1. Peer Learning Through Multi-Institutional Web-based Case Conferences: Perceived Value (and Challenges) From Abdominal, Cardiothoracic, and Musculoskeletal Radiology Case Conference Participants
- Author
-
Travis S. Henry, Victor Sai, J. David Godwin, Michael L. Richardson, Steven C. Eberhardt, Varaha S. Tammisetti, Nelly Tan, Valerie Armstrong, Jeffrey P. Kanne, Aarti Sekhar, and Victoria Chernyak
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Musculoskeletal radiology ,Case conference ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Likert scale ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Continuing medical education ,Interquartile range ,Radiologists ,Humans ,Learning ,Medicine ,Web application ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Peer learning ,Aged ,Internet ,business.industry ,Time zone ,Middle Aged ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Family medicine ,Education, Medical, Continuing ,Radiology ,business - Abstract
Rationale and Objectives Peer learning is a case-based group-learning model intended to improve performance. In this descriptive paper, we describe multi-institutional, multi-subspecialty, web-based radiology case conferences and summarize the participants’ experiences. Materials and Methods A semi-structured, 27-question survey was administered to radiologists participating in abdominal, cardiothoracic, and musculoskeletal case conferences. Survey questions included demographics, perceived educational value and challenges experienced. Survey question formats were continuous, binary, five-point Likert scale or text-based. The measures of central tendencies, proportions of responses and patterns were tabulated. Results From 57 responders, 12/57 (21.1%) were abdominal, 16/57 (28.1%) were cardiothoracic, and 29/57 (50.8%) were musculoskeletal conference participants; 50/56 (89.3%) represented academic practice. Median age was 45 years (range 35–74); 43/57 (75.4%) were male. Geographically, 16/52 (30.8%) of participants were from the East Coast, 16/52 (30.8%) Midwest, 18/52 (34.6%) West Coast, and 2/52 (3.8%) International. The median reported educational value was 5/5 (interquartile range 5–5). Benefits of the case conference included education (50/95, 52.6%) and networking (39/95, 41.1%). Participants reported presenting the following cases: “great call" 32/48 (66.7%), learning opportunity 32/48 (66.7%), new knowledge 41/49 (83.7%), “zebras” 46/49 (93.9%), and procedural-based 16/46 (34.8%). All 51/51 (100%) of responders reportedly gained new knowledge, 49/51 (96.1%) became more open to group discussion, 34/51 (66.7%) changed search patterns, and 50/51 (98%) would continue to participate. Reported challenges included time zone differences and support from departments for a protected time to participate. Conclusion Peer learning through multi-institutional case conferences provides educational and networking opportunities. Current challenges and desires include having department-supported protected time and ability to receive continuing medical education credit.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF