13 results on '"MCKAY, R. R."'
Search Results
2. Imaging, procedural and clinical variables associated with tumor yield on bone biopsy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
- Author
-
McKay, R R, Zukotynski, K A, Werner, L, Voznesensky, O, Wu, J S, Smith, S E, Jiang, Z, Melnick, K, Yuan, X, Kantoff, P W, Montgomery, B, Balk, S P, and Taplin, M-E
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. A phase II trial of abiraterone acetate without glucocorticoids for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
- Author
-
McKay, R. R., Werner, L., Jacobus, S., Jones, A., Mostaghel, E. A., Marck, B. T., Choudhury, A., Pomerantz, M., Sweeney, C., Slovin, S. F., Morris, M. J., Kantoff, P. W., and Taplin, M-E.
- Subjects
Male ,Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant ,Abiraterone Acetate ,Humans ,Antineoplastic Agents ,Middle Aged ,Prognosis ,Glucocorticoids ,Article ,Aged ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
Abiraterone acetate suppresses adrenal androgens and glucocorticoids through the inhibition of CYP17; however, given the risk of mineralocorticoid excess, it is administered with glucocorticoids. Herein, the authors performed a phase 2, single-arm study that was designed to assess the safety of abiraterone acetate without steroids in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.Eligible patients had castration-resistant prostate cancer with controlled blood pressure and normal potassium. Patients initially received abiraterone acetate at a dose of 1000 mg daily alone. Those with persistent or severe mineralocorticoid toxicity received treatment with prednisone initiated at a dose of 5 mg twice daily. Therapy was continued until radiographic progression, toxicity, or withdrawal. The primary objective of the current study was to determine the percentage of men requiring prednisone to manage mineralocorticoid toxicity. Toxicity was graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0.A total of 58 patients received at least 1 dose of abiraterone acetate; the majority had metastases (53 patients; 91.4%). Sixteen patients (27.6%) received prior chemotherapy, 6 patients (10.3%) received prior enzalutamide, and 4 patients (7%) received prior ketoconazole. Grade 3 to 4 adverse events of interest included hypertension (9 patients; 15.5%) and hypokalemia (4 patients; 7%). There was no grade ≥3 edema. Seven patients (12%) initiated prednisone therapy for mineralocorticoid toxicity, 3 patients for hypertension (5%), and 4 patients for hypokalemia (7%). Two patients initiated prednisone therapy for fatigue (3%). Forty patients (68%) experienced a decline in prostate-specific antigen of ≥50% with the use of abiraterone acetate alone. Patients with lower baseline levels of androstenedione (P = .04), androsterone (P = .01), dehydroepiandrosterone (P = .03), and 17-hydroxyprogesterone (P = .03) were found to be more likely to develop mineralocorticoid toxicity.Treatment with abiraterone acetate without steroids is feasible, although clinically significant adverse events can occur in a minority of patients. The use of abiraterone acetate without prednisone should be balanced with the potential for toxicity and requires close monitoring.
- Published
- 2018
4. Cloning and expression of the human transient receptor potential 4 (TRP4) gene: localization and functional expression of human TRP4 and TRP3
- Author
-
McKay, R R, Szymeczek-Seay, C L, Lievremont, J P, Bird, G S, Zitt, C, Jüngling, E, Lückhoff, A, and Putney, J W
- Subjects
DNA, Complementary ,Patch-Clamp Techniques ,Base Sequence ,Chromosomes, Human, Pair 13 ,Protein Conformation ,Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction ,Molecular Sequence Data ,Chromosome Mapping ,CHO Cells ,Cell Line ,Cricetinae ,Animals ,Humans ,Amino Acid Sequence ,Calcium Channels ,Cloning, Molecular ,Research Article ,DNA Primers ,TRPC Cation Channels - Abstract
Mammalian homologues of the Drosophila transient receptor potential (TRP) protein have been proposed to function as ion channels, and in some cases as store-operated or capacitative calcium entry channels. However, for each of the mammalian TRP proteins, different laboratories have reported distinct modes of cellular regulation. In the present study we describe the cloning and functional expression of the human form of TRP4 (hTRP4), and compare its activity with another well studied protein, hTRP3. When hTRP4 was transiently expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293 cells, basal bivalent cation permeability (barium) was increased. Whole-cell patch-clamp studies of hTRP4 expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells revealed a constitutively active non-selective cation current which probably underlies the increased bivalent cation entry. Barium entry into hTRP4-transfected HEK-293 cells was not further increased by phospholipase C (PLC)-linked receptor activation, by intracellular calcium store depletion with thapsigargin, or by a synthetic diacylglycerol, 1-oleoyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycerol (OAG). In contrast, transient expression of hTRP3 resulted in a bivalent cation influx that was markedly increased by PLC-linked receptor activation and by OAG, but not by thapsigargin. Despite the apparent differences in regulation of these two putative channel proteins, green fluorescent protein fusions of both molecules localized similarly to the plasma-membrane, notably in discrete punctate regions suggestive of specialized signalling complexes. Our findings indicate that while both hTRP4 and hTRP3 can apparently function as cation channels, their putative roles as components of capacitative calcium entry channels are not readily demonstrable by examining their behaviour when exogenously expressed in cells.
