Search

Background: Risks of recurrence and major bleeding with extended anticoagulation in Asian patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) are similar to those in non-Asian patients but risks according to baseline risk factor profiles is not well documented., Methods: Subgroup analysis of two randomized trials, which compared once-daily rivaroxaban (20 mg or 10 mg) with placebo or aspirin (100 mg) for extended treatment in Asian patients with VTE who had completed 6-12 months of anticoagulation. Index events were classified as unprovoked, provoked by major persistent risk factors, minor persistent risk factors, minor transient risk factors, or major transient risk factors. One-year cumulative risks of recurrent VTE were calculated for these risk factor profiles., Results: 367 patients received rivaroxaban, 159 aspirin, and 48 placebo. For patients with unprovoked VTE, one-year cumulative incidences of recurrence in the 202 patients given rivaroxaban, the 89 given aspirin and the 28 given placebo were 1.6%, 5.8%, and 14.8%, respectively. For patients with VTE provoked by minor persistent risk factors, these incidences were 0% in the 74 patients given rivaroxaban, 9.3% in the 36 given aspirin, and 0% in the 12 given placebo. No recurrent VTE occurred in patients with VTE provoked by major persistent or transient risk factors or minor transient risk factors. Rivaroxaban was not associated with a significant increase in major bleeding., Conclusions: Rivaroxaban seems to be an effective and safe option for extended treatment in Asian patients, especially those presenting with unprovoked VTE. Subgroups of patients with provoked risk factors were too small to draw meaningful conclusions., Trial Registration: NCT00439725 and NCT02064439., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Women receiving vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) require adequate contraception because of the potential for fetal complications. It is unknown whether the use of hormonal therapy, especially those containing estrogens, is associated with recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) during anticoagulation. Despite the absence of data, World Health Organization guidelines state that use of estrogen-containing contraceptives confers an "unacceptable health risk" during established anticoagulation for VTE. We compared the incidences of recurrent VTE and abnormal uterine bleeding with and without concomitant hormonal therapy in women aged <60 years who were receiving anticoagulation with rivaroxaban or enoxaparin/VKA for confirmed VTE. Incidence densities in percentage per year were computed for the on and off estrogen-containing or progestin-only therapy periods. Cox regression models were fitted, with hormonal therapy (on vs off) as a time-dependent variable to derive the hazard ratio (HR) for the effects on recurrent VTE and abnormal uterine bleeding. In total, 1888 women were included. VTE incidence densities on and off hormonal therapy were 3.7%/year and 4.7%/year (adjusted HR, 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-1.39), respectively, and were 3.7%/year and 3.8%/year, respectively, for estrogen-containing and progestin-only therapy. The adjusted HR for all abnormal uterine bleeding (on vs off hormonal therapy) was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.66-1.57). Abnormal uterine bleeding occurred more frequently with rivaroxaban than with enoxaparin/VKA (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.57-2.89). Hormonal therapy was not associated with an increased risk of recurrent VTE in women receiving therapeutic anticoagulation. The observed increased risk of abnormal uterine bleeding with rivaroxaban needs further exploration., (© 2016 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Objectives: Outpatient treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) requires the selection of patients with a low risk of bleeding during the first few weeks of anticoagulation. The accuracy of four systems, originally derived for predicting bleeding in VTE treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), was assessed in VTE patients treated with rivaroxaban., Methods: All patients treated with rivaroxaban in the multinational EINSTEIN deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) trials were included. Major bleeding was defined as ≥2 g/dL drop in hemoglobin or ≥2-unit blood transfusion, bleeding in critical area, or bleeding contributing to death. The authors examined the incidence of major bleeding in patients with low-risk assignment by the systems of Ruiz-Gimenez et al. (score = 0 to 1), Beyth et al. (score = 0), Kuijer et al. (score = 0), and Landefeld and Goldman. (score = 0). For clinical relevance, the definition of low risk for all scores except Kuijer includes all patients < 65 years with no prior bleeding history and no comorbid conditions (current cancer, renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, anemia, prior stroke, or myocardial infarction)., Results: A total of 4,130 patients (1,731 with DVT only, 2,399 with PE with or without DVT) were treated with rivaroxaban for a mean (±SD) duration of 207.6 (±95.9) days. Major bleeding occurred in 1.0% (40 of 4,130; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.7% to 1.3%) overall. Rates of major bleeding for low-risk patients during the entire treatment period were similar: Ruiz-Gimenez et al., 12 of 2,622 (0.5%; 95% CI = 0.2% to 0.8%); Beyth et al., nine of 2,249 (0.4%; 95% CI = 0.2% to 0.8%); Kuijer et al., four of 1,186 (0.3%; 95% CI = 0.1% to 0.9%); and Landefeld and Goldman, 11 of 2,407 (0.5%; 95% CI = 0.2% to 0.8%). At 30 days, major bleed rates for low-risk patients were as follows: Ruiz-Gimenez et al., five of 2,622 (0.2%; 95% CI = 0.1% to 0.4%); Beyth et al., five of 2,249 (0.2%; 95% CI = 0.1% to 0.5%); Kuijer et al., three of 1,186 (0.3%; 95% CI = 0.1% to 0.7%); and Landefeld and Goldman, seven of 2,407 (0.3%; 95% CI = 0.1% to 0.6%). No low-risk patient had a fatal bleed., Conclusions: Four scoring systems that use criteria obtained in routine clinical practice, derived to predict low bleeding risk with VKA treatment for VTE, identified patients with less than a 1% risk of major bleeding during full-course treatment with rivaroxaban., (© 2016 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.)

