Search

Orthopaedic joint replacement is generally considered 'clean' surgery characterized by a low incidence of infection. In recent years the use of a clean theatre environment, high local concentrations of antibiotic in the cement and systemic antibiotic prophylaxis have been recognized as important measures to reduce infection rates significantly, and this has been supported by clinical trials. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis cause at least half of all orthopaedic surgical infections. Gram-negative bacilli are involved to a much lesser extent (10-30%). First- and second-generation cephalosporins are currently considered by most authors as standard prophylaxis in elective orthopaedic surgery. In the light of the increasing incidence of methicillin resistance in coagulase-positive and -negative staphylococci, it is becoming more important for antibiotics to act efficiently against such organisms if they are to be of value in prophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery. A combined, single-dose of vancomycin/gentamicin has been used successfully in an open, controlled study in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty but, given the disadvantages associated with the use of vancomycin, teicoplanin may be an alternative choice in such procedures. This review analyses four comparative trials of the efficacy and safety of teicoplanin, two with cefamandole, one with cefuroxime and one with cephazolin, as prophylaxis in orthopaedic total joint replacement surgery.

Twenty-four patients undergoing monolateral or bilateral total knee replacement (TKR) procedures were randomized to receive teicoplanin (T) either systemically or regionally. Subjects scheduled for systemic prophylaxis and undergoing monolateral (six patients) or bilateral (five patients) TKR received a single 800-mg dose of T in 100 ml of saline as a 5-min infusion into a forearm vein 2.5 h before surgery. For regional prophylaxis, patients undergoing monolateral surgery (eight subjects) received 400 mg of T in 100 ml of saline as a 5-min infusion into a foot vein of the leg to be operated on immediately after the tourniquet was inflated. For the five patients scheduled for bilateral operation and regional prophylaxis, the administration of T was also repeated for the second knee operation. The tourniquet, as the standard TKR surgical technique, was inflated to 400 mm Hg (c. 50 kPa) in all 24 patients immediately before the beginning of surgery and kept in place for the duration of the operation. Samples of serum, bone, skin, synovia, and subcutaneous tissue were collected at timed intervals during surgery. They were microbiologically assayed for T by using Bacillus subtilis as the test organism. Overall, the mean T concentrations obtained with regional route prophylaxis were found to be 2 to 10 times higher than those achieved following systemic prophylaxis. Moreover, peak levels in different tissues after regional prophylaxis were significantly higher (P < 0.05). None of the patients experienced adverse effects due to regional or systemic T administration; no prosthetic or wound infections were observed in the follow-up period (from 12 to 26 months).

A total of 21 patients with advanced prostatic cancer and one patient with benign prostatic hypertrophy received 3.75, 7.5 or 15 mg leuprorelin acetate depot subcutaneously. Serum leuprorelin concentrations increased immediately after injection, reaching a peak concentration (range 13.1-54.5 ng/ml), which was directly proportional to dose, within 3 h. Mean drug levels subsequently declined to a plateau directly proportional to dose at 5 weeks. There was also a significant (P less than 0.01) dose-dependent increase in the area under the concentration-time curve for 0-35 days. Serum concentrations of luteinizing hormone and follicle stimulating hormone rose initially with all doses, followed by a rise in serum testosterone and dihydrotestosterone concentrations, which then fell sharply, within 3 weeks. A reduced level of follicle stimulating hormone subsequently occurred in all 20 evaluable patients and was maintained in 17 patients over 5 weeks. There was also marked initial suppression of luteinizing hormone levels in 15 patients and in 13 this continued. Castration levels of testosterone and dihydrotestosterone were maintained in all patients for up to 5 weeks. In two patients there was a complete response, in 14 a partial response and in three stable disease, with no significant differences in relation to dose. Clinical improvement and serum hormonal changes suggest that leuprorelin acetate depot is effective at a dose as low as 3.75 mg when given once every 4 weeks.

