Search

INTRODUCTION B3-lesions of the breast are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, associated with a higher risk of breast cancer. Recent studies show a low upgrade rate into malignancy after subsequent open surgical excision (OE) of most B3-lesions when proven by vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB). However, there is a lack of long-term follow-up data after VAB of high-risk lesions. The primary aim of this study was to demonstrate whether follow-up of B3 lesions is a beneficial and reliable alternative to OE in terms of long-term outcome. The secondary aim was to identify patient and lesion characteristics of B3 lesions for which OE is still necessary. METHODS This retrospective multicenter study was conducted at 8 Swiss breast centers between 2010 and 2019. A total of 278 women (mean age: 53.5 ± 10.7 years) with 286 B3-lesions who had observation only and who had at least 24 months of follow-up were included. Any event during follow-up (ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS], invasive cancer, new B3-lesion) was systematically recorded. Data from women who had an event during follow-up were compared with those who did not. The results for the different B3 lesions were analyzed using the t test and Fisher's exact test. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS The median follow-up interval was 59 months (range: 24-143 months) with 52% (148/286) having a follow-up of more than 5 years. During follow-up, in 42 women, 44 suspicious lesions occurred, with 36.4% (16/44) being invasive cancer and 6.8% (3/44) being DCIS. Thus, 6.6% (19/286) of all women developed malignancy during follow-up after a median follow-up interval of 6.5 years (range: 31-119 months). The initial histology of the B3 lesion influenced the subsequent occurrence of a malignant lesion during follow-up (p < 0.038). The highest malignancy-developing rate was observed in atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) (24%, 19/79), while all other B3-lesions had malignant findings ipsi- and contralateral betwe

Most invasive lobular breast carcinomas (ILBCs) are luminal‐type carcinomas with an HER2‐negative phenotype (ERBB2 or HER2 un‐amplified) and CDH1 mutations. Rare variants include ERBB2‐amplified subtypes associated with an unfavorable prognosis and less response to anti‐HER2 targeted therapies. We analyzed the clinicopathological and molecular features of ERBB2‐amplified ILBC and compared these characteristics with ERBB2‐unamplified ILBC. A total of 253 patients with ILBC were analyzed. Paraffin‐embedded formalin‐fixed tumor samples from 250 of these patients were added to a tissue microarray. Protein expression of prognostic, stem cell and breast‐specific markers was tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Hybrid capture‐based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) was performed for 10 ILBCs that were either fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) or IHC positive for HER2 amplification/overexpression and 10 ILBCs that were either FISH or IHC negative. Results were compared with a CGP database of 44,293 invasive breast carcinomas. The CGP definition of ERBB2 amplification was five copies or greater. A total of 17 of 255 ILBC (5%) were ERBB2 amplified. ERBB2‐amplified ILBC had higher tumor stage (p < 0.0001), more frequent positive nodal status (p = 0.00022), more distant metastases (p = 0.012), and higher histological grade (p < 0.0001), and were more often hormone receptor negative (p < 0.001) and more often SOX10 positive (p = 0.005). ERBB2 short variant sequence mutations were more often detected in ERBB2‐unamplified tumors (6/10, p = 0.027), whereas CDH1 mutations/copy loss were frequently present in both subgroups (9/10 and 7/10, respectively). Amplification of pathogenic genes were more common in HER2‐positive ILBC (p = 0.0009). CDK12 gene amplification (≥6 copies) was detected in 7 of 10 ERBB2‐amplified ILBC (p = 0.018). There were no CDK12 gene amplifications reported in 44,293 invasive breast carcinomas in the FMI Insights CGP database. ERBB2‐amplified ILBC i

