Search

Intermittent hemodialysis (HD) in high-bleeding-risk patients presents a challenge as circuit anticoagulation using heparin is contraindicated in such cases. Recently, the use of calcium-free citrate-containing dialysate with calcium supplementation emerged as a viable alternative to heparin-circuit anticoagulation. This is a retrospective, monocentric study to evaluate dialysis efficacy using calcium-free citrate-containing dialysate with calcium reinjection into the venous line in hemodialysis patients at risk of bleeding. A total of 53 patients were analyzed: 52 had a temporary contraindication to systemic anticoagulation (active bleeding or surgical intervention), and 1 chronic HD patient had prolonged bleeding time due to inoperable arteriovenous fistula stenosis. Only 7 out of 79 dialysis sessions performed were prematurely terminated (vascular access dysfunction). The median dialysis time was 240 min (range: 150-300). The chronic dialysis patient had 108 sessions with no premature termination. Frequent monitoring of ionized calcium was performed throughout the dialysis sessions: levels remained stable at T0 and T + 60 min (1.08 ± 0.08 mmol/L) and slightly increased at the end of the dialysis session (1.19 ± 0.13 mmol/L), remaining within normal limits. Target postfilter ionized calcium <0.4 mmol/L was achieved in all sessions (0.31 ± 0.07 mmol/L). There were no cases of symptomatic hypo-/hypercalcemia and no need for calcium infusion rate adjustment throughout the sessions. Hemodialysis with calcium-free citrate-containing dialysate and calcium reinjection into the venous line is efficient and safe in HD patients with contraindications to systemic anticoagulation.

Membranous nephropathy constitutes approximately 20% of adult nephrotic syndrome cases. In approximately 80% of cases, membranous nephropathy is primary, mediated by IgG autoantibodies primarily targeting podocyte antigens (PLA2R, THSD7A, etc.). The treatment involves a combination of corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide or anti-CD20-based therapies, e.g., rituximab. In the event of significant proteinuria and in order to avoid the urinary elimination of rituximab, therapeutic apheresis, in particular semi-specific immunoadsorption, may be an option allowing for a reduction in proteinuria and autoantibodies before initiating treatment with rituximab. We present the preliminary experience of three patients treated with semi-specific immunoadsorption for primary membranous nephropathy between January 2021 and March 2023. Two patients were anti-PLA2R-autoantibody-positive and one was seronegative. The average age was 59 ± 17 years. Semi-specific immunoadsorption did not reduce albuminuria, but it, nevertheless, led to an increase in serum albumin, contributing to the regression of edema. It effectively eliminated anti-PLA2R autoantibodies in the two anti-PLA2R-positive patients. Consequently, apheresis may not induce a rapid reduction in proteinuria, but could contribute to a more accelerated remission when combined with the anti-CD20 treatment.

Outcomes after kidney transplantation are largely driven by the development of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA), which may be triggered by blood transfusion. In this single-center study, we investigated the link between early blood transfusion and dnDSA development in a mainly anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)-induced kidney-transplant cohort. We retrospectively included all recipients of a kidney transplant performed between 2004 and 2015, provided they had >3 months graft survival. DSA screening was evaluated with a Luminex assay (Immucor). Early blood transfusion (EBT) was defined as the transfusion of at least one red blood-cell unit over the first 3 months post-transplantation, with an exhaustive report of transfusion. Patients received either anti-thymocyte globulins (ATG) or basiliximab induction, plus tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid maintenance immunosuppression. A total of 1088 patients received a transplant between 2004 and 2015 in our center, of which 981 satisfied our inclusion criteria. EBT was required for 292 patients (29.7%). Most patients received ATG induction (86.1%); the others received basiliximab induction (13.4%). dnDSA-free graft survival (dnDSA-GS) at 1-year post-transplantation was similar between EBT+ (2.4%) and EBT- (3.0%) patients (chi-squared p=0.73). There was no significant association between EBT and dnDSA-GS (univariate Cox's regression, HR=0.88, p=0.556). In multivariate Cox's regression, adjusting for potential confounders (showing a univariate association with dnDSA development), early transfusion remained not associated with dnDSA-GS (HR 0.76, p=0.449). However, dnDSA-GS was associated with pretransplantation HLA sensitization (HR=2.25, p=0.004), hemoglobin >10 g/dL (HR=0.39, p=0.029) and the number of HLA mismatches (HR=1.26, p=0.05). Recipient's age, tacrolimus and mycophenolic-acid exposures, and graft rank were not associated with dnDSA-GS. Early blood transfusion did not induce dnDSAs in our cohort of ATG-induced patients, but low hemoglobin level was associated with dnDSAs-GS. This suggests a protective effect of ATG induction therapy on preventing dnDSA development at an initial stage post-transplantation., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Jouve, Noble, Naciri-Bennani, Dard, Masson, Fiard, Malvezzi and Rostaing.)

