Search

Background: Patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) have a poor prognosis. The phase III KESTREL study evaluated the efficacy of durvalumab [programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody] with or without tremelimumab [cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) antibody], versus the EXTREME regimen in patients with R/M HNSCC. Patients and methods: Patients with HNSCC who had not received prior systemic treatment for R/M disease were randomized (2: 1: 1) to receive durvalumab 1500 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) plus tremelimumab 75 mg Q4W (up to four doses), durvalumab monotherapy 1500 mg Q4W, or the EXTREME regimen (platinum, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab) until disease progression. Durvalumab efficacy, with or without tremelimumab, versus the EXTREME regimen in patients with PD-L1-high tumors and in all randomized patients was assessed. Safety was also assessed. Results: Durvalumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab were not superior to EXTREME for overall survival (OS) in patients with PD-L1-high expression [median, 10.9 and 11.2 versus 10.9 months, respectively; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-1.32; P = 0.787 and HR = 1.05; 95% CI 0.80-1.39, respectively]. Durvalumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab prolonged duration of response versus EXTREME (49.3% and 48.1% versus 9.8% of patients remaining in response at 12 months), correlating with long-term OS for responding patients; however, median progression-free survival was longer with EXTREME (2.8 and 2.8 versus 5.4 months). Exploratory analyses suggested that subsequent immunotherapy use by 24.3% of patients in the EXTREME regimen arm contributed to the similar OS outcomes between arms. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) for durvalumab, durvalumab plus tremelimumab, and EXTREME were 8.9%, 19.1%, and 53.1%, respectively. Conclusions: In patients with PD-L1-high expression, OS was comparable between durvalumab and the EXTREME regimen. Durvalumab alone, and with tremelimumab, demonstrated durable responses and reduced TRAEs versus the EXTREME regimen in R/M HNSCC.

INTRODUCTION: Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-4/FGF19 pathway dysregulation is implicated in hepatobiliary and other solid tumors. INCB062079, an oral, selective, FGFR4 inhibitor, inhibits growth in FGF19/FGFR4-driven liver cancer models. METHODS: This was a two-part, phase I study (NCT03144661) in previously treated patients with advanced solid tumors. The primary objective was to determine safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD), while secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics (plasma FGF19; bile acid salts/7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one [C4] levels), and preliminary efficacy. In Part 1, patients received INCB062079 starting at 10 mg once daily, with 3 + 3 dose escalation. Part 2 (dose expansion) was not conducted because of study termination. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were treated (hepatobiliary, n = 11; ovarian, n = 9; other, n = 3). Among six patients receiving 15 mg twice daily, two patients had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; grade 3 diarrhea, grade 3 transaminitis). Both had high pretreatment C4 concentrations, prompting a protocol amendment requiring pretreatment C4 concentrations

Not available

BACKGROUND: CheckPoint Inhibitors (CPI) Induced arthritis (IA) is an immune related adverse event (irAEs) occurring in 0.5 to 2% of CPI-treated patients between 3 weeks up to 24 months after initiation of therapy. IA is usually described as a seronegative oligoarticular inflammatory joint disease but IA has been for long underdiagnosed and inappropriately evaluated. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the added value of a systematic joint ultrasound assessment in these patients by the rheumatologist. […]

A non-small-cell-lung-cancer patient with cerebral metastasis presenting an atypical exon 20 mutation in the EGFR gene had a long-lasting tumor cotrol on mulimodal treatment with osimertinib and stereotaxic radiotherapy on oligoprogressing lesions. Most exon-20 mutations are resistant to first, second and third generation EGFR-directed TKI. This case was discussed on our molecular tumour board. As the more specific exon-20 targeted therapies were not yet available and as sporadic short responses on the third generation EGFR-directed TKI, osimertinib had been described, the patient started osimertinib. She had a prolonged tumoral response on Osimertinib. The patient is still asymptomatic up to 32 months after initiating the medication. This case confirms that not all exon20 EGFR mutations are equal to osimertinib and that the localization of the exon 20 insertion mutation is probably important to consider when treating EGFR mutated NSCLC. The long-term clinical benefit can be maintained through stereotactic radiotherapy on focal progressive lesions.

