Search

Three different computed tomography (CT) reconstruction algorithms: Filtered Back Projection (FBP), Unified Tomographic Reconstruction (UTR) and customized Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Technique (cSART), have been systematically compared and evaluated using experimental data from CT scans of ten fresh mastectomy samples collected at the Imaging and Medical beamline of the Australian Synchrotron. All the scans were collected at the mean glandular dose of 2 mGy, using monochromatic X-rays with 32 keV energy, flat-panel detectors with 0.1 mm pixels and 6 meter distance between the rotation stage and the detector. Paganin's phase retrieval method was used in conjunction with all three CT reconstruction algorithms. The reconstructed images were compared in terms of the objective image quality characteristics, including spatial resolution, contrast, signal-to-noise, and contrast-to-noise ratios. The images were also evaluated by seven experienced medical imaging specialists, rating perceptible contrast, sharpness of tissue interfaces, image noise, calcification visibility and overall image quality. Of the three compared algorithms, cSART was clearly superior to UTR and FBP in terms of most measured objective image quality characteristics. At the same time, the results of the subjective quality evaluation consistently favoured the images reconstructed by FBP, followed by UTR, with cSART receiving lower scores on average. We argue that this apparent disagreement between the objective and subjective assessments of image quality can be explained by the importance assigned to image contrast in the subjective assessment, while the signal-to-noise ratio seemed to receive relatively low weighting. This study was conducted in preparation for phase-contrast breast CT imaging of live patients at Australian Synchrotron (Melbourne, Australia)., Comment: 21 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables