5 results on '"Kanji, Falisha F."'
Search Results
2. Using Flow Disruptions to Examine System Safety in Robotic-Assisted Surgery: Protocol for a Stepped Wedge Crossover Design
- Author
-
Alfred, Myrtede C, Cohen, Tara N, Cohen, Kate A, Kanji, Falisha F, Choi, Eunice, Del Gaizo, John, Nemeth, Lynne S, Alekseyenko, Alexander V, Shouhed, Daniel, Savage, Stephen J, Anger, Jennifer T, and Catchpole, Ken
- Subjects
Medicine ,Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics ,R858-859.7 - Abstract
BackgroundThe integration of high technology into health care systems is intended to provide new treatment options and improve the quality, safety, and efficiency of care. Robotic-assisted surgery is an example of high technology integration in health care, which has become ubiquitous in many surgical disciplines. ObjectiveThis study aims to understand and measure current robotic-assisted surgery processes in a systematic, quantitative, and replicable manner to identify latent systemic threats and opportunities for improvement based on our observations and to implement and evaluate interventions. This 5-year study will follow a human factors engineering approach to improve the safety and efficiency of robotic-assisted surgery across 4 US hospitals. MethodsThe study uses a stepped wedge crossover design with 3 interventions, introduced in different sequences at each of the hospitals over four 8-month phases. Robotic-assisted surgery procedures will be observed in the following specialties: urogynecology, gynecology, urology, bariatrics, general, and colorectal. We will use the data collected from observations, surveys, and interviews to inform interventions focused on teamwork, task design, and workplace design. We intend to evaluate attitudes toward each intervention, safety culture, subjective workload for each case, effectiveness of each intervention (including through direct observation of a sample of surgeries in each observational phase), operating room duration, length of stay, and patient safety incident reports. Analytic methods will include statistical data analysis, point process analysis, and thematic content analysis. ResultsThe study was funded in September 2018 and approved by the institutional review board of each institution in May and June of 2019 (CSMC and MDRH: Pro00056245; VCMC: STUDY 270; MUSC: Pro00088741). After refining the 3 interventions in phase 1, data collection for phase 2 (baseline data) began in November 2019 and was scheduled to continue through June 2020. However, data collection was suspended in March 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We collected a total of 65 observations across the 4 sites before the pandemic. Data collection for phase 2 was resumed in October 2020 at 2 of the 4 sites. ConclusionsThis will be the largest direct observational study of surgery ever conducted with data collected on 680 robotic surgery procedures at 4 different institutions. The proposed interventions will be evaluated using individual-level (workload and attitude), process-level (perioperative duration and flow disruption), and organizational-level (safety culture and complications) measures. An implementation science framework is also used to investigate the causes of success or failure of each intervention at each site and understand the potential spread of the interventions. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)DERR1-10.2196/25284
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Advancing Team Cohesion: Using an Escape Room as a Novel Approach
- Author
-
2410022, 2439588, 2410025, Cohen, Tara N., Keebler, Joseph R., Griggs, Andrew C., II, Lazzara, Elizabeth H., Kanji, Falisha F., Cohen, Kate A., Gewertz, Bruce L., 2410022, 2439588, 2410025, Cohen, Tara N., Keebler, Joseph R., Griggs, Andrew C., II, Lazzara, Elizabeth H., Kanji, Falisha F., Cohen, Kate A., and Gewertz, Bruce L.
- Abstract
Objective: An escape room was used to study teamwork and its determinants, which have been found to relate to the quality and safety of patient care delivery. This pilot study aimed to explore the value of an escape room as a mechanism for improving cohesion among interdisciplinary healthcare teams. Methods: This research was conducted at a nonprofit medical center in Southern California. All participants who work on a team were invited to participate. Authors employed an interrupted within-subjects design, with two pre- and post- escape room questionnaires related to two facets of group cohesion: (belonging – (PGC-B) and morale (PGC-M)). Participants rated their perceptions of group cohesion before, after, and one-month after the escape room. The main outcome measures included PGC-B/M. Results: Sixty-two teams participated (n 280 participants) of which 31 teams (50%) successfully “escaped” in the allotted 45 minutes. There was a statistically significant difference in PGC between the three time periods, F(4, 254) 24.10, p < .001; Wilks’ K .725; partial g2 .275. Results indicated significantly higher scores for PGC immediately after the escape room and at the one-month follow-up compared to baseline. Conclusions: This work offers insights into the utility of using an escape room as a team building intervention in interprofessional healthcare teams. Considering the modifiability of escape rooms, they may function as valuable team building mechanisms in healthcare. More work is needed to determine how escape rooms compare to more traditional team building curriculums.
- Published
- 2021
4. Using Escape Rooms for Conducting Team Research: Understanding Development, Considerations, and Challenges
- Author
-
Cohen, Tara N., primary, Griggs, Andrew C., additional, Keebler, Joseph R., additional, Lazzara, Elizabeth H., additional, Doherty, Shawn M., additional, Kanji, Falisha F., additional, and Gewertz, Bruce L., additional
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Using Escape Rooms for Conducting Team Research: Understanding Development, Considerations, and Challenges
- Author
-
2410022, Cohen, Tara N., Griggs, Andrew C., Keebler, Joseph R., Lazzara, Elizabeth H., Doherty, Shawn, Kanji, Falisha F., Gewertz, Bruce L., 2410022, Cohen, Tara N., Griggs, Andrew C., Keebler, Joseph R., Lazzara, Elizabeth H., Doherty, Shawn, Kanji, Falisha F., and Gewertz, Bruce L.
- Abstract
Background. Modern organizations are increasingly reliant on teams, and many organizations are subsequently concerned with the development of interventions that can improve the performance of teams. Escape rooms are beginning to receive attention as a potential avenue to facilitate team-based research. Escape rooms are team-based recreational activities that require a team of individuals to work together and think critically in order to solve a series of puzzles or challenges to escape a room. Purpose. This article provides considerations for researchers and organizations alike concerning the development of an escape room for team-based research, its methodological applications, and challenges associated with the use of escape rooms in research. Developmental considerations include issues such as an escape room’s location and size, financial considerations, theme development, other characteristics of the escape room, the development of puzzles and challenges, prototyping efforts, and the development of hints. Conclusion. Research considerations include the use of observational and survey methods in data collection, measurement of team processes and team performance, and how elements of an escape room influence teamwork and problem solving. Various challenges associated with the use of escape rooms in team-based research include considerations for dealing with cheating behavior, providing hints to participants, and resetting the room between experimental trials.
- Published
- 2020
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.