Background: Rivaroxaban is a new oral anticoagulant (NOAC) that can be prescribed in a fixed dose, making regular monitoring and dose adjustments unnecessary. It has been proven to be safe and effective in comparison with enoxaparin/vitamin K antagonists (LMWH/VKA) for the (extended) treatment of venous thromboembolism in the EINSTEIN studies. Nevertheless, there is a need for information regarding the clinical impact of (major) bleeding events with NOACs such as rivaroxaban., Objectives: A post-hoc analysis was performed to compare the severity of clinical presentation and subsequent clinical course of major bleeding with rivaroxaban vs. LMWH/VKA., Methods: Two investigators performed a blinded classification of major bleeding using a priori defined criteria. During the EINSTEIN studies, data concerning the clinical course and measures applied were prospectively collected for each major bleed., Results: Treatment with LMWH/VKA caused more major bleeding events (1.7%) than rivaroxaban (1.0%; hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-0.79). Major bleeding events during rivaroxaban therapy had a milder presentation (23% were adjudicated to the worst categories vs. 38% for LMWH/VKA; hazard ratio or HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17-0.74; P = 0.0062). The clinical course was severe in 25% of all major bleeding events associated with rivaroxaban, compared with 33% of LMWH/VKA-associated bleeds (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22-0.96; P = 0.040)., Conclusions: Rivaroxaban-associated major bleeding events occurred less frequently, had a milder presentation and appeared to take a less severe clinical course compared with major bleeding with LMWH/VKA., (© 2015 The Authors. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Objectives: The objective was to assess adverse outcomes in relation to the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score in patients treated with rivaroxaban or standard therapy in the phase III EINSTEIN PE study and to evaluate the utility of the simplified PESI score to identify low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) patients., Methods: A post hoc analysis of EINSTEIN PE data was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with a range of simplified PESI scores. Recurrent venous thromboembolism, fatal PE, all-cause mortality, and major bleeding were stratified by simplified PESI scores of 0, 1, or ≥2 and according to treatment period at 7, 14, 30, and 90 days and at the end of the full intended treatment period., Results: Simplified PESI scores could be calculated in 4,831 of the 4,832 randomized patients; of those, 53.6, 36.7, and 9.7% had PESI scores of 0, 1, and ≥2, respectively. Among patients with simplified PESI scores of 0 or 1, fatal PE, all-cause mortality, and other adverse outcomes were uncommon within the first 7, 14, and 30 days. Patients with simplified PESI scores of ≥2 had more frequent adverse outcomes. Major bleeding was lower in the rivaroxaban group, particularly in those with simplified PESI scores of 1 or ≥2., Conclusions: The findings support using risk stratification with the simplified PESI score to identify low-risk patients with PE., (© 2015 The Authors. Academic Emergency Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Acadamic Emergency Medicine.)

Objectives: In the EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN PE studies, the majority of patients received heparins to bridge the period during venous thromboembolism (VTE) diagnosis confirmation and the start of the study. In contrast to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), rivaroxaban may not require initial heparin treatment., Methods: To evaluate the effect of prestudy heparin on the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban relative to enoxaparin/VKA, the 3-month incidence of recurrent VTE, and the 14-day incidence of major and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding were compared in patients who did and did not receive prestudy heparin., Results: Of the 8,281 patients randomized, 6,937 (83.8%) received prestudy heparin (mean ± SD duration = rivaroxaban: 1.04 [± 0.74] days; enoxaparin 1.03 [± 0.42] days), and 1,344 (16.2%) did not. In patients who did not receive prestudy heparin, the incidences of recurrent VTE were similar in rivaroxaban (15 of 649, 2.3%) and enoxaparin/VKA (13 of 695, 1.9%) patients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.52 to 2.37). The incidences of recurrent VTE were also similar in rivaroxaban (54 of 3,501, 1.5%) and enoxaparin/VKA (69 of 3,436, 2.0%) patients who did receive prestudy heparin (adjusted HR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.52 to 1.06; pinteraction  = 0.32). The incidences of major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding with rivaroxaban were not significantly different from those with enoxaparin/VKA, either with (105 of 3,485, 3.0% vs. 104 of 3,428, 3.0%; adjusted HR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.75 to 1.29) or without (24 of 645, 3.7% vs. 30 of 688, 4.4%; adjusted HR = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.46 to 1.40; pinteraction  = 0.68) prestudy heparin., Conclusions: Although the majority of patients in the EINSTEIN studies received prestudy heparin, there were no notable differences in treatment effect of rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin/VKA in those who did and did not receive it., (© 2015 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.)

Background: The global EINSTEIN DVT and PE studies compared rivaroxaban (15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks followed by 20 mg once daily) with enoxaparin/vitamin K antagonist therapy and demonstrated non-inferiority for efficacy and superiority for major bleeding. Owing to differences in targeted anticoagulant intensities in Japan, Japanese patients were not enrolled into the global studies. Instead, a separate study of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE) in Japanese patients was conducted, which compared the Japanese standard of care with a reduced dose of rivaroxaban., Methods: We conducted an open-label, randomized trial that compared 3, 6, or 12 months of oral rivaroxaban alone (10 mg twice daily or 15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks followed by 15 mg once daily) with activated partial thromboplastin time-adjusted intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) followed by warfarin (target international normalized ratio 2.0; range 1.5-2.5) in patients with acute, objectively confirmed symptomatic DVT and/or PE. Patients were assessed for the occurrence of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolic events or asymptomatic deterioration and bleeding., Results: Eighty-one patients were assigned to rivaroxaban and 19 patients to UFH/warfarin. Three patients were excluded because of serious non-compliance issues. The composite of symptomatic venous thromboembolic events or asymptomatic deterioration occurred in 1 (1.4%) rivaroxaban patient and in 1 (5.3%) UFH/warfarin patient (absolute risk difference, 3.9% [95% confidence interval, -3.4-23.8]). No major bleeding occurred during study treatment. Clinically relevant non-major bleeding occurred in 6 (7.8%) patients in the rivaroxaban group and 1 (5.3%) patient in the UFH/warfarin group., Conclusions: The findings of this study in Japanese patients with acute DVT and/or PE suggest a similar efficacy and safety profile with rivaroxaban and control treatment, consistent with that of the worldwide EINSTEIN DVT and PE program., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01516840 and NCT01516814.

