Search

Objectives The criteria for the reimbursement of fluoroquinolones changed in Belgium on 1 May 2018. This study aims to quantify the difference in fluoroquinolone use after this change, and to assess the timing and persistence of this effect, both in terms of total reimbursed fluoroquinolone use and its relative proportion. Methods Longitudinal reimbursement data on fluoroquinolone use in the Belgian community from January 2017 to November 2018 were analysed to identify a change in reimbursed fluoroquinolone use expressed in DDD per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID), using a set of non-linear mixed models including change-points. In addition, longitudinal data on the relative proportion of prescribed fluoroquinolones from January 2017 to December 2018 were analysed to identify a change in the relative proportion of prescribed fluoroquinolones using generalized estimation equations including change-points. Results Fluoroquinolone use dropped significantly immediately after the change in reimbursement criteria, from 2.21 DID (95% CI: 2.03–2.38) to 0.52 DID (95% CI: 0.48–0.56) and from 9.14% (95% CI: 8.75%–9.56%) to 6.52% (95% CI: 6.04%–7.04%). The observed decrease in fluoroquinolone use persisted over time. Conclusions While fluoroquinolone use was still above the target of 5% after the change in reimbursement criteria, its implementation helped to lower fluoroquinolone use in Belgium.

A Hidden Opportunity Coverage of the “routine costs” associated with clinical trial participation will soon be guaranteed for Medicaid beneficiaries for the first time, which could help reduce ineq...

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDs) are a costly problem within the sonography profession, affecting health care organization bottom lines, sonographer satisfaction, and the patient experience. There is limited evidence regarding the limits of exposure to sonography examinations that would reduce on-the-job injury. This case study demonstrates the use of examination schedules that incorporate demand, length and difficulty level of examinations, staffing resources, and equipment availability, which may help to determine appropriate or maximum workloads for sonographers within their respective workplace. Developing a culture of prevention is a critical and cost-effective component of reducing WRMSDs.

Background GEMINI trials and real-world studies in Western population have demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab (VDZ) for IBD. However, long-term real-world evidence of VDZ in Asian populations remains limited. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of VDZ in Taiwan CD and UC patients, and the IBD relapse after VDZ discontinuation. Methods Data were prospectively collected (January 2018-May 2020) from the Taiwan Society of IBD (TSIBD) registry, one of the largest real-world Asian IBD cohorts. Patients (>18 years old) receiving ≥1 dose of VDZ with up to a 1-year follow-up period were analyzed. Effectiveness at 6 month and 1 year including clinical response (CRS), clinical remission (CRM), steroid-free remission (SRM) and mucosal healing (MH);and safety outcome were analyzed descriptively. IBD relapse after VDZ treatment discontinuation was assessed since the reimbursement period in Taiwan is limited due to drug holiday required by government. Results A total of 274 patients (CD:127, UC:147) were included. At VDZ initiation, average [SD] age (year): 33.4 [14.6] in CD and 42.4 [14.3] in UC; median disease duration (years): 3.1 in CD and 3.9 in UC; 50.4% of CD and 70.7% of UC patients were biologics (bio)-naïve. Treatment effectiveness was analyzed (Figure 1-4). At 6 months, effectiveness in the CD bio-naïve group was significantly higher than the bio-exposed patients in CRS (67.4% vs 43.9%, p=0.047), CRM (62.8% vs 39.0%, p=0.025), and SRM (43.3% vs 4.3%, p=0.001), respectively. At 1 year, the CD bio-naïve group had higher CRS (82.1% vs 60.7%, p=0.026) than the bio-exposed group. There was no difference in effectiveness between bio-naïve and bio-exposed groups in UC at both 6 months and 1 year. Three patients (1.1%) reported serious infections (respiratory infection, intractable infection with underlying myelodysplastic syndrome and intestinal perforation due to endoscopy) and two (0.7%) had infusion-related reactions. No malignancies or hepatic injuries were reported. After limited treatment up to one year due to reimbursement, 58% (54/93) of patients had IBD relapse (CD: 27 [62.8%], UC: 27 [54%]). After cessation of VDZ, the mean [SD] time to IBD relapse was 5.5 [4.0] months in CD, and 5.8 [5.7] months for UC. Conclusion This study has shown the effectiveness and safety of VDZ therapy for Taiwan IBD patients. Better outcomes were observed in bio-naïve CD patients, whereas bio-naïve and bio-exposed UC patients have comparable outcomes. After a limited VDZ treatment duration, over one-half of patients had IBD relapse, with the majority occurring within 5 months of VDZ discontinuation. These data suggest that continued VDZ therapy would benefit the majority of IBD patients in Taiwan.

