Search

BACKGROUND: In May 2009, the Italian Constitutional Court banned most of the limitations of a restrictive law regulating assisted reproduction technology on the grounds that it limited a couple's right to have access to the best possible medical treatment and reduce any possible higher risk of complications. The aim of the study was to compare our results in fresh cycles before and after this change. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed retrospectively 3274 IVF cycles: 2248 before and 1026 after the law was modified. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, basal FSH levels, years of infertility, the number of previous cycles or the number of oocytes retrieved but the number of oocytes used (2.7 ± 0.6 versus 4.6 ± 1.8 ; P =

To investigate the consequences of a law introduced in Italy in 2004 that forbids the fertilization or injection of more than three oocytes for assisted reproduction and does not allow any embryo selection or cryopreservation.Retrospective observational analysis.Subfertile patients enrolled in an assisted reproduction program.Before the introduction of the law there were 1,179 cycles and after its enactment there were 1,860 cycles in 1,619 subfertile couples.Ovarian stimulation for IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) attempts.Pregnancy and implantation rate.Pregnancy rates (PR) per cycle (24.34% vs. 23.11%), per retrieval (28.64% vs. 25.65%), per transfer (31.37% vs. 27.74%), and the take-home babies per started cycle (19.1% vs. 18%) was not significantly different between the two periods. After introduction of the law, the PR significantly decreased in patients whose total motile sperm count was1 x 10(6) (40.85% vs. 23.62%) and in patients receiving two embryos (35.71% vs. 23.53%). This difference was mostly the result of a reduced PR in patients36 years old receiving two unselected embryos (41.16% vs. 30.90%). This result was, however, obscured by the higher proportion of patients36 years (3.9% vs. 45.12%) receiving three embryos after the enactment of the law, which lead to a significantly higher PR (28.73% vs. 37.56%) and a consequent significantly higher triplet rate (0.58% vs. 4.71%).Women in whom elective transfer of two embryos was allowed before passing the law and couples with a severe male infertility factor had significantly reduced success rates. Although the overall PR did not change after the new law, if the transfer of frozen embryos is not considered, this was mainly the result of a higher number of embryos transferred into women36 years old. This study shows how the negative effects of the new law are obscured by the transfer of a higher number of embryos in younger patients, resulting in a higher PR at the cost of a significantly higher triplet rate.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study is to investigate cryopreservation of oocytes in patients refusing embryo cryopreservation for ethical reasons, patients from whom no sperm could be retrieved and patients with enough oocytes to yield a number of fresh and cryopreserved embryos to transfer. METHODS: A total of 2900 oocytes out of 6216 retrieved were cryopreserved in 286 patients undergoing 303 cycles. The reasons for cryopreservation were because no sperm was found in 16 cycles, for ethical or personal reasons in 80, and in 207 only supernumerary oocytes were frozen. In 159 cycles, the oocytes were thawed and the surviving metaphase II oocytes microinjected. RESULTS: A toal of 1087 oocytes were thawed, 760 (69.9%) survived and 687 were microinjected. We obtained 368 (53.5%) normally cleaved embryos, 331 were transferred and 37 were cryopreserved. One hundred and forty-five transfers (range 1–3 embryos/patient) were performed and 18 (12.4%) pregnancies were obtained. Twelve patients delivered 13 healthy children, and six first trimester abortions were observed (33.3%). CONCLUSION: Although a low implantation rate was observed and a higher abortion rate than in fresh cycles, our results show that in sibling oocytes, the process of cryopreservation apparently does not affect the fertilization and cleavage rate. In this group of patients, producing a large number of mature gametes, oocyte cryopreservation gives the couple extra chances to achieve a pregnancy within a single retrieval and is a good effort towards reducing the number of embryos cryopreserved and enhancing our experience in this new technology.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of a new ultravitrification technique with a low concentration of cryoprotectants. Design Ultravitrification research. Setting Private assisted reproduction center. Patient(s) Oocytes donated voluntarily with the aim of research. Intervention(s) Ultravitrification with different protocols of 100 mature oocytes and 100 immature oocytes divided in four groups to determine which is the adequate cryoprotectant concentration and the appropriate cooling solution. Main Outcome Measure(s) Human oocytes survival rate with low concentration of cryoprotectants by ultravitrification technique. Result(s) We obtained higher survival rates with slush nitrogen than with liquid nitrogen (92% vs. 56%) and better results with 2 M of cryoprotectants than with 1.5 M (92% vs. 60%). The best protocol was 2 M PrOH + 0.5 M sucrose + slush nitrogen with a mature oocytes survival rate of 92% (23 of 25) and immature of 88% (22 of 25). Conclusion(s) This ultravitrification technique is a new option to preserve human oocytes that avoids the use of a high cryoprotectant concentration while obtaining a high survival rate with a concentration of cryoprotectants typical of slow freezing.