- Published
- 2000
5. Multiple subtypes of phospholipase C are encoded by the norpA gene of Drosophila melanogaster.
- Author
-
Kim, S, McKay, R R, Miller, K, and Shortridge, R D
- Abstract
The norpA gene of Drosophila melanogaster encodes a phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C that is essential for phototransduction. Besides being found abundantly in retina, norpA gene products are expressed in a variety of tissues that do not contain phototransduction machinery, implying that norpA is involved in signaling pathways in addition to phototransduction. We have identified a second subtype of norpA protein that is generated by alternative splicing of norpA RNA. The alternative splicing occurs at a single exon that is excluded from mature norpA transcripts when a substitute exon of equal size is retained. The net difference between the two subtypes of norpA protein is 14 amino acid substitutions occurring between amino acid positions 130 and 155 of the enzyme. Results from Northern analyses suggest that norpA subtype I transcripts are most abundantly expressed in adult retina, while subtype II transcripts are most abundant in adult body. Moreover, norpA subtype I RNA can be detected by the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in extracts of adult head tissue but not adult body nor at earlier stages of Drosophila development. Conversely, norpA subtype II RNA can be detected by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction throughout development as well as in heads and bodies of adults. Furthermore, norpA subtype I RNA is easily detected in retina using tissue in situ hybridization analysis, while subtype II RNA is not detectable in retina but is found in brain. Since only norpA subtype I RNA is found in retina, we conclude that subtype I protein is utilized in phototransduction. Since norpA subtype II RNA is not found in retina but is expressed in a variety of tissues not known to contain phototransduction machinery, subtype II protein is likely to be utilized in signaling pathways other than phototransduction. The amino acid differences between the two subtypes of norpA protein may reflect the need for each subtype to interact with signaling components of different signal-generating pathways.
- Published
- 1995
6. Phospholipase C rescues visual defect in norpA mutant of Drosophila melanogaster.
- Author
-
McKay, R R, Chen, D M, Miller, K, Kim, S, Stark, W S, and Shortridge, R D
- Abstract
Mutations in the norpA gene of Drosophila melanogaster severely affect the light-evoked photoreceptor potential with strong mutations rendering the fly blind. The norpA gene has been proposed to encode phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PLC), which enzymes play a pivotal role in one of the largest classes of signaling pathways known. A chimeric norpA minigene was constructed by placing the norpA cDNA behind an R1-6 photoreceptor cell-specific rhodopsin promoter. This minigene was transferred into norpAP24 mutant by P-element-mediated germline transformation to determine whether it could rescue the phototransduction defect concomitant with restoring PLC activity. Western blots of head homogenates stained with norpA antiserum show that norpA protein is restored in heads of transformed mutants. Moreover, transformants exhibit a large amount of measurable PLC activity in heads, whereas heads of norpAP24 mutant exhibit very little to none. Immunohistochemical staining of tissue sections using norpA antiserum confirm that expression of norpA protein in transformants localizes in the retina, more specifically in rhabdomeres of R1-6 photoreceptor cells, but not R7 or R8 photoreceptor cells. Furthermore, electrophysiological analyses reveal that transformants exhibit a restoration of light-evoked photoreceptor responses in R1-6 photoreceptor cells, but not in R7 or R8 photoreceptor cells. This is the strongest evidence thus far supporting the hypothesis that the norpA gene encodes phospholipase C that is utilized in phototransduction.
- Published
- 1995
7. Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors and drug-drug interactions in prostate cancer.
- Author
-
Bolek H, Yazgan SC, Yekedüz E, Kaymakcalan MD, McKay RR, Gillessen S, and Ürün Y
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Receptors, Androgen metabolism, Phenylthiohydantoin pharmacology, Phenylthiohydantoin therapeutic use, Abiraterone Acetate pharmacology, Abiraterone Acetate therapeutic use, Signal Transduction drug effects, Benzamides pharmacology, Benzamides therapeutic use, Nitriles pharmacology, Nitriles therapeutic use, Thiohydantoins pharmacology, Thiohydantoins therapeutic use, Androstenes, Drug Interactions, Prostatic Neoplasms drug therapy, Androgen Receptor Antagonists pharmacology, Androgen Receptor Antagonists therapeutic use
- Abstract
Prostate cancer represents a major global health challenge, necessitating efficacious therapeutic strategies. Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) have become central to prostate cancer treatment, demonstrating significant effectiveness in both metastatic and non-metastatic contexts. Abiraterone acetate, by inhibiting androgen synthesis, deprives cancer cells androgens necessary for growth, while second-generation androgen receptor (AR) antagonists disrupt AR signaling by blocking AR binding, thereby impeding tumor progression. Given the predominance of prostate cancer in the elderly, who often present with multiple comorbidities requiring complex pharmacological regimens, the potential for drug-drug interactions with ARPIs is a critical concern. These interactions, particularly through pathways like CYP2D6 inhibition by abiraterone and CYP3A4 induction by enzalutamide and apalutamide, necessitate a thorough understanding to optimize therapeutic outcomes and minimize adverse effects. This review aims to delineate the efficacy of ARPIs in prostate cancer management and elucidate their interaction with common medications, highlighting the importance of vigilant drug management to optimize patient care., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Prognostic significance of absolute lymphocyte count in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving first-line combination immunotherapies: results from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium.