• This ESMO–EURACAN Clinical Practice Guideline provides key recommendations for managing salivary gland cancer. • The guideline covers clinical and pathological diagnosis, staging and risk assessment, treatment and follow-up. • Treatment algorithms for parotid, submandibular, sublingual and minor salivary gland cancer are provided. • The author group encompasses a multidisciplinary group of experts from different institutions and countries in Europe. • Recommendations are based on available scientific data and the authors’ collective expert opinion. ispartof: ESMO OPEN vol:7 issue:6 pages:1-16 ispartof: location:England status: published

Atezolizumab; Isatuximab; Solid tumors Atezolizumab; Isatuximab; Tumores sólidos Atezolizumab; Isatuximab; Tumors sòlids Background The anti-CD38 antibody isatuximab is approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, but there are no data on its efficacy in solid tumors. This phase I/II study (NCT03637764) assessed the safety and activity of isatuximab plus atezolizumab (Isa + Atezo), an anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody, in patients with immunotherapy-naive solid tumors: epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), glioblastoma (GBM), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Patients and methods Phase I assessed safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of isatuximab 10 mg/kg intravenously (i.v.) every week for 3 weeks followed by once every 3 weeks + atezolizumab 1200 mg i.v. every 3 weeks. Phase II used a Simon’s two-stage design to assess the overall response rate or progression-free survival rate at 6 months (GBM cohort). Interim analysis was carried out at 6 months following first dose of the last enrolled patient in each cohort. Pharmacodynamic biomarkers were tested for CD38, PD-L1, tumor-infiltrating immune cells, and FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Results Overall, 107 patients were treated (EOC, n = 18; GBM, n = 33; HCC, n = 27; SCCHN, n = 29). In phase I, Isa + Atezo showed an acceptable safety profile, no dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and RP2D was confirmed. Most patients experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), with ≤48.5% being grade ≥3. The most frequent TEAE was infusion reactions. The study did not continue to stage 2 based on prespecified targets. Tumor-infiltrating CD38+ immune cells were reduced and almost cleared after treatment. Isa + Atezo did not significantly modulate Tregs or PD-L1 expression in the TME. Conclusions Isa + Atezo had acceptable safety and tolerability. Clinical pharmacodynamic evaluation revealed efficient target engagement of isatuximab via treatment-mediated reduction of CD38+ immune cells in the TME. Based on clinical data, CD38 inhibition does not improve responsiveness to PD-L1 blockade in these patients. This work was sponsored by Sanofi (no grant number).

Background While docetaxel/cisplatin/5‐fluorouracil (DCF) outperforms CF in first‐line gastric adenocarcinoma, toxicity remains an issue. Methods This multicenter phase II trial randomized chemonaïve metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma patients to fractionated weekly DCF (D 40 mg/m2, C 35 mg/m², F 1800 mg/m² over 24 h, on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, arm (1) or fortnightly DCF (D 50 mg/m2, C 50 mg/m², F 2000 mg/m² over 48 h every 2 weeks, arm (2). Prophylactic granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) was not allowed. The primary endpoint was the rate of febrile neutropenia within the first six treatment weeks (early FN). Results A total of 106 eligible patients were recruited. The early and overall FN rates were 9.5% and 17% in arm 1, respectively, and 5.9% and 8% in arm 2, respectively. Grade ≥3 toxicities occurred in 81% of patients in arm 1 and 90% of patients in arm 2, the most common being neutropenia (33% vs. 61%), fatigue (27% vs. 25%), vomiting (21% vs. 12%), anorexia (19% vs. 18%), and diarrhea (17% vs. 10%). Median progression‐free survival and overall survival were 5.1 (95% CI, 3.2–6.5) and 8.2 months (95% CI, 6.0–14.5), respectively, in arm 1 and 5.2 (95% CI, 3.0–6.9) and 11.9 months (95% CI, 7.4–15.9), respectively, in arm 2. Conclusions Fractionated weekly and fortnightly DCF regimens are associated with a low risk of early FN, and a better hematological toxicity profile as compared to historical DCF without compromising efficacy. Both regimens offer greater convenience removing the need for systematic use of prophylactic G‐CSF., The DoGE multicenter study randomised prospectively patients with chemonaïve gastric cancer between fractionated weekly and fortnightly DCF regimens. Both regimens are associated with a low risk of early FN, and a better hematological toxicity profile as compared to historical DCF without compromising efficacy. Both regimens offer greater convenience removing the need for systematic use of prophylactic G‐CSF.

International audience; BACKGROUND: Colon adenocarcinoma mainly occurs in older patients. Oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy improved disease-free survival after stage III colon cancer resection, but this improvement was not demonstrated in older patients. METHODS: The purpose of ADAGE-PRODIGE 34, randomized open phase III trial is to compare in patients over 70 years oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidine with fluoropyrimidine alone in fit patients (Group 1) and fluoropyrimidine with observation in frail patients (Group 2) after resection of stage III colon adenocarcinoma. We report a preliminary tolerance analysis on 50% of the first patients enrolled. RESULTS: The analysis was conducted on 491 patients (378 in Group 1 and 113 in Group 2). Patients in Group 2 were older and showed more frailty criteria than those in Group 1. Cumulative grade 3-5 toxicities were more frequent in patients treated with oxaliplatin in Group 1 or with fluoropyrimidine in Group 2 than in patients treated with fluoropyrimidine in Group 1. At least one course was deferred in more than half of the patients in all groups. Early treatment cessation was more frequent in Group 2. CONCLUSION: No safety concerns were raised for the continuation of accrual. The frailty criteria distribution suggests that the investigator's evaluation for group allocation was accurate.

