Search

Objective: Air-Q intubating laryngeal airway (ILA) is associated with a 58-77% success rate in blind intubation. The newer laryngeal mask airway (LMA) blockbuster is specially designed to facilitate easier endotracheal intubation and may have a higher success rate. The current study aimed to compare the success rate of endotracheal intubation using the Air-Q ILA and LMA blockbuster. Methods: After ethics committee approval and informed written consent, 140 adult patients with normal airways who were scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation were recruited for this randomized controlled trial. Blind endotracheal intubation was performed using the Air-Q ILA in group A and the LMA blockbuster in group B with special maneuvers and/or tubes in the second attempt. Fibreoptic bronchoscope (FOB) guidance was used in the third attempt if required. The primary outcome was the success rate of intubation without FOB assistance. The number of attempts for supraglottic airway (SGA) insertion, the time taken for SGA insertion, and the overall intubation time was also noted. Results: The success rate of intubation without FOB guidance was significantly higher in group B than in group A [91.4% vs 55.7%; relative risk (RR) 1.68; (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.34, 2.11); p<0.0001]. The number of attempts for SGA insertion was similar in groups A and group B [87% vs 90%; RR 1.03; (95% CI-0.92, 1.16); p=0.60]. The times for successful SGA insertion and endotracheal intubation were also similar between the groups. Conclusion: The LMA blockbuster offers a significantly higher success rate for endotracheal intubation without FOB guidance than the Air-Q ILA in adult patients with normal airways. However, an increased success rate was achieved with the use of a specially designed flexible endotracheal tube and maneuvers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Byline: Anju. Gupta, Raunak. Parida, Rajeshwari. Subramaniam, Karthiga. Kumar Introduction Complex upper gastro-intestinal endoscopy (UGIE) procedures take a long time and are challenging because of a high-risk patient profile, a [...]

Background and Aims: Parental separation, fear, and exposure to the operating room environment lead to stress and anxiety in pediatric patients. This study aims to identify the research gaps in the effect of video distraction on pediatric patients of Indian origin. We hypothesized that video distraction along with parental presence would reduce preoperative anxiety in pediatric patients undergoing ophthalmic procedures under general anesthesia compared with parental presence alone. Material and Methods: In this prospective randomized trial, 145 patients aged 2-8 years, ASA I-II, with at least one functional eye undergoing elective ophthalmic daycare procedures were enrolled. They were randomly allocated to two Groups: Group V had distraction by watching a video/playing a video game together with parental presence, whereas control Group C had parental presence alone without any video distraction. The primary objective of the study was to compare preoperative anxiety using the Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety score (mYPAS) and heart rate (HR), whereas the secondary objective was to compare child fear, emergence delirium, and parental satisfaction between the two groups. The three time points for intergroup comparisons were the preoperative holding area 10 min before induction (T0), transport of the child to the operating room (T1), and face mask introduction (T2). Results: There was a statistically significant difference between mYPAS score in groups V and C at all time points (P = 0.036, P = 0.0001, P = 0.0000), parental satisfaction score at all three time points (P = 0.0049, P = 0.0000, P = 0.0000), and Child Fear Score at T1 and T2 (P = 0.0001, P = 0.0001, respectively). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the emergence of delirium between the two groups. Conclusions: Video distraction together with parental presence has a promising role for implementation in hospitals with heavy workload settings where pharmacological intervention would not be feasible, to alleviate preoperative anxiety in children. However, preoperative anxiety may not translate into increased postoperative emergence delirium as was earlier believed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Comparison of analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transmuscular quadratus lumborum block (QL-3) and erector spinae block (ESP) in children undergoing open pyeloplasty was done in this study. Material and Methods: This was a randomized, double-blinded, controlled study conducted in a tertiary care center, operating rooms, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), and paediatric surgical ward. Sixty children of age 1-6 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status I or II, undergoing elective open pyeloplasty were included in the study. Patients were randomized into two groups: group I (QL block-3) and group II (ESP). Both blocks were performed under USG guidance using 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% ropivacaine after induction of general anesthesia. Postoperative Modified Objective Pain Score (MOPS), perioperative hemodynamic parameters, perioperative time for first rescue analgesia, total rescue analgesia, and incidence of complications were recorded. Statistical tests were applied as follows: (i) quantitative variables were compared using independent t-test/Mann-Whitney test (when the data sets were not normally distributed) between the two groups, and repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA)/Friedman test was used for comparison between different time intervals within the same group and (ii) qualitative variables were correlated using the Chi-square test/Fisher's exact test. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Pain was assessed using MOPS in the postoperative period at 0, 30 min, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h. Overall, the pain scores were low and showed a decreasing trend toward baseline as time progressed. Group I showed lower score, but was statistically significant only at the sixth hour. Highest mean score was 2.4 ± 2.01 in group I and 2.67 ± 2.32 in group II. Perioperative hemodynamic parameters were comparable. Total rescue analgesia during the perioperative period was not statistically significant (intraoperative P = 0.075 and postoperative P = 0.928). Also, 63.33% patients in group I and 63% patients in group II required rescue analgesia in the postoperative period and were comparable. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) for first rescue analgesia time was 6.32 ± 12.57 in group I and 16.67 ± 31.25 in group II, but not significant. The distribution in group II was skewed, hence the larger value for group II, but when compared to group I, this was statistically not significant. Conclusion: Both ultrasound-guided ESP block and QL block using 0.25% ropivacaine 0.5 ml/kg provided adequate analgesia during the first 24 h post-surgery in children undergoing open pyeloplasty. The fentanyl requirement during the first 24-h postoperative period was also decreased. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Byline: Sathianarayanan. Srinivasan, Rajeshwari. Subramaniam, Anjolie. Chhabra, Dalim. Baidya, Mahesh. Arora, Souvik. Maitra, Virender. Bansal, Hemanga. Bhattacharjee Background and Aims: Postoperative pain following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) is significant and [...]