- Author
-
Takemura K, Yuasa T, Lemelin A, Ferrier E, Wells JC, Saad E, Saliby RM, Basappa NS, Wood LA, Jude E, Pal SK, Donskov F, Beuselinck B, Szabados B, Powles T, McKay RR, Gebrael G, Agarwal N, Choueiri TK, and Heng DYC
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Lymphocyte Count, Aged, Lymphopenia, Retrospective Studies, Databases, Factual, Adult, Carcinoma, Renal Cell therapy, Carcinoma, Renal Cell mortality, Carcinoma, Renal Cell immunology, Carcinoma, Renal Cell pathology, Kidney Neoplasms pathology, Kidney Neoplasms immunology, Kidney Neoplasms therapy, Kidney Neoplasms drug therapy, Kidney Neoplasms mortality, Immunotherapy methods
- Abstract
Background: Lymphocytes are closely linked to mechanisms of action of immuno-oncology (IO) agents. We aimed to assess the prognostic significance of absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)., Patients and Methods: Using the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC), patients receiving first-line IO-based combination therapy were analysed. Baseline patient characteristics, objective response rates (ORRs), time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS) were compared., Results: Of 966 patients included, 195 (20%) had lymphopenia at baseline, and they had a lower ORR (37% versus 45%; P < 0.001), shorter TTNT (10.1 months versus 24.3 months; P < 0.001), and shorter OS (30.4 months versus 48.2 months; P < 0.001). Among 125 patients with lymphopenia at baseline, 52 (42%) experienced ALC recovery at 3 months, and they had longer OS (not reached versus 30.4 months; P = 0.012). On multivariable analysis for OS, lymphopenia was an independent adverse prognostic factor (hazard ratio 1.68; P < 0.001). Incorporation of lymphopenia into the IMDC criteria improved OS prediction accuracy (C-index from 0.688 to 0.707)., Conclusions: Lymphopenia was observed in one-fifth of treatment-naive patients with mRCC and may serve as an indicator of unfavourable oncologic outcomes in the contemporary IO era., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Fragmentomic analysis of circulating tumor DNA-targeted cancer panels.
- Author
-
Helzer KT, Sharifi MN, Sperger JM, Shi Y, Annala M, Bootsma ML, Reese SR, Taylor A, Kaufmann KR, Krause HK, Schehr JL, Sethakorn N, Kosoff D, Kyriakopoulos C, Burkard ME, Rydzewski NR, Yu M, Harari PM, Bassetti M, Blitzer G, Floberg J, Sjöström M, Quigley DA, Dehm SM, Armstrong AJ, Beltran H, McKay RR, Feng FY, O'Regan R, Wisinski KB, Emamekhoo H, Wyatt AW, Lang JM, and Zhao SG
- Subjects
- Male, Humans, Mutation, Gene Expression Profiling, Biomarkers, Tumor genetics, Circulating Tumor DNA genetics, Prostatic Neoplasms genetics, Cell-Free Nucleic Acids genetics
- Abstract
Background: The isolation of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from the bloodstream can be used to detect and analyze somatic alterations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and multiple cfDNA-targeted sequencing panels are now commercially available for Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved biomarker indications to guide treatment. More recently, cfDNA fragmentation patterns have emerged as a tool to infer epigenomic and transcriptomic information. However, most of these analyses used whole-genome sequencing, which is insufficient to identify FDA-approved biomarker indications in a cost-effective manner., Patients and Methods: We used machine learning models of fragmentation patterns at the first coding exon in standard targeted cancer gene cfDNA sequencing panels to distinguish between cancer and non-cancer patients, as well as the specific tumor type and subtype. We assessed this approach in two independent cohorts: a published cohort from GRAIL (breast, lung, and prostate cancers, non-cancer, n = 198) and an institutional cohort from the University of Wisconsin (UW; breast, lung, prostate, bladder cancers, n = 320). Each cohort was split 70%/30% into training and validation sets., Results: In the UW cohort, training cross-validated accuracy was 82.1%, and accuracy in the independent validation cohort was 86.6% despite a median ctDNA fraction of only 0.06. In the GRAIL cohort, to assess how this approach performs in very low ctDNA fractions, training and independent validation were split based on ctDNA fraction. Training cross-validated accuracy was 80.6%, and accuracy in the independent validation cohort was 76.3%. In the validation cohort where the ctDNA fractions were all <0.05 and as low as 0.0003, the cancer versus non-cancer area under the curve was 0.99., Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that sequencing from targeted cfDNA panels can be utilized to analyze fragmentation patterns to classify cancer types, dramatically expanding the potential capabilities of existing clinically used panels at minimal additional cost., Competing Interests: Disclosure KTH has a family member who is an employee of Epic Systems. MLB has a family member who is an employee of Luminex. SGZ reports unrelated patents licensed to Veracyte, and that a family member is an employee of Artera and holds stock in Exact Sciences. KTH, SGZ, and the University of Wisconsin have filed a provisional patent on the work herein. SMD reports consulting relationships with BMS, Oncternal therapeutics, Janssen R&D/J&J and a grant from Pfizer/Astellas/Medivation (the grant was submitted to Medivation, ultimately funded by Astellas and then moved to Pfizer). FYF reports personal fees from Janssen Oncology, Bayer, PFS Genomics, Myovant Sciences, Roivant Sciences, Astellas Pharma, Foundation Medicine, Varian, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Exact Sciences, BlueStar Genomics, Novartis, and Tempus; other support from Serimmune and Artera outside the submitted work. Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT, Coralville, IA) assisted in a pilot project to assess the performance characteristics of the UW panel before purchase, but played no role in this study. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Data Sharing Raw sequencing data from the GRAIL dataset are available at the European Genome Archive (Dataset ID EGAD00001005302). Our institutional protocol does not allow unrestricted public access to the raw sequencing data. Therefore, data sharing requests must be submitted to the University of Wisconsin-Madison for approval. For samples from the two clinical trials (NCT03090165, NCT03725761), these trials are still ongoing, and data sharing requests must be submitted to the trial organizers., (Published by Elsevier Ltd.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. COVID-19 vaccination and breakthrough infections in patients with cancer.