Introduction Central diabetes insipidus is a heterogeneous condition characterized by decreased release of antidiuretic hormone by the neurohypophysis resulting in a urine concentration deficit with variable degrees of polyuria. The most common causes include idiopathic diabetes insipidus, tumors or infiltrative diseases, neurosurgery and trauma. Temozolomide is an oral DNA-alkylating agent capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier and used as chemotherapy primarily to treat glioblastoma and other brain cancers. Cases Two men (aged 38 and 54 years) suddenly developed polyuria and polydispsia approximately four weeks after the initiation of temozolomide for a glioblastoma. Plasma and urine parameters demonstrated the presence of a urinary concentration defect. Management The clinical and laboratory abnormalities completely resolved with intranasal desmopressin therapy, allowing the continuation of temozolomide. The disorder did not relapse after cessation of temozolomide and desmopressin and relapsed in one patient after rechallenge with temozolomide. Discussion Our report highlights the importance of a quick recognition of this exceptional complication, in order to initiate promptly treatment with desmopressin and to maintain therapy with temozolomide.

Background and study aim: Over the last 20 years, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has progressively become a therapeutic option for peritoneal carcinomatosis thanks to its favourable oncologic results. The aim of this study is to analyse the overall survival and recurrence-free survival, after complete CRS and closed abdomen technique HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer. Patients and methods: This retrospective study collected the data from all patients who underwent a CRS with HIPEC for colorectal cancer at “Cliniques universitaires Saint Luc” from October 2007 to December 2020. Ninety-nine patients were included. Results: The median follow-up was 34 months. Post-operative mortality and Clavien-Dindo grade III/IV morbidity rates were 2.0% and 28.3%. The overall 2-year and 5-year survival rates were 80.1% and 54.4%. Using the multivariate analysis, age at surgery, liver metastases and PCI score >13 showed a statistically significant negative impact on overall survival. The 2-year and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 33.9% and 22%. Using the multivariate analysis, it was found that liver metastases, the extent of carcinomatosis with PCI>7 have a statistically significant negative impact on recurrence-free survival. Conclusions: Despite a high recurrence rate, CRS followed by HIPEC to treat peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal origin offer encouraging oncologic results with a satisfying survival rate. When PCI>13, CRS and HIPEC does not seem to offer any survival benefit and to efficiently limit recurrence, our data are in favor of a maximum PCI of 7.

Background The phase II TALAPRO-1 study (NCT03148795) demonstrated durable antitumor activity in men with heavily pretreated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Here, we detail the safety profile of talazoparib. Patients and Methods Men received talazoparib 1 mg/day (moderate renal impairment 0.75 mg/day) orally until radiographic progression, unacceptable toxicity, investigator decision, consent withdrawal, or death. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated: incidence, severity, timing, duration, potential overlap of selected AEs, dose modifications/discontinuations due to AEs, and new clinically significant changes in laboratory values and vital signs. Results In the safety population (N = 127; median age 69.0 years), 95.3% (121/127) experienced all-cause treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Most common were anemia (48.8% [62/127]), nausea (33.1% [42/127]), decreased appetite (28.3% [36/127]), and asthenia (23.6% [30/127]). Nonhematologic TEAEs were generally grades 1 and 2. No grade 5 TEAEs or deaths were treatment-related. Hematologic TEAEs typically occurred during the first 4-5 months of treatment. The median duration of grade 3-4 anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia was limited to 7-12 days. No grade 4 events of anemia or neutropenia occurred. Neither BRCA status nor alteration origin significantly impacted the safety profile. The median (range) treatment duration was 6.1 (0.4-24.9) months; treatment duration did not impact the incidence of anemia. Only 3 of the 15 (11.8% [15/127]) permanent treatment discontinuations were due to hematologic TEAEs (thrombocytopenia 1.6% [2/127]; leukopenia 0.8% [1/127]). Conclusion Common TEAEs associated with talazoparib could be managed through dose modifications/supportive care. Demonstrated efficacy and a manageable safety profile support continued evaluation of talazoparib in mCRPC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03148795

