Search

Anterior open bite (AOB) is one of the most complex malocclusions to manage. AOB is caused by either by skeletal, genetic or environmental factors. Numerous treatment options are currently utilised to manage AOB. These vary from non-invasive behavioural shaping to orthodontic and surgical interventions. This paper reviews the available orthodontic and non-orthodontic interventions used in the management of AOB. The literature review was carried out using the PubMed search engine from the first of January 2000 to the first of June 2017. Two major keywords (open bite and anterior open bite) were used in addition to 23 minor keywords in the review. AOB is one of the most complex malocclusions to treat with high relapse rates. Long term outcome in treatments of patients with AOB was substantially low. Relapse rates were not taken into consideration for some of the literature reviewed. Despite limitations of the literature, it is recommended that orofacial myofunctional therapy (OMT) and non-orthodontic intervention (NOI) be used in conjunction as an effective treatment option for Anterior Open Bite., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Taiwan.)

This study estimated the prevalence of negative self-perception of smile because of occlusion abnormalities and investigated their association according to standard clinical criteria. The sample consisted of 1290 randomly selected Brazilian adolescent boys and girls aged 12-16 years. The outcome of interest was dissatisfaction with smile, and data were collected using a standardized questionnaire. Occlusion characteristics were assessed using the dental aesthetic index (DAI). The other study variables were gender, age, and use of dental services. A chi-square test and Poisson multiple regression were used for statistical analysis. Of the 1290 students interviewed and examined, 539 (41.8 per cent) were dissatisfied with their smile; of these, 373 (69.2 per cent) assigned their dissatisfaction to the presence of an occlusal abnormality, and 166 (30.8 per cent) reported reasons other than occlusal abnormalities for their negative self-perception of their smile. In multivariate analysis, the following variables were associated with the outcome of interest: maxillary anterior irregularity [prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.40; 95 per cent confidence interval (CI) = 1.29-1.80], incisal spacing (PR = 1.37; 95 per cent CI = 1.19-1.57), vertical open bite (PR = 1.34; 95 per cent CI = 1.15-1.55), mandibular anterior irregularity (PR = 1.29; 95 per cent CI = 1.14-1.46), permanent anterior teeth missing (PR = 1.21; 95 per cent CI = 1.05-1.39), and incisal diastema (PR = 1.14; 95 per cent CI = 1.01-1.31). The negative self-perception of smile was statistically associated with severity of occlusal disorders according to the DAI scores, which suggests that self-perception should be used together with standard clinical criteria when decisions about orthodontic treatments are made in public health care systems.

Objective: To compare perceptions of dental aesthetics of Class III and anterior open bite (AOB) malocclusions between 10- to 11-year-old Birmingham schoolchildren and orthodontists., Materials and Methods: Thirty-one orthodontists practicing in Birmingham (UK) and 383 school children aged 10-11 years from a random and representative sample of seven primary schools in South Birmingham participated in the study. Participants were asked to assess five anterior photographs of the dentition representing varying degrees of aesthetic impairment of Class III and AOB malocclusions. Perceptions of dental aesthetics were determined using the aesthetic component (AC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN)., Results: Perceptions of dental aesthetics were similar among males and females (P > .05). Both groups allocated the highest median AC score to the photo representing severe Class III malocclusion and the lowest to the photo representing mild Class III and AOB malocclusion. Differences in perceived dental aesthetics were significant for photos representing severe Class III and moderate AOB malocclusions, with orthodontists perceiving greater aesthetic impairment for severe Class III and schoolchildren for moderate AOB, respectively (P < .05)., Conclusions: Schoolchildren and orthodontists perceived Class III malocclusions to have greater aesthetic impairment compared to AOB malocclusions. Surprisingly, none of the median AC scores allocated to the five photos were in the "Definite need" for treatment category. The IOTN may not be sensitive to these types of malocclusions. This finding merits further investigation.

This study was carried out to determine the level of attractiveness of anterior open bites (AOB) and reverse overjets of varying severity. A sample of 180 non-dental students (101 females and 79 males; average age 20 +/- 0.75 years) and 45 dental professionals (12 females and 33 males; average age 35.5 +/- 5.07 years) was asked to complete a questionnaire to rate the level of attractiveness of AOB and reverse overjets of varying severity using the aesthetic component (AC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). Photographs of mild and severe AOB and reverse overjets were projected onto a white screen in a lecture theatre (15 seconds each with a 5 second interval between images). The participants were asked to record the AC grade at which they thought the projected picture of the AOB or reverse overjets had similar attractiveness. Dental awareness of non-dental students was determined by asking them their opinion on how important it was to have straight teeth (very unimportant, unimportant, important, very important), about their personal or close family members' orthodontic experiences and if they thought they were in need of any orthodontic treatment. A chi-square test was applied to record any differences between sexes and between the different groups. Backward stepwise linear regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between the students' ratings of the photographs and their dental awareness. The majority of non-dental students rated a mild AOB (93 per cent) and mild reverse overjet (96 per cent) to be aesthetically acceptable. A mild AOB and mild reverse overjet were found to be acceptable by 40 and 58 per cent of dental professionals, respectively. The differences in the ratings between dental professionals and non-dental students were significant at P < 0.001.A severe AOB was considered unattractive by both students and dental professionals. However, dental professionals rated it at the more unattractive end of the scale (P < 0.001). A severe reverse overjet was rated by the majority of the subjects as aesthetically unacceptable (85 per cent of the non-dental students and 78 per cent of the dental professionals).

The objective was to investigate the opinion of Tanzanian parents on dental attractiveness and to compare their opinion with that of their children. A prestructured questionnaire with 18 intraoral frontal photographs was given to 286 parents and their children aged 9-18 years. The photographs represented various types of occlusion traits, with the first 10 intraoral photographs representing grade 1-10 of the aesthetic component (AC) of the index of orthodontic treatment need, and the remaining eight photographs were added to represent malocclusions that are often seen in Tanzania. Basic statistical techniques were used to analyze the data. Photographs showing severe deviations were perceived by both children and parents as the most unattractive. The opinion was significantly correlated with children's age (P = .02) and sex (P < .0005), with older girls tending to dislike photographs showing severe deviations the most. The mean of the opinion for the photographs showing some spacing with overbite < or = 2 mm or open bite and overbite > 2 mm fell in the middle of the scale, with a tendency toward unattractiveness. Photographs matching 8-10 on the AC scale were perceived as the most unattractive, indicating what could be a lay person's priority when considering an orthodontic treatment policy in Tanzania.