Background: Statins may reduce the risk of first and recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE). No data are available on their potential benefit in patients treated with the oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban., Methods: The EINSTEIN DVT/PE and EINSTEIN Extension studies compared rivaroxaban with standard of care (n=8280) and placebo (n=1188), respectively. The incidences of recurrent VTE and major bleeding per 100 patient-years for exposure (or not) to statins were calculated. A Cox proportional hazards model was constructed, stratified by index event and intended treatment duration, with statin use as a time-dependent variable, for each treatment group (rivaroxaban vs enoxaparin/vitamin K antagonist or placebo) and adjusted for relevant variables., Results: In EINSTEIN DVT/PE, 1509 (18.3%) patients used statins during the at-risk period, and 6731 (81.7%) did not. Overall, 2.6 recurrent VTEs occurred per 100 patient-years with statin use compared with 3.8 per 100 patient-years without statins (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-1.25). HRs for recurrent VTE were similar for concomitant use of rivaroxaban-statin and enoxaparin/VKA-statin. Major bleeding events occurred in 3.0 per 100 patient-years with statin use compared with 2.3 per 100 patient-years without statins (adjusted HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.46-1.29). Due to adjustments in the Cox regression model, the direction of this HR is in contrast to the crude comparison. In EINSTEIN Extension, no recurrent VTEs occurred with statin use in the rivaroxaban group compared with 1.6 per 100 patient-years without statins. In the placebo group, 12.2 recurrent VTEs occurred per 100 patient-years with statin use compared with 13.2 per 100 patient-years without (adjusted HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.35-1.86)., Conclusions: The effect of statins in this secondary analysis of the EINSTEIN VTE treatment program is consistent with other studies that suggest a reduced risk of recurrent VTE, but conclusive evidence of this benefit is lacking. Statins are simple to use, inexpensive, very safe and do not cause bleeding. Therefore, the potential effect on reducing recurrent VTE, which is in the range of that of acetylsalicylic acid, deserves evaluation in a large randomized trial., Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov: EINSTEIN PE, NCT00439777; EINSTEIN DVT, NCT00440193; EINSTEIN Extension, NCT00439725.

Background: Patients with renal impairment receiving classical anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at increased risk of bleeding and possibly pulmonary embolism. We examined the efficacy and safety of oral rivaroxaban in patients with VTE with and without renal impairment., Methods: Prespecified subgroup analysis of the EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN PE studies comparing fixed-dose rivaroxaban with enoxaparin/a vitamin K antagonist (VKA), performed in 8246 patients enrolled from 2007 to 2011 in 314 hospitals., Results: Outcomes were recurrent VTE and major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in patients with normal renal function (n = 5569; 67.3%) or mild (n = 2037; 24.6%), moderate (n = 636; 7.7%), or severe (n = 21; 0.3%) renal impairment. Rates of recurrent VTE were 1.8%, 2.8%, 3.3%, and 4.8% in patients with normal renal function and mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment, respectively (ptrend = 0.001). Hazard ratios for recurrent VTE were similar between treatment groups across renal function categories (pinteraction = 0.72). Major bleeding in rivaroxaban recipients occurred in 0.8%, 1.4%, 0.9%, and 0%, respectively (ptrend = 0.50). Respective rates in enoxaparin/VKA recipients were 1.0%, 3.0%, 3.9%, and 9.1% (ptrend < 0.001). Rivaroxaban-enoxaparin/VKA hazard ratios were 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-1.36) for normal renal function, 0.44 (95% CI 0.24-0.84) for mild renal impairment, and 0.23 (95% CI 0.06-0.81) for moderate renal impairment (pinteraction = 0.034)., Conclusions: Patients with symptomatic VTE and renal impairment are at increased risk of recurrent VTE. Renal impairment increased the risk of major bleeding in enoxaparin/VKA-treated patients but not in rivaroxaban-treated patients., Trial Registration: NCT00440193 and NCT00439777.

Background: The worldwide EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN PE studies randomized 8282 patients with acute symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE) and, for the first time in trials in this setting, included patients in China. This analysis evaluates the results of these studies in this subgroup of patients., Methods: A total of 439 Chinese patients who had acute symptomatic DVT (n=211), or PE with or without DVT (n=228), were randomized to receive rivaroxaban (15 mg twice daily for 21 days, followed by 20 mg once daily) or standard therapy of enoxaparin overlapping with and followed by an adjusted-dose vitamin K antagonist, for 3, 6, or 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism. The principal safety outcome was major or non-major clinically relevant bleeding., Results: The primary efficacy outcome occurred in seven (3.2%) of the 220 patients in the rivaroxaban group and in seven (3.2%) of the 219 patients in the standard-therapy group (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval 0.36-3.0; p=0.94). The principal safety outcome occurred in 13 (5.9%) patients in the rivaroxaban group and in 20 (9.2%) patients in the standard-therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval 0.31-1.26; p=0.19). Major bleeding was observed in no patients in the rivaroxaban group and in five (2.3%) patients in the standard-therapy group. In fragile patients (defined as age >75 years, creatinine clearance <50 mL/min, and/or body weight ≤50 kg), the principal safety outcome occurred in four (8.9%) of the 45 patients who received rivaroxaban compared with seven (15.2%) of the 46 patients who received standard therapy., Conclusions: In Chinese patients with acute symptomatic DVT and/or PE, rivaroxaban was as efficacious as enoxaparin followed by vitamin K antagonist therapy, with a similar safety profile. The relative efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin/vitamin K antagonist were consistent with that found in the rest of the world., Trial Registration Number: EINSTEIN PE, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00439777; EINSTEIN DVT, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00440193.