Background Erdafitinib, a pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was shown to be clinically active and tolerable in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma and prespecified FGFR alterations in the primary analysis of the BLC2001 study at median 11 months of follow-up. We aimed to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of the selected regimen of erdafitinib determined in the initial part of the study. Methods The open-label, non-comparator, phase 2, BLC2001 study was done at 126 medical centres in 14 countries across Asia, Europe, and North America. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, at least one prespecified FGFR alteration, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2, and progressive disease after receiving at least one systemic chemotherapy or within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy or were ineligible for cisplatin. The selected regimen determined in the initial part of the study was continuous once daily 8 mg/day oral erdafitinib in 28-day cycles, with provision for pharmacodynamically guided uptitration to 9 mg/day (8 mg/day UpT). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1. Efficacy and safety were analysed in all treated patients who received at least one dose of erdafitinib. This is the final analysis of this study. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02365597. Findings Between May 25, 2015, and Aug 9, 2018, 2328 patients were screened, of whom 212 were enrolled and 101 were treated with the selected erdafitinib 8 mg/day UpT regimen. The data cutoff date for this analysis was Aug 9, 2019. Median efficacy follow-up was 24·0 months (IQR 22·7–26·6). The investigator-assessed objective response rate for patients treated with the selected erdafitinib regimen was 40 (40%; 95% CI 30–49) of 101 patients. The safety profile remained similar to that in the primary analysis, with no new safety signals reported with longer follow-up. Grade 3–4 treatment-emergent adverse events of any causality occurred in 72 (71%) of 101 patients. The most common grade 3–4 treatment-emergent adverse events of any cause were stomatitis (in 14 [14%] of 101 patients) and hyponatraemia (in 11 [11%]). There were no treatment-related deaths. Interpretation With longer follow-up, treatment with the selected regimen of erdafitinib showed consistent activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma and prespecified FGFR alterations.

Background Despite recent improvements, management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) remains challenging, and many patients (pts) still experience recurrence. In preclinical models, combining Rego with an anti-PD-1 inhibitor led to superior tumour growth suppression as compared with either treatment alone. In a phase I clinical trial, remarkable results were reported for the combination of Rego and Nivo in advanced MSS colorectal cancer. This synergistic effect is thought to be secondary to the anti-angiogenic effects of Rego and its potential to reduce TAMs, promote M1 macrophage conversion, and downregulate expression of immunosuppressive factors. Building on these data, we designed a trial of Rego-Nivo with standard SCRT in the neoadjuvant setting of RC. Trial design REGINA is an academic, multicentre, single-arm, phase II trial sponsored by Institut Jules Bordet. Eligible patients are treated according to the following plan: induction phase (Nivo 240 mg IV D1&15, and Rego 80 mg PO D1-14), SCRT (D22-26), consolidation phase (Nivo 240 mg IV D29,43&57, and Rego 80 mg PO D29-49), and surgery (7-8 weeks after SCRT). Key eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years, ECOG PS ≤1, adenocarcinomas below the peritoneal reflection, intermediate-risk, stage II-III tumour (ie, cT3/T4aNany or cT1-2N+, no involvement/threatening of the mesorectal fascia, no involvement of lateral pelvic lymph nodes). The primary endpoint is pathological complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints include, among others, toxicity, compliance to treatment, pTRG, event-free survival, and overall survival. The study follows a Simon’s two-stage design (null hypothesis pCR=12%, alternative hypothesis pCR=24%; α=5%, β=20%) with a maximum of 60 pts to be enrolled. A safety interim analysis is planned after the first 6 pts have completed treatment. Serial collection of tumour, blood, and stool samples is mandatory at pre-specified time points for exploratory correlative biomarker analyses. The trial is planned to be run at 8-10 centres across Belgium. Study recruitment started in Q1 2021 and is anticipated to complete in Q3 2023. Clinical trial information: NCT04503694.

Simple Summary The field of liquid biopsy is rapidly evolving. Techniques that improve accuracy are constantly being developed, and clinicians increasingly use liquid biopsy as a tool to guide their clinical practice. The assessment of minimal or microscopic residual disease (MRD) after oncological treatment with curative intent, however, remains challenging. Therefore, the implementation of liquid biopsy to determine the presence of MRD is not yet standardized. In this review, we focus on the detection of MRD through liquid biopsy in solid cancers, highlighting currently available methodologies and ongoing challenges. Abstract One reason why some patients experience recurrent disease after a curative-intent treatment might be the persistence of residual tumor cells, called minimal residual disease (MRD). MRD cannot be identified by standard radiological exams or clinical evaluation. Tumor-specific alterations found in the blood indirectly diagnose the presence of MRD. Liquid biopsies thus have the potential to detect MRD, allowing, among other things, the detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTC), or tumor-specific microRNA. Although liquid biopsy is increasingly studied, several technical issues still limit its clinical applicability: low sensitivity, poor standardization or reproducibility, and lack of randomized trials demonstrating its clinical benefit. Being able to detect MRD could give clinicians a more comprehensive view of the risk of relapse of their patients and could select patients requiring treatment escalation with the goal of improving cancer survival. In this review, we are discussing the different methodologies used and investigated to detect MRD in solid cancers, their respective potentials and issues, and the clinical impacts that MRD detection will have on the management of cancer patients.