Introduction: Breast lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) include atypical ductal and lobular hyperplasias, lobular carcinoma in situ, flat epithelial atypia, papillary lesions, radial scars and fibroepithelial lesions as well as other rare miscellaneous lesions. They are challenging to categorise histologically, requiring specialist training and multidisciplinary input. They may coexist with in situ or invasive breast cancer (BC) and increase the risk of subsequent BC development. Management should focus on adequate classification and management whilst avoiding overtreatment. The aim of these guidelines is to provide updated information regarding the diagnosis and management of B3 lesions, according to updated literature review evidence. Methods: These guidelines provide practical recommendations which can be applied in clinical practice which include recommendation grade and level of evidence. All sections were written according to an updated literature review and discussed at a consensus meeting. Critical appraisal by the expert writing committee adhered to the 23 items in the international Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation (AGREE) tool. Results: Recommendations for further management after core-needle biopsy (CNB) or vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) diagnosis of a B3 lesion reported in this guideline, vary depending on the presence of atypia, size of lesion, sampling size, and patient preferences. After CNB or VAB, the option of vacuum-assisted excision or surgical excision should be evaluated by a multidisciplinary team and shared decision-making with the patient is crucial for personalizing further treatment. De-escalation of surgical intervention for B3 breast lesions is ongoing, and the inclusion of vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) will decrease the need for surgical intervention in further approaches. Communication with patients may be different according to histological diagnosis, presence or absence of atypia, or risk of upgrade due to d

Molecular testing in breast cancer gained increasing attention and importance as specific molecular results can tailor not only oncological decisions on systemic adjuvant or neoadjuvant or in metastatic setting, but increasingly serve in diagnostic routine histopathological services to differentiate between morphologically overlapping or ambiguous histological pictures. Diagnostic tools involve in most cases a broad spectrum of immunohistochemical panels, followed by entity-specific in situ hybridization probes and in given cases NGS-based sequencing. Workflow of which methodology is applied and in which order depends on the specific entity resp. on the given differential diagnosis in question. Regarding prognostic/predictive molecular testing, the choice of assay and the workflow are based on clinical algorithms and on the evidence of targeted therapies following the molecular alterations. In this review paper, we aim to address the use of molecular technics in [1] the histological diagnostic setting (such as subtyping of invasive carcinomas/malignant spindle cell tumors and sarcomas and some B3 lesions) and [2] in the context of adjuvant or neoadjuvant or other clinical settings with special focus of targeted therapies.

Rapid, highly multiplexed, nondestructive imaging that spans the molecular to the supra-cellular scale would be a powerful tool for tissue analysis. However, the physical constraints of established imaging methods limit the simultaneous improvement of these parameters. Whole-organism to atomic-level imaging is possible with tissue-penetrant, picometer-wavelength X-rays. To enable highly multiplexed X-ray imaging, we developed multielement Z-tag X-ray fluorescence (MEZ-XRF) that can operate at kHz speeds when combined with signal amplification by exchange reaction (SABER)-amplified Z-tag reagents. We demonstrated parallel imaging of 20 Z-tag or SABER Z-tag reagents at subcellular resolution in cell lines and multiple human tissues. We benchmarked MEZ-XRF against imaging mass cytometry and demonstrated the nondestructive multiscale repeat imaging capabilities of MEZ-XRF with rapid tissue overview scans, followed by slower, more sensitive imaging of low-abundance markers such as immune checkpoint proteins. The unique multiscale, nondestructive nature of MEZ-XRF, combined with SABER Z-tags for high sensitivity or enhanced speed, enables highly multiplexed bioimaging across biological scales.

PURPOSE Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a molecularly complex and heterogeneous breast cancer subtype with distinct biological features and clinical behavior. Although TNBC is associated with an increased risk of metastasis and recurrence, the molecular mechanisms underlying TNBC metastasis remain unclear. We performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) analysis of primary TNBC and paired recurrent tumors to investigate the genetic profile of TNBC. METHODS Genomic DNA extracted from 35 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples from 26 TNBC patients was subjected to WES. Of these, 15 were primary tumors that did not have recurrence, and 11 were primary tumors that had recurrence (nine paired primary and recurrent tumors). Tumors were analyzed for single-nucleotide variants and insertions/deletions. RESULTS The tumor mutational burden (TMB) was 7.6 variants/megabase in primary tumors that recurred (n = 9); 8.2 variants/megabase in corresponding recurrent tumors (n = 9); and 7.3 variants/megabase in primary tumors that did not recur (n = 15). MUC3A was the most frequently mutated gene in all groups. Mutations in MAP3K1 and MUC16 were more common in our dataset. No alterations in PI3KCA were detected in our dataset. CONCLUSIONS We found similar mutational profiles between primary and paired recurrent tumors, suggesting that genomic features may be retained during local recurrence.