Search

Purpose Coregistered SPECT/CT can improve accuracy of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for staging melanoma. This benefit has implications for pathology services and surgical practice with increased diagnostic and surgical workload. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of SPECT/CT imaging. Methods SNB data were collected over a 10-year period. Preoperative SLN mapping was performed by using planar lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) for all patients (n = 1522) and after October 2015, patients underwent a second co-registered SPECT/CT scan (n = 559). The patients were stratified according to the imaging protocol. The number of nodes and nodal basins were assessed. The reasons for cancellation also were assessed. Results A total of 95% (1446/1522) of patients underwent a successful SNB procedure. Significantly more sentinel nodes were identified by the SPECT/CT protocol (3 vs. 2; p < 0.0001). More patients were cancelled in the SPECT/CT cohort (9.3% vs. 2.5%; p < 0.0001). Head & neck, lower limb, and AJCC IB primaries were significantly less likely to proceed to SNB. SPECT/CT identified significantly more positive SNBs (20.9% vs. 16.5%; p = 0.038). SPECT/CT imaging was associated with improved disease-free (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54–1.0); p = 0.048) and disease-specific survival (HR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.3–0.78; p = 0.003). Patients who did not proceed to SNB had a significantly increased nodal relapse rate (23.5% vs. 6.8%; HR = 3.4; 95% CI: 1.9–6.2; p < 0.0001) compared with those who underwent SNB. Conclusions This large cohort study confirms the increased accuracy of SPECT/CT for identifying SLN metastases, which would appear to have a significant therapeutic benefit, although an increased risk of cancellation of the SNB procedure on the day of surgery.

Purpose Coregistered SPECT/CT can improve accuracy of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for staging melanoma. This benefit has implications for pathology services and surgical practice with increased diagnostic and surgical workload. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of SPECT/CT imaging. Methods SNB data were collected over a 10-year period. Preoperative SLN mapping was performed by using planar lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) for all patients (n = 1522) and after October 2015, patients underwent a second co-registered SPECT/CT scan (n = 559). The patients were stratified according to the imaging protocol. The number of nodes and nodal basins were assessed. The reasons for cancellation also were assessed. Results A total of 95% (1446/1522) of patients underwent a successful SNB procedure. Significantly more sentinel nodes were identified by the SPECT/CT protocol (3 vs. 2; p < 0.0001). More patients were cancelled in the SPECT/CT cohort (9.3% vs. 2.5%; p < 0.0001). Head & neck, lower limb, and AJCC IB primaries were significantly less likely to proceed to SNB. SPECT/CT identified significantly more positive SNBs (20.9% vs. 16.5%; p = 0.038). SPECT/CT imaging was associated with improved disease-free (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54–1.0); p = 0.048) and disease-specific survival (HR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.3–0.78; p = 0.003). Patients who did not proceed to SNB had a significantly increased nodal relapse rate (23.5% vs. 6.8%; HR = 3.4; 95% CI: 1.9–6.2; p < 0.0001) compared with those who underwent SNB. Conclusions This large cohort study confirms the increased accuracy of SPECT/CT for identifying SLN metastases, which would appear to have a significant therapeutic benefit, although an increased risk of cancellation of the SNB procedure on the day of surgery.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Survival in penile cancer is largely determined by lymph node (LN) metastasis. Dynamic Sentinel Node Biopsy (DSNB) staging procedure has a false negative rate of 5-13%. W...