Introduction Les inhibiteurs de points de controle immunitaire (IPCI) ont ameliore la survie de nombreux patients oncologiques, mais presentent une toxicite etendue. Le diabete secondaire aux IPCI est rare (0,4–0,9 %) et potentiellement grave vu l’insulinopenie d’emblee severe. Il existe peu de donnees sur le devenir de ces patients. Observations Nous rapportons l’evolution de 3 patients (1 F/2 H) ayant developpe brutalement un diabete secondaire a une immunotherapie (anti-PD1, 3/3 et anti-CTLA-4, 1/3). L’âge median au diagnostic etait de 57 ans et l’IMC de 25,2 kg/m2. Le diabete etait diagnostique apres un delai median de 7 mois suivant le debut du traitement et etait caracterise par une (acido)cetose dans les 3 cas. La glycemie moyenne etait a 521 mg/dL, l’HbA1c a 7,3% et le peptide C etait d’emblee tres bas (0,02–0,36 nmol/L), temoignant d’une atteinte severe des cellules B. Les anticorps anti-GAD etaient retrouves dans 2/3 cas. L’evolution sous insulinotherapie basal-bolus etait marquee par : –une suppression complete et definitive du peptide C ( –un controle satisfaisant du diabete (HbA1c moyenne : 6,8%), la presence d’autres endocrinopathies immuno-induites (thyroidite et hypophysite, 2/3), et une bonne reponse oncologique chez tous les patients justifiant la poursuite des IPCI (suivi 12 mois). Discussion Le diabete sucre induit par les IPCI est caracterise par une degradation rapide et irreversible de la fonction des cellules B et un contexte auto-immun frequent. Vu les benefices sur le plan oncologique, la poursuite de l’immunotherapie est recommandee malgre la survenue des complications endocriniennes.

Protocol tittle: Study of BO-112 with pembrolizumab for colorectal or gastric/GEJ cancer with liver metastasis.Background: Gastric (GC), oesophagogastric junction (EGJC) and colorectal tumors (CRC) with microsatellite stability (MSS) are poorly responders to PD(L)-1 inhibition, due to low CD8+ T cell infiltration and PD-L1 expression. Therefore, modulation of the tumor microenvironment (TME) could increase disease control. In these tumors the presence of liver lesions is difficult to control because of the hepatic immune tolerance. Control of the hepatic disease could increase survival.BO-112 is a non-coding dsRNA agonist of TLR3, MDA5 and RIG-I which activates the innate and adaptative immune response, inducing apoptosis and immunogenic cell death, with a local and a systemic effect. A prior Phase I trial showed that the combination of pembrolizumab and intratumoral (IT) BO-112 has a good safety profile and encouraging activity. Study design: This is a single arm phase IIa trial to assess the efficacy of intrahepatic IT BO-112 and iv pembrolizumab in 3W cycles in patients with MSS CRC, GC or EGJ tumors. Up to 69 patients with at least one liver lesion and 2 prior lines for CRC and 1 for GC/EGJC will be enrolled. Primary endpoints: ORR and related TEAEs ≥ grade 3. Secondary endpoints: ORR (iRECIST), PFS, 6-months OS and safety. Exploratory endpoint: Changes in TME (PD-L1 expression and CD8+ T cell infiltration) from baseline to C2D1.Results: A total of 11 CRC and 7 GC/EGJC patients were enrolled since July 2020. This abstract focuses on the CRC patients´ biomarker expression. These patients had low PD-L1 CPS (combined positive score) expression and CD8+ T cell infiltration with a median value of 5 and 4%, respectively, in the TME at baseline. Following two IT BO-112 injections, an important increase in PD-L1 expression and CD8+ T cell infiltration was observed in 5 and 7 patients, respectively. PD-L1 CPS median value increased to 37.9 while CD8+ T cell infiltration median values raised to 12.9%.Conclusions: A meaningful increase in PD-L1 expression and CD8+ T cell infiltration was achieved in MSS CRC patients after one cycle of BO-112-pembrolizumab. Table 1.Baseline characteristics and TME changesBaseline characteristicsCRC N=11Demographics-Sex-Male-Female-Age (mean, range)7 (63.6%)4 (36.4%)55 (38-74)Location of primary tumor-Right colon-Left colon2 (36.4%)7 (63.6%)Presence of extrahepatic disease-No-YesLocation of the extrahepatic disease-Lungs-Lymph nodes-Ohers (bone, adrenal gland, peritoneum, pancreas)2 (18.2%)9 (81.8%)6 (54.5%)5 (45.5%)1 (9.1%)Molecular characteristics:-MMR status-MSS-KRAS-Wild type-Mutant -PD-L1-CPS Citation Format: Mariano Ponz-Sarvisé, Elena Élez, Andrés Muñoz, Marc Van den Eynde, Antonio Gaetano Rampoldi, Alain Hendlisz, Hans Prenen, Mercedes Rodríguez, María Teresa Cano, Marya Chaney, Helena Escuin, Vanesa Pons, Marisol Quintero, Andrés Cervantes. Phase IIa open-label clinical study of intratumoural administration of BO-112 in combination with pembrolizumab in subjects with liver metastasis from colorectal cancer or gastric/gastro-oesophageal junction cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT192.

