed as secondary endpoints., Findings: 1439 patients were included between 2016 and 2021. The incidence of probable or proven pre-SCT IA was 6.0% (n = 87). The cumulative incidence of 1-year NRM was 17.3% (95% CI 10.2-26.0) and 11.2% (9.6-13.0) for patients with and without pre-SCT IA. In multivariate analyses the hazard ratio (HR) for 1-year NRM was 2.1 (1.2-3.6; p = 0.009) for patients with pre-SCT IA. One-year relapse-free survival was inferior in patients with pre-SCT IA (59.4% [48.3-68.9] vs. 70.4 [67.9-72.8]; multivariate HR 1.5 [1.1-2.1]; p = 0.02). Consequently, 1-year overall survival was lower in patients with pre-SCT IA: (68.8% [57.8-77.4] vs. 79.0% [76.7-81.1]; multivariate HR 1.7 [1.1-2.5]; p = 0.01)., Interpretation: Pre-SCT IA remains to be significantly associated with impaired alloSCT outcome. On the other hand, more than two thirds of patients with pre-SCT IA were alive at one year after alloSCT. IA is not anymore an absolute contraindication for alloSCT because the majority of patients with IA who undergo alloSCT benefit from this procedure., Funding: There was no external funding source for this study., Competing Interests: R.dlC. Has received honoraria from Pfizer and MSD; J.S. reports personal fees from Gilead, outside the submitted work. EDK reports grants from Gilead sciences, personal fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. L.Y. reports grants and personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from Abbvie, personal fees and non-financial support from AstraZeneca, personal fees and non-financial support from Beigene, personal fees and non-financial support from Kite/Gilead, personal fees and non-financial support from Pfizer, outside the submitted work; S.M reports other from Celgene/BMS, other from Novartis, other from Kite/Gilead, other from Pfizer, other from Miltenyi, other from Mendes, other from SWECARNET, other from Scientify Research, outside the submitted work; J.M. reports personal fees and non-financial support from Gilead Sciences, personal fees and non-financial support from Mundipharma, personal fees and non-financial support from F2G, personal fees and non-financial support from Takeda, personal fees and non-financial support from Basilea, outside the submitted work; M.M. reports grants and personal fees from Gilead, personal fees from Mundipharma, personal fees from Pfizer, from null, outside the submitted work; H.P. reports non-financial support from Neovii, during the conduct of the study; OP has no COIs directly related to this work. HP reports non-financial support from Neovii during the conduct of the study; OP has received honoraria or travel support from Gilead, Jazz, MSD, Neovii, Novartis, Pfizer and Therakos. He has received research support from Incyte and Priothera. He is member of advisory boards to Equillium Bio, Jazz, Gilead, Novartis, MSD, Omeros, Orca Bio, Priothera, Sanofi, Shionogi and SOBI. T.Z. reports personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from Orgenesis Inc, personal fees from BioSight Ltd, personal fees from Cellect Biotechnology, personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Gilead Sciences, outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interests., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Background and Objectives: Veno-occlusive disease (VOD) is one of the most frequent complications after stem cell transplantation. We conducted a prospective survey of 244 hematopoietic stem cell transplants in children to determine the incidence of VOD, its main risk factors, treatment and effect on the transplant., Design and Methods: Two hundred and forty-four hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) performed in 220 pediatric patients from 1993 to 2003 were evaluated. The series included 127 males and 93 females with a median age of 6.7 years at the time of transplantation., Results: VOD was diagnosed following 26 of the 244 transplants (cumulative incidence 11%), but a higher incidence was found in patients with at least one known risk factor for VOD (cumulative incidence 20%). In multivariate analysis, risk factors for VOD were age < 6.7 years; type of VOD prophylaxis, and busulphan-containing conditioning regimens. Routine treatment of VOD was based on supportive care and, starting from 1999, defibrotide was used. All patients were monitored with daily Doppler ultrasound-(US) for early diagnosis of inversion of portal blood flow. Twelve patients developed inversion of portal flow (9 had severe VOD; 3 had moderate VOD) and were promptly started on fibrinolytic and anticoagulant therapy with heparin and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA). Hepatic flow reverted to normal in all 12 patients; only 4 patients ultimately developed multiorgan failure and died. The transplant-related-mortality (TRM) rate in patients with or without inversion of portal flow was 33% vs 7%, (p=0.1). The TRM in patients with or without VOD was 19% vs 8% (p=0.001)., Interpretation and Conclusions: This study showed that younger age, type of VOD prophylaxis, and busulphan-based conditioning regimens are independent risk factors for VOD. Inversion of portal flow was found in 9 of 10 patients with severe VOD. Doppler US monitoring may be helpful in early identification of the patients with VOD-induced inversion of portal flow who might benefit from therapy with heparin and rt-PA.

Treatment of healthy donors with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) allows the mobilization and peripheralization into circulating blood of an adequate number of CD34+ cells that can then be collected by leukapheresis (PBSC). This procedure avoids the invasiveness of bone marrow harvest and the risks related to general anesthesia. The main adverse effects of rhG-CSF are: bone pain, 84%, headache, 54%, fatigue, 31%, and nausea, 13%, which are usually scored by the donors as moderate to severe, resolving within 2-3 days after discontinuation of the cytokine. Analgesics, mainly acetaminophen, are sufficient to control the pain. Less than 5% of the donors experience non-cardiac chest pain, a local reaction at the injection site, insomnia, dizziness or a low-grade fever. Discontinuation of the PBSC procedure because of adverse effects of rhG-CSF or leukapheresis is rarely necessary (0.5%) but this good tolerability can be hampered by the need, in 5-20% of cases, for an adequate venous access that requires insertion of a central or venous catheter. There are no absolute contraindications to the stimulation of healthy donors with rhG-CSF but the description of cases of non-traumatic splenic rupture, iritis, cardiac ischemia, and gouty arthritis suggests that further precautionary restrictions are advisable when deciding eligibility for PBSC collection. The main advantages for patients receiving an allogeneic PBSC transplant are the faster hematologic and immunologic recovery and the potential for a greater efficacy in advanced disease by lowering the transplant-related mortality. One of the major concerns regarding the use of rhG-CSF in unrelated healthy donors is the uncertainty about its possible role in triggering malignancy, in particular myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia. There are no studies with an adequate sample size and follow-up that can answer this question but two recent retrospective studies reported that in the medium term rhG-CSF is not associated with an excess of lymphoproliferative disorders. Currently, caution on the long-term safety of the use of rhG-CSF in healthy donor is still warranted but the data so far accumulated on allogeneic PBSC transplants are encouraging both as far as concerns the good short-medium tolerability profile of G-CSF-stimulation of the donor and the potential major efficacy in leukemia patients.