Search

Protein synthesis is energetically expensive and its rate is influenced by factors such as cell type and environment. Suppression of translation is a canonical response to stressful changes in the cellular environment. In particular, inhibition of the initiation step of translation has been highlighted as the key control step in stress-induced translational suppression as mechanisms that quickly suppress initiation are well-conserved. However, cells have evolved complex regulatory means to control translation apart from initiation. Here, we examine the role of the elongation step of translation in yeast subjected to acute glucose deprivation. The use of ribosome profiling and in vivo reporter assays demonstrated elongation rates slow progressively following glucose removal. We observed that ribosome distribution broadly shifts towards the downstream ends of transcripts after both acute and gradual glucose deprivation but not in response to other stressors. Additionally, on assessed mRNAs, a correlation existed between ribosome occupancy and protein production pre-stress but was lost after stress. These results indicate that stress-induced elongation regulation causes ribosomes to slow down and build up on a considerable proportion of the transcriptome in response to glucose withdrawal. Finally, we report ribosomes that built up along transcripts are competent to resume elongation and complete protein synthesis after readdition of glucose to starved cells. This suggests that yeast has evolved mechanisms to slow translation elongation in response to glucose starvation which do not preclude continuation of protein production from those ribosomes, thereby averting a need for new initiation events to take place to synthesize proteins. Abbreviations: AUG: start codon, bp: base pair(s), CDS: coding sequence, CHX: cycloheximide, eEF2: eukaryotic elongation factor 2, LTM: lactimidomycin, nt: nucleotide, PGK1: 3-phosphoglycerate kinase, ribosomal biogenesis: ribi, RO: ribosome occupancy, RPF: ribosome protected fragment, TE: translational efficiency.

Matching appendage size to body size is fundamental to animal function. Generating an appropriately-sized appendage is a robust process executed during development which is also critical for regeneration. When challenged, larger animals are programmed to regenerate larger limbs than smaller animals within a single species. Understanding this process has important implications for regenerative medicine. To approach this complex question, models with altered appendage size:body size ratios are required. We hypothesized that repeatedly challenging axolotls to regrow limb buds would affect their developmental program resulting in altered target morphology. We discovered that after 10 months following this experimental procedure, limbs that developed were permanently miniaturized. This altered target morphology was preserved upon amputation and regeneration. Future experiments using this platform should provide critical information about how target limb size is encoded within limb progenitors., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Mammals have extremely limited regenerative capabilities; however, axolotls are profoundly regenerative and can replace entire limbs. The mechanisms underlying limb regeneration remain poorly understood, partly because the enormous and incompletely sequenced genomes of axolotls have hindered the study of genes facilitating regeneration. We assembled and annotated a de novo transcriptome using RNA-sequencing profiles for a broad spectrum of tissues that is estimated to have near-complete sequence information for 88% of axolotl genes. We devised expression analyses that identified the axolotl orthologs of cirbp and kazald1 as highly expressed and enriched in blastemas. Using morpholino anti-sense oligonucleotides, we find evidence that cirbp plays a cytoprotective role during limb regeneration whereas manipulation of kazald1 expression disrupts regeneration. Our transcriptome and annotation resources greatly complement previous transcriptomic studies and will be a valuable resource for future research in regenerative biology., (Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)