This cohort study examines the application of a combined reimbursement model to brand-name and generic drugs as well as biologic and biosimilar therapies in the Medicare Part B program., Key Points Question Is generic drug competition associated with prices of physician-administered drugs, and what price changes could occur under increased biosimilar competition? Findings In this cohort study of 50 brand-name drugs and generic versions as well as 28 biologics and biosimilars, generic competition was associated with reduced prices, achieving a nearly 53% price decrease after 3 generic competitors were approved. If biosimilar products were treated similar to generic products in the Medicare Part B program, spending on biologics with their approved biosimilars was estimated to have been nearly 27% lower from 2015 to 2019. Meaning Findings from this study suggest that implementing the bundled biosimilar reimbursement model may be associated with substantially reduced Medicare spending and increased biosimilar market entry., Importance Price decreases of biologic and biosimilar products in Medicare Part B have been minimal, even with biosimilar competition. Medicare reimburses clinicians for biologics and biosimilars differently than for brand-name and generic drugs, which has generated greater price reductions. Objective To characterize the nature of price competition among brand-name and generic drugs under Medicare Part B and to estimate the cost savings to the program of subjecting biologic and biosimilar therapies to a similar price competition. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study analyzed all brand-name drugs and their approved generic versions as well as biologics and biosimilars that were reimbursed under Medicare Part B from quarter 1 of 2005 to quarter 2 of 2021. Two separate data sets were created: brand-name and generic drugs as well as biologics and biosimilars data sets. Brand-name products with generic versions that were introduced before 2005 were excluded, and so were vaccines. Exposures Number of generic and biosimilar competitors over time. Main Outcomes and Measures Price change as a percentage of the brand-name drug or biologic price in the quarter before generic or biosimilar competition. Price change was modeled using a linear, fixed-effects time series regression, with the number of generic or biosimilar competitors as the main covariate. Time was expressed as the number of quarters since the first generic or biosimilar competitor entered the market. Savings were estimated by projecting the regression model of brand-name and generic drug competition to observed biologic and biosimilar competition and by applying the estimated price reduction to actual Medicare spending for those products from 2015 to 2019. Results Of the 988 Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes identified, 50 (5.0%) met the inclusion criteria for the brand-name and generic drug data set and 28 (2.8%) met the criteria for the biologic and biosimilar data set. The first generic competitor was associated with reduced drug prices by 17.0%, the second competitor with a 39.5% decrease, the third competitor with a 52.5% decrease, and the fourth and more competitors with a 70.2% decrease (price decline was measured from brand-name drug price before the first generic competitor rather than from price established with fewer competitors). If biologics and biosimilars were subject to the same Medicare reimbursement framework as brand-name and generic drugs, Medicare spending on these products was estimated to have been 26.6% lower ($1.6 billion) from 2015 to 2019. Conclusions and Relevance This study found minimal uptake of biosimilars and limited price reductions for biologics and biosimilars under the current Medicare Part B reimbursement policy. Adopting the bundled biosimilar reimbursement structure for biologic and biosimilar therapies may be associated with substantial savings and encourage greater biosimilar market entry.

IMPORTANCE: Women cardiologists receive lower salaries than men; however, it is unknown whether US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) reimbursement also differs by gender and contributes to the lower salaries. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether gender differences exist in the reimbursements, charges, and reimbursement per charge from CMS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional analysis used the CMS database to obtain 2016 reimbursement data for US cardiologists. These included reimbursements to cardiologists, charges submitted, and unique billing codes. Gender differences in reimbursement for evaluation and management and procedural charges from both inpatient and outpatient settings were also assessed. Analysis took place between April 2019 and December 2020. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Outcomes included median CMS payments received and median charges submitted in the inpatient and outpatient settings in 2016. RESULTS: In 2016, 17 524 cardiologists (2312 women [13%] and 15 212 men [87%]) received CMS payments in the inpatient setting, and 16 929 cardiologists (2151 women [13%] and 14 778 men [87%]) received CMS payments in the outpatient setting. Men received higher median payments in the inpatient (median [interquartile range], $62 897 [$30 904-$104 267] vs $45 288 [$21 371-$73 191]; P

This cross-sectional study assesses the use of Medicare's cognitive assessment and care planning codes in the first 2 years of their introduction.

