Search

Introduction: Digital vaginal examination (DVE) is considered the standard of care for assessing labor progress and cervical dilatation. However, it may be painful and is a subjective method that can increase the risk of chorioamnionitis. Known inter‐ and intra‐observer variability exists in measurements of cervical dilatation obtained digitally. However, little is known about the inter‐ and intra‐observer variability when using intrapartum transperineal ultrasound (TPUS). Our objectives were to investigate the relationship between cervical dilatation as assessed by TPUS and DVE. To assess inter‐ and intra‐observer variability in both single and repeated ultrasound assessments of cervical dilatation during active labor. Material and Methods: This single‐center study was conducted at an inner‐city maternity unit in London, UK. Nulliparous participants at term with a live, singleton fetus in cephalic presentation were recruited between May 2021 and November 2022. During active labor, TPUS was performed subsequent to DVE. Repeat ultrasound assessments were performed where feasible. Participants were in a supine position, with flexed hips and knees and with an empty bladder. The ultrasound transducer was placed transversely on the maternal perineum. The anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the cervix was measured, and two‐dimensional (2D) cine‐loop videos were analyzed to obtain accurate measurements. Data were excluded if the time difference between DVE and TPUS exceeded 60 min. Results: Of the 206 participants who consented to the study, complete data were obtained from 110 participants, yielding 147 paired TPUS and DVE observations. Ninety‐six participants were excluded. The absolute difference between TPUS and DVE assessments was 0 cm in 34% of the observations, 1 cm in 46.3%, and between 2 and 4 cm in 19.7%. The mean difference was −0.9 cm (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.85; p < 0.001). Data from 30 participants, with 50 cervical dilatation measurements, were used to assess inter‐ and intra‐observer variability. The mean difference for the first ultrasound assessment was 0.07 cm (95% limit of agreement = −0.96 to 1.10, p < 0.001), for inter‐observer variability, and 0.01 cm (95% limit of agreement = −0.29 to 0.30; p < 0.001) for intra‐observer variability. Conclusions: Assessment of the cervix with TPUS during active labor is feasible and shows a strong correlation with DVE measurements. The majority of ultrasound measurements yielded readings within 1 cm of the corresponding DVE values, demonstrating high intraclass correlation and good inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This document provides abstracts from various studies on labor and childbirth. The studies examine different ultrasound parameters and their relationship to outcomes such as ECV effectiveness, fetal cardiac function, mode of delivery, cervical dilatation, CPD, and OASI. The findings suggest that ultrasound measurements can be useful in evaluating clinical conditions and predicting outcomes. However, more research is needed to establish specific parameters and improve diagnostic accuracy. Other studies explore the use of intrapartum ultrasound in labor management, including predicting vaginal delivery, diagnosing complications, evaluating the pelvic floor, and assessing fetal position. The studies indicate that intrapartum ultrasound is a valuable tool for decision-making and improving outcomes. Transperineal ultrasound has shown promise in assessing anal sphincter injuries, and both parents and healthcare providers have positive attitudes towards using ultrasound for predicting delivery mode. Additionally, fetal head molding during labor was found to be common and not associated with difficult deliveries, except for parieto-parietal molding which was linked to failed operative deliveries. [Extracted from the article]