Search

Soil organisms, including earthworms, are a key component of terrestrial ecosystems. However, little is known about their diversity, their distribution, and the threats affecting them. We compiled a global dataset of sampled earthworm communities from 6928 sites in 57 countries as a basis for predicting patterns in earthworm diversity, abundance, and biomass. We found that local species richness and abundance typically peaked at higher latitudes, displaying patterns opposite to those observed in aboveground organisms. However, high species dissimilarity across tropical locations may cause diversity across the entirety of the tropics to be higher than elsewhere. Climate variables were found to be more important in shaping earthworm communities than soil properties or habitat cover. These findings suggest that climate change may have serious implications for earthworm communities and for the functions they provide., Unión Europea. Horizonte 2020, Unión Europea. FP7, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICCIN), sDiv [Synthesis Centre of the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Academy of Finland, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, DOB Ecology, TULIP Laboratory of Excellence, Russian Foundation for Basic Research, Tarbiat Modares University, Aurora Organic Dairy, UGC (NERO), Slovak Research and Development Agency, Science for Global Development through Wageningen University, Norman Borlaug LEAP Programme and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Royal Canadian Geographical Society, Environmental Protection Agency (Ireland), University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, U.S. Department of the Navy, Commander Pacific Fleet, Science and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, India, Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP) of the U.S. Department of Defense, Maranhão State Research Foundation (FAPEMA), Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic, Colorado Wheat Research Foundation; Zone Atelier Alpes, French National Research Agency, Austrian Science Fund, Landwirtschaftliche Rentenbank Frankfurt am Main, Welsh Government and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, SÉPAQ, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Finland, Science Foundation Ireland, University of Toronto (Faculty of Forestry), Haliburton Forest and Wildlife Reserve, NKU College of Arts and Sciences, Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft, Mountain Agriculture Research Unit of the University of Innsbruck, Higher Education Commission of Pakistan, Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi, Kerala, UNEP/GEF/TSBF-CIAT, GRDC, AWI, LWRRDC, DRDC, National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), National Agency of Scientific and Technological Promotion (FONCyT), Universidad Nacional de Luján/FONCyT, Fonds de recherche sur la nature et les technologies du Québec, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, CONACYT, NSF, Institute for Environmental Science and Policy at the University of Illinois at Chicago, Dean’s Scholar Program at UIC, Garden Club of America Zone VI Fellowship in Urban Forestry from the Casey Tree Endowment Fund, J. E. Weaver Competitive Grant from the Nebraska Chapter of The Nature Conservancy, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences at DePaul University, Elmore Hadley Award for Research in Ecology and Evolution from the UIC Dept. of Biological Sciences, Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología (CICYT), Yokohama National University, MEXT KAKENHI, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI, ADEME, Syngenta Philippines, UPSTREAM, LTSER, Comisión Europea, National Science and Technology Base Resource Survey Project of China, McKnight Foundation, Program of Fundamental Researches of Presidium of Russian Academy of Sciences, Brazilian National Council of Research CNPq, French Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs, Depto. de Biodiversidad, Ecología y Evolución, Fac. de Ciencias Biológicas, TRUE, pub

The formation of soil organic matter (SOM) very much depends on microbial activity. Even more, latest studies identified microbial necromass itself being a significant source of SOM and found microbial products to initiate and enhance the formation of long-term stabilized SOM. The objectives of this study were to investigate the microbial contribution to SOM in pools of different stability and its impact on SOM quality. Hence, four arable soils of widely differing properties were density-fractionated into free and occluded particulate organic matter (fPOM, oPOM < 1.6 g cm−3 and oPOM < 2.0 g cm−3) and mineral associated organic matter (MOM > 2.0 g cm−3) by using sodium polytungstate. These fractions were characterized by in-source pyrolysis-field ionization mass spectrometry (Py-FIMS). Main SOM compound classes of the fractions were determined and further SOM properties were derived (polydispersity, thermostability). The contribution of microbial derived input to arable soil OM was estimated from the hexose to pentose ratio of the carbohydrates and the ratio of C4–C26 to C26–C36 fatty acids. Additionally, selected samples were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for visualizing structures as indicators for the origin of OM. Results showed that, although the samples differed significantly regarding soil properties, SOM composition was comparable and almost 50% of identifiable SOM compounds of all soils types and all density fractions were assigned to phenols, lignin monomers and alkylaromatics. Most distinguishing were the high contents of carbohydrates for the MOM and of lipids for the POM fractions. Qualitative features such as polydispersity or thermostability were not in general assignable to specific compounds, density fractions or different mean residence times. Only the microbial derived part of the soil carbohydrates c

