Search

Background Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) are two closely related blood cancers that are more frequent in older adults. AML is the most common type of adult acute leukemia, and MDS is characterized by ineffective blood cell production and abnormalities in the bone marrow and blood. Both can be resistant to treatment, often due to dysfunction in the process of apoptosis, the body’s natural mechanism for cell death. Venetoclax, an orally-administered medication that selectively targets the BCL-2 protein, has shown promise in enhancing treatment sensitivity in some hematological malignancies by reducing the apoptotic threshold. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of venetoclax in treating AML and MDS, as well as potential mechanisms of resistance to the medication. Methods A literature search was conducted utilizing PUBMED to capture all relevant research articles on the use of venetoclax as a therapy for both diseases. The MeSH terms “acute myeloid leukemia”, “myelodysplastic syndrome” and “venetoclax” were searched. Furthermore, Clinicaltrials.gov was accessed to ensure the inclusion of all ongoing clinical trials. Results Although Venetoclax showed modest results as a single-agent therapy in AML, venetoclax-based combination therapies? mainly with hypomethylating agents or low-dose cytarabine? yielded significantly positive results. Preliminary results oN the use of venetoclax-based combination therapy with HMA, mainly azacitidine, in unfit high-risk MDS also yielded optimistic results. Identification of mutations for which various drugs have been approved has spurred active investigation of venetoclax in combination trials. Conclusion Venetoclax-based combination therapies have been shown to induce rapid responses and increase overall survival in AML patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. These therapies are also yielding positive preliminary results in high-risk MDS patients in phase I trials. Resistance to venetoclax and drug-related toxicity are two main obstacles that need to be overcome to reap the full benefits of this therapy.

BackgroundAutologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has become the mainstay treatment for many hematological malignancies and solid tumors. An adequate number of stem cells must be collected for better ASCT outcomes, which is challenging in 5%–30% of patients. To improve mobilization, plerixafor is used along with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF).Patients and methodsWe conducted a retrospective single center study involving patients who received plerixafor pre-ASCTs between January 2013 and December 2020 at a tertiary care center in Lebanon. We identified a total of 84 consecutive adult patients. All patients identified were poor mobilizers and have eventually received plerixafor either as pre-emptive use before first apheresis in those with peripheral CD34 + of less than 20 cells/ul, or after failure of first apheresis in those with peripheral stem cells (PSC) >2.0 × 106 cells/Kg.ResultsThe median age at ASCT was 52.7 years (22–74) with 61% male predominance. Multiple myeloma was the most prevalent disease 64% followed by Lymphoma 32%. The majority of patients were in complete remission 64% at the time of ASCT. Most patients received proteasome inhibitor-based induction therapy 67% and Melphalan-based conditioning therapy 68%. The median follow-up from ASCT was 9 months (1–59). It was noted that greater body mass index (BMI) is a significant factor for better PSC collection whether premobilization (P = 0.003), or post plerixafor mobilization (P = 0.024). Moreover, Multiple Myeloma patients showed better mobilization using Plerixafor (P = 0.049). Using Plerixafor along with G-CSF in poor mobilizers post G-CSF alone showed a statistically significant increase in the collected PSC mean from 0.67 × 106 cells/Kg to 4.90 × 106 cells/Kg (P 2.5 × 106 cells/Kg has shown 3 days decrease in time to platelet engraftment (P = 0.021) and a 36% decrease in progression/relapse rate (P = 0.025).ConclusionPlerixafor is effective in increasing the PSC yield in poor mobilizers. Low BMI and hematologic malignancies other than Multiple Myeloma are risk factors for poor mobilization. More studies should be performed to establish more risk factors, helping us to identify poor mobilizers more accurately and initiate plerixafor mobilization early on.