The outcomes of 1028 assisted reproductive technology cycles were studied retrospectively, considering two different periods of embryo transfer. In the first period, 262 cycles in women36 years old were studied, in which three embryos were transferred, followed by 157 cycles in womenor = 36 years, in which four embryos were transferred. In the second period, 332 cycles were evaluated in women36 years and 277 cycles in womenor = 36 years old, reducing the number of embryos transferred to two and three respectively. Embryos were only scored morphologically, and the best embryos were chosen for transfer. In the first period, in women36 years old, a clinical pregnancy rate of 55.7% was achieved, compared with 42.5% in the second period (P0.01). In womenor = 36 years old, the first period of embryo transfer showed a clinical pregnancy rate of 39.5%, compared with 28.5% in the second period (P0.01). The number of twin pregnancies in the three groups of patients in whom one to four embryos were transferred was not significantly different (24.2, 28.4, 24.8%). It is concluded that even with the biases induced by a retrospective study, the reduction in the number of embryos transferred, from three to two in women36 years of age, and from four to three in womenor = 36 years of age, without any selection other than pre-transfer morphological score, adversely affects the outcome of treatment, without a significant reduction in twin gestation rate. Other strategies are to be implemented in gametes and embryo selection, and patients must be aware that, even with a reduction in pregnancy rate, the goal is to achieve a high cumulative pregnancy rate, reducing the complications induced by multiple pregnancies.

Objective To report the first birth after transfer of cryopreserved embryos generated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection of cryopreserved testicular spermatozoa into cryopreserved human oocytes. Design Case report. Setting Tertiary center for reproductive technology. Patient(s) A 36-year-old woman with primary infertility of 3 years' duration and a 37-year-old man with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens. Intervention(s) Cryopreservation of human embryos after oocytes and sperm thawing. Main outcome measure(s) Live birth. Result(s) A healthy, normal female infant with a birth weight of 2,950 g was born by cesarean section at 38 weeks' gestation, with normal 6-month follow-up. Conclusion(s) Embryo cryopreservation can lead to successful results, even with the use of cryopreserved gametes.

Background This study was carried out to evaluate whether bilateral orchidopexy represents a poor or good prognostic factor in azoospermic men undergoing testicular sperm extraction (TESE). Methods One hundred and seven presumed non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) patients, according to conventional clinical parameters (volume of testis, FSH, clinical history) were submitted to testicular biopsy with TESE. Thirty men (28%) had a history of bilateral orchidopexy for cryptorchidism. Results Normal spermatogenesis or mild hypospermatogenesis was diagnosed in 12/30 ex-cryptorchid patients and in 7/77 presumed NOA patients (P = 0.0004). Conversely, pure Sertoli cell-only syndrome or complete maturation arrest was found in 10/30 ex-cryptorchid patients and in 48/77 presumed NOA patients (P = 0.0094). In 53/107 patients (49.5%), TESE allowed a positive sperm retrieval. At least one spermatozoon was observed in 22/30 ( approximately 73%) ex-cryptorchid patients and in 31/77 ( approximately 40%) presumed NOA patients (P = 0.0026). A large number of spermatozoa (equivalent to an obstructive pathology) were retrieved in 13/30 ex-cryptorchid and in 10/77 presumed NOA patients (P = 0.001). A history of bilateral orchidopexy in presumed NOA patients correlates positively for the chance of retrieving testicular spermatozoa (odds ratio 3.8; 95% confidence interval 1.41-10.21; P = 0.008). Conclusions Although bilateral cryptorchidism is usually considered a testicular secretive dysfunction, TESE permits retrieval of a large number of spermatozoa in almost 40% of cases. Our data suggest the existence of congenital or acquired obstructive anomalies of the seminal ducts in azoospermic orchidopexed men.