Search

Clinical trials have demonstrated conclusively the non-inferiority of breast-conserving surgery followed by breast radiation therapy (BCT) compared with mastectomy for the treatment of early-stage invasive breast cancer (BC). The definition of the required surgical margin to ensure adequate removal of the cancer by BCT to obtain an acceptable low local recurrence (LR) rate remains controversial. Meta-analyses published by Houssami et al. in 2010 and 2014 demonstrated significantly lower LR rates for patients with a negative margin compared with those with positive (ink on tumour) or close (defined as ≤1 mm or ≤2 mm) margins. Neither meta-analysis addressed whether ‘no ink on tumour’ was adequate to define a negative margin because of a lack of data. Nevertheless, in 2014, the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) and the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) with advice from pathologists reviewed these data together and published guidelines recommending that a margin of ‘no ink on tumour’ was sufficient to define a clear margin in BCT. Subsequently, clinical practice has varied with some national and international bodies endorsing ‘no ink on tumour’, whilst others have recommended a ≥1 mm margin as acceptable margins for BCT. A more recent meta-analysis conducted by Bundred and colleagues in 2022 did have sufficient data to compare ‘no ink on tumour’ and 1 mm and concluded that 1 mm rather than ‘no ink on tumour’, should be used as a minimum negative margin, and recommended that international guidelines be revised. The current review presents a balanced assessment of the evidence relating margin width and local recurrence after BCT. This review concludes that guidelines should consider re-defining a negative margin as ≥1 mm rather than ‘no ink on tumour’ in the context of BCT, recognising there will be variation to tailor therapy for any individual patient situation to ensure optimal patient care.

While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized modern oncology, they are also associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Previous histopathological descriptions of organ-related inflammatory changes do not consider systemic effects of ICIs, because of an absence of comprehensive autopsy studies. We performed a retrospective study on 42 whole-body autopsies of patients treated with ICIs from January 2011 to March 2024 to determine frequency, organ distribution and morphology of ICIs-associated inflammatory changes as well as their clinical relevance. Twenty-three of 42 patients (54.8%) presented irAEs with inflammatory changes in at least one organ. Most frequent irAEs were ICIs-related hypophysitis (N=12, 28.6%), myocarditis (N=8, 19.0%), pneumonitis (N=5, 11.9%), hepatitis (N=6, 14.3%), and adrenalitis (N=5, 11.9%). ICIs-related inflammation was mainly characterized by lympho-histiocytic and macrophage-rich tissue infiltrates, whereas a granulomatous "sarcoid-like" reaction was observed in one patient. Cause of death was attributable to ICIs-therapy in 7 patients (16.7%), with ICIs-associated myocarditis as the most common cause of death (N=5, 71.4%). Clinically, irAEs were unsuspected in 5 of 7 ICIs-related deaths (71.4%). Among irAEs, myocarditis has been clinically undiagnosed in 5 out of 8 cases (62.5%). Encephalitis was identified only at autopsy in all cases (N=2). Hypophysitis was clinically unsuspected in 8 of 12 cases (66.7%). Patients who died from irAEs developed more frequently a complete tumor regression than patients who died from other causes (P=0.018). Of note, ICIs-related myocarditis and pneumonitis were both associated with a systemic occurrence irAEs. Our study demonstrates that some irAEs, especially myocarditis, hypophysitis, and encephalitis are clinically underdiagnosed. Autopsy remains a valuable tool to monitor diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic side effects in patients who died under ICIs-therapy.

Clinical trials have demonstrated conclusively the non-inferiority of breast-conserving surgery followed by breast radiation therapy (BCT) compared with mastectomy for the treatment of early-stage invasive breast cancer (BC). The definition of the required surgical margin to ensure adequate removal of the cancer by BCT to obtain an acceptable low local recurrence (LR) rate remains controversial. Meta-analyses published by Houssami et al. in 2010 and 2014 demonstrated significantly lower LR rates for patients with a negative margin compared with those with positive (ink on tumour) or close (defined as ≤1 mm or ≤2 mm) margins. Neither meta-analysis addressed whether 'no ink on tumour' was adequate to define a negative margin because of a lack of data. Nevertheless, in 2014, the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) and the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) with advice from pathologists reviewed these data together and published guidelines recommending that a margin of 'no ink on tumour' was sufficient to define a clear margin in BCT. Subsequently, clinical practice has varied with some national and international bodies endorsing 'no ink on tumour', whilst others have recommended a ≥1 mm margin as acceptable margins for BCT. A more recent meta-analysis conducted by Bundred and colleagues in 2022 did have sufficient data to compare 'no ink on tumour' and 1 mm and concluded that 1 mm rather than 'no ink on tumour', should be used as a minimum negative margin, and recommended that international guidelines be revised. The current review presents a balanced assessment of the evidence relating margin width and local recurrence after BCT. This review concludes that guidelines should consider re-defining a negative margin as ≥1 mm rather than 'no ink on tumour' in the context of BCT, recognising there will be variation to tailor therapy for any individual patient situation to ensure optimal patient care.