PurposeNumerous factors may affect the survival outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), mainly disease-related and treatment-related factors. The impact of other factors, such as the insurance status and the distance to healthcare facilities, are still unclear and may differ between different healthcare systems. We investigated the effects of insurance status and distance to the treatment center on the survival of AML patients.Materials and methodsThis is a single-center, observational, retrospective study of patients diagnosed with AML (2015–2020) and treated at the American University of Beirut Medical Center in Lebanon. Data regarding patient baseline characteristics, disease-related factors, insurance status, and area of residence were collected. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify main independent predictors of overall survival (OS).ResultsWe identified 142 AML patients with a median age of 52 years (range 18–86). Of them, 91 (64%) were males, 77 (54%) had ELN intermediate risk, and 88 (62%) patients received intensive chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 22.4 months, the median RFS and OS were 37.4 months and not reached, respectively. A Cox regression model for OS was done using the following variables: age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities, smoking status, insurance status, distance from the center, ELN classification, treatment used, and allotransplant. A higher risk of death was seen among the uninsured patients and those living beyond 40 km from the treatment center compared with fully insured patients and those living in proximity to the center (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.65; 95% CI [1.79, 7.45], p-value ConclusionsThe outcome of patients with AML does not depend only on disease-related factors, as the insurance status and the distance from the area of residence to the treatment center were found to be independent predictors of survival in AML patients.

Background: Clofarabine (Clo) is an immunosuppressive purine analog that may have better anti-leukemic activity than fludarabine (Flu) in the conditioning regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) for acute leukemia patients. The addition of total body irradiation (TBI) to conditioning regimens has been widely investigated. However, the use of single agent Clo in combination with intermediate doses of TBI ranging from 4-8 Gy has not been studied yet. Objective: This study aims to identify the outcome of patients with high-risk hematological malignancies who underwent allo-SCT from different donor types and received Clo and TBI (4-8 Gy) as a conditioning regimen. Methods: This is a double center, observational, retrospective study of patients with high-risk hematological malignancies diagnosed from 2012 to 2021, treated at the American University of Beirut Medical Center in Beirut (AUBMC), Lebanon, and Saint-Antoine Hospital (SA) in Paris, France. Data regarding patient baseline characteristics, disease-related factors, and transplant outcomes including graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), Non-relapse mortality (NRM), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), were collected. Results: We identified 24 high-risk patients with a median age at transplant of 37 years (range 22-78). Of these, 15 patients (63%) were males, 8 patients (33%) had acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 3 patients (13%) had myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and 12 patients (50%) had acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and 1 patient had B-lymphoblastic lymphoma (B-ALL) (4%). At the time of the transplant, only 15 patients (63%) were in complete remission (CR). Nine patients (38%) received transplants from a matched related donor(MRD), 9 patients (38%) from a haploidentical related donor(haplo), 4 patients (17%) from a matched unrelated donor(MUD), and 2 patients (8%) from an unrelated cord blood donor (UCB). All patients received Clo. For TBI, 21 patients (88%) received a total dose of 4 Gy, and 3 (12%) received 8 Gy. Sixteen patients (67%) received anti-thymocyte globulin(ATG). After a median follow-up of 40 months, the cumulative incidences of grade II-III acute GVHD, grade IV acute GVHD, and chronic GVHD were 50%, 4%, and 8%, respectively. NRM at 100 days, and 1 year after transplant was 4% and 25%, respectively. 17% of the patients had a relapse or progression of the disease by the end of the study. The 2-year PFS and OS were 50% and 56%, respectively. The median PFS and OS were not reached. Conclusions: Clo/TBI (4-8 Gy) as a conditioning regimen for allo-SCT in high-risk patients confers disease control with an acceptable toxicity profile.

