Search

Background: Chronic neuropathic pain is one of the most difficult problems to manage after spinal cord injury (SCI). Pain coping and pain cognitions are known to be associated with the patient's experience of neuropathic pain, but they have not been studied in the context of a cognitive behavioral treatment program for coping with neuropathic pain after SCI. Objective: To explore associations pain coping strategies and cognitions with pain intensity and pain-related disability and changes in pain coping strategies and cognition with changes in pain intensity and pain-related disability. Methods: Forty-seven persons who participated in the CONECSI (COping with NEuropathiC Spinal cord Injury pain) trial completed questionnaires before the intervention (baseline) and 3 months after of the intervention (follow-up). Results: Compared to baseline, participants showed more favorable scores on 2 pain coping scales (Pain Transformation and Worrying), the subtotal score Active Coping, and 3 pain cognitions scales (Catastrophizing, Optimism, and Reliance on Health Care) at follow-up. Baseline Reliance on Health Care was associated with change in pain intensity and pain-related disability Change in Catastrophizing and change in Restriction cognitions were associated with change in pain-related disability. Conclusion Our findings suggest that modifying pain coping strategies and cognitions by a cognitive behavioral intervention for chronic neuropathic pain after SCI may have some beneficial effects on pain intensity and pain-related disability. Further research should show how dysfunctional pain coping strategies and cognitions can be most effectively modified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Responsiveness was measured in a number of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments among which two generic (SF-36 and COOP/WONCA Charts) and one disease-specific instrument, the Disability & Impact Profile (DIP). Subjects were 162 multiple sclerosis patients. The following responsiveness indices were used: effect size, standardised response mean and smallest real difference (SRD). The latter measure gives an indication of the magnitude of real change, i.e. change not attributable to 'noise' or 'error' and can thus be used for the interpretation of change scores in clinical practice whereby change scores larger than the SRD value indicate real change. It is assumed that low SRD values indicate high responsiveness. The results confirmed our expectation that the effect size and standardised response mean are probably less suitable for use in slowly progressive diseases, since they use the average change as the numerator. Therefore, the article focused on the SRD. Compared to scales, items measured on a visual analogue scale show high SRD values. The DIP scales generally show lower SRD values compared to scales of other questionnaires. The SRD seems to be a promising new measure to study responsiveness. More research into the interpretation of this measure is necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Most people with a spinal cord injury rate neuropathic pain as one of the most difficult problems to manage and there are no medical treatments that provide satisfactory pain relief in most people. Furthermore, psychosocial factors have been considered in the maintenance and aggravation of neuropathic spinal cord injury pain. Psychological interventions to support people with spinal cord injury to deal with neuropathic pain, however, are sparse. The primary aim of the CONECSI (COping with NEuropathiC Spinal cord Injury pain) trial is to evaluate the effects of a multidisciplinary cognitive behavioural treatment programme on pain intensity and pain-related disability, and secondary on mood, participation in activities, and life satisfaction.Methods/design: CONECSI is a multicentre randomised controlled trial. A sample of 60 persons with chronic neuropathic spinal cord injury pain will be recruited from four rehabilitation centres and randomised to an intervention group or a waiting list control group. The control group will be invited for the programme six months after the intervention group. Main inclusion criteria are: having chronic (> 6 months) neuropathic spinal cord injury pain as the worst pain complaint and rating the pain intensity in the last week as 40 or more on a 0-100 scale. The intervention consists of educational, cognitive, and behavioural elements and encompasses 11 sessions over a 3-month period. Each meeting will be supervised by a local psychologist and physical therapist. Measurements will be performed before starting the programme/entering the control group, and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Primary outcomes are pain intensity and pain-related disability (Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire). Secondary outcomes are mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), participation in activities (Utrecht Activities List), and life satisfaction (Life Satisfaction Questionnaire). Pain coping and pain cognitions will be assessed with three questionnaires (Coping Strategy Questionnaire, Pain Coping Inventory, and Pain Cognition List).Discussion: The CONECSI trial will reveal the effects of a multidisciplinary cognitive behavioural programme for people with chronic neuropathic spinal cord injury pain. This intervention is expected to contribute to the rehabilitation treatment possibilities for this population.Trial Registration: Dutch Trial Register NTR1580. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]