Search

Background. ,e rehabilitation of edentulous jaws with guided and flapless surgery applied to the All-on-4 concepts is a predictable treatment with a high implant and prosthetic survival rates, but there are several contraindications for this technique like when bone reduction is needed due to a high smile line in the maxilla or when there is an irregular or thin bone crest. Purpose. To report a technique with double guided surgery for bone reduction and implant placement with the All-on-4 concept. Materials and Methods. 7 patients were included in the study. Guided implant planning was performed using CBCT, and the virtual templates were created with three dedicated software. Custom surgical templates were made for the ostectomy and for implants positioning. Results. 28 implants were placed using a double bone-supported surgical guide. ,e mean angular errors between the preoperative-planned implant and the postoperative-placed implant were 2.155° ± 2.03°; the mean distance errors between the planned and the placed implants were 0.763mm± 0.55mm on the shoulder implant and 0.570mm± 0.40mm on the apex implant. Conclusions. ,e results of our study indicate that this treatment is predictable with an excellent survival rate allowing excellent results even when bone reduction is mandatory.

Osteoblastoma is a benign tumor of bone, representing less than 1% of bone tumors. Craniomaxillofacial localizations account for up to 15% of the total and frequently involve the posterior mandible. Endo-orbital localization is very rare, with most occurring in young patients. Very few of these tumors become malignant. Orbital localization requires radical removal of the tumor followed by careful surgical reconstruction of the orbit to avoid subsequent aesthetic or functional problems. Here, we present a clinical case of this condition and describe a surgical protocol that uses and integrates state-of-the art technologies to achieve orbital reconstruction

Purpose: Correction of post traumatic orbital and zygomatic deformity is a challenge for maxillofacial surgeons. Integration of different technologies, such as software planning, surgical navigation and stereolithographic models, opens new horizons in terms of the surgeons' ability to tailor reconstruction to individual patients. The purpose of this study was to analyze surgical results, in order to verify the suitability, effectiveness and reproducibility of this new protocol. Methods: Eleven patients were included in the study. Inclusion criteria were: unilateral orbital pathology; associated diplopia and enophthalmos or exophthalmos, and zygomatic deformities. Syndromic patients were excluded. Pre-surgical planning was performed with iPlan 3.0 CMF software and we used Vector Vision II (BrainLab, Feldkirchen, Germany) for surgical navigation. We used 1:1 skull stereolithographic models for all the patients. Orbital reconstructions were performed with a titanium orbital mesh. The results refer to: correction of the deformities, exophthalmos, enophthalmos and diplopia; correspondence between reconstruction mesh positioning and preoperative planning mirroring; and the difference between the reconstructed orbital volume and the healthy orbital volume. Results: Correspondence between the post-operative reconstruction mesh position and the presurgical virtual planning has an average margin of error of less than 1.3 mm. In terms of en- and exophthalmos corrections, we have always had an adequate clinical outcome with a significant change in the projection of the eyeball. In all cases treated, there was a complete resolution of diplopia. The calculation of orbital volume highlighted that the volume of the reconstructed orbit, in most cases, was equal to the healthy orbital volume, with a positive or negative variation of less than 1 cm3. Conclusion: The proposed protocol incorporates all the latest technologies to plan the virtual reconstruction surgery in detail. The res

An essential step in the navigation procedure is the recording of markers required for the triangulation of the intraoperative navigation system. The aim of this study was to describe the procedure and preliminary results of a simple methodology for the application of dental markers to achieve good triangulation of the navigation system in maxillofacial surgery, highlighting the indications, contraindications, and possible limitations. We analyzed results from a sample of 7 patients with orbital or orbitozygomatic fractures, who were subjected to surgical intervention for the reduction and synthesis of the zygomatic fracture and from 1 case of untreated orbital fracture with enophthalmos and diplopia. We used 2 different types of dental markers: in 3 patients, we used 4 or 5 ordinary orthodontic brackets, which we placed on their upper maxillary teeth, and in 1 patient, the hexagonal-headed screws used in osteosynthesis. The accuracy of the recording was assessed during surgery by checking healthy anatomic structures against computed tomographic images. By analyzing our clinical results in light of the most recent literature, we highlighted that the application of dental markers is comparable with the best recording systems requiring a discrepancy of less than 1 mm. From the preliminary clinical analysis of the results, we confirm that the introduction of this new and simple procedure enables the successful triangulation of the navigation system, which can be used whenever the use of a navigator is required.

The Authors present how the use of the navigator can achivea good function a good aesthetic in orbital reconstruction.