Search

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients often experience deficits in positive psychological well-being (PPWB) due to intensive treatment and follow-up care. Positive psychology interventions (PPIs) that promote PPWB via deliberate and systematic exercises (e.g., writing a gratitude letter) have consistently improved PPWB in medical populations, yet have never been studied in early HSCT recovery. In this single-arm, proof-of-concept study, we assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a novel eight-session, telephone-delivered PPI in early HSCT recovery. A priori, we defined feasibility as >50% of eligible patients enrolling in the study and >50% of participants completing 5/8 sessions, and acceptability as mean ease and utility scores of weekly participant ratings of PP exercises as 7/10. Of 45 eligible patients, 25 (55.6%) enrolled, 20 (80%) completed baseline assessments, 15 (75%) started the intervention, and 12 (60%) completed the intervention and follow-up assessments. The intervention was feasible (55.6% of eligible participants enrolled; 60% of baseline assessment completers finished 5/8 sessions) and led to very small-to-medium effect-size improvements in patient-reported outcomes. A novel, eight-week, telephone-delivered PPI was feasible and acceptable in allogeneic HSCT recipients. Larger, randomized studies are needed to examine the efficacy of PPIs for improving outcomes in this population.

Although the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) drastically altered the daily lives of much of the world--requiring masking, additional sanitation behaviors, and social isolation-patients who have undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) were already experts in these precautionary behaviors. HSCT provides a potential cure for some hematologic malignancies. However, it entails a protracted hospitalization, substantial physical side effects, and a decline in psychological well-being and quality of life. The COVID-19 pandemic has tightened many of the already strict procedures put in place for HSCT patients in order to protect their vulnerable immune systems, which could lead to more distress. Alternatively, exposure to this public health crisis may unlock the lives of HSCT survivors for their communities and healthcare providers to further inspire HSCT care built on a stronger foundation of empathy.

Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) have become increasingly recognized as essential to the practice of high-quality patient care delivery and the support of members of the clinical environment. A solid understanding of DEI contributes to a better grasp of what drives health care disparities and yields improved clinical outcomes for minority populations. This column discusses how individuals can practically promote DEI by describing the design and implementation of DEI in an academic psychiatry department. The authors highlight the powerful role of departmental initiatives in establishing best practices for DEI and lessons learned through the work of the psychiatry department's DEI committee.

BACKGROUND: Advances in diagnostic and therapeutics for cancer patients have resulted in improved survival rates. Yet, there is significant burden of psychosocial and physical health concerns among cancer survivors. Although digital health tools (DHT) are a promising alternative and effective strategy to deliver cancer care and support, their role in health promotion among cancer survivors remains relatively unexplored. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the acceptability and impact of DHT for health promotion in cancer survivors. METHODS: Data was pooled from cycle three of the 5th edition of the Health Information National Trends Survey. Chi-square tests were conducted to evaluate differences between cancer survivors and the general population regarding ownership, usage, and perceived usefulness of DHT for health management. Regression models were used to identify sociodemographic predictors of DHT usage among cancer survivors. RESULTS: Overall, cancer survivors were as likely as the general population to own and use DHT (e.g., health apps, wearable devices) for their care and they were likely to find these tools beneficial in tracking their health and communicating with healthcare providers. Cancer survivors who had health applications installed on their mobile device were more likely to meet national recommendations for diet (fruit and vegetable consumption) and strength training than those without health apps. Age, income, and education level were significant sociodemographic predictors of DHT ownership and usage. CONCLUSION: Our study shows cancer survivors own and use DHT at rates similar to the general population. Although cancer survivors from lower socioeconomic backgrounds are less likely to own DHT, DHT have the potential to reach many cancer survivors and positively impact clinically meaningful health outcomes for this growing patient population. With increasing use of DHT in health care, future studies that target digital access disparities and aim to explore factors associated with digital access in cancer survivors from low SES is essential.

The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically transformed the U.S. healthcare landscape. Within psychiatry, a sudden relaxing of insurance and regulatory barriers during the month of March 2020 enabled clinicians practicing in a wide range of settings to quickly adopt virtual care in order to provide critical ongoing mental health supports to both existing and new patients struggling with the pandemic's impact. In this article, we briefly review the extensive literature supporting the effectiveness of telepsychiatry relative to in-person mental health care, and describe how payment and regulatory challenges were the primary barriers preventing more widespread adoption of this treatment modality prior to COVID-19. We then review key changes that were implemented at the federal, state, professional, and insurance levels over a one-month period that helped usher in an unprecedented transformation in psychiatric care delivery, from mostly in-person to mostly virtual. Early quality improvement data regarding virtual visit volumes and clinical insights from our outpatient psychiatry department located within a large, urban, tertiary care academic medical center reflect both the opportunities and challenges of virtual care for patients and providers. Notable benefits have included robust clinical volumes despite social distancing mandates, reduced logistical barrieres to care for many patients, and decreased no-show rates. Finally, we provide clinical suggestions for optimizing telepsychiatry based on our experience, make a call for advocacy to continue the reduced insurance and regulatory restrictions affecting telepsychiatry even once this public health crisis has passed, and pose research questions that can help guide optimal utilization of telepsychiatry as mainstay or adjunct of outpatient psychiatric treatment now and in the future.