Byline: Anjolie. Chhabra, Tangirala. Rao, Mritunjay. Kumar, Yudhyavir. Singh, Rajeshwari. Subramaniam The corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic sweeping across the world has severely strained health care resources (equipment and [...]

This article discusses the phenomenon of "happy hypoxemia" in COVID-19 patients, which refers to a condition where patients have low blood oxygen levels without experiencing significant respiratory distress. The study analyzed data from 450 patients admitted to a dedicated COVID unit and found a negative correlation between the oxygenation status and respiratory rate at admission. The study suggests that a lower baseline oxygenation ratio and the presence of self-reported shortness of breath were associated with a higher respiratory rate. The article emphasizes the importance of monitoring respiratory rate in COVID-19 patients as it can predict clinical deterioration and the need for mechanical ventilation. [Extracted from the article]

Objective: Postspinal hypotension occurs in nearly 50% of women undergoing cesarean section (CS). Although phenylephrine (PE) is currently the vasopressor of choice, severe maternal bradycardia may adversely affect the fetal status due to the reduction in the maternal cardiac output. Norepinephrine (NE) is not associated with bradycardia and is now being evaluated for the treatment of post-spinal hypotension in obstetric patients. The hypothesis of this study was that the prophylactic NE infusion was non-inferior to PE infusion when used for the prevention of postspinal hypotension. Methods: This was a randomized, double-blinded controlled study conducted in 130 parturients scheduled for CS. The participants received either prophylactic NE (5 µg min-1) or PE (25 µg min-1) infusion beginning at the time of spinal injection. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension in both groups. Maternal bradycardia, reactive hypertension, nausea and vomiting, requirement of rescue boluses of vasopressor and/or atropine, and neonatal acid base status were also recorded. Results: The incidence of hypotension was 33.80% (22 of 65) in Group PE and 26.10% (17 of 65) in Group NE (P=0.85). The absolute risk difference [90% confidence interval (CI)] in the incidence of hypotension between the groups was -7.7% (-20.9, 5.4). The upper limit of the CI was less than the non-inferiority margin of 20%, indicating that the NE infusion was non-inferior to PE. Conclusion: Prophylactic infusion of NE is not inferior to prophylactic PE infusion in the prevention of postspinal hypotension in patients undergoing CS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Byline: Manpreet. Kaur, Nirupa. Ramakumar, Sangam. Yadav, Rajeshwari. Subramaniam Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a myocardial repolarisation disorder caused by cardiac ion channelopathy and one of its common presentations is [...]

Byline: Rajeshwari. Subramaniam Anaesthesia for neonates is a composite of good knowledge of neonatal and transitional physiology combined with skill in airway maintenance and vascular access. When the newborn is [...]