Relapse rates following allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia remain unacceptably high and a major cause of death. Maintenance therapies post-transplant administered either to patients with impending relapse or at high risk of relapse could present a strategy to improve survival and overall outcomes. With the increasing use of molecular and genomic characterization of the disease, more novel therapies became available as maintenance strategies. These options were, however, hindered by excessive toxicities, mostly hematologic, especially with the use of myeloablative conditioning regimens. Several key questions have also emerged including the efficacy of these therapies, the duration of maintenance, as well as the potential modulation of the graft and the immune microenvironment. These issues are further complicated by the paucity of well-designed prospective randomized clinical trials evaluating these agents. Future directions in this field should include better risk stratification and patient selection based on assays of minimal residual disease, as well as the incorporation of novel targets and pathways of leukemogenesis. In this article, we highlight the current evidence behind the use of post-transplant maintenance therapy, the optimal patient and disease selection, as well as the challenges faced by these strategies in an area that remains quite controversial. We will focus on therapies targeting leukemia stem cells that directly or indirectly modulate the allografted immune microenvironment and augment the graft-versus-leukemia impact.

Given the absence of consensus on oral feeding of patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation, the ninth workshops of practice harmonization of the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC) allocated one session to address this topic, especially during the hospitalization. A questionnaire was sent to all SFGM-TC pediatric and adult centers in order to investigate oral feeding practices. The results demonstrated a large disparity among centers regarding oral feeding. Here, we report our recommendations regarding the oral feeding after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in terms of quality, quantity and bacterial authorized load.

Extranodal Natural Killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL) is an extremely rare type of lymphoma which is highly lethal. It mainly affects the midline area unfolding as a necrotic granulomatous and extremely disfiguring lesion. There are two subtypes of (NKTL); the most common one is nasal which appears in the nasal cavity including the nasopharynx, oropharynx, parts of the aero digestive tract and Waldeyer’s ring. While the other rarer subtype, appears in sites like the skin, testis, gastrointestinal tract, salivary glands and muscle. ENKTL is popular for the expression of multidrug resistance-associated P-glycoprotein, which not only plays the main role at exporting many antitumor agents outside tumor cells, but also makes the disease hard to treat. It is commonly associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and commonly occurs in Asian populations. However, there is no single unified consensus yet as to what is the standardized treatment for ENKTL. Radiotherapy alone treatment, has been considered as a first-line therapy for localized ENKTL, which later on was found to be insufficient for improving survival rates. Thus, the combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy has been recommended as a therapeutic modality for localized ENKTL. Several combination modalities of radiotherapy and chemotherapy have been advised in clinical practice including concurrent, sequential and sandwich chemo radiotherapy. For the best treatment outcome, only patients with localized nasal ENKTL and low risk of treatment failure are eligible for radiotherapy. Both radiotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have been used as treatment modalities in ENKTL patients. Upfront HSCT was performed for ENKTL, but it was associated with a very poor prognosis even for the limited-stage disease. The evidence supporting the use of HSCT to treat ENKTL was derived from the results of a series of phase 1 and 2 trials along with retrospective studies. The end result was a unified consensus that consolidative HSCT is not necessary in patients with newly diagnosed localized ENKTL who achieved complete response after treatment with any of the modern chemo radiotherapy regimens. Hence, HSCT is solely advised for advanced and relapsed NKTL. The main debate remains over which HSCT is the most suitable for patients with newly diagnosed advanced NKTL and relapsed NKTL.

The treatment of newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with nilotinib has resulted in a higher rate of major molecular (MMR) and complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) at 12 months compared to imatinib but at a higher cumulative cost and increased risk of serious adverse events. To maintain long-term efficacy and minimize both toxicity and costs, we aimed at evaluating in a prospective single-center trial the efficacy and safety of a response-directed switch from nilotinib to imatinib after 12 months in patients newly diagnosed with chronic phase CML. Thirteen adult patients were enrolled. Twelve patients started on nilotinib 300 mg twice daily. Eleven patients completed one year of nilotinib and were switched to imatinib 400 mg daily as per protocol. At 3 months, all patients achieved a complete hematologic response, with 7 (58%) patients had early molecular response. At 12 months, all patients achieved CCyR, of whom 5 (42%) and 4 (33%) patients achieved MMR and MR4.5, respectively. Three (27%) patients switched back to nilotinib after 18, 24, and 51 months respectively: 1 patient because of loss of CCyR after 18 months, and 2 patients because of imatinib intolerance. At last follow-up, all patients (n = 12) were alive and in MMR, 6 (50%) of them in continuous MR4.5. These findings suggest that response directed switch from nilotinib to imatinib at 12 months is capable of maintaining long-term response, with manageable side effects. This approach warrants further exploration with larger prospective trials. Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01316250, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=NCT01316250&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=.