Kidney transplant candidates (KTCs) who are HLA highly sensitized (calculated panel-reactive alloantibodies >95%) have poor access to deceased kidney transplantation. In this single-center prospective study, 13 highly sensitized desensitization-naïve KTCs received IV tocilizumab (8 mg/kg) every 4 weeks. We evaluated tolerability as well as immune responses, that is, T cell, B cell, T follicular helper (Tfh) subsets, blood cytokines (IL-6, soluble IL-6 receptor-sIL-6R-, IL-21), blood chemokines (CXCL10, CXCL13), and anti-HLA alloantibodies. Tocilizumab treatment was well-tolerated except in one patient who presented spondylodiscitis, raising a note of caution. Regarding immune parameters, there were no significant changes of percentages of lymphocyte subsets, that is, CD3 + , CD3 + /CD4 + , CD3 + /CD8 + T cells, and NK cells. This was also the case for Tfh cell subsets, B cells, mature B cells, plasma cells, pre-germinal center (GC) B cells, and post-GC B cells, whereas we observed a significant increase in naïve B cells (p = .02) and a significant decrease in plasmablasts (p = .046) over the tocilizumab treatment course. CXCL10, CXCL13, IL-21, total IgG, IgA, and IgM levels did not significantly change during tocilizumab therapy; conversely, there was a significant increase in IL-6 levels (p = .03) and a huge increase in sIL-6R (p = .00004). There was a marginal effect on anti-HLA alloantibodies (class I and class II). To conclude in highly sensitized KTCs, tocilizumab as a monotherapy limited B cell maturation; however, it had almost no effect on anti-HLA alloantibodies., (© 2021 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Background: Primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is associated with a high risk of recurrence after kidney transplantation with a major risk of graft loss despite preventive or curative treatments., Aim: to assess graft survival in FSGS kidney-transplant recipients and to compare those that had a relapse with those that had no relapse., Patients/methods: we included 17 FSGS kidney-transplant recipients between January 2000 and January 2020, separated retrospectively into two groups (recurrences: n = 8 patients; no recurrences: n = 9 patients). FSGS recurrence was defined as having proteinuria of ≥3 g/g or urinary creatinine of ≥3 g/day. All patients received an induction therapy; maintenance immunosuppressive therapy at post-transplantation relied on tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil/steroids. In order to prevent or treat FSGS recurrence, patients received apheresis sessions plus rituximab., Results: FSGS recurrence rate was 47%. All patients that relapsed with a first graft also relapsed with subsequent grafts. Median time to recurrence was 3 (min: 1; max: 4745) days, despite rituximab/apheresis prophylaxis. Mean age was significantly lower in the relapsers (group 1) than in the non-relapsers (group 2); i.e., 47 ± 11 vs. 58 ± 9 years ( p = 0.04). Time to progression to stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) and young age at FSGS diagnosis were lower in group 1 compared to group 2; i.e., 5 (min: 1; max: 26) vs. 2 (min: 1; max: 26) years, and 16 (min: 4; max: 55) vs. 34 (min: 6; max 48) years, respectively. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of progression to CKD stage 5 on the native kidneys, averaging 7 years in both groups ( p = 0.99). In group 1, seven patients received rituximab/apheresis prophylaxis, although this did not prevent the recurrence of FSGS., Conclusion: pretransplant prophylaxis with plasmapheresis/rituximab did not appear to reduce the risk of recurrence of primary FSGS on the graft, but could allow remission in the event of recurrence.

