Search

Background. The 21-gene Oncotype DX Recurrence Score assay is a validated assay to help decide the appropriate treatment for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), early-stage breast cancer (EBC) in the adjuvant setting. The choice of adjuvant treatments might vary considerably in different countries according to various treatment guidelines. This prospective multicenter study is the first to assess the impact of the Oncotype DX assay in the French clinical setting. Methods. A total of 100 patients with ER+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative EBC, and node-negative (pN0) disease or micrometastases in up to 3 lymph nodes (pN1mi) were enrolled. Treatment recommendations, physicians’ confidence before and after knowing the Recurrence Score value, and physicians’ perception of the assay were recorded. Results. Of the 100 patients, 95 were evaluable (83 pN0, 12 pN1mi). Treatment recommendations changed in 37% of patients, predominantly from chemoendocrine to endocrine treatment alone. The proportion of patients recommended chemotherapy decreased from 52% pretest to 25% post-test. Of patients originally recommended chemotherapy, 61% were recommended endocrine treatment alone after receiving the Recurrence Score result. For both pN0 and pN1mi patients, post-test recommendations appeared to follow the Recurrence Score result for low and high values. Physicians’ confidence improved significantly. Conclusion. These are the first prospective data on the impact of the Oncotype DX assay on adjuvant treatment decisions in France. Using the assay was associated with a significant change in treatment decisions and an overall reduction in chemotherapy use. These data are consistent with those presented from European and non-European studies. Implications for Practice: This study shows that in estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer (either node-negative or with micrometastases in up to 3 lymph nodes), Oncotype DX testing is associated with a treatment recommendation change in more than a third of patients (primarily from chemoendocrine treatment to endocrine treatment alone but also in the opposite direction) and an overall reduction in chemotherapy use. These results are consistent with those from other decision impact studies worldwide and further emphasize the role of Oncotype DX testing in management of early breast cancer, as reflected in international treatment guidelines.

Background One can consider as a standard neoadjuvant treatment for breast cancer, the sequence of 4 cycles of anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by 4 cycles of docetaxel. Based on the belief that the sequence order between anthracycline and taxane might be of interest, this study assessed the impact of the sequence order. Methods One hundred and twenty three patients with breast cancer were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 5 oncologic centers between 2003 and 2007. This study compared 65 patients treated with 4 cycles of docetaxel followed by 4 cycles of anthracycline-based chemotherapy (cohort T), versus another cohort of 58 patients treated with 4 cycles of anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by 4 cycles of docetaxel (cohort A). Results The overall dose intensity of docetaxel and clinical complete responses were significantly higher in cohort T. No statistically significant differences were observed in terms of conservative surgeries or histological responses. The sequence of chemotherapy did not significantly influence other treatment-related toxicities. Mild neurotoxicity was higher in patients treated in cohort T. Anemias (≥Grade 1) were higher in cohort A (52% versus 81%; p = 0.0008). Conclusion The present study failed to identify an impact of the sequence of taxane administration on the efficacy. Nevertheless, starting neoadjuvant chemotherapy by taxane reduces the occurrence of anemia. These findings might allow a selection of the sequence order based on the toxicity profile.