We investigated the pharmacokinetics of meropenem after the first and tenth i.m. administration in patients with respiratory tract infections. Ten patients (mean age 63.8 +/- 5.2 years) received meropenem 500 mg tds for at least ten doses, and plasma and urine antibiotic concentrations were determined by microbiological assay. After the first injection a mean peak plasma concentration of 7.93 +/- 1.29 mg/L was observed at 1 h. Trough levels at 8 h (0.29 +/- 0.16 mg/L) were detectable in five of ten treated patients. The mean terminal half-life was 1.08 +/- 0.2 h with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 23.8 +/- 4.59 mg/L.h, and a cumulative urinary recovery at 8 h of 48.43 +/- 3.12%. There was no evidence of change in the pharmacokinetics of meropenem after repeated i.m. administration, though the mean peak plasma concentration and AUC value were slightly increased. The accumulation ratio (assessed using AUC values) was 1.18 +/- 0.19 after multiple doses and was considered to be of little kinetic and clinical importance. Moreover, many of the trough concentrations of meropenem were below the limit of detection of the assay. After i.m. administration meropenem concentrations exceeded 0.5 mg/L for longer than previously described following i.v. infusion. No adverse events were reported.

The penetration of cefotetan (2-g intravenous bolus) into the suction blister fluid and tissue homogenates of 11 patients was investigated. Mean concentrations in tissue were significantly lower than contemporary suction blister fluid levels. These data show that the determination of beta-lactam concentrations by the tissue homogenate method may seriously underestimate the actual antibiotic levels in extracellular fluid.

Between February 1991 and July 1992, 79 previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma were enrolled in a phase II study of combined 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and l-folinic acid (FA). 5-FU 370 mg/m2/day was administered for 5 consecutive days as an intravenous (i.v.) bolus injection preceded by l-FA 100 mg/m2/day with the same administration modality. Treatment was given every 4 weeks until progression. 79 patients were evaluable for toxicity and 64 for response. 2 patients (3%) achieved a complete remission and 8 (12.5%) a partial remission, 33 (52%) had stable disease and 21 patients (33%) had progressive disease. Median duration of remission was 32.5 weeks and median survival for all evaluable patients was 64.5 weeks. Substantial to severe side-effects occurred in 39% of patients. Dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3-4) was mainly diarrhoea (18%) and mucositis (15%). Nausea/vomiting, cutaneous toxicity, leucopenia, alopecia and conjunctivitis of grade 3-4 occurred respectively in 6, 4, 2.5, 1 and 1% of cases. Toxicity appeared to be substantially similar to that characteristic of combined 5-FU and the chiral mixture of d,l-FA. Efficacy was within the range of that observed with the 5-FU/d,l-FA combination, although at the lower level.

The therapeutic efficacy and safety of various doses of leuprorelin acetate depot were determined in an open, multicentre study of patients with locally advanced or metastatic prostatic cancer (stages C, D1 or D2). Patients were randomly assigned to receive 3.75 mg (30 cases), 7.5 mg (eight cases), 15 mg (eight cases) and 30 mg (one patient) leuprorelin acetate depot administered subcutaneously once every 4 weeks. Of the 43 patients evaluable, two (5%) had complete remission, 23 (53%) partial remission and 13 (30%) patients stable disease. No significant differences were observed in response rates in relation to dose, disease stage or previous hormonal therapy. Disappearance or improvement in bone pain and urinary symptoms occurred in 63% and 79% of cases, respectively. Serum androgen concentrations decreased rapidly and persistently to castration levels, without significant differences for different doses. Treatment was well tolerated with a low incidence of mild side-effects - gynaecomastia (16%), nausea/vomiting (13%) and diarrhoea (2%). It is concluded that 3.75 mg leuprorelin acetate depot given subcutaneously once every 4 weeks is able to produce hormonal effects in all patients, an overall objective response comparable to that obtained using higher doses.