Background: Standard treatment for venous thromboembolism (VTE) consists of a heparin combined with vitamin K antagonists. Direct oral anticoagulants have been investigated for acute and extended treatment of symptomatic VTE; their use could avoid parenteral treatment and/or laboratory monitoring of anticoagulant effects., Methods: A prespecified pooled analysis of the EINSTEIN-DVT and EINSTEIN-PE studies compared the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban (15 mg twice-daily for 21 days, followed by 20 mg once-daily) with standard-therapy (enoxaparin 1.0 mg/kg twice-daily and warfarin or acenocoumarol). Patients were treated for 3, 6, or 12 months and followed for suspected recurrent VTE and bleeding. The prespecified noninferiority margin was 1.75., Results: A total of 8282 patients were enrolled; 4151 received rivaroxaban and 4131 received standard-therapy. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 86 (2.1%) rivaroxaban-treated patients compared with 95 (2.3%) standard-therapy-treated patients (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-1.19; pnoninferiority < 0.001). Major bleeding was observed in 40 (1.0%) and 72 (1.7%) patients in the rivaroxaban and standard-therapy groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37-0.79; p = 0.002). In key subgroups, including fragile patients, cancer patients, patients presenting with large clots, and those with a history of recurrent VTE, the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban were similar compared with standard-therapy., Conclusion: The single-drug approach with rivaroxaban resulted in similar efficacy to standard-therapy and was associated with a significantly lower rate of major bleeding. Efficacy and safety results were consistent among key patient subgroups., Trial Registration Einstein-Pe: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00439777; EINSTEIN-DVT: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00440193.

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants that target a single coagulation factor have been developed as an alternative to standard therapies with heparin and/or vitamin K antagonists. The purpose of this study was to derive non-inferiority margins suitable for randomised clinical studies designed to evaluate these agents for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE)., Methods: We performed a systematic review to derive non-inferiority margins suitable for use in studies evaluating direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment of VTE. A PubMed search identified publications that evaluated current standard treatment versus placebo, 'no treatment' or 'less intensive treatment' in patients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE). Publications were eligible if they had a randomised study design, included patients with symptomatic DVT and/or PE, used objective diagnostic methods to document the index event and reported objectively confirmed symptomatic recurrent VTE., Results: Fourteen publications were included in the analysis. Recurrent VTE occurred in 25 (1.5%) out of 1715 patients who received current standard of care and in 157 (9.2%) out of 1711 patients who received placebo, 'no treatment' or 'less intensive treatment', for an odds ratio of 0.18 (95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.25; test for heterogeneity, p=0.87). In order to preserve 50% or 75% of the established treatment effect using a linear scale, the corresponding thresholds for non-inferiority equalled 2.50 and 1.75, respectively., Conclusions: This systematic review and statistical approach determined non-inferiority margins suitable for use in studies of direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment of DVT and/or PE.

Introduction: Little is known about the natural history of clot resolution in the initial weeks of anticoagulant therapy in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Clot resolution of acute PE was assessed with either computed tomography pulmonary angiography scan (CT-scan) or perfusion scintigraphy scan (Q-scan) after 3 weeks of treatment., Methods: This was a predefined safety analysis of the Einstein PE study, including PE patients, randomized to either enoxaparin with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or rivaroxaban. A similar scan as at baseline was repeated after 3 weeks. The percentage of vascular obstruction (PVO) was calculated on the basis of a weighted semiquantitative estimation of obstruction. Clot resolution was assessed blindly by calculating the relative change after 3 weeks., Results: PE was diagnosed in 264 patients with CT-scan and in 83 with Q-scan. Baseline characteristics were similar. At baseline, the mean PVO assessed with CT-scan (PVO-CT) and the mean PVO assessed with Q-scan (PVO-Q) were both 21% (standard deviation [SD] 13%) (P = 0.9). The mean relative decrease in PVO was 71% (SD 33%) for PVO-CT, and 62% (SD 36%) for PVO-Q (P = 0.02); complete resolution was observed in 44% (116/264; 95% confidence interval [CI] 38-50%) and 31% (26/83; 95% CI 22-42%) with CT-scan and Q-scan, respectively (P = 0.04). No difference in clot resolution between enoxaparin/VKA and rivaroxaban was found., Conclusion: In patients with acute PE, only 3 weeks of anticoagulant treatment leads to complete clot resolution in a considerable proportion of patients, and normalization is more often observed with CT-scan than with Q-scan., (© 2013 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Background: Selecting initial anticoagulant dose by patient weight for acute pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis has clinical credibility; however, uncertainty remains regarding how to dose obese patients with newer anticoagulants because outcome data are sparse., Objectives: To use the Matisse trials' comparison of sc fondaparinux once daily with control heparin therapies (intravenous unfractionated heparin for pulmonary embolism, sc enoxaparin 1 mg/kg b.i.d. for deep vein thrombosis) for initial treatment in order to compare primary outcomes (venous thromboembolism recurrence and major bleeding) in obese patients., Patients and Methods: Primary outcomes were compared in subsets composed of patients weighing < or = and > 100 kg and with body mass index (BMI) < 30 and > or = 30 kg/m(2). Medians and ranges for weight and BMI were compared for patients suffering either recurrence or major bleeding., Results: Twenty-two thousand and one patients received fondaparinux and 2217 received enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin. Four hundred and ninety-six patients (11%) weighed > 100 kg and 1216 (28%) had a BMI > or = 30. Treatment groups had similar characteristics. The upper limit in subject weight for recurrence was 166 kg (BMI 58), and for major bleeding 120 kg (BMI 39). The incidences of recurrence and major bleeding were similar for each patient subset of weight and BMI for both fondaparinux and heparin treatment groups. Among patients with a primary outcome, median weights and BMIs were also similar., Conclusions: The current recommended doses of fondaparinux and heparins for the treatment of venous thromboembolism appear to provide similar protection against recurrence and major bleeding to one another and to obese and non-obese patients.