Background In vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment is one of the most expensive infertility treatments. Cost has been described as a substantial barrier to access. In France all infertility treatments, including IVF, are fully reimbursed, but are there other barriers to access? Methods Based on the French national health insurance database that exhaustively records reimbursed healthcare, this cohort study included all women aged 18–49 years unsuccessfully treated with ovarian induction (first-line infertility treatment) between January–August 2016. Outcome was IVF access within 24 months of starting first-line treatment. Univariate and multivariate regressions explored age, disadvantaged social status, driving time to nearest IVF centre, and deprivation index of area of residence. Results Over 20,000 women unsuccessfully received first-line treatment. Almost 80% did not access IVF within 24 months. After age 34, probability of access decreased. Disadvantaged social status and living in a disadvantaged area were associated with lower probability of accessing IVF. Driving time to the nearest IVF centre was not significantly associated with access. Conclusions Socio-economic barriers to access IVF exist despite full treatment reimbursement in France. To reduce health inequalities, we need to better understand the nature and patterns of these barriers among less socially advantaged people. Key messages After failure of first-line infertility treatment, only 20% of women access IVF although it is fully reimbursed in France. Age, but most importantly socio-economic status, is a key determinant of access to IVF treatment. Distance from nearest IVF centre does not appear significant in explaining access to treatment in France.

Study question What is the probability that patients will receive assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment based on their out-of-pocket payment and income class? Summary answer Higher-income patients opted for ART even at a higher cost, whereas an out-of-pocket payment was the most influential determinant in all income groups. What is known already Economic disparities affect access to ART treatment in many countries. At the time of this survey, Japan provided partial reimbursement for ART treatment exclusively for those in low- or middle-income classes due to limited governmental budgets. However, the optimal financial support by income class is unknown. Study design, size, duration We conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) in Japan in January 2020 including 824 women with fertility problems who were recruited via an online social research panel. Participants/materials, setting, methods Participants included women aged 25–44 years undergoing fertility diagnosis or treatment. They completed a DCE questionnaire including 16 hypothetical scenarios, created by orthogonal design, to measure six relevant ART attributes (pregnancy rate, risk of adverse effects, number of visits to outpatient clinics, consultation hours, kindness of staff, and out-of-pocket expense) and their relation to treatment choice. We used mixed-effect logistic regression models to estimate the probability of receiving ART treatment for each attribute. Main results and the role of chance Of the 1,247 eligible women recruited, 824 completed the survey (66% participation rate). All six attributes significantly influenced treatment preference, with participants valuing out-of-pocket payment the most, followed by pregnancy rates and kindness of staff. The odds ratios of each attribute to receiving ART treatment were 0.58 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57 − 0.59) for out-of-pocket payments per additional 100,000 Japanese yen (JPY; i.e., 800 euros), 1.47 (95% CI: 1.43 − 1.53) for pregnancy rates per additional 5%, and 4.16 (95% CI: 3.73 − 4.64) for kindness of staff, after adjusting for clinical and socioeconomic factors. Significant interactions occurred between high household income (≥8 million JPY) and high out-of-pocket payment (≥500,000 JPY). However, the mean predicted probability of the highest-income patients (i.e., ≥10 million JPY) to receive ART treatment at the average cost without public funding (i.e., 400,000 JPY) was 47% (interquartile range: 18%−76%), whereas that of middle-income patients (i.e., 6–8 million JPY) to receive ART at the average subsidized cost (i.e., 100,000 JPY) was 60% (interquartile range: 33%–88%). Limitations, reasons for caution Other attributes not included in our DCE scenarios might be relevant in real-life settings. Choices made in a DCE would not wholly match the actual treatment choices. Wider implications of the findings: The present DCE suggested that out-of-pocket payment was the primary determinant in patients’ ART decisions. High-income patients were more likely to receive ART treatment even at a high cost, but their ineligibility for government financial support due to their high income might discourage them from receiving treatment. Trial registration number NA

DISCLOSURES: No funding supported the writing of this commentary. The author has nothing to disclose.

OBJECTIVES: Child day care centers that serve low-income families may qualify to participate in the US Department of Agriculture Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) and receive reimbursement for meals and snacks served. In 2017, day care sites were mandated to follow the new CACFP meal guidelines. The objective of this study was to assess knowledge and perspectives about the new CACFP meal guidelines among parents of children attending day care sites. METHODS: Individual interviews and focus groups with parents of children at CACFP day care sites in two Texas cities. Qualitative data were coded and analyzed using using a modified version of focused coding and grounded theory methods. Themes and sub-themes were identified. Quantitative data were analyzed for frequencies and descriptives. RESULTS: A total of 54 parents participated via 29 individual interviews and 7 focus groups and completed questionnaires. All participants were females; majority were Hispanics and with income < $20,000, about 67% were aware of the new CACFP meal guidelines. Five major themes emerged: thoughts on menus and meals served at day care (sub-themes: overall menu, nutritional value, portion size, quality, variety of options), perceived child likability of foods served at day care, perceived child satiety, suggested changes to meals, and barriers to children eating meals at day care (sub-themes: time, child preferences). CONCLUSIONS: This study helped identify thoughts and perceptions of parents of children attending CACFP day care. Issues identified should be systematically addressed and incorporated into CACFP menu planning at day care sites. FUNDING SOURCES: NIH and USDA-ARS.

