Search

We examine the coseismic influence of the 5 July 2019, MW7.1 Ridgecrest and the 24 June 2020 MW5.8 Owens Lake earthquakes on rockfall distributions in two undisturbed high-altitude areas of the southern Sierra Nevada Mountains, California, USA. These events occurred within the geologically recent (<2 Mya) Walker Lane/eastern California shear zone. While both study areas are characterized as plutonic, the Owens Lake event largely affected terrain that was formerly glaciated and oversteepened while the Ridgecrest event affected non-glaciated terrain. Our inventory of rockfall locations was derived from analysis of Sentinel-2 images acquired just prior to and immediately after the events. This difference mapping approach using readily-available Sentinel-2 imagery allows for rapid rockfall and landslide mapping. GIS analysis shows that even though the total area assessed for both earthquakes was similar (~1500 km2), the significantly lower magnitude Owens Lake event produced nearly twice as many (102) mappable rockslides as the significantly stronger Ridgecrest event (58), a difference likely due to slope oversteepening in the formerly glaciated area. Significant seismic amplification by topography and reactivation of preexisting failures was apparent for both areas. Inclusion of these factors may improve failure predictions and rockfall probability estimation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We conduct a high‐resolution teleseismic receiver function investigation of the subducting plate interface within the Alaskan forearc beneath Kodiak Island using data collected as part of the Alaska Amphibious Community Seismic Experiment in 2019. The Kodiak node array consisted of 398 nodal geophones deployed at ∼200–300 m spacing on northeastern Kodiak Island within the southern asperity of the 1964 Mw9.2 Great Alaska earthquake. Receiver function images at frequencies of 1.2 and 2.4 Hz show a coherent, slightly dipping velocity increase at ∼30–40 km depth consistent with the expected slab Moho. In contrast to studies within the northern asperity of the 1964 rupture, we find no evidence for a prominent low‐velocity layer above the slab Moho thick enough to be resolved by upgoing P‐to‐S conversions. These results support evidence from seismicity and geodetic strain suggesting that the 1964 rupture connected northern (Kenai) and southern (Kodiak) asperities with different plate interface properties. Plain Language Summary: We use 398 portable seismometers that were deployed as part of the Alaska Amphibious Community Seismic Experiment to image the boundary between the subducting Pacific plate and the base of the North American plate. The seismometers, spaced ∼200–300 m apart, were stationed on Kodiak Island in 2019 within the southern rupture area of the 1964 Mw9.2 Great Alaska earthquake. We analyze conversions from compressional to shear waves from distant earthquakes to understand the conditions of the plate interface. Our results show a dipping velocity increase at ∼30–40 km depth at the expected location of the Pacific slab crust‐mantle boundary. In contrast to prior results from the northern 1964 rupture zone, we do not find a low‐velocity layer on the subducting plate. Our results indicate that the 1964 rupture connected segments of the Alaskan subduction zone with different plate interface properties. Key Points: We present receiver function imaging from a dense three‐component nodal array deployment on Kodiak Island above the subducting Pacific PlateA clear slab Moho conversion is found but, in contrast to the Kenai Peninsula, there is no coherent low‐velocity layer atop the slabThe 1964 Great Alaska Earthquake ruptured across structural segments with different plate interface properties [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]