Search

Simple Summary: Throughout the years, endoscopic technologies have advanced to facilitate better assessment of gastric lesions and early detection of gastric cancer. With improvements in conventional white light endoscopy, we have also witnessed the development of newer endoscopic diagnostic modalities, giving rise to several classifications for early gastric cancer. Different endoscopic classifications of early gastric based on several endoscopic diagnostic modalities were included in this review. In addition to this, newer and novel endoscopic classifications that were specifically developed for the stomach for assessing and diagnosing gastric lesions have also been included. Illustrative representations of each classification have also been provided to aid readers in better understanding of these endoscopic classifications of early gastric cancer. Endoscopic technologies have been continuously advancing throughout the years to facilitate improvement in the detection and diagnosis of gastric lesions. With the development of different endoscopic diagnostic modalities for EGC, several classifications have been advocated for the evaluation of gastric lesions, aiming for an early detection and diagnosis. Sufficient knowledge on the appearance of EGC on white light endoscopy is fundamental for early detection and management. On the other hand, those superficial EGC with subtle morphological changes that are challenging to be detected with white light endoscopy may now be clearly defined by means of image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE). By combining magnifying endoscopy and IEE, irregularities in the surface structures can be evaluated and highlighted, leading to improvements in EGC diagnostic accuracy. The main scope of this review article is to offer a closer look at the different classifications of EGC based on several endoscopic diagnostic modalities, as well as to introduce readers to newer and novel classifications, specifically developed for the stomach, for the assessment and diagnosis of gastric lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and study aims Mucosal defect closure after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has the potential to reduce the occurrence of delayed adverse events (AEs) such as bleeding and perforation. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of the Loop9 method for closing mucosal defects following colorectal ESD. Patients and methods A retrospective single-center study was conducted using prospectively collected data from May 2020 to March 2023. Loop9 was deployed through a single instrument channel and anchored with clips at the defect site. Closure was accomplished by tightening the loop and deploying additional conventional clips as needed for complete closure. The primary outcome was complete closure rate, with secondary outcomes including the sustained closure rate at 4 to 5 days post-ESD, closed defect size, closure time, number of additional clips, and incidence of delayed AEs. Results This study included 118 cases. Complete closure was achieved in 96.6% of cases (114/118) with a sustained closure rate of 93.9% (107/114). The median size of the closed mucosal defects was 30 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 25-38, range: 15-74). The median closure time was 14 minutes (IQR: 11.25-17), and the median number of additional clips deployed was six (IQR: 4-7). Stenosis requiring balloon dilatation was observed in one patient; however, there were no instances of post-ESD bleeding or delayed perforation. Conclusions The Loop9 method proved feasible and effective for closing mucosal defects following colorectal ESD, achieving high rates of complete and sustained closure., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Author H.I. serves as an advisor for Olympus Corporation and Top Corporation. In addition, he has received educational grants from Olympus Corporation and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Background: Anorectal function deteriorates with age. The diagnostic performance of the endoscopic pressure study integrated system (EPSIS), an endoscopic carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) insufflation stress test of the lower esophageal sphincter has been previously evaluated as a diagnostic tool for gastroesophageal reflux disease. We aimed to evaluate the applicability of EPSIS in improving anorectal function. We hypothesized that EPSIS can be applied to the diagnosis of lower gastrointestinal tract disorders., Methods: This was a pilot, single-center, retrospective study using prospectively collected data between December 2021 and March 2022. It was designed to evaluate the differences in EPSIS rectal pressure measurements between older (≥80 years) and younger (<80 years) patients. At the end of the screening colonoscopy, the colonoscope was fixed in a retroflex position. When bowel movement was observed, CO 2 was insufflated to the point where gas leakage occurred through the anus. The measured maximum pressure was defined as EPSIS-rectal pressure max (EPSIS-RP max) and compared between the groups., Results: Overall, 30 patients were included and examined. The median ages of the <80 and ≥80 years' groups were 53 (range: 27-79) and 82 (range: 80-94) years, respectively, with corresponding median measured EPSIS-RP max of 18.7 (range: 8.5-30.2) and 9.8 (range: 5.4-22.3) mmHg (P<0.001)., Conclusions: Measurement of maximum rectal pressure illustrates the age-related decline in physiological anorectal function. Future studies should consider a loading test using EPSIS to quantify the decline in anorectal function and use it as a routine tool for screening and adjunctive diagnosis of anorectal hypofunction., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest: Haruhiro Inoue is an advisor to Olympus Corporation and Top Corporation. He has also received educational grants from Takeda Pharmaceutical Company and Olympus Corporation. The other co-authors have no conflict of interests to disclose, (Copyright: © Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology.)