This cross-sectional study compares cost and payer reimbursement for hospital admissions of children and assesses associations of underpayment by patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics.

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital district Finnish foundation for cardiovascular research Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major cause of ischemic stroke. The risk of stroke is strongly associated with age, sex and comorbidities of the patients. Therefore, it is crucial that the comorbidities are consistently recorded in medical records as well as health care registries. Purpose This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of the comorbidities related to AF stroke risk in Finnish nationwide population registries, and assess how the use and combination of these registries affect the calculated CHA2DS2-VASc risk score. The comorbidities evaluated were Hypertension, Diabetes, Stroke or TIA, Heart Failure, and Vascular Disease. Methods The Finnish AntiCoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation (FinACAF) study collected data on all Finnish AF patients from 1st January 2004 to 31st December 2018. Due to the initiation of the national primary care register in 2012, this substudy uses the data of patients with a new AF diagnosis during 2012-2018 (n = 168 353). Using a unique personal identification code, individual patient data were linked from the Finnish national health care registries "AvoHILMO" (primary care) and "HILMO" (secondary and tertiary care), National Prescription Register (ATC codes of purchased medication) and the National Reimbursement Register for reimbursed medication upheld by the Social Insurance Institute (KELA). Results The average CHA2DS2-VASc risk score when entering the cohort, and including information from all registries, equaled 2.91 for men (mean age 70.0 years) and 4.42 for women (mean age 76.9 years). The highest prevalence of diabetes and hypertension were found based on the National Reimbursement Register (ATC codes). Stroke or TIA and heart failure were identified almost exclusively based on secondary and tertiary hospital records. The table represents our results. Conclusion Comprehensive registry analysis of AF patients requires the inclusion of both hospital and medication data. The role of primary care information was limited. Comorbidity and CHA2DS2-VASc weight Total Prevalence Primary care ICD-10 codes Primary care ICPC-2 codes Secondary and tertiary care ICD-10 codes ATCcodes Medication reimbursement codes Hypertension 1 82%137 317 28%47 337 13%21 427 39%66 252 77%130 400 7%10 957 Diabetes 1 24%41 017 13%22 666 13%22 547 14%23 793 21%35 942 12%20 295 Stroke or TIA 2 17%28 653 4%6 254 1%1 968 16%27 379 - - Heart Failure 1 18%29 827 5%7 630 1%1 398 16%26 366 - 1%1 908 Vascular Disease1 28%47 420 12%19 581 2%3 265 25%41 647 - 7%11 802 Average CHA2DS2-VASc contribution 1.86 0.65 0.31 1.26 0.99 0.26 The prevalence of the comorbidities and average CHA2DS2-VASc risk score contribution by registry and combined.

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR-HB) models have been shown to be effective, however, there is a large variation of protocols and minimal evidence of effectiveness in higher risk populations, in which exercise at distance might be concerning. In addition, lack of reimbursement models has discouraged the widespread adoption of CR-HB. During the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, an even greater gap in CR care has emerged due to the decreased availability of on-site services. Purpose Evaluation of the safety of a CR-HB program during COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Prospective cohort study which included patients (pts) who were participating in a centre-based CR program and accepted to participate in a CR-HB after the centre-based CR program closure due to COVID-19. The CR-HB consisted in a multidisciplinary digital CR program, including: 1.pts regular clinical and exercise risk assessment; 2.psychological tele-appointments and group sessions; 3. online exercise training sessions, which consisted of recorded videos and real time online exercise training sessions (each session recommended 3 times per week, during 60 minutes); 4.structured online educational program for pts and family members/caregivers, including educational videos and webinars; 5. follow-up fortnightly questionnaire to evaluate risk factors control and need for appointments or directing to hospital; 6. nutrition tele-appointments; 7. physician tele-appointments, scheduled according to follow-up questionnaire or at patients request (e-mail or telephone) to avoid unnecessary exposure and overload in the hospital. Minor and major adverse events such as hospitalizations due to cardiac event or other non CV reason, cardiac or noncardiac death, during or immediately after the exercise sessions, were collected. Results 116 cardiovascular disease (CVD) pts (62.6 ± 8.9 years, 95 males) who were attending a Centre-based CR program were included in a CR-HB program. Almost 90% (n = 103) of the participants had coronary artery disease; 13.8% pts had heart failure. The mean LVEF was 52 ± 11%; 31,1% of the population had at least moderate risk. Regarding risk factors, obesity was the most common risk factor (74.7%) followed by hypertension (59.6%), family history (41.8%), dyslipidaemia (37.9%), diabetes (18.1%), and smoking (12.9%). 98 CVD pts (85.5%) successfully completed all the online assessments. Three male participants dropped out for hospitalization due to knee surgery, pacemaker implantation and in-stent restenosis without relation to exercise sessions. No major events were registered during the exercise training sessions and only one minor adverse event, sprained ankle, was reported during the training sessions. Conclusions This CR-HB program, originated by the need of social distancing during COVID-19 pandemic, revealed to be a valuable and safe strategy to reach at distance most patients previously in a Centre-based CR program.