Byline: Bandi. Joshiraj, Ankur. Sharma, Rajeshwari. Subramaniam, Varuna. VyasSir,The presence of hypokalaemia in patients with systemic hypertension is highly suggestive of aldosteronism.[1] We present the successful perioperative management of a [...]

Background and Aims: Mechanical ventilation in prone position was associated with a reduction in mortality and increase in arterial oxygenation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. However, physiological effects of prone position in COVID ARDS patients are unknown. Material and Methods: In this prospective observational study, data of n = 47 consecutive real time RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infected patients with severe ARDS were included. Respiratory mechanics and oxygenation data of recruited patients were collected before and after prone position. Results: Median (Interquartile range, IQR) age of the recruited patients was 60 (50-67) years and median (IQR) PaO2/FiO2 ratio of 61.2 (54-80) mm Hg with application of median (IQR) positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 12 (10-14) cm H2O before initiation of prone position. Out of those patients, 36 (77%) were prone responders at 16 hours after prone session, evident by increase of PaO2 by at least 20 mm Hg or by 20% as compared to baseline, and 73% patients were sustained responders (after returning to supine position). Plateau airway pressure (p < 0.0001), peak airway pressure (p < 0.0001), and driving pressure (p < 0.0001) were significantly reduced in prone position, and static compliance (p = 0.001), PaO2/FiO2 ratio (p < 0.0001), PaO2 (p = 0.0002), and SpO2 (p = 0.0004) were increased at 4 hours and 16 hours since prone position and also after returning to supine position. Conclusion: In SARS-CoV-2-infected patients, mechanical ventilation in prone position is associated with improvement in lung compliance and oxygenation in almost three-fourth of the patients and persisted in supine position in more than 70% of the patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) over noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia is not known. We aimed to assess the incidence of invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 treated with either HFNC or NIV. METHODS: This was a single-center randomized controlled trial performed in the COVID-19 ICU of a tertiary care teaching hospital in New Delhi, India. One hundred and nine subjects with severe COVID-19 pneumonia presenting with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure were recruited and allocated to either HFNC (n = 55) or NIV (n = 54) arm. Primary outcome was intubation by 48 h. Secondary outcomes were improvement in oxygenation by 48 h, intubation rate at day 7, and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics and PaO2/FIO2 ratio were similar in both the groups. Intubation rate at 48 h was similar between the groups (33% NIV vs 20% HFNC, relative risk 0.6, 95% CI 0.31-1.15, P = .12). Intubation rate at day 7 was lower in the HFNC (27.27%) compared to the NIV group (46.29%) (relative risk 0.59, 95% CI 0.35-0.99, P = .045), and this difference remained significant after adjustment for the incidence of chronic kidney disease and the arterial pH (adjusted OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.93, P = .03). Hospital mortality was similar between HFNC (29.1%) and NIV (46.2%) group (relative risk 0.6, 95% CI 0.38-1.04, P = .06). CONCLUSIONS: We were not able to demonstrate a statistically significant improvement of oxygenation parameters nor of the intubation rate at 48 h between NIV and HFNC. These findings should be further tested in a larger randomized controlled trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Byline: Pradeep. Prakash, Virinder. Bansal, Mahesh. Misra, Divya. Babu, Rajesh. Sagar, Asuri. Krishna, Subodh. Kumar, Vimi. Rewari, Rajeshwari. Subramaniam Background: The aim of our study was to compare chronic groin [...]

