Search

Abstract Background Heavy alcohol use among U.S. college students is a major contributor to young adult morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to examine whether college alcohol policy enforcement levels predict changes in student drinking and related behaviors in a state system of public colleges and universities, following a system-wide change to a stricter policy. Methods Students and administrators at 11 Massachusetts public colleges/universities completed surveys in 1999 (N of students = 1252), one year after the policy change, and again in 2001 (N = 1074). We calculated policy enforcement scores for each school based on the reports of deans of students, campus security chiefs, and students, and examined the correlations between perceived enforcement levels and the change in student drinking rates over the subsequent two year period, after weighting the 2001 data to adjust for demographic changes in the student body. Results Overall rates of any past-30-days drinking, heavy episodic drinking, and usual heavy drinking among past-30-days drinkers were all lower in 2001 compared to 1999. School-level analyses (N = 11) found deans' baseline reports of stricter enforcement were strongly correlated with subsequent declines in heavy episodic drinking (Pearson's r = -0.73, p = 0.011). Moreover, consistently high enforcement levels across time, as reported by deans, were associated with greater declines in heavy episodic drinking. Such relationships were not found for students' and security chiefs' reports of enforcement. Marijuana use did not rise during this period of decline in heavy drinking. Conclusions Study findings suggest that stronger enforcement of a stricter alcohol policy may be associated with reductions in student heavy drinking rates over time. An aggressive enforcement stance by deans may be an important element of an effective college alcohol policy.

Background: Until local healthcare infrastructure is strengthened, cardiac surgical care in low- and middle-income countries is often provided by non-governmental organizations by way of visiting healthcare teams. This is generally considered to be a cost-effective alternative to transporting patients to high income countries for surgical care, but the costs of cardiac surgery consumables under this model are poorly understood. Our objective was to identify the per-patient cost of cardiac surgery consumables used in single and double valve replacements performed by a non-governmental organization in Rwanda., Methods: Financial data from 2020 were collected from Team Heart, a non-governmental organization that supports cardiac surgical care in Rwanda. A comprehensive list of consumables was generated, including surgical, perfusion, anesthesia, and inpatient supplies and medications. Acknowledging the variability in perioperative needs, the quantities of consumables were calculated from an average of six patients who underwent single or double-valve replacement in 2020. Total costs were calculated by multiplying purchasing price by average quantity per patient. Costs absorbed by the local hospital were excluded from the calculations., Results: The total cost per patient was estimated at $9,450. Surgical supplies comprised the majority of costs ($6,140 per patient), with the most substantial cost being that of replacement valves ($3,500 per valve), followed by surgical supplies ($1,590 per patient)., Conclusions: This preliminary analysis identifies a cost of just over $9,000 per patient for consumables used in cardiac valve surgery in Rwanda, which is lower than the estimated costs of transporting patients to centers in high income countries. This work highlights the relative cost effectiveness of cardiac surgical care in low- and middle- income countries under this model and will be instrumental in guiding the allocation of local and international resources in the future., (© 2024. The Author(s).)