- Author
-
Schmidt AL, Labaki C, Hsu CY, Bakouny Z, Balanchivadze N, Berg SA, Blau S, Daher A, El Zarif T, Friese CR, Griffiths EA, Hawley JE, Hayes-Lattin B, Karivedu V, Latif T, Mavromatis BH, McKay RR, Nagaraj G, Nguyen RH, Panagiotou OA, Portuguese AJ, Puc M, Santos Dutra M, Schroeder BA, Thakkar A, Wulff-Burchfield EM, Mishra S, Farmakiotis D, Shyr Y, Warner JL, and Choueiri TK
- Subjects
- COVID-19 Vaccines, Humans, SARS-CoV-2, Vaccination, COVID-19, Neoplasms complications
- Abstract
Background: Vaccination is an important preventive health measure to protect against symptomatic and severe COVID-19. Impaired immunity secondary to an underlying malignancy or recent receipt of antineoplastic systemic therapies can result in less robust antibody titers following vaccination and possible risk of breakthrough infection. As clinical trials evaluating COVID-19 vaccines largely excluded patients with a history of cancer and those on active immunosuppression (including chemotherapy), limited evidence is available to inform the clinical efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination across the spectrum of patients with cancer., Patients and Methods: We describe the clinical features of patients with cancer who developed symptomatic COVID-19 following vaccination and compare weighted outcomes with those of contemporary unvaccinated patients, after adjustment for confounders, using data from the multi-institutional COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19)., Results: Patients with cancer who develop COVID-19 following vaccination have substantial comorbidities and can present with severe and even lethal infection. Patients harboring hematologic malignancies are over-represented among vaccinated patients with cancer who develop symptomatic COVID-19., Conclusions: Vaccination against COVID-19 remains an essential strategy in protecting vulnerable populations, including patients with cancer. Patients with cancer who develop breakthrough infection despite full vaccination, however, remain at risk of severe outcomes. A multilayered public health mitigation approach that includes vaccination of close contacts, boosters, social distancing, and mask-wearing should be continued for the foreseeable future., Competing Interests: Disclosure ALS reports non-financial support from Astellas, non-financial support from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. CL reports research support from Genentech/imCORE, outside the submitted work. ZB reports non-financial support from Bristol Myers Squibb, grants from Genentech/imCORE, personal fees from UpToDate, outside the submitted work. CYH reports personal fees from NashBio, outside the submitted work. SAB reports personal fees from Exelixis, personal fees from Seattle Genetics, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, outside the submitted work. CRF reports research grants from the Merck Foundation and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)/Pfizer, outside the submitted work. EAG reports personal fees and other from Alexion Pharmaceuticals, personal fees and non-financial support from Novartis Pharmaceuticals, personal fees, non-financial support and other from Astex/Otsuka Pharmaceuticals, other from Apellis Pharmaceuticals, personal fees, non-financial support, and other from Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, grants and personal fees from AbbVie/Genentech, other from Celldex Therapeutics, personal fees from Boston Biomedical, outside the submitted work. JEH reports research funding paid to her institution from Dendreon Pharmaceuticals LLC, research funding paid to her institution from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from Genzyme, personal fees from Seagen, outside the submitted work. RRM reports grants and personal fees from Bayer, grants from Pfizer, grants from Tempus, personal fees from AVEO, personal fees from Caris, personal fees from Bristol Myers Squib, personal fees from Exelixis, personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from Tempus, personal fees from Dendreon, personal fees from Vividion, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Calithera, personal fees from Merck, outside the submitted work. OAP reports personal fees from International Consulting Associates, Inc., outside the submitted work. EMW-B reports personal fees from Astellas, personal fees from AVEO Oncology, personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, other from Exelixis, grants from Pfizer Global Medical Grants, other from Nektar, other from Immunomedics, outside the submitted work. SM reports personal fees from National Geographic, outside the submitted work. DF reports a grant from Merck to study COVID-19 in immunocompromised patients, outside of the submitted work. YS reports personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from Eisai, personal fees from AstraZeneca, outside of the submitted work. JLW reports personal fees from Westat, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Melax Tech, personal fees from Flatiron Health, other from HemOnc.org LLC (ownership), outside the submitted work. TKC reports institutional and personal, paid and unpaid support for research, advisory boards, consultancy, and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Aravive, Aveo, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, EMD Serono, Exelixis, GlaxoSmithKline, IQVIA, Ipsen, Kanaph, Lilly, Merck, Nikang, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi/Aventis, Takeda, Tempest, UpToDate, CME events (Peerview, OncLive and others), outside the submitted work. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Association of clinical factors and recent anticancer therapy with COVID-19 severity among patients with cancer: a report from the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium.
- Author
-
Grivas P, Khaki AR, Wise-Draper TM, French B, Hennessy C, Hsu CY, Shyr Y, Li X, Choueiri TK, Painter CA, Peters S, Rini BI, Thompson MA, Mishra S, Rivera DR, Acoba JD, Abidi MZ, Bakouny Z, Bashir B, Bekaii-Saab T, Berg S, Bernicker EH, Bilen MA, Bindal P, Bishnoi R, Bouganim N, Bowles DW, Cabal A, Caimi PF, Chism DD, Crowell J, Curran C, Desai A, Dixon B, Doroshow DB, Durbin EB, Elkrief A, Farmakiotis D, Fazio A, Fecher LA, Flora DB, Friese CR, Fu J, Gadgeel SM, Galsky MD, Gill DM, Glover MJ, Goyal S, Grover P, Gulati S, Gupta S, Halabi S, Halfdanarson TR, Halmos B, Hausrath DJ, Hawley JE, Hsu E, Huynh-Le M, Hwang C, Jani C, Jayaraj A, Johnson DB, Kasi A, Khan H, Koshkin VS, Kuderer NM, Kwon DH, Lammers PE, Li A, Loaiza-Bonilla A, Low CA, Lustberg MB, Lyman GH, McKay RR, McNair C, Menon H, Mesa RA, Mico V, Mundt D, Nagaraj G, Nakasone ES, Nakayama J, Nizam A, Nock NL, Park C, Patel JM, Patel KG, Peddi P, Pennell NA, Piper-Vallillo AJ, Puc M, Ravindranathan D, Reeves ME, Reuben DY, Rosenstein L, Rosovsky RP, Rubinstein SM, Salazar M, Schmidt AL, Schwartz GK, Shah MR, Shah SA, Shah C, Shaya JA, Singh SRK, Smits M, Stockerl-Goldstein KE, Stover DG, Streckfuss M, Subbiah S, Tachiki L, Tadesse E, Thakkar A, Tucker MD, Verma AK, Vinh DC, Weiss M, Wu JT, Wulff-Burchfield E, Xie Z, Yu PP, Zhang T, Zhou AY, Zhu H, Zubiri L, Shah DP, Warner JL, and Lopes G
- Subjects
- Aged, COVID-19 Testing, Female, Humans, Male, Pandemics, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, Neoplasms drug therapy, Neoplasms epidemiology
- Abstract
Background: Patients with cancer may be at high risk of adverse outcomes from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. We analyzed a cohort of patients with cancer and coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) to identify prognostic clinical factors, including laboratory measurements and anticancer therapies., Patients and Methods: Patients with active or historical cancer and a laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis recorded between 17 March and 18 November 2020 were included. The primary outcome was COVID-19 severity measured on an ordinal scale (uncomplicated, hospitalized, admitted to intensive care unit, mechanically ventilated, died within 30 days). Multivariable regression models included demographics, cancer status, anticancer therapy and timing, COVID-19-directed therapies, and laboratory measurements (among hospitalized patients)., Results: A total of 4966 patients were included (median age 66 years, 51% female, 50% non-Hispanic white); 2872 (58%) were hospitalized and 695 (14%) died; 61% had cancer that was present, diagnosed, or treated within the year prior to COVID-19 diagnosis. Older age, male sex, obesity, cardiovascular and pulmonary comorbidities, renal disease, diabetes mellitus, non-Hispanic black race, Hispanic ethnicity, worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, recent cytotoxic chemotherapy, and hematologic malignancy were associated with higher COVID-19 severity. Among hospitalized patients, low or high absolute lymphocyte count; high absolute neutrophil count; low platelet count; abnormal creatinine; troponin; lactate dehydrogenase; and C-reactive protein were associated with higher COVID-19 severity. Patients diagnosed early in the COVID-19 pandemic (January-April 2020) had worse outcomes than those diagnosed later. Specific anticancer therapies (e.g. R-CHOP, platinum combined with etoposide, and DNA methyltransferase inhibitors) were associated with high 30-day all-cause mortality., Conclusions: Clinical factors (e.g. older age, hematological malignancy, recent chemotherapy) and laboratory measurements were associated with poor outcomes among patients with cancer and COVID-19. Although further studies are needed, caution may be required in utilizing particular anticancer therapies., Clinical Trial Identifier: NCT04354701., Competing Interests: Disclosure JDA reports research funding to the institution from Tesaro, outside the submitted work. ZB reports nonfinancial support from Bristol Myers Squibb and grants from Genentech/imCORE, outside the submitted work. BB reports research funding to the institution from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bicycle Therapeutics, Syros Pharmaceuticals, and Ikena Oncology, all outside the submitted work. TB-S reports research funding to the institution from Agios, Arys, Boston Biomedical, Bayer, Amgen, Merck, Celgene, Lilly, Ipsen, Clovis, Seattle Genetics, Array Biopharma, Genentech, Novartis, Mirati, Merus, AbGenomics, Incyte, Pfizer, BMS; consulting (to institution) for Ipsen, Array Biopharma, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Bayer, Genentech, Incyte, and Merck; consulting (to self) for AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Eisai, Daiichi Sankyo, Natera, Treos Bio, Celularity, Exact Science, Sobi, BeiGene, Xilis, Astra Zeneca, and Foundation Medicine; serving on Independent Data Monitoring Committee/Data and Safety Monitoring Board (to self) for AstraZeneca, Exelixis, Lilly, PanCAN, and 1Globe; positions on Scientific Advisory Board for Imugene, Immuneering, and Sun Biopharma; and inventions/patents (WO/2018/183488 and WO/2019/055687), all outside the submitted work. SB reports being on advisory boards for Bristol Meyers Squibb and Seattle Genetics. MAB reports personal fees from Exelixis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer, Eisai, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Genomic Health, Nektar, and Sanofi; grants from Xencor, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech/Roche, Seattle Genetics, Incyte, Nektar, AstraZeneca, Tricon Pharmaceuticals, Peloton Therapeutics, and Pfizer, outside the submitted work. NB reports honoraria from Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Lilly, outside the submitted work. DWB reports research funding to the institution from Exelixis, Ayala, Merck, and Elevar, all outside the submitted work. DDC declares consulting or advisory role with Exelixis, outside the submitted work. TKC reports institutional and personal research support from Alexion, Analysis Group, AstraZeneca, Aveo, Bayer, Bristol Myers-Squibb/ER Squibb and sons LLC, Calithera, Cerulean, Corvus, Eisai, Exelixis, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Foundation Medicine Inc., Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Ipsen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Peloton, Pfizer, Prometheus Labs, Roche, Roche Products Limited, Sanofi/Aventis, Takeda, Tracon; consulting/honoraria or advisory role with Alexion, Analysis Group, AstraZeneca, Aveo, Bayer, Bristol Myers-Squibb/ER Squibb and sons LLC, Cerulean, Corvus, Eisai, EMD Serono, Exelixis, Foundation Medicine Inc., Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Heron Therapeutics, Infinity Pharma, Ipsen, Jansen Oncology, IQVIA, Lilly, Merck, NCCN, Novartis, Peloton, Pfizer, Pionyr, Prometheus Labs, Roche, Sanofi/Aventis, Surface Oncology, Tempest, Up-to-Date; CME-related events (e.g. OncLive, PVI, MJH Life Sciences); stock ownership in Pionyr, Tempest; patents filed, royalties, or other intellectual properties related to biomarkers of immune checkpoint blockers; fees for travel, accommodations, expenses, medical writing in relation to consulting, advisory roles, or honoraria; and no speaker's bureau; also supported in part by the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Kidney SPORE and Program, the Kohlberg Chair at Harvard Medical School and the Trust Family, Michael Brigham, and Loker Pinard Funds for Kidney Cancer Research at DFCI. DBD reports consulting for Ipsen, Boehringer Ingelheim; ASCO Young Investigator Award from Conquer Cancer Foundation, outside the submitted work. AE reports grant support from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. DF reports research funding to the institution from Viracor-Eurofins and Astellas, all outside the submitted work. LAF reports clinical trial funding to the institution from BMS, EMD Serono, Pfizer, Merck KGaA, Array, Kartos, Merck, and Incyte, ECOG-ACRIN study funding from Array; and personal fees from Elsevier and Via Oncology, outside the submitted work. DBF reports honoraria from Castle Biosciences. SMG reports Honoraria from AstraZeneca, Merck, Genentech/Roche; consulting or advisory role with Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, Xcovery, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novocure, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Blueprint Medicines, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Janssen Oncology; research funding (to self) from Merck, AstraZeneca; research funding (to institution) from Genentech/Roche, Merck, Blueprint Medicines, ARIAD/Takeda, Astellas Pharma, Lycera, Daiichi Sankyo, IMAB, Nektar, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Amgen; travel, accommodations, expenses from Genentech/Roche, Merck; and other relationship from AstraZeneca, all outside the submitted work. MDG reports personal fees from Genentech, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, Merck, Bristol Myers Squib, Dragonfly, Dracen, Seattle Genetics, and Astellas, outside the submitted work. PG reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clovis Oncology, Dyania Health, Driver, EMD Serono, Exelixis, Foundation Medicine, Genentech/Roche, Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Heron Therapeutics, Immunomedics, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Merck, Mirati Therapeutics, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, QED Therapeutics; research funding to institution from Merck, Mirati Therapeutics, Pfizer, Clovis Oncology, Bavarian Nordic, Immunomedics, Debiopharm, Bristol-Myers Squibb, QED Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline, and Kure It Cancer Research, all outside the submitted work. SG reports research funding to the institution from AstraZeneca and consulting/advisory role with Puma Biotechnology. SG reports consultancy fees from BMS, Merck, AstraZeneca, Seattle Genetics, Pfizer; and speaker fees from Seattle Genetics and Janssen, all outside the submitted work. TRH reports consulting or advisory role with Curium, ScioScientific, TERUMO, Lexicon, Ipsen, Advanced Accelerator; research funding from Ipsen, ArQule, Agios, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Basilea. BH reports research funding to the institution from Amgen, AbbVie, BI, Mirati, Merck, Eli-Lilly, AstraZeneca, BMS, Novartis, GSK, Pfizer, Advaxis, and Guardant Health; consulting/advisory role with Merck, BMS, Genentech, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Novartis, TPT, VI, Guardant Health; and honoraria from PER and OncLive, all outside the submitted work. JEH reports research funding from Regeneron and Dendreon; and travel, accommodations, and expenses from Genzyme. CH reports funding from the Henry Ford Cancer Institute supporting the current work; research funding to institution from Merck, Exelixis, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Dendreon and Bausch; personal fees from Sanofi/Genzyme, Dendreon, Exelixis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Astellas, Medivation, Bayer, and Janssen Scientific, all outside the submitted work; and stock ownership by an immediate family member in Johnson and Johnson. DBJ reports advisory board participation for Array Biopharma, BMS, Catalyst Biopharma, Iovance, Jansen, Merck, Novartis, and OncoSec, and receives research funding from BMS and Incyte, all outside the submitted work. AK reports support to his institution from TESARO, Halozyme, Geistlich Pharma, Astellas Pharma, and Rafael Pharmaceuticals; and honoraria from OncLive, outside the submitted work. ARK (or an immediate family member) has currently or during the past 2 years owned stock or held an ownership interest in Merck, Sanofi, and BMS. VSK reports personal fees from Pfizer, Janssen, Dendreon, AstraZeneca, Seattle Genetics, and Clovis; grants (for institution) from Nektar, Novartis/Endocyte, Janssen, Clovis, and Prostate Cancer Foundation, all outside the submitted work. NMK reports personal fees from G1 Therapeutics, Invitae, Beyond Spring, Spectrum, BMS, Janssen, and Total Health, all outside the submitted work. PEL reports consulting/advisory role with Pfizer, Merck, Teva, BI, and Astra Zeneca, all outside the submitted work. AL-B reports personal fees from PSI CRO, Bayer, Blueprint, Astra-Zeneca, Medidata, Taiho, QED, Cardinal Health, BrightInsight, The Lynx Group, Boston Biomedical, Amgen, Bayer, Guardant, Natera, Eisai, Ipsen, and Merck; and stock options from Massive Bio, outside the submitted work. GdLL reports honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim; consulting or advisory role for Pfizer and AstraZeneca; research funding from AstraZeneca; funding to his institution from Merck Sharp & Dohme, EMD Serono, AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines, Tesaro, Bavarian Nordic, NOVARTIS, G1 Therapeutics, Adaptimmune, BMS, GSK, AbbVie, Rgenix, Pfizer, Roche, Genentech, Lilly, and Janssen; travel, accommodations, and expenses from Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, E.R. Squibb Sons, LLC, Janssen. GHL reports grants from AMGEN (institution); personal fees from G1 Therapeutics, TEVA, Samsung Bioepis, Beyond Spring, and Merck, outside the submitted work. RRM reports research funding from Bayer, Pfizer, Tempus; serves on Advisory Board for AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calithera, Exelixis, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Tempus; is a consultant for Dendreon, Vividion; and serves on the molecular tumor board at Caris. RAM grants from Incyte, CTI, AbbVie, and Celgene; personal fees from Novartis, Genentech, Sierra Oncology, La Jolla, and Samus, outside the submitted work. VM has currently or during the past 2 years employment and stock or other ownership interest with Johnson & Johnson, all outside the submitted work. GN reports research funding to the institution from Novartis, all outside the submitted work. JN reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology; all outside the submitted work. CAP (or an immediate family member) has currently or during the past 2 years owned stock or held an ownership interest in Pfizer, Epizyme, Inovio, OPKO Health Inc, Roche. JMP reports grant from Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Breast SPORE Program, outside the submitted work. PP reports receiving payment for speakers' bureau from Novartis, Daichi Sankyo, Genentech, Seattle Genetics, and Pfizer, all outside the submitted work. NAP reports personal fees from Eli Lilly, Merck, BMS, Genentech, AstraZeneca, Inivata, and Regeneron, outside the submitted work. SP reports personal fees from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biocartis, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, Eli Lilly, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Foundation Medicine, Illumina, Janssen, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Merck Serono, Merrimack, Novartis, Pharma Mar, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics and Takeda, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, and Takeda; nonfinancial support from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Clovis, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Illumina, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi; and personal fees from BioInvent (all fees to institution), outside the submitted work. DYR reports consulting/advisory role with and coverage of travel/accommodation expenses by Castle Biosciences, all outside the submitted work. BIR reports grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from Merck; grants and personal fees from BMS, Pfizer, Aveo, and Genentech; grants from Astra Zeneca; personal fees from Synthorx, 3D Medicines, Aravive, Surface Oncology, and Arrowhead Therapeutics; and other from PTC Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. RPR reports research grants to her institution from BMS and Janssen and has worked as a consultant/advisor and received honoraria from BMS and Janssen, all of which are outside the scope of submitted work. ALS reports travel support provided by Pfizer and Astellas. GKS reports personal fees from Apexigen, Array, Epizyme, GenCirq, Daiichi Sankyo, Fortress, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Oncology, Array Advisory Board, Oncogenuity, Puretech, PTC Therapeutics, Ellipses Pharma, Concarlo; advisory board for Bionaut; grants from Astex; stock ownership in Pfizer, all outside the submitted work. SS reports stock and other ownership interests in Grand Rounds, Janssen, and Natera. YS reports honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Eisai; consulting or advisory role with Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Roche, Genentech, and Janssen, all outside the submitted work. MAT reports travel support from Syapse, Royalties from UpToDate, Connect MDS/AML Registry in Celgene (now owned by BMS), Myeloma Registry in Takeda; stock ownership in Doximity; personal fees from VIA Oncology (now owned by Elsevier ClinicalPath), Adaptive Advisory Board, and GSK; he is the local PI for Clinical Trials in AbbVie, BMS, CRAB CTC, Denovo, Research Network, Eli Lilly, LynxBio, Strata Oncology, and TG Therapeutics, all outside the submitted work. AKV reports research funding to the institution from BMS, MedPacto, Prelude, iOnctura, and Janssen; honoraria from Acceleron and Novartis; consulting/advisory role with Stelexis and Janssen; stock or other ownership in Stelexis; and an immediate family member with employment/leadership with CereXis, all outside the submitted work. DCV reports honoraria and speakers' bureau fees from CSL Behring, Merck Canada, Novartis Canada, Takeda, and UCB Biosciences GmbH, and travel accommodations from CSL Behring, and Avir Pharma, all outside the submitted work. He is supported by the Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec (FRQS) Clinician-Scientist Junior 2 program. JLW reports grants from the National Cancer Institute during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Westat and IBM Watson Health; and other from HemOnc.org LLC, outside the submitted work. TMW-D reports stock and other ownership interests in High Enroll; honoraria from Physicians' Education Resource; consulting or advisory roles with Shattuck Labs, Rakuten Medical, Exicure; research funding from Merck, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Caris Life Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline; travel, accommodations, expenses from Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bexion, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Caris Life Sciences, Lilly, and Tesaro, all outside the submitted work. EW-B reports work in a consultant/advisor role for Astellas and BMS; funding support from Pfizer Global Medical Grants; other for Exelixis; and an immediate family member with stock ownership in Immunomedics and Nektar, all outside the submitted work. TZ reports research funding (to Duke) from Pfizer, Janssen, Acerta, AbbVie, Novartis, Merrimack, OmniSeq, PGDx, Merck, Mirati, Astellas, and Regeneron; consulting/speaking role with Genentech Roche, Exelixis, Genomic Health, and Sanofi Aventis; and serves on the consulting/advisory board for AstraZeneca, Bayer, Pfizer, Foundation Medicine, Janssen, Amgen, BMS, Calithera, Dendreon, and MJH Associates; stock ownership/employment (spouse) from Capio Biosciences, Archimmune Therapeutics, and Nanorobotics. AYZ has currently or during the past 2 years owned stock or held an ownership interest in Gilead Sciences. LZ reports personal fees from MERCK, outside the submitted work. All others have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Cloning and expression of the human transient receptor potential 4 (TRP4) gene: localization and functional expression of human TRP4 and TRP3.