Introduction: Belatacept is a common immunosuppressive therapy used after kidney transplantation (KT) to avoid calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) use and its related toxicities. It is unclear whether its use exposes KT recipients (KTx) to a greater risk of infection or a poorer response to vaccines. Areas covered: We reviewed PubMed and the Cochrane database. We then summarized the mechanisms and impacts of belatacept use on the risk of infection, particularly opportunistic, in two settings, i.e., de novo KTx and conversion from CNIs. We also focused on COVID-19 infection risk and response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients whose maintenance immunosuppression relies on belatacept. Expert opinion: When belatacept is used de novo, or after drug conversion the safety profile regarding the risk of infection remains good. However, there is an increased risk of opportunistic infections, mainly CMV disease and Pneumocystis pneumonia, particularly in those with a low eGFR, in older people, in those receiving steroid-based therapy, or those that have an early conversion from CNI to belatacept (i.e.,

Background: In many centers, a protocol kidney biopsy (PKB) is performed at 3 months post-transplantation (M3), without a demonstrated benefit on death-censored graft survival (DCGS). In this study, we compared DCGS between kidney transplant recipients undergoing a PKB or without such biopsy while accounting for the obvious indication bias., Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study conducted between 2007 and 2013, we compared DCGS with respect to the availability and features of a PKB. We built a propensity score (PS) to account for PKB indication likelihood and adjusted the DCGS analysis on PKB availability and the PS., Results: A total of 615 patients were included: 333 had a PKB, 282 did not. In bivariate Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, adjusting for the availability of a PKB and for the PS, a PKB was associated with a better 5-year DCGS independently of the PS ( p < 0.001). Among the PKB+ patients, 87 recipients (26%) had IF/TA > 0. Patients with an IF/TA score of 3 had the worst survival. A total of 144 patients (44%) showed cv lesions. Patients with cv2 and cv3 lesions had the worst 5-year DCGS., Conclusions: A M3 PKB was associated with improved graft survival independently of potential confounders. These results could be explained by the early treatment of subclinical immunological events. It could be due to better management of the immunosuppressive regimen.

Introduction: In the setting of kidney transplantation (KT), we assessed the efficacy of desensitization and compared the survival of desensitized patients (HLA-incompatible KT) with similarly sensitized patients receiving HLA-compatible KT or sensitized patients still on a waiting list after adjusting for the usually unaccounted immortal time bias., Methods: All patients in a French KT center on the waiting list between August 1994 and December 2019 with a high level of sensitization (panel-reactive antibodies [PRAs] ≥80%) were included. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. A time-varying covariate Cox survival model was used to account for the immortal time bias. A landmark analysis was used as a sensitivity analysis., Results: During the study period, 326 patients with high PRAs were followed, among which 147 (45%) remained on the waiting list at the time of last follow-up and 179 benefited from a KT. Thirty-six patients were desensitized, of which 30 received a kidney transplant, including eight deceased kidney donors. There were no differences in mortality rates between desensitized KT patients, nondesensitized KT patients, and waitlisted patients after adjusting for immortal time bias (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.48, P  = 0.22). Death-censored graft survival was similar between desensitized and nondesensitized KT patients (HR = 0.92, P  = 0.88 adjusting for donor age >65 years, donor status, and time on the waiting list). Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year post-KT was similar for desensitized KT patients (53.3 ± 21 vs. 53.6 ± 21 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 for nondesensitized patients; P  = 0.95)., Conclusions: HLA-desensitization was effective for highly sensitized patients and gave access to KT without detrimental effects on patient or graft survival rates., (© 2021 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Highly HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates are difficult to desensitize, which reduces their chances of receiving a transplant., Methods: We administered tocilizumab as a monotherapy (8 mg/kg once a mo) to 14 highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates. Highest mean fluorescence intensities of anti-HLA antibodies obtained before and after tocilizumab administration were compared from raw and diluted sera., Results: The administration of tocilizumab significantly reduced dominant anti-HLA antibody sensitization. However, this decrease in mean fluorescence intensities was minor compared with the initial values., Conclusions: Tocilizumab as a monotherapy was not sufficient to allow highly sensitized kidney-transplant candidates to undergo transplantation and, therefore, was not an effective desensitization method., Competing Interests: The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Nearly 18% of patients on a waiting list for kidney transplantation (KT) are highly sensitized, which make access to KT more difficult. We assessed the efficacy and tolerance of different techniques (plasma exchanges [PE], double-filtration plasmapheresis [DFPP], and immunoadsorption [IA]) to remove donor specific antibodies (DSA) in the setting of HLA-incompatible (HLAi) KT. All patients that underwent apheresis for HLAi KT within a single center were included. Intra-session and inter-session Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) decrease in DSA, clinical and biological tolerances were assessed. A total of 881 sessions were performed for 45 patients: 107 DFPP, 54 PE, 720 IA. The procedures led to HLAi KT in 39 patients (87%) after 29 (15-51) days. A higher volume of treated plasma was associated with a greater decrease of inter-session class I and II DSA ( p = 0.04, p = 0.02). IA, PE, and a lower maximal DSA MFI were associated with a greater decrease in intra-session class II DSA ( p < 0.01). Safety was good: severe adverse events occurred in 17 sessions (1.9%), more frequently with DFPP (6.5%) p < 0.01. Hypotension occurred in 154 sessions (17.5%), more frequently with DFPP ( p < 0.01). Apheresis is well tolerated (IA and PE > DFPP) and effective at removing HLA antibodies and allows HLAi KT for sensitized patients.

