Search

Purpose: To apply methods for quantifying uncertainty of deep learning segmentation of geographic atrophy (GA). Design: Retrospective analysis of OCT images and model comparison. Participants: One hundred twenty-six eyes from 87 participants with GA in the SWAGGER cohort of the Nonexudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration Imaged with Swept-Source OCT (SS-OCT) study. Methods: The manual segmentations of GA lesions were conducted on structural subretinal pigment epithelium en face images from the SS-OCT images. Models were developed for 2 approximate Bayesian deep learning techniques, Monte Carlo dropout and ensemble, to assess the uncertainty of GA semantic segmentation and compared to a traditional deep learning model. Main Outcome Measures: Model performance (Dice score) was compared. Uncertainty was calculated using the formula for Shannon Entropy. Results: The output of both Bayesian technique models showed a greater number of pixels with high entropy than the standard model. Dice scores for the Monte Carlo dropout method (0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.87–0.93) and the ensemble method (0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.85–0.91) were significantly higher (P

Purpose: Spectral-domain OCT angiography (SD-OCTA) scans were tested in an algorithm developed for use with swept-source OCT angiography (SS-OCTA) scans to determine if SD-OCTA scans yielded similar results for the detection and measurement of persistent choroidal hypertransmission defects (hyperTDs). Design: Retrospective study. Participants: Forty pairs of scans from 32 patients with late-stage nonexudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Methods: Patients underwent both SD-OCTA and SS-OCTA imaging at the same visit using the 6 × 6 mm OCTA scan patterns. Using a semiautomatic algorithm that helped with outlining the hyperTDs, 2 graders independently validated persistent hyperTDs, which are defined as having a greatest linear dimension ≥250 μm on the en face images generated using a slab extending from 64 to 400 μm beneath Bruch’s membrane. The number of lesions and square root (sqrt) total area of the hyperTDs were obtained from the algorithm using each imaging method. Main Outcome Measures: The mean sqrt area measurements and the number of hyperTDs were compared. Results: The number of lesions and sqrt total area of the hyperTDs were highly concordant between the 2 instruments (rc = 0.969 and rc = 0.999, respectively). The mean number of hyperTDs was 4.3 ± 3.1 for SD-OCTA scans and 4.5 ± 3.3 for SS-OCTA scans (P = 0.06). The mean sqrt total area measurements were 1.16 ± 0.64 mm for the SD-OCTA scans and 1.17 ± 0.65 mm for the SS-OCTA scans (P < 0.001). Because of the small standard error of the differences, the mean difference between the scans was statistically significant but not clinically significant. Conclusions: Spectral-domain OCTA scans provide similar results to SS-OCTA scans when used to obtain the number and area measurements of persistent hyperTDs through a semiautomated algorithm previously developed for SS-OCTA. This facilitates the detection of atrophy with a more widely available scan pattern and the longitudinal study of early to late-stage AMD. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Purpose: An algorithm developed to obtain drusen area and volume measurements using swept-source OCT angiography (SS-OCTA) scans was tested on spectral-domain OCT angiography (SD-OCTA) scans. Design: Retrospective study. Participants: Forty pairs of scans from 27 eyes with intermediate age-related macular degeneration and drusen. Methods: Patients underwent both SD-OCTA and SS-OCTA imaging at the same visit using the 6 mm × 6 mm OCTA scan patterns. Using the same algorithm, we obtained drusen area and volume measurements within both 3 mm and 5 mm fovea-centered circles. Paired 2-sample t-tests were performed along with Pearson’s correlation tests. Main Outcome Measures: Mean square root (sqrt) drusen area and cube root (cbrt) drusen volume within the 3 mm and 5 mm fovea-centered circles. Results: Mean sqrt drusen area values from SD-OCTA and SS-OCTA scans were 1.57 (standard deviation [SD] 0.57) mm and 1.49 (SD 0.58) mm in the 3 mm circle and 1.88 (SD 0.59) mm and 1.76 (SD 0.58) mm in the 5 mm circle, respectively. Mean cbrt drusen volume measurements were 0.54 (SD 0.19) mm and 0.51 (SD 0.20) mm in the 3 mm circle, and 0.60 (SD 0.17) mm and 0.57 (SD 0.17) mm in the 5 mm circle. Small differences in area and volume measurements were found (all P 0.97; all P