Background: Recently, we reported an association between asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis and venous thromboembolism (VTE) of unknown origin. We hypothesized that patients with VTE of unknown origin would be at a higher risk of developing symptomatic atherosclerosis than patients with VTE induced by known risk factors., Methods: To examine this hypothesis, we studied 1,919 consecutive patients followed prospectively after their first VTE episode. The primary outcome was non-fatal and fatal symptomatic atherosclerotic disease in patients with VTE of unknown origin as compared to those with secondary VTE. An independent committee assessed all study outcomes, and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using the Cox's proportional hazards model., Results: After a median follow-up of 48 and 51 months, respectively, at least one symptomatic atherosclerotic complication was detected in 160 of the 1,063 patients (15.1%) with VTE of unknown origin, and in 73 of the 856 (8.5%) with secondary VTE. After adjusting for age and other risk factors of atherosclerosis, the HR for symptomatic atherosclerotic complications in patients with VTE of unknown origin compared to those with secondary VTE was 1.6 (95% confidence intervals; CI: 1.2-2.0). When the analysis was restricted to patients without previous symptomatic atherosclerosis, the HR became 1.7 (95% CI: 1.1-2.4)., Conclusions: Patients with VTE of unknown origin have a 60% higher risk of developing symptomatic atherosclerotic disease than do patients with secondary venous thrombosis.

Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of the anticoagulant fondaparinux in older acute medical inpatients at moderate to high risk of venous thromboembolism., Design: Double blind randomised placebo controlled trial., Setting: 35 centres in eight countries., Participants: 849 medical patients aged 60 or more admitted to hospital for congestive heart failure, acute respiratory illness in the presence of chronic lung disease, or acute infectious or inflammatory disease and expected to remain in bed for at least four days., Interventions: 2.5 mg fondaparinux or placebo subcutaneously once daily for six to 14 days., Outcome Measure: The primary efficacy outcome was venous thromboembolism detected by routine bilateral venography along with symptomatic venous thromboembolism up to day 15. Secondary outcomes were bleeding and death. Patients were followed up at one month., Results: 425 patients in the fondaparinux group and 414 patients in the placebo group were evaluable for safety analysis (10 were not treated). 644 patients (75.9%) were available for the primary efficacy analysis. Venous thrombembolism was detected in 5.6% (18/321) of patients treated with fondaparinux and 10.5% (34/323) of patients given placebo, a relative risk reduction of 46.7% (95% confidence interval 7.7% to 69.3%). Symptomatic venous thromboembolism occurred in five patients in the placebo group and none in the fondaparinux group (P = 0.029). Major bleeding occurred in one patient (0.2%) in each group. At the end of follow-up, 14 patients in the fondaparinux group (3.3%) and 25 in the placebo group (6.0%) had died., Conclusion: Fondaparinux is effective in the prevention of asymptomatic and symptomatic venous thromboembolic events in older acute medical patients. The frequency of major bleeding was similar for both fondaparinux and placebo treated patients.

Background: The SOMIT trial randomized patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism (IVTE) and without signs of cancer at routine medical examination, to extensive screening for cancer plus 2 years of follow-up or to just 2-year follow-up., Methods: The data of the SOMIT-trial were used to perform a decision analysis. The screening tests were divided in several possible strategies. The number of detected cancer patients and the number of patients investigated further for an eventually benign condition were calculated for each strategy. The total costs for the screening strategy and for each detected cancer patient were determined. Based on the tumor type, stage, age and gender of the individual cancer patient, the difference in live years gained (LYG) was calculated between the two study groups., Results: Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen combined with sputum cytology and mammography detected 12 of the 14 patients with cancer and had one false-positive result. In general, screening strategies including abdominal/pelvic ultrasonography (US) or tumor markers yielded a higher number of patients needed to screen in comparison with those using abdominal/pelvic CT. Furthermore, the strategies which included colonoscopy, tumor markers, and abdominal/pelvic US were significantly more costly, had inferior LYG and higher costs per LYG, when compared with strategies using abdominal/pelvic CT., Conclusions: Despite the limitations of this analysis, the screening for cancer with a strategy including abdominal/pelvic CT with or without mammography and/or sputum cytology appears potentially useful for cancer screening in patients with IVTE. The cost-effectiveness analysis of this strategy needs confirmation in a large trial.

Background: Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) have been shown to be effective and safe in preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE), and may also be effective for the initial treatment of VTE., Objectives: To determine the effect of LMWH compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the initial treatment of VTE., Search Strategy: Trials were identified from the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group's Specialised Register, CENTRAL and LILACS. Colleagues and pharmaceutical companies were contacted for additional information., Selection Criteria: Randomised controlled trials comparing fixed dose subcutaneous LMWH with adjusted dose intravenous or subcutaneous UFH in people with VTE., Data Collection and Analysis: At least two reviewers assessed trials for inclusion and quality, and extracted data independently., Main Results: Twenty-two studies were included (n = 8867). Thrombotic complications occurred in 151/4181 (3.6%) participants treated with LMWH, compared with 211/3941 (5.4%) participants treated with UFH (odds ratio (OR) 0.68; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.55 to 0.84, 18 trials). Thrombus size was reduced in 53% of participants treated with LMWH and 45% treated with UFH (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.81, 12 trials). Major haemorrhages occurred in 41/3500 (1.2%) participants treated with LMWH, compared with 73/3624 (2.0%) participants treated with UFH (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.83, 19 trials). In eighteen trials, 187/4193 (4.5%) participants treated with LMWH died, compared with 233/3861 (6.0%) participants treated with UFH (OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.62 to 0.92). Nine studies (n = 4451) examined proximal thrombosis; 2192 participants treated with LMWH and 2259 with UFH. Subgroup analysis showed statistically significant reductions favouring LMWH in thrombotic complications and major haemorrhage. By the end of follow up, 80 (3.6%) participants treated with LMWH had thrombotic complications, compared with 143 (6.3%) treated with UFH (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.75). Major haemorrhage occurred in 18 (1.0%) participants treated with LMWH, compared with 37 (2.1%) treated with UFH (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.85). Nine studies (n = 4157) showed a statistically significant reduction favouring LMWH with respect to mortality. By the end of follow up, 3.3% (70/2094) of participants treated with LMWH had died, compared with 5.3% (110/2063) of participants treated with UFH (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.84)., Reviewers' Conclusions: LMWH is more effective than UFH for the initial treatment of VTE. LMWH significantly reduces the occurrence of major haemorrhage during initial treatment and overall mortality at follow up.

Objectives: In this dose-finding study, we sought to compare fondaparinux with enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS)., Background: Fondaparinux is a synthetic pentasaccharide that selectively inhibits activated clotting factor X. It has been demonstrated as effective in preventing thromboembolic complications in orthopedic surgery., Methods: Four doses fondaparinux (2.5, 4, 8, or 12 mg once daily) and enoxaparin (1 mg/kg twice daily) were compared, both given for three to seven days, in patients with ACS without persistent ST-segment elevation., Results: The rates of the combined primary end point of death, myocardial infarction, or recurrent ischemia after nine days were 27.9%, 35.9%, 34.7%, 30.3%, and 35.7% in patients allocated to fondaparinux doses of 2.5, 4, 8, and 12 mg and enoxaparin, respectively (p = NS). In the per-protocol analysis (929 patients who received adequate study drug and had adequate ST-segment monitoring), these figures were 30.0%, 43.5%, 41.0%, 34.8%, and 40.2%. Again, no dose response was observed. The lowest event rates were observed in the 2.5-mg fondaparinux group, which had significantly lower rates than the enoxaparin group as well as for 4 and 8 mg fondaparinux in the per-protocol analysis (p < 0.05). Bleeding rates were low and not different among the patient groups. No differences were observed in fondaparinux concentrations in patients with or without death, myocardial infarction, recurrent ischemia, or bleeding events., Conclusions: This dose-finding study revealed no dose response for different fondaparinux doses ranging from 2.5 to 12 mg subcutaneously and suggests that the efficacy and safety of fondaparinux may be similar to that of enoxaparin. Further studies with fondaparinux in ACS might include the lowest dose (2.5 mg) investigated in this study.

Patients with acute venous thromboembolism have an increased risk for occult malignancy. Limited screening for these malignancies has become common practice but little is known about its usefulness. This is a prospective cohort follow-up study in consecutive patients with acute venous thromboembolism. All patients underwent a routine clinical evaluation for malignancy, if negative, followed by a limited diagnostic work-up consisting of abdominal and pelvic ultrasound and laboratory markers for malignancy. Clinical follow-up was conducted to detect screening failures. The routine clinical evaluation was performed in 864 patients and revealed malignancy in 34 (3.9%) of them. Among the remaining 830 patients the limited diagnostic work-up revealed 13 further malignancies. During follow-up, cancer became symptomatic in 14 patients who were negative for cancer at screening (sensitivity of limited diagnostic work-up, 48.1%). Malignancies that were identified by the limited diagnostic work-up were early stage in 61% of cases vs. 14% in cases occurring during follow-up. Most patients with occult cancer had idiopathic venous thromboembolism and were older than 70 years. A limited diagnostic work-up for occult cancer in patients with venous thromboembolism has the capacity to identify approximately one-half of the malignancies. Identified malignancies were predominantly in an early stage.

Patients with symptomatic idiopathic venous thromboembolism and apparently cancer-free have an approximate 10% incidence of subsequent cancer. Apparently cancer-free patients with acute idiopathic venous thromboembolism were randomized to either the strategy of extensive screening for occult cancer or to no further testing. Patients had a 2-year follow-up period. Of the 201 patients, 99 were allocated to the extensive screening group and 102 to the control group. In 13 (13.1%) patients, the extensive screening identified occult cancer. In the extensive screening group, a single (1.0%) malignancy became apparent during follow-up, whereas in the control group a total of 10 (9.8%) malignancies became symptomatic [relative risk, 9.7 (95% CI, 1.3-36.8; P < 0.01]. Overall, malignancies identified in the extensive screening group were at an earlier stage and the mean delay to diagnosis was reduced from 11.6 to 1.0 months (P < 0.001). Cancer-related mortality during the 2 years follow-up period occurred in two (2.0%) of the 99 patients of the extensive screening group vs. four (3.9%) of the 102 control patients [absolute difference, 1.9% (95% CI, -5.5-10.9)]. Although early detection of occult cancers may be associated with improved treatment possibilities, it is uncertain whether this improves the prognosis.