Background: Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and steroids are strongly associated with new-onset diabetes after transplantation, worsening of pre-existing diabetes, and cardiovascular events. We assessed the benefit of conversion from CNI-based to belatacept-based immunosuppression in diabetic kidney-transplant (KT) recipients on glucose control and cardiovascular risk factors., Methods: In this retrospective, noncontrolled single-study conducted between May 2016 and October 26, 2018, we recruited KT recipients converted from CNIs to belatacept at least 6 months after KT. The primary endpoint was the evolution of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) between baseline and after 6 months of treatment. Secondary endpoints included modifications to antidiabetic drugs, other cardiovascular risk factors, and renal function., Results: One hundred and three KT recipients were included. Of these, 26 (25%) had type 2 diabetes. The patients were either receiving oral antidiabetic drugs (n = 21; 75%) or insulin therapy (n = 14; 54%). Overall HbA1c decreased significantly from 6.2 ± 1 to 5.8 ± 1%, P < 0.001. In diabetic patients, HbA1c decreased from 7.2 ± 1 to 6.5 ± 1%, P = 0.001. HbA1c significantly decreased in the subgroup of patients with new-onset diabetes after transplantation and whether diabetes was controlled at inclusion or not (ie, HA1c ≤7% or >7%). Moreover, no diabetic patient increased the number of oral antidiabetic drugs and the dose of basal insulin was not statistically different from baseline to 6 months (16 international unit at baseline and 16 international unit at 6 mo, P = 1). One patient had to start treatment by insulin pump. During follow-up, the renal function, body mass index, and hemoglobin level of all 103 patients remained stable, 2 patients presented acute cellular rejection, and no patient suffered from graft loss., Conclusions: A late switch from CNI to belatacept was a valuable therapeutic option for diabetic kidney recipients and substantially improved glycemic parameters., (Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Living-kidney transplantation is increasing because of the scarcity of kidneys from deceased donors and the increasing numbers of patients on waiting lists for a kidney transplant. Living-kidney transplantation is now associated with increased long-term patient- and allograft-survival rates., Objectives: The purpose of this retrospective study was to identify, in a cohort of 44 ABO-incompatible (ABOi) live-kidney transplant patients, the main complications that occurred within 6 months post-transplantation, and to compare these findings with those from 44 matched ABO-compatible (ABOc) live-kidney transplant patients who were also from our center., Patients and Methods: This single-center retrospective study assessed post-transplantation complications in 44 ABO-i versus 44 matched ABO-c patients. All patients were comparable at baseline except that ABO-i patients had greater immunological risks., Results: During the 6-month post-transplant period, more ABO-i patients presented with postoperative bleeds, thus requiring significantly more blood transfusions. Bleeds were associated with significantly lower values of fibrinogen, platelets, prothrombin time, and hemoglobin levels. Surgical complications, patient- and graft-survival rates, and kidney-function statuses were similar between both groups at 6 months post-transplantation., Conclusions: We conclude that impairment of hemostatic factors at pre-transplant explained the increased risk of a post-transplant bleed in ABO-i patients.