Search

Background: The nucleus accumbens (NAc) is a key node of the brain reward circuit driving reward-related behavior. Dysregulation of NAc has been demonstrated to contribute to pathological markers of addiction in substance use disorder (SUD) making it a potential therapeutic target for brain stimulation. Transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) is an emerging non-invasive brain stimulation approach that can modulate deep brain regions with a high spatial resolution. However, there is currently no evidence showing how the brain activity of NAc and brain functional connectivity within the reward network neuromodulated by tFUS on the NAc., Methods: In this pilot study, we carried out a single-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the underlying mechanism of tFUS neuromodulating the reward network through NAc in ten healthy adults. Specifically, the experiment consists of a 20-min concurrent tFUS/fMRI scan and two 24-min resting-state fMRI before and after the tFUS session., Results: Firstly, our results demonstrated the feasibility and safety of 20-min tFUS on NAc. Additionally, our findings demonstrated that bilateral NAc was inhibited during tFUS on the left NAc compared to sham. Lastly, increased functional connectivity between the NAc and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) was observed after tFUS on the left NAc, but no changes for the sham group., Conclusion: Delivering tFUS to the NAc can modulate brain activations and functional connectivity within the reward network. These preliminary findings suggest that tFUS could be potentially a promising neuromodulation tool for the direct and non-invasive management of the NAc and shed new light on the treatment for SUD and other brain diseases that involve reward processing., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Peng, Connolly, Sutton, Robinson, Baker-Vogel, Short and Badran.)

Background: Implanted vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and transcutaneous auricular VNS (taVNS) have been primarily administered clinically to the unilateral-left vagus nerve. This left-only convention has proved clinically beneficial in brain disorders. However, in stroke survivors, the presence of a lesion in the brain may complicate VNS-mediated signaling, and it is important to understand the laterality effects of VNS in stroke survivors to optimize the intervention., Objective: To understand whether taVNS delivered to different ear targets relative to the lesion (ipsilesional vs contralesional vs bilateral vs sham) impacts blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal propagation in stroke survivors., Methods: We enrolled 20 adults with a prior history of stroke. Each participant underwent a single visit, during which taVNS was delivered concurrently during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) acquisition. Each participant received three discrete active stimulation conditions (ipsilesional, contralesional, bilateral) and one sham condition in a randomized order. Stimulation-related BOLD signal changes in the active conditions were compared to sham conditions to understand the interaction taVNS and laterality effects., Results: All active taVNS conditions deactivated the contralesional default mode network related regions compared to sham, however only ipsilesional taVNS enhanced the activations in the ipsilesional visuomotor and secondary visual cortex. Furthermore, we reveal an interaction in task activations between taVNS and cortical visuomotor areas, where ipsilesional taVNS significantly increased ipsilesional visuomotor activity and decreased contralesional visuomotor activity compared to sham., Conclusion: Laterality of taVNS relative to the lesion is a critical factor in optimizing taVNS in a stroke population, with ipsilesional stimulation providing largest direct brain activation and should be explored further when designing taVNS studies in neurorehabilitation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Non-invasive brain stimulation is designed to target accessible brain regions that underlie many psychiatric disorders. One such method, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), is commonly used in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, for non-responders, the choice of an alternative therapy is unclear and often decided empirically without detailed knowledge of precise circuit dysfunction. This is also true of invasive therapies, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS), in which responses in TRD patients are linked to circuit activity that varies in each individual. If the functional networks affected by these approaches were better understood, a theoretical basis for selection of interventions could be developed to guide psychiatric treatment pathways. The mechanistic understanding of TMS is that it promotes long-term potentiation of cortical targets, such as dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), which are attenuated in depression. DLPFC is highly interconnected with other networks related to mood and cognition, thus TMS likely alters activity remote from DLPFC, such as in the central executive, salience and default mode networks. When deeper structures such as subcallosal cingulate cortex (SCC) are targeted using DBS for TRD, response efficacy has depended on proximity to white matter pathways that similarly engage emotion regulation and reward. Many have begun to question whether these networks, targeted by different modalities, overlap or are, in fact, the same. A major goal of current functional and structural imaging in patients with TRD is to elucidate neuromodulatory effects on the aforementioned networks so that treatment of intractable psychiatric conditions may become more predictable and targeted using the optimal technique with fewer iterations. Here, we describe several therapeutic approaches to TRD and review clinical studies of functional imaging and tractography that identify the diverse loci of modulation. We discuss differentiating factors associated with responders and non-responders to these stimulation modalities, with a focus on mechanisms of action for non-invasive and intracranial stimulation modalities. We advance the hypothesis that non-invasive and invasive neuromodulation approaches for TRD are likely impacting shared networks and critical nodes important for alleviating symptoms associated with this disorder. We close by describing a therapeutic framework that leverages personalized connectome-guided target identification for a stepwise neuromodulation paradigm., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Idlett-Ali, Salazar, Bell, Short and Rowland.)