Innovative reimbursement mechanisms have long been considered potential solutions to the data uncertainty associated with one-off, high-value gene therapies that have long-term therapeutic potential, combined with limited supporting evidence at launch. The launches of increasing numbers of such gene therapies in Europe and the USA in the past 5 years provide valuable exemplars of how innovative reimbursement mechanisms are used by healthcare system decision makers in practice. This review details the use of such reimbursement schemes for recently launched gene therapies in key European countries and the USA, and shows that they are more widespread in Europe than in the USA. Although innovative payment schemes are increasingly used across countries, differences in healthcare system structures (e.g., single- vs multi-payer systems) and willingness to pay mean that decision makers in different countries have different incentives to manage uncertainties around long-term, real-world product value.

Background To promote their sexual and reproductive health and rights, women need full access to contraception and choice of contraceptive method. Precarious women may have difficulties in accessing contraception even in developed countries with widespread health insurance coverage. It is difficult to explore this issue through national surveys that often include too few precarious women. We aimed to compare contraceptive use among precarious and non-precarious women based on the exhaustive French health insurance database. Methods The French health insurance database covers 98% of the population living in France and includes all healthcare reimbursements. Contraceptives are partly reimbursed by the national health insurance. For people in a precarious situation, they are fully reimbursed by a specific system called universal health coverage. We selected all women aged 15-49 years living in metropolitan France in 2019. We compared the prevalence of use of each contraceptive method: pill, hormonal intra-uterine device (IUD), copper IUD and implant, between precarious and non-precarious women. Results Among the study population of 14 million women, 11% were in a precarious situation. Fewer precarious women used contraceptives (31%) than non-precarious women (44%, p < 0.001). When using a contraceptive, precarious women used a different method than non-precarious women: under the age of 30 years, they used the pill much less and implants more often; above 35 years, they used hormonal IUDs less often and the pill and implants more often. Conclusions Although in France contraceptives are fully reimbursed for precarious women, they used fewer and different contraceptives than non-precarious women. Social inequalities may exist even in such a favorable national context. Further research should explore barriers that precarious women may encounter in accessing and choosing their contraception. Key messages Although French national health insurance fully covers contraceptives for precarious women, their use of contraceptives is much lower (31% versus 44%), suggesting possible social inequalities. When using contraception, precarious women do not use the same methods as non-precarious women, suggesting possible differences in their contraceptive choice or differences in medical practice.

Policymakers everywhere struggle to introduce therapeutic innovation while controlling costs, a particular challenge for the universal Italian National Healthcare System (SSN), which spends only 8.8% of GDP to care for one of the world's oldest populations. Oncology provides a telling example, where innovation has dramatically improved care and survival, transforming cancer into a chronic condition. However, innovation has also increased therapy duration, adverse event management, and service demand. The SSN risks collapse unless centralized cancer planning changes gear, particularly with Covid-19 causing treatment delays, worsening patient prognosis and straining capacity. In view of the 750 billion Euro “Next Generation EU”, released by the European Union to relieve Member States hit by the pandemic, the SSN tapped a multidisciplinary research team to identify key strategies for equitable uptake of innovations in treatment and delivery, with emphasis on data-driven technological and managerial advancements – and lessons from Covid-19.

INTRODUCTION: Telehealth is gaining more attention in multiple specialties, including urology. Video visits in particular have shown high satisfaction and cost-saving for patients. However, there has been little investigation into how video visits compare to traditional clinic visits on measures of clinical efficiency and reimbursement. METHODS: Our dataset included 250 video visits of established patients at Michigan Medicine Department of Urology and 250 in-person clinic visits with the same providers completed between July 2016 and July 2017. Information on visit completion and cancellation rates; cycle time (time from check in to check out); reimbursement; and patient out-of-pocket expenses was collected using the electronic medical record and billing data. RESULTS: Completion rates were similar between video and clinic visits (58% versus 61%, respectively; p=0.24). Average cycle time for video visits was significantly shorter compared to clinic visits (24 min vs 80 min, respectively; p

This cohort study describes recent trends in use and payment rates and in overall expenditure for skin cancer procedures in the Medicare Part B population in the United States.

Background 2019 ESC/EAS dyslipidaemia guidelines recommend a 50% lowering in untreated LDL-C and use of PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) for patients at very-high cardiovascular (CV) risk when LDL-C target goals of Purpose This observational study describes a cohort of patients initiating evolocumab across 10 EU countries. Methods Patients are followed from evolocumab initiation (baseline). Demographic/clinical characteristics, lipid modifying therapy (LLT) and lipid values were collected from medical records (6 months prior to evolocumab initiation through 30 months post initiation). We report interim data from patients initiating evolocumab from August 2015 with follow-up through October 2019. Results 1896 patients initiated on evolocumab as per local reimbursement criteria were included in this interim analysis (planned sample size: N=2,000). Most (1663 [88%]) had 12 months follow-up, 665 (35%) had 18 months follow-up; mean follow-up, 16.3 months. Mean (SD) age was 60.0 (10.8) years; 85% of patients had a history of CV disease (CVD), 44% had a diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), 19% had type 2 diabetes, 66% were hypertensive, 7% had renal impairment and half (51%) were prior or current smokers. The majority (60%) reported statin intolerance and 42% were not receiving any LLT at evolocumab initiation. Fewer than half (805 [43%]) were receiving a statin (±ezetimibe) at evolocumab initiation; of these, most were on a high/moderate intensity (68%/22%). 12% of patients were receiving statin monotherapy. Median (Q1, Q3) baseline LDL-C was 3.98 (3.16, 5.06) mmol/L. Within 3 months of evolocumab initiation median LDL-C fell by 58% to 1.62 mmol/L. This reduction was maintained over time (Figure). Overall, 58% of patients achieved at least one LDL-C Conclusion In Europe, patients initiated on evolocumab had baseline LDL-C levels almost 3 times higher than the present threshold for PCSK9i use, reflecting local reimbursement criteria. Evolocumab resulted in a more than 50% reduction in LDL-C; however, only approximately half of all patients achieved an LDL-C LDL-C levels after evolocumab initiation Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Amgen

From a smartphone ping signifying the start of a fertile window to controlling a breast pump with a few clicks in a mobile app, “femtech” has readily integrated into women's daily lives. Femtech, a term coined to describe the realm of technology catering to female health needs, encompasses a range of digital technology addressing women's health, including fertility tracking, pregnancy and nursing counseling, and online contraception provision. While femtech puts autonomy and information in the hands of its users, access to the technology is not yet equitably distributed. As insurance reimbursement can increase and equitize that access, this research examines what legal duties exist for increasing access to femtech. In analyzing how insurance schemes have integrated femtech, this research compares how select femtech products fare across reimbursement systems, using fertility algorithm, smart breast pump, and pelvic floor trainer case studies in the U.S, U.K, and Sweden. Insights reveal a duty to promote access to femtech, as well as varying degrees of integration in respective health systems. Insights also reveal which elements of the female life course are overlooked in reimbursement schemes. Key messages Femtech has the power to put agency and information in the hands of millions of women. Yet, access is not equitable given significant financial and regulatory barriers. Comparative studies of fertility algorithms, smart breast pumps, and pelvic floor trainers in international health systems demand increased advocacy to realize the duty to enable femtech access.

The fourth speaker will present the role of HTA in reimbursement, as well as existing pricing frameworks and HTA initiatives, and determining overall access. An overview of constraints and opportunities in terms of establishing legislative frameworks to enable deliberation, transparency will be further discussed. Their importance for national healthcare systems, i.e., payers, and for ensuring system sustainability. Affordability will be examined in terms of effect on individuals, on payers, and on systems.

Background Financial accessibility to healthcare is a cornerstone in the Belgian health care system. A whole range of financial protectives measures are applied to ensure accessibility to all residents by minimizing the medical costs including a higher reimbursement for vulnerable population groups and protective measures for people with high health expenses due to chronic diseases. This study examines the effectiveness of such protective measures on the use of dental care among a representative sample of Belgian adults. Methods Data from the participants of the Belgian health interview survey (BHIS) 2013 aged 18 years and over were individually linked with data from the Belgian compulsory health insurance data (BCHI), (n = 8,668). Multivariate logistic regression was applied to assess the impact of the financial measures on the use of dental care. Results Five percent of the population reported having delayed dental care in the past 12 months due to financial barriers. Results from the multivariate model show that irrespective of gender, age, and educational level, individuals who have preferential reimbursement are more likely to postpone their dental care (OR = 3.32, 95% CI: 1.87-5.92), while those who can account on measures for high health expenses due to chronic diseases are less likely to do so (but not significantly). Conclusions Findings suggest that vulnerable people have more postponement despite the fact that they have a preferential reimbursement and, high expenses as a result of chronic diseases are not associated with more postponement of dental care. More targeted financial interventions should be necessary to reduce postponement of dental service utilization. Key messages Current health interventions are not yet effective for vulnerable people in dental care use. High expenses as a result of chronic diseases are not associated with more postponement of dental care.

