Search

Brain control of the reproductive system is mediated through hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) which activates specific receptors (GnRHR) present at the surface of the pituitary gonadotropes to trigger secretion of the two gonadotropins LH and FSH. A unique feature of this system is the high dependence on the secretion mode of GnRH, which is basically pulsatile but undergoes considerable fluctuations in pulse frequency pattern in response to endogenous or external factors. How the physiological fluctuations of GnRH secretion that orchestrate normal reproduction are decoded by the gonadotrope cell machinery to ultimately control gonadotropin release and/or subunit gene transcription has been the subject of intensive studies during the past decades. Surprisingly, the mammalian GnRHR is unique among G protein-coupled receptor family as it lacks the carboxy-terminal tail usually involved in classical endocytotic process. Accordingly, it does not desensitize properly and internalizes very poorly. Both this atypical intrinsic property and post-receptor events may thus contribute to decode the GnRH signal. This includes the participation of a network of signaling pathways that differently respond to GnRH together with a growing amount of genes differentially sensitive to pulse frequency. Among these are two pairs of genes, the transcription factors EGR-1 and NAB, and the regulatory factors activin and follistatin, that function as intracellular autoregulatory feedback loops controlling respectively LHβ and FSHβ gene expression and hence, LH and FSH synthesis. Pituitary gonadotropes thus represent a unique model of cells functionally adapted to respond to a considerably fluctuating neuroendocrine stimulation, from short individual pulses to sustained GnRH as observed at the proestrus of ovarian cycle. Altogether, the data emphasize the adaptative reciprocal complementarity of hypothalamic GnRH neurones and pituitary gonadotropes to function as an original unit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The activity of pituitary gonadotrope cells, crucial for reproductive function, is regulated by numerous factors including signals related to nutritional status. In this work, we demonstrated, for the first time, that in vivo central exposure of rats to lipids intracarotid infusion of a heparinized triglyceride emulsion selectively increases the expression of pituitary LH subunit genes without any alteration of pituitary GnRH receptor and hypothalamic GnRH or Kiss-1 transcript levels. Furthermore, we showed that unsaturated fatty acids (UFA), oleate and linoleate, increase LH release in a dose-dependent manner as well as LHβ mRNA levels in both immortalized LβT2 gonadotrope cell line and rat primary cell cultures. In contrast, the saturated palmitate was ineffective. ACTH or TSH secretion was unaffected by UFA treatment. We demonstrated in LβT2 cells that linoleate effect is mediated neither by activation of membrane fatty acid (FA) receptors GPR40 or GPR120 although we characterized these receptors in LβT2 cells, nor through nuclear peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. Furthermore, linoleate β-oxidation is not required for its action on LH secretion. In contrast, pharmacological inhibition of protein kinase C (PKC) or ERK pathways significantly prevented linoleate-stimulated LH release. Accordingly, linoleate was shown to activate novel PKC isoforms, PKCε and -θ, as well as ERK1/2 in LβT2 cells. Lastly, unsaturated, but not saturated, FA inhibited GnRH-induced LH secretion in LβT2 cells as well as in pituitary cell cultures. Altogether, these results suggest that the pituitary is a relevant site of FA action and that UFA may influence reproduction by directly interfering with basal and GnRH-dependent gonadotrope activity.

Normal gametogenesis and steroidogenesis is highly dependent on the pulsatile release of hypothalamic GnRH that binds high-affinity receptors present at the surface of pituitary gonadotrophs thereby triggering the synthesis and release of the gonadotropins LH and FSH. The mammalian GnRH receptor displays the classical heptahelical structure of G protein-coupled receptors with, however, a unique feature, the lack of a C-terminal tail. Accordingly, it does not desensitise sensu stricto, and internalises very poorly. It is now well established that GnRH stimulation induces the activation of a complex network of transduction pathways involved in the control of gonadotropin release and subunit gene expression. Other authors and ourselves have demonstrated that the GnRH action is associated with an increased complexity regarding gene regulation/cell function. Indeed GnRH affects the GnRH receptor gene itself and a number of additional genes that include some involved in cell signalling and auto-/paracrine regulation. The fact that GnRH regulates the expression of its own receptor, together with a host of other genes typically involved in its signal transduction cascades implies alteration/auto-adaptation in gonadotropic responsiveness. Furthermore, some of these genes respond differentially depending on whether the GnRH stimulation is intermittent or permanent suggesting specific roles in the dual process of activation/desensitisation. Thus, it can be assumed that the importance of pulsatility of GnRH action is closely related to, or dependent on, the inability of the GnRH receptor to desensitise. Moreover, multiple post-receptor events are crucial for both the regulation/plasticity of gonadotropic function and the maintenance of cell integrity.