1. Immediate Loading of Post-Extraction Implants: Success and Survival Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
- Author
-
Rojas-Rojas, Pastora del Pilar, Gracia-Rojas, Andrea, Traboulsi-Garet, Bassel, Sánchez-Garcés, Mª Ángeles, Toledano-Serrabona, Jorge, and Gay-Escoda, Cosme
- Abstract
The study aimed to assess the success and survival rates of post-extraction implants with immediate loading. A systematic search was performed in the Medline (PubMed), Cochrane Library (Wiley), and Scopus (Elsevier) databases to identify randomized and non-randomized studies of intervention (NRSI) on bone loss and success and survival rates in post-extraction implants with immediate, early, and delayed loading. Articles were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the risk of bias was assessed following Cochrane guidelines, and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used to assess quality. A fixed-effect meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate bone loss using mean, median, and standard deviation, and to calculate odds ratios for success-survival rates. Of the 13 studies identified, three met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis, involving a total of 178 patients and 296 post-extraction implants. Bone loss was the lowest in the delayed loading group (0.51 mm) compared to immediate (0.55 mm) and early loading (0.54 mm). Implant failures were similar in the immediate and early groups (one case each), while two failures were reported in the delayed group. Delayed loading reduced peri-implant bone loss, but immediate loading showed a slightly higher success-survival rate. Further high-quality studies are needed to strengthen the evidence on the long-term effects of the different implant loading protocols. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF