Search

The objective of this article is to investigate the viewpoints of both undergraduate and graduate students of English regarding online education in the aftermath of the Corona virus pandemic, which commenced in March 2020 and resulted in immediate, hit-or-miss changes within the higher education sector. To realize this aim, the study examines the perspectives of graduate and undergraduate students in the English Department at The Hashemite University in the fields of literary, cultural, and critical studies. Consequently, fifty graduate students were asked to write a well-thought essay in which they express their opinion about their experience in online education. On the other hand, eighty-four undergraduate students had to respond to a questionnaire designed to express their opinion within a scale of different responses. The results for both groups show that there is no significant difference between their attitudes. In general, there is a propensity to endorse a novel educational approach that integrates the traditional on-campus education with the most recent online off-campus education. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The female protagonists in Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter (1850) and Fadia Faqir's My Name Is Salma (2007) face similar themes and explore the effects of adultery on women. Despite their different temporal, geographical, and cultural contexts, the novels fight oppression and marginalization. The authors carefully and delicately place the stories in a framework of crimes, marginalization, and dissent. The researchers use feminist critical analysis of the two texts to build an innovative argument that highlights the texts' many dissents. Hester Prynne's and Salma Ibrahim El-Musa's internal and external battles about giving up their lives, identities, and daughters disrupt cultural and religious standards. Hester commits adultery, refuses to reveal her daughter's biological father, and is, therefore, punished. Likewise, an illegitimate premarital affair impregnates Salma, and thus she is at risk of an honor murder. Hester and Salma resist being hushed, abused, and marginalized. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article examines the absurdity of wars and grounds their intersecting contours of enormous death (physical and psychological), destruction, and trauma notwithstanding their location, grounds, pretext, or repercussions. It underlines the scathing critiques of their constituencies in Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse-Five (1969) and Ahmed Saadawi's Frankenstein in Baghdad (2013, trans. 2018), two novels articulating a striking disdain for the ethics and myths of the so-called "just wars." The researchers, sharing the novelists' moral qualms about wars, bring these two novels together in a potent critique uncovering the cruelties of wars, which have led to the dislodgement and demise of millions of people all over the world, not to mention the psychological insecurities and anxieties instigated by war. To illustrate, the horrible car bomb explosions besetting Baghdad in the aftermath of the 2003-American invasion of Iraq are equated with the Allies' firebombing and leveling of Dresden in Eastern Germany. Hence, Dresden and Baghdad lapse into waves of horror and massacres committed in the name of justice, and Vonnegut and Saadawi, whose awfully poignant firsthand war experiences enticed them to foreground the tragedies of war, interweave nonlinear antiwar narratives reminiscent of the mismatched body of Whatsitsname in Frankenstein in Baghdad and Billy Pilgrim's disheveled appearance and lack of training as a soldier in Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse-Five. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]