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an important staging tool for the management of melanoma. A multicentre study was done to validate previous findings that the timing of lymphoscintigraphy influences the accuracy of SLNB and patient outcomes, particularly survival.Data were reviewed on patients undergoing SLNB for melanoma at three centres in the UK and Sweden, examining the effect of timing of SLNB after nuclear medicine scanning. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess overall (OS), disease-specific (DSS) and progression-free (PFS) survival, stratified by timing of lymphoscintigraphy. Independent risk factors for survival were identified by Cox multivariable regression analysis.A total of 2270 patients were identified. Median follow-up was 56 months. Univariable analysis showed a 4·2 per cent absolute and 35·5 per cent relative benefit in DSS (hazard ratio 1·36, 95 per cent c.i. 1·05 to 1·74; P = 0·018) for 863 patients whose SLNB was performed up to 12 h after lymphoscintigraphy compared with 1407 patients who had surgery after more than 12 h. There were similar OS and PFS benefits (P = 0·036 and P = 0·022 respectively). Multivariable analysis identified timing of lymphoscintigraphy as an independent predictor of OS (P = 0·017) and DSS (P = 0·030). There was an excess of nodal recurrences as first site of recurrence in the group with delayed surgery (4·5 versus 2·5 per cent; P = 0·008).Delaying SLNB beyond 12 h after lymphoscintigraphy withLa biopsia de ganglio centinela (sentinel lymph node biopsy, SLNB) es una técnica importante para la estadificación y tratamiento del melanoma. Se realizó un estudio multicéntrico para validar hallazgos previos según los cuales el momento de la linfogammagrafía (lymphoscintigraphy, LS) influye en la precisión de la SLNB y en los resultados de los pacientes, especialmente en la supervivencia. MÉTODOS: Se revisaron los datos de los pacientes a los que se realizó una SLNB por melanoma en 3 centros en el Reino Unido y Suecia, con especial atención al efecto del período entre la inyección el material radioactivo y la SLNB. Se realizó un análisis de supervivencia mediante el método de Kaplan-Meier para la supervivencia específica de la enfermedad (disease-specific survival, DSS), supervivencia global (overall survival, OS) y supervivencia libre de progresión (progression-free survival, PFS), todas ellas estratificadas por el momento de la LS. Los factores de riesgo independientes para la supervivencia se determinaron mediante un análisis de regresión multivariable de Cox.Se incluyeron 2.270 pacientes. La mediana de seguimiento fue de 49 meses. El análisis univariado mostró un beneficio absoluto del 4,2% y relativo del 35,5% (cociente de riesgos instantáneos, hazard ratio, HR: 1,36 (i.c. del 95% 1,05-1,74, P = 0.02)) en la DDS para los pacientes a los que la SLNB se realizó 12 horas después de la LS (n = 863) en comparación con aquellos realizados 12 horas (n = 1407). Se detectaron beneficios similares para la OS y la PFS (P = 0,04 y P = 0,02, respectivamente). El análisis multivariable identificó el tiempo entre la LS y la SLNB como un factor independiente de OS (P = 0,017) y DSS (P = 0,03). Hubo un aumento en las recidivas ganglionares como primer sitio de recidiva en el grupo de 12 horas (2,5% versus 4,5%; P = 0,008). CONCLUSIÓN: Estos datos validan nuestra investigación previa y tienen implicaciones significativas para las unidades de melanoma, en el sentido de que retrasar la SLNB más allá de las 12 horas después de realizar la LS con nanocoloides marcados con Tc99 tiene un impacto negativo significativo en la supervivencia de los pacientes y debe evitarse. Se presenta la hipótesis de que la causa subyacente es la migración temporal del trazador que determina una SLNB incorrecta. .

Introduction: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in cutaneous melanoma (CM) is performed to identify patient at risk of regional and distant relapse. We hypothesized that timing of lymphoscintigraphy may influence the accuracy of SLNB and patient outcomes. Methods: We reviewed prospective data on patients undergoing SLNB for CM at a large university cancer-center between 2008-2015, examining patient and tumor demographics and time between lymphoscintigraphy (LS) and SLNB. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis assessed disease-specific (DSS) and overall-survival (OS), stratified by timing of LS. Cox multivariate regression analysis assessed independent risk factors for survival. Results: We identified 1015 patients. Median follow-up was 45 months (IQR 26-68 months). Univariate analysis showed a 6.8% absolute DSS (HR 1.6 [1.03-2.48], p= 0.04) benefit and a 10.7% absolute OS (HR 1.64 [1.13-2.38], p=0.01) benefit for patients whose SLNB was performed < 12 hrs of LS (n= 363) compared to those performed >12 hours (n=652). Multivariate analysis identified timing of LS as an independent predictor of OS (p=0.007) and DSS (p=0.016) when competing with age, sex, Breslow thickness (BT) and SLN status. No difference in nodal relapse rates (5.2% v 4.6%; p=0.67) was seen. Both groups were matched for age, sex, BT and SLN status. Conclusion: These data have significant implications for SLNB services, suggesting delaying SLNB >12 hours after LS using a Tc99-labelled nanocolloid has a significant negative survival impact for patients and should be avoided. We hypothesise that temporal tracer migration is the underlying cause and advocate further trials investigating alternative, 'stable' tracer-agents.