A small proportion of patients with deep vein thrombosis develop recurrent venous thromboembolic complications or bleeding during anticoagulant treatment. These complications may occur more frequently if these patients have concomitant cancer. This prospective follow-up study sought to determine whether in thrombosis patients those with cancer have a higher risk for recurrent venous thromboembolism or bleeding during anticoagulant treatment than those without cancer. Of the 842 included patients, 181 had known cancer at entry. The 12-month cumulative incidence of recurrent thromboembolism in cancer patients was 20.7% (95% CI, 15.6%-25.8%) versus 6.8% (95% CI, 3.9%- 9.7%) in patients without cancer, for a hazard ratio of 3.2 (95% CI, 1.9-5.4) The 12-month cumulative incidence of major bleeding was 12.4% (95% CI, 6.5%-18.2%) in patients with cancer and 4.9% (95% CI, 2.5%-7.4%) in patients without cancer, for a hazard ratio of 2.2 (95% CI, 1.2-4.1). Recurrence and bleeding were both related to cancer severity and occurred predominantly during the first month of anticoagulant therapy but could not be explained by sub- or overanticoagulation. Cancer patients with venous thrombosis are more likely to develop recurrent thromboembolic complications and major bleeding during anticoagulant treatment than those without malignancy. These risks correlate with the extent of cancer. Possibilities for improvement using the current paradigms of anticoagulation seem limited and new treatment strategies should be developed.

Carriers of a mutation in the prothrombin (clotting factor II) or factor V gene have a 2- to 4-fold greater risk for venous thromboembolism than subjects without the mutations. Whether both mutations also predispose to recurrent venous thromboembolism is unclear. Outpatients who had a first episode of proven symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis and a long-term follow-up were studied. The outcome measure was the cumulative incidence of confirmed venous thromboembolic complications. Two hundred fifty-one patients were enrolled in the study. Mean duration of follow-up was 8.3 years. The prothrombin gene mutation was demonstrated in 27 patients (prevalence, 10.8%; 95% CI, 6.9 to 14.6), and the factor V gene mutation was demonstrated in 41 patients (prevalence, 16.3%; 95% CI, 11.8 to 20.9). The cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolic complications after 10 years was 61.3% (95% CI, 35.7 to 87.9), and the hazard ratio was 2.4 (95% CI, 1.3 to 4.7; P =.004) in patients with the prothrombin gene mutation); the cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolic complications after 10 years was 55.2% (95% CI, 36.4 to 74.0), and the hazard ratio was 2.4 (95% CI, 1.4 to 4.1; P =.001) in patients with the factor V gene mutation. In comparison, the cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolic complications after 10 years was 23.1% (95% CI, 16.2 to 30.1) in patients without the mutations. Prothrombin and factor V gene mutations occur frequently in patients with venous thrombosis and are associated with an increased risk for recurrent venous thromboembolic complications.

Background: Low molecular weight heparins have been shown to be effective and safe for prevention of venous thromboembolism. There is accumulating evidence that these new anticoagulants are also effective and safe for treatment of venous thromboembolism., Objectives: The objective of this review was to determine the effect of fixed-dose, subcutaneous low molecular weight heparins compared with adjusted-dose, intravenous or subcutaneous, unfractionated heparin for initial treatment of acute deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism., Search Strategy: Trials were identified from the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group trials register and LILACS. The reviewers contacted colleagues and representatives of pharmaceutical companies for additional information about trials., Selection Criteria: Randomised trials comparing fixed-dose, subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin with adjusted-dose, intravenous or subcutaneous, unfractionated heparin in patients with venous thromboembolism., Data Collection and Analysis: Two reviewers assessed trials for inclusion and quality, and extracted data independently., Main Results: Fourteen studies with a total of 4754 patients were included. By the end of follow up in ten trials, thrombotic complications occurred in 86 (4.3%) of the 1998 patients treated with low molecular weight heparin, compared with 113 (5.6%) of the 2021 patients treated with unfractionated heparin (odds ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.57 to 1.01). In eight trials a reduction in thrombus size was shown by 60% treated with low molecular weight heparin and 54% treated with unfractionated heparin (odds ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.97). At the end of the initial treatment period, in all 14 of the trials, major haemorrhages occurred in 30 (1.3%) of the 2353 patients treated with low molecular weight heparin, compared with 51 (2.1%) of the 2401 patients treated with unfractionated heparin (odds ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.93). By the end of follow up in 11 trials, 135 (6.4%) of the 2108 patients treated with low molecular weight heparin had died, compared with 172 (8.0%) of the 2137 patients treated with unfractionated heparin (odds ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.62 to 0.99). Five studies with a total of 1636 patients examined proximal (above the knee) thrombosis; 814 treated with low molecular weight heparin and 822 with unfractionated heparin. A sub-analysis of these trials showed statistically significant reductions favouring the action of low molecular weight heparin in three areas: thrombotic complications; major haemorrhages; and overall mortality. By the end of follow up 39 (4. 8%) patients treated with low molecular weight heparin had thrombotic complications, compared with 64 (7.8%) treated with unfractionated heparin (odds ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0. 40 to 0.89). Major haemorrhages occurred in 8 (1.0%) treated with low molecular weight heparin, compared with 68 (8.3%) treated with unfractionated heparin (odds ratio 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0. 21 to 0.95). By the end of follow up, 44 (5.4%) treated with low molecular weight heparin had died, compared with 68 (8.3%) treated with unfractionated heparin (odds ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.43 to 0.93)., Reviewer's Conclusions: Low molecular weight heparin is at least as effective as unfractionated heparin in preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism, and significantly reduces the occurrence of major haemorrhage during initial treatment and overall mortality at the end of follow-up. It can be adopted safely as the standard therapy for deep venous thrombosis, and studies comparing individual low molecular weight heparins are merited.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of using a rapid plasma D-dimer test as an adjunct to compression ultrasound for diagnosing clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis., Design: D-dimer concentrations were determined in all patients with a normal ultrasonogram at presentation. Repeat ultrasonography was performed 1 week later only in patients with abnormal D-dimer test results., Main Outcome and Measures: Patients with normal ultrasonograms were not treated with anticoagulants and were followed for 3 months for thromboembolic complications., Setting: University research and affiliated centres., Subjects: 946 patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis., Results: Ultrasonograms were abnormal at presentation in 260 (27.5%) patients. Of the remaining 686 patients tested for D-dimer, 88 (12.8%) had abnormal concentrations. During follow up venous thromboembolic complications occurred in one of the 598 patients who were not treated with anticoagulants and who had an initial normal ultrasonogram and D-dimer concentration, whereas thromboembolic complications occurred in two of the 83 untreated patients who had abnormal D-dimer concentrations but a normal repeat ultrasonogram. The cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolic complications during follow up was 0.4% (95% confidence interval 0% to 0.9%). The rapid plasma D-dimer test used as an adjunct to compression ultrasonography resulted in a reduction in the mean number of repeat ultrasound examinations and additional hospital visits from 0.7 to 0.1 per patient., Conclusions: Testing for D-dimer as an adjunct to a normal baseline ultrasound examination decreased the number of subsequent ultrasound examinations considerably without any increased risk of venous thromboembolic complications in patients not receiving anticoagulants. The use of ultrasound and testing for D-dimer enabled treatment decisions to be made at the time of presentation in most patients.