- Author
-
McKay RR, Szymeczek-Seay CL, Lievremont JP, Bird GS, Zitt C, Jüngling E, Lückhoff A, and Putney JW Jr
- Subjects
- Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Base Sequence, CHO Cells, Calcium Channels chemistry, Calcium Channels metabolism, Calcium Channels physiology, Cell Line, Chromosome Mapping, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 13, Cloning, Molecular, Cricetinae, DNA Primers, DNA, Complementary, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Protein Conformation, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, TRPC Cation Channels, Calcium Channels genetics
- Abstract
Mammalian homologues of the Drosophila transient receptor potential (TRP) protein have been proposed to function as ion channels, and in some cases as store-operated or capacitative calcium entry channels. However, for each of the mammalian TRP proteins, different laboratories have reported distinct modes of cellular regulation. In the present study we describe the cloning and functional expression of the human form of TRP4 (hTRP4), and compare its activity with another well studied protein, hTRP3. When hTRP4 was transiently expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293 cells, basal bivalent cation permeability (barium) was increased. Whole-cell patch-clamp studies of hTRP4 expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells revealed a constitutively active non-selective cation current which probably underlies the increased bivalent cation entry. Barium entry into hTRP4-transfected HEK-293 cells was not further increased by phospholipase C (PLC)-linked receptor activation, by intracellular calcium store depletion with thapsigargin, or by a synthetic diacylglycerol, 1-oleoyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycerol (OAG). In contrast, transient expression of hTRP3 resulted in a bivalent cation influx that was markedly increased by PLC-linked receptor activation and by OAG, but not by thapsigargin. Despite the apparent differences in regulation of these two putative channel proteins, green fluorescent protein fusions of both molecules localized similarly to the plasma-membrane, notably in discrete punctate regions suggestive of specialized signalling complexes. Our findings indicate that while both hTRP4 and hTRP3 can apparently function as cation channels, their putative roles as components of capacitative calcium entry channels are not readily demonstrable by examining their behaviour when exogenously expressed in cells.
- Published
- 2000
13. Tissue-specific expression of phospholipase C encoded by the norpA gene of Drosophila melanogaster.
- Author
-
Zhu L, McKay RR, and Shortridge RD
- Subjects
- Animals, Blotting, Northern, Female, Immune Sera, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Mutation, Photoreceptor Cells enzymology, RNA, Messenger genetics, Signal Transduction, Type C Phospholipases biosynthesis, Type C Phospholipases immunology, Drosophila melanogaster enzymology, Type C Phospholipases genetics
- Abstract
Mutations in the norpA gene of Drosophila melanogaster severely affect the light-evoked photoreceptor potential with strong mutations rendering the fly blind. Molecular cloning of the norpA gene revealed that it encodes phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C, which enzymes play a pivotal role in one of the largest classes of signaling pathways known. We have used Northern analysis, Western blots, phospholipase C activity assays, and immunohistochemical staining of tissues to examine the tissue-specific expression of the norpA gene and found that it is expressed in a variety of tissues besides the eye. Hybridization of norpA cRNA probe to blots of poly(A+) RNA reveals that the gene encodes at least four transcripts: a 7.5-kilobase (kb) transcript that is expressed in eye and 6.5-, 5.5-, and 5.0-kb transcripts that are expressed in adult body or early stages of development. Antiserum generated against the major gene product of norpA recognizes a 130-kDa protein that is abundant in eyes but severely reduced or absent in norpA mutants, a result which is consistent with previous conclusions that the norpA gene encodes an essential component of the visual system. However, the norpA antiserum also recognizes a 130-kDa protein in adult legs, thorax, and male abdomen, but not female abdomen. These localizations are supported by results of phospholipase C activity assays which show that the norpA mutation reduces phospholipase C activity in each of the tissues in which norpA protein can be detected. Furthermore, immunohistochemical staining of tissue sections with the norpA antiserum demonstrates that the norpA protein is abundant in the retina and ocelli and is present to a lesser extent in the brain and thoracic nervous system. Since some of the above mentioned tissues that express norpA (such as thorax, legs, and abdomen) have no known photoreceptor tissue, we conclude that the norpA gene product is also likely to have a role in signaling pathways other than phototransduction.
- Published
- 1993
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.