Background: Administration of vitamin D to unselected heterogeneous critically ill patients did not demonstrate outcome benefit. The current study was undertaken to identify if early administration of vitamin D can reduce intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay and improve clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with sepsis. Methods: This single-center randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial was done in the ICU and emergency inpatient ward of a tertiary care teaching institute in New Delhi, India. A total of 126 adult patients aged 18 to 80 years of either sex diagnosed to have sepsis were included within 24 hours of admission to the hospital and randomized into vitamin D or placebo groups. The patients in the intervention group received vitamin D3 540,000 units dissolved in 45 mL of milk. The placebo group received 45 mL of milk. Results: The median length of ICU stay (8 vs 9 days; p = 0.32), median length of hospital stay (12 vs 12 days; p = 0.33), median duration of vasopressors requirement (4 vs 3 days; p = 0.84), median duration of mechanical ventilation (5 vs 7 days; p = 0.23), requirement of tracheostomy (34 vs 39%; p = 0.71), and 90-day mortality [35 vs 46%; p = 0.29; HR 0.72 (0.42-1.24)] were similar in vitamin D and placebo arm. A subgroup analysis in patients with severe vitamin D deficiency (vitamin D <12 ng/mL) revealed a significantly decreased incidence of tracheostomy (28 vs 57%; p = 0.04), a trend toward decreased 90-day mortality [34 vs 66%; p = 0.08; HR 0.44 (0.19-1.01)], and duration of mechanical ventilation (6 vs 11 days; p = 0.05) in patients receiving vitamin D. Conclusion: Administration of large-dose vitamin D within 24 hours of admission does not reduce the length of ICU stay in critically ill sepsis patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Selective spinal anesthesia has been safely applied for short-duration outpatient gynecological laparoscopic procedure. However, this anesthesia technique is often inadequate and not tolerated by awake patients due to pneumoperitoneum and visceral manipulation. Aims: We aimed to conduct a study to compare spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine, fentanyl, and i.v. sedation with i.v. sedation and laparoscopic port-site infiltration with local anaesthetic in outpatient laparoscopic tubal ligation procedures. Settings and Design: 100 female patients posted for elective surgeries were recruited for a prospective single blind randomised control trial in a tertiary care center in two groups. Materials and Methods: In Group S, patients receive intrathecal 3 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% plus 20 microgram fentanyl along with intravenous (i.v.) fentanyl at 1μg.kg-1.h-1 and in Group C i.v. fentanyl at 1μg.kg-1.h-1 along with laparoscopic port site infiltration with 0.5% bupivacaine. Postoperatively, overall patient satisfaction, visual analog score (VAS) score, duration of motor blockade, sensory blockade, and time to attain discharge criteria and any adverse. Statistical Analysis: Continuous variables between the groups were compared by the independent t-test and Wilcoxon rank sum. Chi-square and Fisher exact test used for the categorical value. Results: Overall VAS was significantly lower and patient satisfaction was higher in Group S than Group C. Time to oral intake was significantly prolonged in Group C 126.33 (±29.54) compared to group S 110.81 (±29.54). The requirement of total rescue analgesia (fentanyl) was significantly higher in Group C 2.0 (±0.6) μg.kg-1 compared to group S 0.79 (±0.53) μg.kg-1. Incidence of postoperative nausea vomiting (PONV) was significantly greater in Group C while incidence of pruritus was significantly greater in Group S. Conclusion: Low-dose intrathecal anesthesia with 3 mg bupivacaine and 20 μg fentanyl provided better analgesia, patient satisfaction and with less opioids consumption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Data are lacking on the role of cellular components of hematological system as biomarkers for prognosis of sepsis. We planned to identify if these parameters measured at admission to ICU and at 72 hours can be useful as prognostic marker in septic critically ill patients. Materials and methods: In this prospective observational study, 130 adult patients with sepsis were recruited. Various hematological study parameters (total, differential, and absolute leukocyte count, platelet count, platelet distribution width, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio) were noted at day 1 and day 3 of admission. Primary outcome was 28-day mortality, and secondary outcomes were duration of mechanical ventilation, vasopressor requirement, ICU length of stay, and requirement of renal replacement therapy. The variables were compared between two groups and using binary regression model and were evaluated as prognostic markers for 28-day mortality. Results: Data from n = 129 were analyzed. At day-28, n = 58 (44.96%) patients survived. Baseline and demographic parameters were comparable between survivors and nonsurvivors. Admission Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was more in nonsurvivors than survivors [8 (6--8) vs 6 (4--8); p = 0.002]. In nonsurvivors, monocyte, lymphocyte, basophil, eosinophil, and platelet count were significantly less at day 1 and lymphocyte, eosinophil, basophil and platelet count were significantly less at day 3. NLR and PLR at day 3 were significantly more in nonsurvivors. On logistic regression analysis, age, thrombocytopenia on day 1, and low eosinophil count on day 3 predicted 28-day mortality (p = 0.006, p = 0.02, and p = 0.04, respectively). Conclusion: Thrombocytopenia on day 1 and eosinopenia on day 3 may predict 28-day mortality in sepsis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]