Search

Highlights: What are the main findings? This multicenter retrospective study, encompassing two hospital sites for training and leveraging data from forty-seven different hospitals for testing, aimed to develop machine learning models utilising both clinical and radiomics features (individually and in combination) extracted from pre-treatment CT scans. The objective was to predict PFS and OS in patients with PDAC. Among the various models developed, the model based on the combination of clinical and CT-derived tumour radiomics features demonstrated superior performance for OS with a C-index of 0.72 in the testing dataset. Conversely, the model based solely on clinical features excelled in predicting PFS, achieving a C-index of 0.70 in the testing dataset. What is the implication of the main finding? The analysis further highlighted the high relevance of clinical features both for OS and PFS outcomes in patients with PDAC. Purpose. This multicenter retrospective study aims to identify reliable clinical and radiomic features to build machine learning models that predict progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. Methods. Between 2010 and 2020 pre-treatment contrast-enhanced CT scans of 287 pathology-confirmed PDAC patients from two sites of the Hopital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB) and from 47 hospitals within the HUB network were retrospectively analysed. Demographic, clinical, and survival data were also collected. Gross tumour volume (GTV) and non-tumoral pancreas (RPV) were semi-manually segmented and radiomics features were extracted. Patients from two HUB sites comprised the training dataset, while those from the remaining 47 hospitals of the HUB network constituted the testing dataset. A three-step method was used for feature selection. Based on the GradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis classifier, different machine learning models were trained and tested to predict OS and PFS. Model performances, SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Background: Bone age in children is mainly assessed using the Greulich and Pyle (GP) atlas, a validated method with limited interobserver accuracy. While automated methods increase interobserver accuracy, they represent considerable costs and technical requirements. Objective: A proof-of-concept study to create and evaluate an online software program, Boneureka©, based on linear metacarpal length measurements, to assess bone age in healthy children. Materials and methods: The study retrospectively included 434 consecutive children (215 girls) who underwent a left-hand radiograph to rule out trauma between March 2008 and December 2017. Two reviewers measured the second to fourth metacarpal lengths on each radiograph and the distance between the centre of the epiphyses of the second and fifth metacarpals. A single reviewer estimated the bone age using the GP atlas. The automated software assessed the bone age for all radiographs. A mathematical model was developed based on linear regressions to provide the mean bone age and standard deviation based on the estimates. Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to evaluate the correlation and agreement between the estimated bone ages using Boneureka©, the GP atlas and BoneXpert® compared to chronological age. Results: The measure that showed the highest correlation (r2=0.877 for girls and r2=0.834 for boys; P<.001) and the highest ICC (ICC=0.937 for girls and ICC=0.926 for boys; P<0.001) with chronological age was length of the second metacarpal. The GP atlas and the automated software evaluation had excellent ICC with chronological age (ICC>0.95 for both methods and sexes). Using this data, we created an online software program based on the second metacarpal length to obtain bone age estimates, means and standard deviations. Conclusion: The newly created online software Boneureka,© based on the second metacarpal length, is a reliable and user-friendly tool to assess bone age in healthy children. Furt, SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Highlights: What are the main findings? Both the model utilizing edema-related features and the model utilizing mass-related features demonstrated promising results in predicting the occurrence of lung metastases, with similar performances. What is the implication of the main finding? The findings suggest that the analysis of radiomic features extracted exclusively from edema can offer valuable insights into the prediction of lung metastases. Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate whether radiomic features extracted solely from the edema of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) could predict the occurrence of lung metastasis in comparison with features extracted solely from the tumoral mass. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of 32 STSs, including 14 with lung metastasis and 18 without. A segmentation of the tumor mass and edema was assessed for each MRI examination. A total of 107 radiomic features were extracted for each mass segmentation and 107 radiomic features for each edema segmentation. A two-step feature selection process was applied. Two predictive features for the development of lung metastasis were selected from the mass-related features, as well as two predictive features from the edema-related features. Two Random Forest models were created based on these selected features; 100 random subsampling runs were performed. Key performance metrics, including accuracy and area under the ROC curve (AUC), were calculated, and the resulting accuracies were compared. Results: The model based on mass-related features achieved a median accuracy of 0.83 and a median AUC of 0.88, while the model based on edema-related features achieved a median accuracy of 0.75 and a median AUC of 0.79. A statistical analysis comparing the accuracies of the two models revealed no significant difference. Conclusion: Both models showed promise in predicting the occurrence of lung metastasis in soft tissue sarcomas. These findings suggest t, SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

info:eu-repo/semantics/published