Background Colon adenocarcinoma occurs mainly in older patients (pts). Oxaliplatin based adjuvant chemotherapy has demonstrated an improvement on disease-free survival (DFS) after a stage III colon cancer resection in young pts. Nevertheless, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy is matter of debate in old pts. Methods The purpose of ADAGE trial is to compare the DFS obtain with oxaliplatin combined with fluoropyrimidine (F) to F alone in fit pts over 70 years (group 1) and F to observation in frail pts (group 2) after resection of a stage III colon cancer. We here report a preliminary tolerance analysis on 50% of the first pts enrolled in the study. Results The analysis was performed on 491 pts (378 in group 1 and 113 in group 2). Main pts characteristics were respectively for the group 1 and 2: male in 57% and 50%, median age of 76 and 83 years, ECOG=0 in 59% and 29%, abnormal IADL in 23% and 62%, no caregiver in 26% and 28%, fall ≤6 months in 9% and 14%, depression possible 28% and 40%, fail of one-leg balance in 20% and 59%, impaired cognition in 21% and 38%, G8 score

Background Radiotherapy association with immunotherapy has a strong rationale. This study evaluates this combination before surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer (RC). Methods R-IMMUNE (NCT03127007), a multicentric phase Ib/II prospective trial includes patients with stage II/III RC treated with a preoperative combination of radio-chemotherapy (45-50 Gy/25 fractions, 5FU 225 mg/m2/d, 5d/w from week 1-5) + atezolizumab 1200 mg/infusion (ATZ). The phase Ib had a 3+3 design with a safety period up to surgery and evaluated a single infusion of ATZ at week 3. The phase II, in progress, evaluates 4 infusions of ATZ at weeks 3, 6, 9 and 12. Surgery is planned at week 15. Primary objectives are safety and efficacy based on pathological complete response rate (pCR). Based on a 2-stage Simon design, 36 patients are needed in the phase II to detect a pCR rate increase from 15% to 35% (α = 0.1 and β = 0.1). At least 4 pCRs must be observed among 19 patients treated in the 1st stage to move the 2nd stage. Results This analysis concerns 26 patients treated with the study treatment (median age 66 y-old, 48% male, 88% stage III). Safety was evaluated in 6 patients from phase Ib and 20 from phase II. Overall, 151 AEs were reported and 20 (13%) were grade 3-4 on 9/26 patients, including 2/20 (10%) anastomotic leakage/infections, 4/20 (20%) urinary infections, 1/20 (5%) renal function impairment and 1/20 (5%) immune thrombocytopenia. Three grade 2 immune endocrine disorders were observed. Efficacy was evaluable on 25/26 patients after 1 exclusion for inclusion criteria deviation. Four among 19 patients included in the 1st stage of phase II had a pCR. Overall, 6/25 (24%) pCRs were observed. Conclusions R-IMMUNE interim analysis reveals an acceptable safety profile. Observed pCR rate until now supports the pursuit of the trial. Clinical trial identification NCT03127007.

Background The present study was performed to evaluate the predictive capacity of the TNM-Immune (TNM-I) classification staging system vs. the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM8) staging system for survival of patients with colon cancer. Methods Data of eligible patients from the Society-for-Immunotherapy-of-Cancer (SITC) international-consortium from 13 countries were evaluated for the consensus Immunoscore in 3539 patients with AJCC/UICC-TNM stages I-III colon cancer. The primary-endpoint time-to-recurrence (TTR) and secondary-endpoint overall-survival (OS) were evaluated for 2650 patients with complete TNM staging and Immunoscore information. The consensus Immunoscore was predefined and previously published (Pages et al. Lancet 2018), and TNM-I categories (IA to IIID) were performed based on TNM8 plus consensus Immunoscore categories. Results A total of 1737 (64.8%) patients presented stage migration, including 1495 (55.8%) migrating to a lower stage and 242 (9.0%) to a higher stage. In TNM8 stage IIIB, patients migrated to all possible TNM-I stages from IA to IIID. A total of 563 Stage IIIB (67.0%) patients presented stage migration, including 181 (32.1%) migrating to a lower stage and 196 (34.8%) to a higher stage. TNM-I Hazard ratio for TTR between TNM-I stage IA and IIID was HR= 16.9 (95%CI 7.75-36.83), in contrast TNM8 TTR between IA and IIIC was only HR= 12.77 (95%CI 7.99-20.4), all P< 0.0001. TNM-I Hazard ratio for OS between TNM-I stage IA and IIID was HR= 5.95 (95%CI 3.17-11.19), in contrast, TNM8 OS between IA and IIIC was only HR= 3.16 (95%CI 2.38-4.18), all P< 0.0001. The TNM8 staging system exhibited prognostic discrepancies in discriminating stage IIB and IIC and between IIC and IIIA on survival curves from TTR and OS, which were improved in the TNM-I staging system. In cox multivariate analysis, the relative contribution of TNM-I was 90.3% in comparison to gender, sidedness, MSI, grade of differentiation, mucinous colloid, VELIPI. The TNM-I had a better predictive capability of survival, as evidenced by higher likelihood ratio scores, and smaller AIC values for TNM-I compared with those for TNM8 edition. Conclusion Therefore, the present study showed the importance of immuno-pathology and demonstrated that the TNM-Immune (TNM-I) classification staging system is superior (log-likelihood ratio test P< 0.0001) to the 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC-TNM staging system in predicting the TTR and OS of patients with colon cancer.

Background Immunoscore® is an in vitro diagnostic test predicting the risk of relapse in early-stage Colon Cancer (CC), by measuring the host immune response at the tumor site. This risk-assessment tool provides independent and superior prognostic value than the usual risk parameters and is intended to be used as an adjunct to the TNM classification for clinical decision. In the present study, we investigated Immunoscore® clinical performance in the Asian population from the international SITC-led validation study (Pagès et al. The Lancet 2018). Methods Out of the 2681 eligible stage I-III patients of the international Immunoscore® study, 423 were collected from 4 expert centers in Asia including Japan (n=330), China (n=35), and India (n=58). Patients were classified by Immunoscore® based on pre-defined cutoffs, either in 5 (IS 0-4) or 2 categories: IS Low (IS 0-1) and IS High (IS 2-4). Time to recurrence (TTR) was compared between Immunoscore® categories. Results Immunoscore® Low and High were observed in 37% (n=158) and 63% (n=265) of the Asian cohort, respectively. Immunoscore® was positively and significantly correlated with TTR. After 5 years, 86.9% (95% CI 82.7-91.4), and 77% (95% CI 70,5-84,1) of Immunoscore -High and -Low patients respectively were event free (HR =0.52; 95% CI 0.32-0.86; p=0.0085). When adjusting the model with Immunoscore®, age, gender, T-stage, N-stage, sidedness and MSI, and when stratified by center, Immunoscore® remained a significant parameter (HR=0.45; 95% CI 0.22-0.91; p=0.027). When stratified into 5 Immunoscore® categories, TTR rates at 5 years were 100%, 96%, 84%, 80%, and 73.5% for IS4, IS3, IS2, IS1, IS0, respectively. These results were similar to those found in European and North American patients. Conclusions Immunoscore® is a strong prognostic indicator of the risk of recurrence in stage I-III CC patients who receive standard of care treatment in real-life clinical practice in Asia. This first standardized immune-based assay risk assessment tool can be used reliably to guide clinical decision according to each patient information.

Background Pathological response (PR) of resected CRCM after preop treatment is a recognized prognostic factor. Retrospective studies reported that BEV + oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy increased PR compared to irinotecan-based chemotherapy. In this trial, we aim to demonstrate that preop BEV + FOLFOX would increase PR. Methods BEV-ONCO (NCT01858649) is a multicenter prospective randomized (1/1) phase II trial evaluating PR on resected CRCM after 3 to max 6 cycles of mFOLFOX (ARM A) or FOLFIRI (ARM B) + BEV (5mg/kg/2 weeks). Primary endpoint is the major pathological response rate (MPRR) defined as the % of patients presenting CRCMs with a mean tumor regression grade (TRG)