The global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has drastically disrupted cancer care, potentially exacerbating patients' distress levels. Patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) may be especially vulnerable to this pandemic stress. However, the associations of the COVID-19 pandemic with distress, fatigue, and quality of life (QoL) are not well understood in this population. In a cross-sectional analysis of data from 205 patients undergoing HSCT enrolled in a supportive care trial, we compared baseline pre-HSCT distress symptoms (depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD]), fatigue, and QoL between enrollees before (ie, March 2019-January 2020) and during (ie, March 2020-January 2021) the COVID-19 pandemic. We used linear regression models adjusting for sociodemographics and cancer diagnosis to examine the associations between enrollment period and patient-reported outcomes. We used semistructured qualitative interviews in 20 allogeneic HSCT recipients who were ≥3-months post-HSCT to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their recovery post-HSCT. One hundred twenty-four participants enrolled before COVID-19, and 81 participants enrolled during the pandemic. The 2 cohorts had similar baseline demographics and disease risk factors. In multivariate regression models, enrollment during COVID-19 was not associated with pre-HSCT symptoms of depression, anxiety, PTSD, fatigue, or QoL impairment. COVID-19-era participants reported themes of negative (eg, increased isolation) and positive (eg, engagement with meaningful activities) implications of the pandemic on HSCT recovery. We found no differences in pre-HSCT distress, fatigue, or QoL in patients undergoing HSCT before or during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, patients in early recovery post-HSCT report both negative and positive implications of the COVID-19 pandemic in their lives.

Background: Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) receiving intensive chemotherapy face a life-threatening illness, experience a prolonged, isolating hospitalization, and endure substantial physical and psychological symptoms. Some patients with AML experience traumatic stress as a result of their diagnosis and illness course. As traumatic stress reactions can negatively impact patients' QOL, mood, and clinical outcomes, it is essential to understand the extent of this trauma, its clinical manifestations, and risk factors to inform targeted management strategies. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), characterized by experiencing a traumatic event, is a common stress related disorder in cancer populations. Despite the potential link between AML and PTSD, data are limited regarding risk and risk factors of PTSD symptoms in this population. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of 160 patients with high-risk AML hospitalized to receive intensive chemotherapy. We used the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Civilian Version to assess PTSD symptoms at one month after diagnosis of AML. We used the Brief COPE, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia at baseline and week-2 during hospitalization to assess coping and quality of life (QOL), respectively. We then used multivariate regression models to assess the relationship between PTSD symptoms at one month and patient baseline sociodemographic factors, coping, and QOL. Results: Twenty-eight percent of patients reported clinically significant PTSD symptoms, describing high rates of intrusion (92%), avoidance (100%), and hypervigilance (97%). Among those who did not have clinically significant PTSD symptoms, 27%, 26%, and 23% of patients reported clinically significant intrusion, avoidance, and hypervigilance symptoms, respectively. In adjusted analyses, higher baseline QOL (B= -.22, p= Conclusion: A substantial proportion of patients with AML report clinically significant PTSD symptoms at one month after initiating intensive chemotherapy. These findings highlight the need to routinely screen, assess, and manage PTSD symptoms in all patients with AML. Patients' baseline QOL, coping strategies, and extent of QOL decline during hospitalization are important risk factors for PTSD symptoms, underscoring potential intervention targets in future studies to reduce the impact of PTSD in this population. Disclosures LeBlanc: Heron: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medtronic: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Welvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; American Cancer Society: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Duke University: Research Funding; NINR/NIH: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; UpToDate: Patents & Royalties; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CareVive: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Flatiron: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Helsinn: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hobbs:Merck: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Bayer: Research Funding; Constellation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Brunner:Novartis: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Forty-Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Luger:Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Acceleron: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria; Loxo Oncology: Honoraria; Onconova: Research Funding; Kura: Research Funding; Hoffman La Roche: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Biosight: Research Funding. Bhatnagar:KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KaryoPharm Therapuetics: Research Funding; Cell Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.