Background and Aims A living-donor kidney transplant (LDKT) is one of the best treatments for kidney failure, yet in the UK there is evidence of ethnic inequity in access. We designed this questionnaire-based mixed-methods study to investigate the patient-reported reasons that family members of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic group (BAME) individuals were not able to become living kidney donors. Method This questionnaire-based case-control study included 14 UK hospitals. Participants were adults transplanted between 1/4/13-31/3/17. Participants provided data on all relatives aged >18 years who could have been potential living kidney donors. Participants were asked for the reasons why relatives could not donate: individuals were asked to tick all options that applied from a list of reasons (Age; Health; Weight; Location; Financial/Cost; Job; Blood group; No-one to care for them after donation), and a box was provided for free-text entries following the option of ‘Other – please give details’. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyse the association between the likelihood of selecting each reason for non-donation and the participant’s ethnicity (binary variable White versus BAME). 56/171 BAME respondents provided free text responses and all were analysed. Qualitative responses were analysed using thematic analysis. Results 1,240 questionnaires were returned from 3,103 patients (40% response). There was strong evidence that after adjustment for potential confounders sex, age and socioeconomic position, BAME individuals were more likely than White respondents to indicate that family members lived too far away to donate (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.14 [95% CI 2.10-4.70]), were prevented from donating by financial concerns (aOR 2.25 [95% CI 1.49-3.39]), were not able to take time off work (aOR 2.05 [95% CI 1.36-3.09]), and were not the right blood group (aOR 1.47 [95% CI 1.12-1.94]). Four qualitative themes were identified from free-text responses from BAME participants: i) Burden of disease within the family ii) ‘Unorthodox’ religious beliefs iii) Specific geographical concerns (healthcare provision, visa difficulties) iv) Knowledge handling. The theme ‘Knowledge Handling’ incorporated three subthemes: a) Need for more detailed knowledge, b) Protected disclosure of health status, and c) Recipient assumptions about potential donor knowledge. Conclusion We have identified multiple barriers to living kidney donation in the UK BAME population, which should be further investigated and addressed. BAME transplant recipients were more likely to report that potential donors were not the right blood group to donate: work should be undertaken to ascertain if this reflects true ABO-incompatibility or perceived incompatibility. Potential donors living outside the UK is a major barrier, related to difficulties with accessing visa and concerns about a specific country’s healthcare system’s capacity for longer-term post-donation care. The financial barriers reported may disproportionately affect overseas donors who, although entitled to reimbursement for travel, accommodation and visa costs, may incur large “up-front” costs which may be prohibitive. No respondents reported that a major religion’s position on living donation was a barrier to donation. However, there were several references to family members holding beliefs that were described as ‘distorted’ religious beliefs: this highlights the need to understand the beliefs of potential donors who belong to non-mainstream religions, which may be out of the remit of denominational faith leaders.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services should immediately update current policies to include reimbursement for Medicare patients receiving intravenous antibiotics at home. The majority of these patients are over the age of 65 and at increased risk for severe illness due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Requiring them to travel to an infusion center, stay in a skilled nursing facility or remain in the hospital longer than necessary to receive treatment results in avoidable risk of exposure amidst a pandemic. Current policy has significant implications for increased cost and harm to both these patients and the US healthcare system.

Ensuring fit between a service and the implementing context is a critical but often overlooked precursor of implementation success. This commentary proposes five key considerations that should be evaluated when exploring fit: alignment with needs and metrics; alignment with organizational resources and capabilities; alignment with organizational priorities and culture; alignment with reimbursement mechanisms for long-term sustainability; and alignment with the regulatory environment. Successful uptake and implementation hinges on careful planning and, most importantly, appropriate fit between the service and the implementing environment.