Background Microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer is typically unresponsive to immunotherapy. This phase 3 study was designed to assess atezolizumab plus cobimetinib in metastatic colorectal cancer. Here, we report the comparison of atezolizumab plus cobimetinib or atezolizumab monotherapy versus regorafenib in the third-line setting. Methods IMblaze 370 is a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled trial, done at 73 academic medical centres and community oncology practices in 11 countries. Patients aged at least 18 years with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1, and disease progression on or intolerance to at least two previous systemic chemotherapy regimens were enrolled. We used permuted-block randomisation (block size four) to assign patients (2:1:1) via an interactive voice and web response system to atezolizumab (840 mg intravenously every 2 weeks) plus cobimetinib (60 mg orally once daily for days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle), atezolizumab monotherapy (1200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks), or regorafenib (160 mg orally once daily for days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle). Stratification factors were extended RAS status (wild-type vs mutant) and time since diagnosis of first metastasis (

Summary Background Few treatments with a distinct mechanism of action are available for patients with platinum-refractory advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. We assessed the efficacy and safety of treatment with docetaxel plus either ramucirumab—a human IgG1 VEGFR-2 antagonist—or placebo in this patient population. Methods We did a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial in patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who progressed during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were enrolled from 124 sites in 23 countries. Previous treatment with one immune-checkpoint inhibitor was permitted. Patients were randomised (1:1) using an interactive web response system to receive intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 plus either intravenous ramucirumab 10 mg/kg or matching placebo on day 1 of repeating 21-day cycles, until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria were met. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, analysed by intention-to-treat in the first 437 randomised patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02426125. Findings Between July, 2015, and April, 2017, 530 patients were randomly allocated either ramucirumab plus docetaxel (n=263) or placebo plus docetaxel (n=267). Progression-free survival was prolonged significantly in patients allocated ramucirumab plus docetaxel versus placebo plus docetaxel (median 4·07 months [95% CI 2·96–4·47] vs 2·76 months [2·60–2·96]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·757, 95% CI 0·607–0·943; p=0·0118). A blinded independent central analysis was consistent with these results. An objective response was achieved by 53 (24·5%, 95% CI 18·8–30·3) of 216 patients allocated ramucirumab and 31 (14·0%, 9·4–18·6) of 221 assigned placebo. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events, regardless of causality, in either treatment group (any grade) were fatigue, alopecia, diarrhoea, decreased appetite, and nausea. These events occurred predominantly at grade 1–2 severity. The frequency of grade 3 or worse adverse events was similar for patients allocated ramucirumab and placebo (156 [60%] of 258 vs 163 [62%] of 265 had an adverse event), with no unexpected toxic effects. 63 (24%) of 258 patients allocated ramucirumab and 54 (20%) of 265 assigned placebo had a serious adverse event that was judged by the investigator to be related to treatment. 38 (15%) of 258 patients allocated ramucirumab and 43 (16%) of 265 assigned placebo died on treatment or within 30 days of discontinuation, of which eight (3%) and five (2%) deaths were deemed related to treatment by the investigator. Sepsis was the most common adverse event leading to death on treatment (four [2%] vs none [0%]). One fatal event of neutropenic sepsis was reported in a patient allocated ramucirumab. Interpretation To the best of our knowledge, ramucirumab plus docetaxel is the first regimen in a phase 3 study to show superior progression-free survival over chemotherapy in patients with platinum-refractory advanced urothelial carcinoma. These data validate inhibition of VEGFR-2 signalling as a potential new therapeutic treatment option for patients with urothelial carcinoma. Funding Eli Lilly and Company.

Background: Half of anticancer drugs are predominantly excreted in urine. Dosage adjustment in renal insufficiency (RI) is, therefore, a crucial issue. Moreover, patients with abnormal renal function are at high risk for drug-induced nephrotoxicity. The Belgian Renal Insufficiency and Anticancer Medications (BIRMA) study investigated the prevalence of RI in cancer patients, and the profile/dosing of anticancer drugs prescribed. Methods:Primary end point: to estimate the prevalence of abnormal glomerular filtration rate (GFR; estimated with the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula) and RI in cancer patient. Secondary end point: to describe the profile of anticancer drugs prescribed (dose reduction/nephrotoxicity). Data were collected for patients presenting at one of the seven Belgian BIRMA centres in March 2006. Results: A total of 1218 patients were included. The prevalence of elevated SCR (1.2 mg per 100 ml) was 14.9%, but 64.0% had a GFR90 ml min 1 per 1.73 m 2. In all, 78.6% of treated patients (n1087) were receiving at least one drug needing dosage adjustment and 78.1% received at least one nephrotoxic drug. In all, 56.5% of RI patients receiving chemotherapy requiring dose reduction in case of RI did not receive dose adjustment. Conclusions: The RI is highly frequent in cancer patients. In all, 80% of the patients receive potentially nephrotoxic drugs and/or for which dosage must be adjusted in RI. Oncologists should check the appropriate dose of chemotherapeutic drugs in relation to renal function before prescribing. © 2010 Cancer Research UK., SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published