Search

The feasibility of small animal imaging using a clinical positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scanner with [F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) was evaluated. As tumor-bearing small animal models, rabbits with VX-2 liver tumors, rats with mammary tumors on the back, and mice with LS174T human colon tumor xenografts were prepared. Two-dimensional PET, CT, and fused PET/CT images were obtained and reconstructed with a combined PET/CT system using a conventional protocol for humans and dedicated high-resolution mode protocols specialized for each species. Estimated radioactivity concentrations in tumors and normal organs determined noninvasively on FDG-PET/CT were compared with the actual tissue radioactivity levels determined from gamma-counting after vivisection in rats. In addition, recovery-corrected radioactivity concentrations were calculated and evaluated using the tumor/normal organ sizes measured on CT. Tumors in rabbits and rats were clearly visualized by FDG-PET/CT in the dedicated protocols, and images were considered suitable for research purposes. With the aid of thin-slice CT-mapping images, FDG uptake was correctly localized in the viable tumor regions. In mice, increased FDG uptake in tumors with varying activity levels was observed, but detailed anatomical information was not optimally provided from the images, even using specialized protocols. The estimated radioactivity concentrations of tumors and normal organs were close to the actual radioactivity concentrations obtained by gamma-counting (r = 0.97, P < 0.001, the estimated/actual slope: 1) when recovery correction was applied using the sample sizes measured on CT. FDG-PET/CT imaging with a modern clinical scanner was demonstrated to be feasible, of excellent quality, and quite quantitatively accurate for research in rabbits or rats with tumors of appropriate size (>2 cm without recovery correction and >1 cm with recovery correction). Evaluation of FDG uptake within a tumor was possible with the aid of CT images. Dedicated small animal PET/CT scanner would be better suited for evaluating tumor-bearing mice and likely could enhance imaging smaller tumors in rabbits or rats. Although it has limitations, small animal imaging with a clinical PET/CT scanner may be quite adequate for sequential noninvasive imaging in oncology research because the CT is of high resolution, allowing for localization of PET findings and for more precise noninvasive estimation of radioactivity concentration through partial volume corrections.

Unlabelled: The aims of the study were to evaluate the effects of oral contrast on apparent tracer activity measured with PET/CT when using CT attenuation correction and to report our initial experience in the use of oral contrast with PET/CT., Methods: Phantom studies with (18)F activity and saline bags or syringes filled with barium or gastrografin of varying densities were performed using a PET/CT scanner (CT attenuation correction). In the study, 91 clinical patients received dilute oral contrast and were evaluated by whole-body (18)F-FDG PET., Results: A phantom experiment with CT contrast (1.3% weight/volume [w/v] barium) showed a "cold" area in the cold stomach whereas a phantom with high-density barium (98% w/v) showed an artifactual focus of intense "activity" in the cold stomach. In clinical studies, stomach and right colon were opacified by CT contrast. Maximal measured contrast density was 239 Hounsfield units., Conclusion: High-density barium causes overestimation of tissue (18)F-FDG concentration. Low-density barium does not cause significant artifacts and appears suitable for clinical use.

Unlabelled: This study evaluated lesion mislocalization between PET and CT on PET/CT studies when CT instead of germanium is used for attenuation correction (AC)., Methods: PET/CT scans were obtained for 300 clinical patients. Both CT and germanium scans were used to correct PET emission data. Cases were noted of suspected inaccurate localization of lesions on any of the 5 sets of images (PET using germanium AC [GeAC] fused and not fused with CT, PET using CT AC fused and not fused with CT, and PET with no AC [NAC]). Independent CT or MRI was used to determine true lesion locations., Results: Six of 300 patients (2%) had lesion mislocalization when CT was used for AC or fusion. True liver dome lesions were mislocalized to the right lung base on PET/CT, likely because of a respiratory motion difference between PET and CT. No mislocalization was present on NAC PET or non-CT-fused GeAC PET images., Conclusion: Serious lesion mislocalization on PET/CT studies may occur, albeit very infrequently, when CT is used for either AC or fusion.

Unlabelled: In PET, transmission scanning for attenuation correction has most commonly been performed with an external positron-emitting radionuclide source, such as (68)Ge. More recently, combined PET/CT scanners have been developed in which the CT data can be used for both anatometabolic image formation and attenuation correction of the PET data. The purpose of this study was to assess the quantitative differences between CT-based and germanium-based attenuation-corrected PET images., Methods: Twenty-eight patients with known or suspected cancer underwent whole-body (18)F-FDG PET/CT scanning for clinical diagnostic purposes. For each patient, attenuation maps were obtained from both the CT scan and the (68)Ge transmission data, and 2 different attenuation-corrected emission datasets were produced. Measured activity concentrations (both mean and maximum) from identical regions of interest in representative normal organs and in 36 pathologic foci of uptake were compared., Results: CT-corrected emission images generally showed slightly higher radioactive concentration values than did germanium-corrected images (P < 0.01) for all lesions and all normal organs except the lung. Mean and maximum radioactivity concentrations were 4.3%-15.2% higher for CT-corrected images than for germanium-corrected images. Calculated radioactivity concentrations were significantly greater in osseous lesions than in nonosseous lesions (11.0% vs. 2.3%, P < 0.05, for mean value; 11.1% vs. 2.1%, P < 0.01, for maximum value). A weak positive correlation was observed between the CT Hounsfield units within the regions of interest and the percentage difference in apparent tracer activity in the CT-corrected images., Conclusion: Although quantitative radioactivity values are generally comparable between CT- and germanium-corrected emission PET images, CT-based attenuation correction produced radioactivity concentration values significantly higher than the germanium-based corrected values. These effects, especially in radiodense tissues, should be noted when using and comparing quantitative PET analyses from PET and PET/CT systems.