Pesticide use is well known to be detrimental for maintaining biodiversity in the agricultural landscape. Amphibians are especially affected by these agrochemicals. In particular, these animals’ high sensitivity was demonstrated for glyphosate-based herbicides which are dominating the world market today. Pesticide impacts are influenced by several co-stressors, and we for the first time link the exposure risk of amphibians to these commonly used pesticides to observed recent effects from ongoing climate change. In a simple verbal model, based on present-day data from Germany, we show that amphibian populations which have undergone phenological shift towards earlier reproduction potentially suffer less from applications of glyphosate-based herbicides compared to those which (yet) show no such reproductive shift. Although, apparently observed recent climate change effects lower the exposure risk, we advocate that amphibians are not necessarily safer now, mainly because farmers most likely will adapt their cultivation practices in the future if climate change becomes more obvious. Rather, we conclude that combining pesticide applications, climate change and phenological responses need an increased consideration in amphibian conservation. The results from our verbal model should be seen as a hypothesis that needs to be tested with specific field studies and (based on these data which are widely lacking today) more complex modelling of future exposure risk of pesticides to amphibians.

Earthworms are used in an increasing number of microcosm experiments that investigate their behaviour and biology or that consider earthworms an environmental factor that influences soil properties and biological interactions. However, there exists no standardized protocol for performing comparable studies. After giving a short overview of the different experimental approaches using earthworms as model organisms, the present paper provides recommendations for the planning and execution of earthworm experiments that help in achieving comparable results. The recommendations, summarized in a workflow diagram, pertain to the acquisition, treatment and description of earthworms for experimentation, the description and preparation of test soils and the criteria that should be met for valid experimental results.

Problemstellung/Ziele: Im Projekt ‚Ökologische Bodenbewirtschaftung’ (PÖB) der Stiftung Ökologie und Landbau, Bad Dürckheim, wird seit 1995 am Standort Rommersheim, Rheinhessen, eine differenzierte Grundbodenbearbeitung mit den Varianten Pflug (P), Zweischichtenpflug (LP) und Schichtengrubber (LC) durchgeführt. Ziel der Untersuchungen war es, vertiefende Einsichten in die Reaktion der mikrobiellen Biomasse auf die differenzierte Bodenbearbeitung unter den besonderen Bedingungen des Ökologischen Landbaus zu erhalten. Hypothesen: Eine reduzierte (LP) und konservierende (LC) Bodenbearbeitung führt im Vergleich zum Pflug (P) zu einer Anreicherung und Sequestrierung sowie einer qualitativen Modifikation von organischer Bodensubstanz und mikrobieller Biomasse. Die funktionelle und strukturelle Diversität der Bodenmikroorganismen-Gemeinschaft wird hierdurch ebenfalls modifiziert. Methoden: Im Frühjahr 2001 wurden Bodenproben aus Grünbrache-Parzellen in vierfacher Wiederholung je Bodenbearbeitungsvariante differenziert nach Ober- (0-15cm) und Unterkrume (15-25cm) entnommen und hinsichtlicher der Gehalte an organischer Substanz (trockene Veraschung), mikrobieller Biomasse (CFE-C) und Aktivität (Infrarotgasanalysator) sowie der funktionellen Diversität (community level substrate utilization profiles – BIOLOG GN2) untersucht. Die strukturelle Diversität wurde mittels Phospholipid-Fettsäure (PLFA) und Phospholipid-Etherlipide (PLEL) –Muster analysiert. Ergänzend wurde die Qualität der organischen Bodensubstanz durch eine Kaltwasser-Extraktion und der spektroskopischen Eigenschaften untersucht. Fazit: Reduzierte und konservierende Bodenbearbeitung modifiziert die Organische Bodensubstanz, die Leistung sowie die funktionelle und strukturelle Diversität von Bodenmikroorganismen-Gemeinschaften.