Background: Invasive fungal infections (IFI) following allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Primary prophylaxis using voriconazole has been shown to decrease the incidence of IFI. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis at the Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT) unit of the American University of Beirut including 195 patients who underwent allo-HCT for hematological malignancies and received voriconazole as primary prophylaxis for IFI. The primary endpoints were based on the incidence of IFI at day 100 and day 180, and the secondary endpoint based on fungal-free survival. Results: For the study, 195 patients who underwent allo-HCT between January 2015 and March 2021 were included. The median age at transplant was 43 years. Of the patients, 63% were male, and the majority of patients were diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (60%). Voriconazole was given for a median of 90 days and was interrupted in 20 patients. The majority of IFI cases were probable invasive aspergillosis (8%). The incidence of IFI including proven, probable and possible IFI was 34%. The incidence of proven and probable IFI was 5% were 8%, respectively. The incidence of proven-probable (PP-IFI) was 5.1% at day 100 and 6.6% at day 180. The majority of PP-IFI cases were invasive aspergillosis (8%). A univariate analysis of patients, transplant characteristics and IFI showed a significant correlation between the type of donor, disease status before transplant, graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis used and incidence of IFI. Only disease status post-transplant showed a significant correlation with fungal-free survival in the multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Primary prophylaxis with voriconazole in allo-HCT is associated with a low incidence of IFI. More studies are required to compare various antifungal agents in this setting.

Treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in general has improved over the years with the emergence of the monoclonal antibodies (MAB) therapy. NHL is divided into B cell NHL and T cell NHL. Treatment of NHL was based on the subtype of NHL and its staging. NHL is divided into aggressive and indolent NHL (iNHL). Subtypes of iNHL include: Follicular lymphoma (FL), Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small-cell lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), Gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, Waldenström macroglobulinemia, Nodal marginal zone lymphoma (NMZL), Splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL). Chemotherapy was the main stay treatment of iNHL until the emergence of Rituximab, anti-CD20 MAB targeting CD-20 surface cell antigens that are present on B-cells lymphoma and not on precursor cells, mainly efficacious in B cell iNHL, It became the mainstay treatment in follicular lymphoma (FL) as a single agent modality or in combination with chemotherapy. The anti-CD20 Rituximab played an important role in the development of the treatment of iNHL to become FDA approved in 1997. It was also proven effective in multiple other types of lymphoma. MAB through targeting the cell surface antigen leads to a direct or immune mediated cytotoxicity. This carries few side effects, including allergic reactions. Other than that, a resistance mechanism to rituximab emerged by inducing a failure in the apoptosis mechanism. Alternative mechanisms of resistance included the presence of soluble antigens that could act by binding to the antibody present before the drug itself can bind the lymphoma cell. Thus, the interest in immunotherapy grew further to explore the possibility of conjugating an immune mediated drug to a radio-sensitizing agent in order to enhance the selectivity of the drug. Here came the development of 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan and 131I-tositumomab. After it, humanized anti-CD20 emerged ofatumumab, IMMU106 (veltuzumab) in 2005, and ocrelizumab which are considered as second generation anti-CD20 and 3

Vaccines against COVID-19 have demonstrated a remarkable efficacy in decreasing hospitalisations and deaths; however, clinical trials leading to vaccine approvals did not include immunocompromised individuals such as patients receiving antineoplastic therapies. Emerging data suggest that patients on active anti-cancer therapy may have a reduced immune response to COVID-19 vaccination compared to the general population and may be at greater risk of COVID-19 infection as measures to reduce transmission in the community are relaxed. We report preliminary data from the American University of Beirut Medical Center in Lebanon demonstrating relatively low seroconversion rates. Of 36 patients on active anti-cancer therapy who had received two doses of vaccine, 17% were negative for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) anti-spike IgG. These results highlight the importance of maintaining strict precautionary measures against COVID-19 in patients on immunosuppressive treatment. There is an urgent need for active monitoring of immune response post-vaccination in prospective studies involving populations from diverse resource settings.

The World Health Organization-designated Eastern Mediterranean region (EMRO) consists of 22 countries in North Africa and Western Asia with a collective population of over 679 million. The area comprises some of the wealthiest countries per capita income and some of the poorest. The population structure is also unique and contrasts with western countries, with a much younger population. The region sits in the heart of the thalassemia belt. Many countries have a significant prevalence of sickle cell disease, and cancer is on the rise in the region. Therefore, the strategic priorities for the growth and development of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) differ from country to country based on resources, healthcare challenges, and prevalent infrastructure. Thirty-one reporting teams to the Eastern Mediterranean Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group have active HSCT programs in 12 countries; allogeneic transplants outnumber autologous transplants, and the proportion of allotransplants for non-malignant conditions is higher in the EMRO region than in Western Europe and North America. The vast majority (99%) of allotransplants are from matched related donors. Matched unrelated donors and other alternate donor transplants are underutilized. The chance of finding a matched related donor for allografts is higher, with a significant chance of finding matched donors among non-sibling related donors. Reasons for relatively lower rates of transplants compared with other countries are multifactorial. Capacity building, development of newer centers, innovative funding, and better utilization of information technology are required to make transplantation as an accessible modality to more patients. Cost-effectiveness and cost-containment, regulation, and ensuring quality will all be priorities in planning HSCT development in the region.

Objectives: Bacterial bloodstream infections (BSIs) with resistant pathogens in patients with haematological malignancies are rising due to increased use of novel chemotherapeutic agents and prophylactic antibiotics. Our goal was to understand the epidemiology and resistance patterns of bacterial pathogens in patients with haematological malignancies to help tailor empirical antibiotics and to limit resistance. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review looking at bacterial BSI episodes between 2007–2017 in patients previously diagnosed with haematological malignancy at a tertiary-care centre in Lebanon. Results: Among 165 hospitalised patients with haematological malignancy and bacterial BSI over 10 years, Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) caused 65.0% of all episodes, with the most common pathogens being Escherichia coli (45.6%), 79.6% of which were ESBL-producers, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (7.5%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (4.0%). The majority of the organisms (61.0%) were multidrug-resistant (MDR), with ANC < 100 neutrophils/μL (OR = 0.12, 95% CI 0.03–0.54) identified as an independent marker for increased multidrug resistance. The risk factors associated with increased mortality included recent use of amikacin (p

This prospective, observational, multicenter study evaluated the real-world incidence of invasive fungal infection (IFI) during and after micafungin prophylaxis in France. Patients with a hematological malignancy/solid tumor received micafungin prophylaxis according to usual clinical practice and were followed for 3 months. Primary endpoint was breakthrough IFI incidence during prophylaxis. Secondary endpoints included the identification of IFI risk factors, IFI incidence during follow-up, and adverse events (AEs). One hundred and fifty patients (55 children, 95 adults) were enrolled. Micafungin prophylaxis was initiated at 50 mg in adults and at a median 1.01 mg/kg (range: 0.6–2.2) in children. Fifteen patients (10%) experienced an IFI during prophylaxis. IFI breakthrough occurred in 15% children, 7% adults, 3.1% allogeneic transplant patients, 8.7% acute myeloid leukemia (AML)/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients, 7.0% other patients (never allotransplanted/non-AML/MDS). Nineteen patients (12.7%) experienced an IFI during 3-month follow-up. Micafungin was well tolerated with few treatment-related AEs, supporting its use in this patient population in France.