Background Quota payment for specific diseases under global budget is one of the most typical modes of provider payment system reform in rural China. This study aimed to assess this reform mode from aspects of the total fee, structure of the fee and enrollees’ benefits. Methods A total of 127,491 inpatient records from 2014 to 2016 were extracted from the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme (NRCMS) database in Weiyuan County, Gansu Province. Total fee, actual compensation ratio, out-of-pocket ratio, constituent ratio of the treatment fee, constituent ratio of the inspection and laboratory fee, and length of stay were selected as dependent variables. Both generalized additive models (GAMs) and multiple linear regression models were used to measure the change in dependent variables along with year. Results Prior to the adjustment of the compensation type, out-of-pocket ratio and length of stay decreased, while total fee, actual compensation ratio, constituent ratio of the treatment fee, and constituent ratio of the inspection and laboratory fee increased. After the compensation type was adjusted, the mean of the total fee increased rapidly in 2015 and remained stable in 2016. The mean length of stay increased in 2015 but decreased in 2016. A comparison of inpatients suffering from diseases covered by quota payments and those suffering from general diseases revealed that total fee, out-of-pocket ratio, and length of stay decreased and actual compensation ratio increased for the former, whereas the opposite was true for the latter. Constituent ratio of the treatment fee and constituent ratio of the inspection and laboratory fee increased for both samples, except for the constituent ratio of the inspection and laboratory fee of quota payment diseases in 2016, which did not change. Conclusions Quota payment for specific diseases under global budget had obviously positive effects on cost control in Weiyuan, Gansu. Considering the limited coverage of quota payment for diseases, the long-term effect of this reform mode and its replicability awaits further evaluation.

The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) launched the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative in 2013. A subsequent study showed that the initiative was associated with reductions in Medicare payments for total joint replacement, but little is known about the effect of BPCI on medical conditions.We used Medicare claims from 2013 through 2015 to identify admissions for the five most commonly selected medical conditions in BPCI: congestive heart failure (CHF), pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), sepsis, and acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We used difference-in-differences analyses to assess changes in standardized Medicare payments per episode of care (defined as the hospitalization plus 90 days after discharge) for these conditions at BPCI hospitals and matched control hospitals.A total of 125 hospitals participated in BPCI for CHF, 105 hospitals for pneumonia, 101 hospitals for COPD, 88 hospitals for sepsis, and 73 hospitals for AMI. At baseline, the average Medicare payment per episode of care across the five conditions at BPCI hospitals was $24,280, which decreased to $23,993 during the intervention period (difference, -$286; P=0.41). Control hospitals had an average payment for all episodes of $23,901, which decreased to $23,503 during the intervention period (difference, -$398; P=0.08; difference in differences, $112; P=0.79). Changes from baseline to the intervention period in clinical complexity, length of stay, emergency department use or readmission within 30 or 90 days after hospital discharge, or death within 30 or 90 days after admission did not differ significantly between the intervention and control hospitals.Hospital participation in five common medical bundles under BPCI was not associated with significant changes in Medicare payments, clinical complexity, length of stay, emergency department use, hospital readmission, or mortality. (Funded by the Commonwealth Fund.).

Team-based care delivery models offer opportunities to improve quality of care and outcomes for patients, providers, and communities. Because of various barriers, including disincentives in the payment system, team-based care has not reached its potential. This commentary discusses team-based care in the context of emerging value-based payment models and the potential costs of, and opportunities afforded by, these models.

In this paper, we re‐examine the properties of two commonly adopted government reimbursement schemes for pharmaceuticals: reference pricing and fixed percentage reimbursement. We depart from the previous literature by assuming that the individual demand is price‐sensitive and depends on the copayment rate (i.e., the part paid by each consumer). We obtain two novel results under reference pricing: first, as the copayment rate increases, so do pharmaceutical prices; second, this increase in pharmaceutical prices reduces social welfare. Whilst reference pricing does emerge as a preferable reimbursement scheme, demand elasticities and the copayment rate interact in complex ways. This leads (unexpectedly) to the possibility that a higher copayment rate (lower reimbursement rate) results in higher government expenditure.

Background: The aim of this study was to examine the access of Indian cancer patients to optimum cancer care under selected government schemes by reviewing reimbursement schemes for cancer care in India. Methods: All cancer care reimbursement schemes in India were identified and three highly utilized schemes (VAS, RAS, CMCHS) were selected. Quality of breast, colorectal, lung, head & neck, and gastric cancer care was reviewed with respect to NCCN guidelines. Direct medical costs and shortage of budget in reimbursed amounts were calculated for each listed chemotherapy regimen. Results: Medical oncology practice following the schemes’ formularies is inferior to recommendations by the NCCN guidelines. Innovative treatment (targeted therapies) like trastuzumab, pertuzumab (breast), bevacizumab, cetuximab, panitumumab (colorectal), erlotinib, gefitinib, crizotinib, and nivolumab (lung) are either not reimbursed (VAS, CMCHS) or partially reimbursed (RAS). Average shortage of budget was found to be 43% (breast), 55% (colorectal), 74% (lung), 7% (head & neck), and 51% (gastric cancer). Conclusions: Policy makers should consider addition of newer treatments, exclusion of sub-optimal treatments, increments in per patient budget and optimization of supportive care, which may contribute to improvements in survival and quality of life for Indian cancer patients.