Surgical techniques targeting behavioral disorders date back thousands of years. In this review, the authors discuss the history of neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders, starting with trephination in the Stone Age, progressing through the fraught practice of prefrontal lobotomy, and ending with modern neurosurgical techniques for treating psychiatric conditions, including ablative procedures, conventional deep brain stimulation, and closed-loop neurostimulation. Despite a tumultuous past, psychiatric neurosurgery is on the cusp of becoming a transformative therapy for patients with psychiatric dysfunction, with an ever-increasing evidence base suggesting reproducible and ethical therapeutic benefit.

Background: Findings from correlative neuroimaging studies link increased frontoparietal network (FPN) activation and default mode network (DMN) deactivation to enhanced high cognitive demand processing. To causally investigate FPN-DMN contributions to high cognitive demand processing, the current interleaved TMS-fMRI study simultaneously manipulated and indexed neural activity while tracking cognitive performance during high and low cognitive load conditions., Methods: Twenty participants completed an n-back task consisting of four conditions (0-back, 0-backTMS, 2-back, 2-backTMS) while undergoing interleaved TMS-fMRI. During TMS concurrent with n-back blocks, TMS single pulses were delivered to the left DLPFC at 100% motor-threshold every 2.4s., Results: TMS delivered during high cognitive load strengthened cognitive processing. FPN node activations and DMN node deactivations were increased in the high versus low cognitive load TMS condition. Contrary to our hypothesis, TMS did not increase high load related activation in FPN nodes. However, as hypothesized, increased DMN node deactivations emerged as a function of TMS during high load (right angular gyrus) and from interactions between cognitive load and TMS (right middle temporal gyrus). Load and TMS combined to dampen activation within the DMN at trend level (p = .058). Deactivation in a dorsomedial DMN node was associated with TMS driven improvements in high load cognitive processing., Conclusions: Exogenous perturbation of the DLPFC via single pulse TMS amplified DMN node deactivations and enhanced high cognitive demand processing. Neurobehavioral findings linking these effects hint at a promising, albeit preliminary, cognitive control substrate requiring replication in higher-powered studies that use control stimulation., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

(Appeared originally in Brain Stimulation 2020; 13:1805-1812) Reprinted with permission from Elsevier., (Copyright © 2022 by the American Psychiatric Association.)

Background: Transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation method that may modulate deep brain structures. This study investigates whether sonication of the right anterior thalamus would modulate thermal pain thresholds in healthy individuals., Methods: We enrolled 19 healthy individuals in this three-visit, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover trial. Participants first underwent a structural MRI scan used solely for tFUS targeting. They then attended two identical experimental tFUS visits (counterbalanced by condition) at least one week apart. Within the MRI scanner, participants received two, 10-min sessions of either active or sham tFUS spread 10 min apart targeting the right anterior thalamus [fundamental frequency: 650 kHz, Pulse repetition frequency: 10 Hz, Pulse Width: 5 ms, Duty Cycle: 5%, Sonication Duration: 30s, Inter-Sonication Interval: 30 s, Number of Sonications: 10, ISPTA. 0 995 mW/cm2, ISPTA. 3 719 mW/cm2, Peak rarefactional pressure 0.72 MPa]. The primary outcome measure was quantitative sensory thresholding (QST), measuring sensory, pain, and tolerance thresholds to a thermal stimulus applied to the left forearm before and after right anterior thalamic tFUS., Results: The right anterior thalamus was accurately sonicated in 17 of the 19 subjects. Thermal pain sensitivity was significantly attenuated after active tFUS. The pre-post x active-sham interaction was significant (F(1,245.95) = 4.03, p = .046). This interaction indicates that in the sham stimulation condition, thermal pain thresholds decreased 1.08 °C (SE = 0.28) pre-post session, but only decreased .51 °C (SE = 0.30) pre-post session in the active stimulation group., Conclusions: Two 10-min sessions of anterior thalamic tFUS induces antinociceptive effects in healthy individuals. Future studies should optimize the parameter space, dose and duration of this effect which may lead to multi-session tFUS interventions for pain disorders., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest AB is employed by BrainSonix, which manufactures the ultrasound device. He holds patents in this area. BWB owns minority stake in Bodhi NeuroTech Inc, which manufactures meditation enhancing devices and holds patents in this area. No other authors have any other conflicts., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Focal Electrically-Administered Seizure Therapy (FEAST) is a form of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) that spatially focuses the electrical stimulus to initiate seizure activity in right prefrontal cortex. Two open-label non-comparative studies suggested that FEAST has reduced cognitive side effects when compared to historical data from other forms of ECT. In two different ECT clinics, we compared the efficacy and cognitive side effects of FEAST and Right Unilateral Ultrabrief Pulse (RUL-UBP) ECT., Methods: Using a non-randomized, open-label design, 39 depressed adults were recruited after referral for ECT. Twenty patients received FEAST (14 women; age 45.2 ± 12.7), and 19 received RUL-UBP ECT (16 women; age 43.2 ± 16.4). Key cognitive outcome measures were the postictal time to reorientation and the Columbia University Autobiographical Memory Interview: Short-Form (CUAMI-SF). Antidepressant effects were assessed using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD 24 )., Results: In the Intent-to-treat sample, a repeated measures mixed model suggested no between group difference in HRSD 24 score over time (F 1,35  = 0.82, p = 0.37), while the response rate favored FEAST (FEAST: 65%; RUL-UBP ECT: 57.9%), and the remission rate favored RUL-UBP ECT (FEAST: 35%; RUL-UBP ECT: 47.4%). The FEAST group had numeric superiority in average time to reorientation (FEAST: 6.6 ± 5.0 min; RUL-UBP ECT: 8.8 ± 5.8 min; Cohens d = 0.41), and CUAMI-SF consistency score (FEAST: 69.2 ± 14.2%; RUL-UBP ECT: 63.9 ± 9.9%; Cohens d = 0.43); findings that failed to meet statistical significance., Conclusions: FEAST exerts similar efficacy relative to an optimal form of conventional ECT and may have milder cognitive side effects. A blinded, randomized, non-inferiority trial is needed., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest This study was supported in part by an unrestricted educational grant from the MECTA Corporation. The MECTA Corporation also provided custom-modified MECTA spECTrum 5000Q devices. Dr. Sackeim is the inventor on a patent for FEAST (US8712532 B2) and serves as a consultant to the MECTA Corporation, Neuronetics Inc, and LivaNova LPC. Dr. McCall receives research support from MECTA, Vistagen, and Merck. Dr. McCall receives royalties from Wolters Kluwer, and is a scientific adviser for Jazz, Sage, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. None of the other authors have any conflicts. Dr. Youssef discloses that he receives research support (but not salary support) from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Augusta Biomedical Research Corporation, Merck & Co., VistaGen Therapeutics, Inc., and MECTA Corporation., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is emerging as a powerful tool for the alleviation of targeted symptoms in treatment-resistant neuropsychiatric disorders. Despite the expanding use of neuropsychiatric DBS, the mechanisms responsible for its effects are only starting to be elucidated. Several modalities such as quantitative electroencephalography as well a intraoperative recordings have been utilized to attempt to understand the underpinnings of this new treatment modality, but functional imaging appears to offer several unique advantages. Functional imaging techniques like positron emission tomography, single photon emission computed tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging have been used to examine the effects of focal DBS on activity in a distributed neural network. These investigations are critical for advancing the field of invasive neuromodulation in a safe and effective manner, particularly in terms of defining the neuroanatomical targets and refining the stimulation protocols. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current functional neuroimaging findings from neuropsychiatric DBS implantation for three disorders: treatment-resistant depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and Tourette syndrome. All of the major targets will be discussed (Nucleus accumbens, anterior limb of internal capsule, subcallosal cingulate, Subthalamic nucleus, Centromedial nucleus of the thalamus-Parafasicular complex, frontal pole, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex). We will also address some apparent inconsistencies within this literature, and suggest potential future directions for this promising area.

Vagus nerve stimulation is an interesting new approach to treating neuropsychiatric diseases within the class of brain-stimulation devices sometimes labeled 'neuromodulators'. With vagus nerve stimulation, a battery-powered generator implanted in the chest wall connects to a wire wrapped around the vagus nerve in the neck, and sends intermittent pulses of electricity along the nerve directly into the brain. This mechanism takes advantage of the natural role of the vagus nerve in conveying information into the brain concerning homeostatic information (e.g., hunger, chest pain and respirations). Vagus nerve stimulation therapy is US FDA approved for the adjunctive treatment of epilepsy and has recently been FDA approved for the treatment of medication-resistant depression. Owing to its novel route into the brain, it has no drug-drug interactions or systemic side effects. This treatment also appears to have high long-term tolerability in patients, with low rates of patients relapsing on vagus nerve stimulation or becoming tolerant. However, alongside the excitement and enthusiasm for this new treatment, a lack of Class I evidence of efficacy in treating depression is currently slowing down adoption by psychiatrists. Much more research is needed regarding exactly how to refine and deliver the electrical pulses and how this differentially affects brain function in health and disease.