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a hematological disease resulting in pancytopenia due to bone marrow failure. Treatment consists of immunosppressive therapy, or allo-SCT. Patients with aplastic anemia are predisposed to invasive fungal infections due to mucormycosis. Till now, syngeneic SCT in the context of active mucormycosis infection for patients with severe aplastic anemia is lacking in the literature.Here, we report a case of severe aplastic anemia with disseminated mucormycosis infection undergoing syngeneic transplant. Keywords: Mucormycosis, Severe aplastic anemia, Syngeneic transplantation

BackgroundThe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) was declared a pandemic by WHO in March 2020. The first case of COVID-19 was identified in Lebanon on the 21st of February 2020, amid a national economic crisis. As the numbers of cases increased, ICU admissions and mortality rose, which led hospitals across Lebanon to take certain safety measures to contain the virus. The Naef K. Basile Cancer Institute (NKBCI) at the American University of Beirut Medical Center handles oncology outpatient visits and outpatient treatment protocol infusions. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the safety measures put forth by the NKBCI early in the pandemic.MethodsOncology patients are amongst the immunosuppressed population, who are at greatest risk of contracting COVID-19 and consequently suffering its complications. In this manuscript, we evaluated the precautionary measures implemented at the NKBCI of AUBMC from March 1st to May 31st of 2020, by surveying oncology patients on the telephone who had live and virtual appointments in both the oncology outpatient clinics and infusion unit. We conducted a prospective study of 670 oncology patients who had appointments at the NKBCI during this period and used their answers to draw responses about patient satisfaction towards those safety measures.ResultsOur results involved 387 responses of oncology patients who visited the NKBCI during the period of March 1st to May 31st of 2020. 99% of our respondents gave a rating of good to excellent with these new measures. The option of online consultation was given to 35% in the hematology group compared to 19% in those with solid tumors (p=0.001). From the total, 15% of patients opted for the telemedicine experience as a new implemented strategy to provide patient-centered medical care. Of this group of patients, 22% faced problems with connectivity and 19% faced problems with online payment.ConclusionNKBCI was competent in following the WHO guidelines in protecting the oncology patient population. Feedback collected from the surveys will be taken into account by the committee of the NKBCI to develop new safety measures that can better control viral spread while providing patient-centered medical care.

Background: Immunotherapy agents offer novel treatment options in advanced cancers. However, their use is limited in developing countries lacking unifying guidelines and can be followed by a financial burden. In this study, we aimed to provide an overview regarding the use of immunotherapy and the overall response to treatment in patients with metastatic disease in relation to cost-effectiveness. Methods: This was a retrospective study involving adult metastatic cancer patients, treated with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors at American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), a tertiary cancer center in Lebanon. Study enrollment began on January 1, 2014 and ended on January 12, 2016. Baseline demographics, epidemiological and clinical data were collected from the patients' records. Results: Our study consisted of 34 patients. Fifteen patients self-financed the treatment. The patients were prescribed immunotherapy without programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing as it was not part of the guidelines at the time. Twenty-two patients were treated with nivolumab and 12 patients with pembrolizumab. Thirteen patients showed partial response or stable disease, while 21 patients showed progression. Conclusion: Improvement in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival has been undercut by the lack of availability of these drugs and their cost. Considering that a large percentage of patients do not respond to immunotherapy, there is a need to use guidelines such as a preset PD-L1 level that ensure cost-effectiveness and prevent resource waste. World J Oncol. 2020;11(4):150-157 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/wjon1277

Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haploSCT) is becoming a major transplant modality for lymphoma. To assess the effects of donor characteristics, stem cell source and conditioning on outcomes, we identified 474 adults with Hodgkin (HL; 240), peripheral T-cell (PTCL; 88), diffuse large B-cell (77), mantle cell (40) or follicular lymphoma (FL; 29), who received haploSCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide. Median follow-up of alive patients was 32 months. On multivariate analysis, acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade 2-4 was lower with offspring donors or bone marrow cells, whereas extensive chronic GVHD was higher in partial response at haploSCT or when using sisters, haploidentical donors beyond first degree, or female donors in male patients. Progression-free survival (PFS) was better for FL, HL and PTCL, whereas overall survival (OS) was better for HL and PTCL. Complete remission at haploSCT improved PFS and OS whereas these were negatively affected by cytomegalovirus donor positive/recipient positive status. No other donor characteristics (age, gender, human leucocyte antigen mismatch, ABO incompatibility) affected PFS or OS except use of haploidentical donors beyond first degree, which negatively affected OS. PFS and OS are mostly influenced by disease status and lymphoma subtype, supporting the use of any first degree haploidentical family member as a donor.

Patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia are offered allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in first remission to reduce risk of relapse. However, disease recurrence remains the major reason of allo-HCT failure, occurring in around 35–45% of patients, and leading to dismal outcomes. Strategies to reduce the risk of relapse are greatly needed, especially in the early post-transplant phase where the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect is not yet activated. Some practices include the use of myeloablative conditioning regimens, close monitoring of measurable residual disease and donor chimerism, rapid tapering of immunosuppression, and implementation of pre-emptive strategies as the use of donor lymphocyte infusion. However, it’s time to consider prophylactic pharmacologic interventions post allo-HCT that aim at maintaining leukemic clones under control by both direct cytotoxic activity and by enhancing the GVL effect. In this current review, available data on drugs targeting epigenetic pathways like azacitidine, or actionable mutations like FLT3 and IDH1/2 inhibitors used as maintenance post allo-HCT, will be discussed.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) who develop disease progression after undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo‐SCT) remains challenging. METHODS: The authors assessed outcomes in 184 adult patients with HL who developed disease recurrence or progression after a matched related or unrelated allo‐SCT at European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation–participating centers between 2010 and 2014. RESULTS: Eighty patients who received brentuximab vedotin (BV) salvage therapy were compared with 104 patients who did not. Patients in the BV group were younger (median age of 30 years vs 34 years) and were more likely to receive pretransplant BV (65% vs 46%) or posttransplant donor lymphocyte infusion (66% vs 33%). The 2 groups otherwise were comparable. Patients in the BV group received a median of 6 doses of posttransplant BV, resulting in a complete remission rate of 29%, a partial response rate of 45%, and a stable disease rate of 26%. Response to BV after allo‐SCT did not appear to be affected by receipt of pretransplant BV. Despite a longer median follow‐up for surviving patients in the BV group (33 months vs 23 months; P

Dynamics of molecular response in AML patients with NPM1 and FLT3 mutations undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplant

BACKGROUND Sorafenib has shown encouraging results in patients with Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3)-positive acute myeloid leukemia. Its role after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been reported in a few cases with encouraging results. METHODS The authors describe the use of sorafenib as a maintenance agent after HSCT in 27 patients with FLT3-positive acute myeloid leukemia. RESULTS The median age of the patients was 46 years (range, 15-57 years). Sorafenib was introduced at a median of 70 days (range, 29-337 days) after HSCT. The median treatment duration was 8.4 months (range, 0.2-46 months). Eleven patients experienced treatment toxicities, mainly of grade 1 to 2 (graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria [version 4.0]). Dose reduction or withdrawal was required in 4 patients and 4 patients, respectively. The persistence of toxicity prompted treatment withdrawal in 1 patient. Clinical improvement followed dose modifications. Thirteen patients experienced chronic graft-versus-host disease (limited in 9 patients and extensive in 4 patients), resulting in dose reduction in 5 patients followed by withdrawal in 1 of these individuals. At a median follow-up of 18 months (range, 4-48 months), 25 patients were alive (all of whom were in complete molecular remission) and 18 were still receiving treatment, with 1-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates of 92% ± 6% and 92% ± 5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Sorafenib treatment after HSCT appears to be feasible and highly effective with dose individualization according to patient tolerability. Further analysis is needed to evaluate the immunomodulating role of sorafenib after HSCT. The data from the current support prospective controlled trials of sorafenib after HSCT. Cancer 2017;123:2867–74. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Low-dose 5-azacytidine as preventive therapy for relapse of AML and MDS following allogeneic HCT