Objective: To evaluate the safety of withholding anticoagulant treatment from patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis but normal findings on compression ultrasonography., Design: Compression ultrasonography was done with a simplified diagnostic procedure limited to the common femoral vein in the groin and the popliteal vein extending down to the trifurcation of the calf veins. Patients with normal ultrasonography findings at presentation were retested 1 week later., Main Outcome Measure: The incidence of venous thromboembolic complications during follow up for 6 months in patients in whom anticoagulant treatment was withheld on the basis of normal results on two ultrasonography tests 1 week apart., Setting: University research centres in four hospitals., Results: A total of 1702 patients were included in the study. Abnormal results on compression ultrasonography at presentation or at 1 week were found in 400 and 12 patients, respectively, for a prevalence of deep vein thrombosis of 24%. None of the patients were lost to follow up. Venous thromboembolic complications during the week of serial testing occurred in a single patient and in eight patients during 6 months' follow up, resulting in a cumulative rate of venous thromboembolic complications of 0.7% (95% confidence interval 0.3% to 1.2%). The mean number of extra hospital visits and additional tests required per initially referred patient was 0.8., Conclusion: It is safe to withhold anticoagulant treatment from patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis who have a normal result on compression ultrasonography at the time of presentation and at 1 week.

Few natural history studies are available which describe long-term outcomes after venous thromboembolism. However, symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremities carries a high risk for recurrent venous thromboembolism that persists for many years. This risk is higher among patients with permanent risk factors including inherited abnormalities of hemostasis than among patients who have suffered trauma or who are postoperative. The development of recurrent ipsilateral DVT carries a high risk for severe post-thrombotic syndrome, an otherwise rare problem in patients with a first episode of DVT adequately treated with anticoagulant drugs and wearing vascular compression stockings. Long-term survival following DVT is generally good in the absence of malignancy. Carefully designed randomized trials are needed to determine whether chronic anticoagulation can reduce further the risks of recurrent DVT and symptoms of post-thrombotic syndrome.

Objectives: We recently demonstrated the utility of a clinical model combined with ultrasonography to assist the diagnostic approach in patients with suspected deep-vein thrombosis (DVT). In this study we also sought to demonstrate that the model is useful with impedance plethysmography, a less accurate and less utilized diagnostic test. The original clinical model is slightly cumbersome to use; thus at the completion of the study we attempted to develop a simpler scoring system with a goal of maintaining accuracy., Design: An open, nonrandomized, multicentre trial., Setting: Three centres, two in Canada, and one in Italy., Subjects: Ambulatory patients with suspected deep-vein thrombosis., Interventions: All patients were assessed clinically to determine the probability for deep-vein thrombosis prior to performing impedance plethysmography and venography. We compared the accuracy of impedance plethysmography between the three pretest probability categories of high, moderate and low. All of the above were performed and interpreted by independent observers. When the study was completed, we revised the clinical model by first performing a simple regression analysis then a multiple logistic regression analysis; a scoring system was devised using the latter., Results: Impedance plethysmography is significantly more sensitive and less specific for all DVT in patients with high pretest probability for deep-vein thrombosis (P = 0.001). The post- test probability (positive predictive value) for deep-vein thrombosis with an abnormal impedance plethysmography result was significantly different (P = 0.0001) between the three pretest probability categories. Multiple regression analysis has provided a new model with only nine variables and a simple scoring system. The retrospective application of the revised clinical model, which is simpler to use, suggests it will provide similar results as the original clinical model when combined with impedance plethysmography. The combination of impedance plethysmography and the clinical model suggests patients are likely to have false positive results if they have a low or moderate pretest probability for deep-vein thrombosis and false negative results if the pretest probability is high. The combination of a low pretest probability and a normal impedance plethysmography result may exclude the need for serial testing, and represented more than 50% of our patient population., Conclusions: The use of the clinical model in conjunction with impedance plethysmography would decrease the number of false positive and negative diagnoses and could markedly decrease the need for serial impedance plethysmography. Combining the clinical model with impedance plethysmography could overcome the fact that impedance plethysmography is clearly less accurate than venous ultrasound imaging. The use of the revised clinical model may increase acceptability and utility, but prospective testing is required before widespread use.