Background: Intensified immunochemotherapy with rituximab, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin, and prednisone (R-ACVBP) has been shown to improve outcomes in younger adults with high-grade B-cell lymphomas (hg-BCL) when compared to standard therapy with R-CHOP (Cyclophosphamide-Adriamycin-Vincristine-Prednisone) (Recher C. Lancet 2011). Due to unavailability of vindesine at our institution, we primarily aimed at assessing the safety and efficacy of replacing vindesine with vincristine in a modified R-ACVBP protocol (mR-ACVBP). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Methods: This is a retrospective study performed at the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), Lebanon, including all consecutive adult patients (pts) with newly diagnosed hg-BCL who received first-line mR-ACVBP from 10/2014 to 10/2019. mR-ACVBP protocol was similar to published original protocol with the exception of vindesine being replaced by vincristine 1.5 mg intravenously on days 1 and 5 of each cycle (initial protocol included vincristine 2 mg on days 1 and 5, later adjusted for toxicity). Pts were assessed for response after 4 cycles of mR-ACVBP. Responders continued with consolidation consisting of 2 cycles of high-dose methotrexate followed by 4 cycles of Rituximab-Ifosfamide-Etoposide then low-dose cytarabine x2. Pts with inadequate response on interim imaging were offered consolidative autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Incomplete responders after 4 cycles (CR defined as delta SUVmax more than 70%) were shifted to salvage therapy including R-ICE (Rituximab, Ifosfamide, Cytarabine, Etoposide), or R-DHAP (Rituximab, Dexamethasone, Cytarabine, Cisplatin). Pts with age-adjusted IPI ≥ 2 could receive consolidative ASCT at the physician's discretion. Results: We identified 56 pts with hg-BCL, with a median age of 41 years [range: 21-67]. 64% of patients were males. 45 (80%) pts had advanced stage (III/IV), and 37 (66%) pts had an age-adjusted-IPI score >1. Fifty-one pts were evaluable for response after 4 cycles by PET CT scan. The overall response rate was achieved in 46 (90%) pts; complete response (CR) in 41 (80%), partial response (PR) in 5 (10%), 2 of which considered to have inadequate response as per delta SUVmax. 12 (27%) pts received consolidative ASCT, 27 (61%) continued consolidation chemotherapy, and 5 (11%) pts received subsequent salvage treatment. The most common reported treatment emergent adverse events, encountered during induction mR-ACVBP, were anemia (n=51, 91%), followed by febrile neutropenia (n=36, 64%, grade 4 in 26 (46%) pts, of whom four required intensive care monitoring), thrombocytopenia (n=22, 39%), and mucositis (n=12, 21%). Peripheral neuropathy was encountered in 7 (12%) pts (grade 1, n=2, grade 2, n=4, grade 3, n =1). Two deaths were attributed to treatment due to febrile neutropenia and septic shock during first and third cycle of mR-ACVBP in patients who had an aaIPI of 3. After a median follow up of 17 months [range, 0.5-55], a total of 4/44 (9%) pts progressed, 3 while on treatment after high-dose methotrexate, 1 after therapy completion. The median PFS and OS were not reached. The 2-year PFS and OS were 86% and 87% respectively. At last follow up, 47 pts were alive (44 (94%) pts were in continuous CR, 1 (2%) pt in PR and 2 (4%) pts progressive disease), 6 pts died, and 3 were lost to follow up. Conclusion: The use of vincristine in mR-ACVBP instead of vindesine seems to be feasible, with acceptable manageable adverse events. Despite higher risk disease, survival rates seem to be comparable to published data of the original R-ACVBP protocol. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.