Most invasive lobular breast carcinomas (ILBCs) are luminal-type carcinomas with an HER2-negative phenotype (ERBB2 or HER2 un-amplified) and CDH1 mutations. Rare variants include ERBB2-amplified subtypes associated with an unfavorable prognosis and less response to anti-HER2 targeted therapies. We analyzed the clinicopathological and molecular features of ERBB2-amplified ILBC and compared these characteristics with ERBB2-unamplified ILBC. A total of 253 patients with ILBC were analyzed. Paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed tumor samples from 250 of these patients were added to a tissue microarray. Protein expression of prognostic, stem cell and breast-specific markers was tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Hybrid capture-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) was performed for 10 ILBCs that were either fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) or IHC positive for HER2 amplification/overexpression and 10 ILBCs that were either FISH or IHC negative. Results were compared with a CGP database of 44,293 invasive breast carcinomas. The CGP definition of ERBB2 amplification was five copies or greater. A total of 17 of 255 ILBC (5%) were ERBB2 amplified. ERBB2-amplified ILBC had higher tumor stage (p < 0.0001), more frequent positive nodal status (p = 0.00022), more distant metastases (p = 0.012), and higher histological grade (p < 0.0001), and were more often hormone receptor negative (p < 0.001) and more often SOX10 positive (p = 0.005). ERBB2 short variant sequence mutations were more often detected in ERBB2-unamplified tumors (6/10, p = 0.027), whereas CDH1 mutations/copy loss were frequently present in both subgroups (9/10 and 7/10, respectively). Amplification of pathogenic genes were more common in HER2-positive ILBC (p = 0.0009). CDK12 gene amplification (≥6 copies) was detected in 7 of 10 ERBB2-amplified ILBC (p = 0.018). There were no CDK12 gene amplifications reported in 44,293 invasive breast carcinomas in the FMI Insights CGP database. ERBB2-amplified ILBC i

The impact of special histological types (ST) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and its association with overall outcome has gained increasing relevance as survival has been linked to specific histological TNBC subtypes. We evaluated the clinicopathological and survival data of 598 patients with 613 TNBCs, including 464 TNBCs of no special type (NST) and 149 TNBCs ST (low-grade, n = 12, 8.1%; high-grade, n = 112, 75.2%; apocrine and androgen receptor-positive [APO AR], n = 25, 16.8%). Patients with low-grade TNBC ST and TNBC ST APO AR were significantly older (P < 0.001) and had a lower Ki67 index (P < 0.001) than those with TNBC NST. Patients with high-grade TNBC ST were significantly older (P = 0.006) and had poorer pathological responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) (P < 0.001) than those with TNBC NST. Significant survival differences were observed between low-grade TNBC ST, TNBC ST APO AR, high-grade TNBC ST, and TNBC NST in the entire study group (DFS, P = 0.002; DDFS, P = 0.001) and in the non-NAC subgroup (OS, P = 0.034; DFS, P = 0.001; DDFS, P < 0.001). Patients with low-grade TNBC ST had the best survival outcomes. Patients with high-grade TNBC ST showed significantly worse outcomes than those with TNBC NST (entire study group: OS, P = 0.049; DFS, P < 0.001; DDFS, P = 0.001; non-NAC subgroup: OS, P = 0.014; DFS, P < 0.001; DDFS, P < 0.001). We conclude that prognostic stratification of TNBC ST is ultimately important for optimizing the therapeutic management of patients with these rare tumor entities.

This work demonstrates the successful reconstruction of phase contrast images under challenging acquisition conditions in grating interferometry breast CT (GI-BCT) with an algorithm that adds a novel regularization functional to the existing iterative-based intensity reconstruction (IBIR) algorithm. The addition of a cross-channel regularizer allows to leverage the absorption channel’s convergence to promote that of the phase channel, which otherwise struggles to converge. We demonstrate convergence of phase contrast images on both simulations and real data. This work sets a step towards a clinically compatible reconstruction procedure using cross-channel regularization for the generation of standalone phase-contrast images of breasts.

Introduction Quality care in breast cancer is higher if patients are treated in a Breast Center with a dedicated and specialized multidisciplinary team. Quality control is an essential activity to ensure quality care, which has to be based on the monitoring of specific quality indicators. Eusoma has proceeded with the up-dating of the 2017 Quality indicators for non-metastatic breast cancer based on the new diagnostic, locoregional and systemic treatment modalities. Methods To proceed with the updating, EUSOMA setup a multidisciplinary working group of BC experts and patients’ representatives. It is a comprehensive set of QIs for early breast cancer care, which are classified as mandatory, recommended, or observational. For the first time patient reported outcomes (PROMs) have been included. As used in the 2017 EUSOMA QIs, evidence levels were based on the short version of the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Results This is a set of quality indicators representative for the different steps of the patient pathway in non-metastatic setting, which allow Breast Centres to monitor their performance with referring standards, i.e minimum standard and target. Conclusions Monitoring these Quality Indicators, within the Eusoma datacentre will allow to have a state of the art picture at European Breast Centres level and the development of challenging research projects.

INTRODUCTION B3-lesions of the breast are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, associated with a higher risk of breast cancer. Recent studies show a low upgrade rate into malignancy after subsequent open surgical excision (OE) of most B3-lesions when proven by vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB). However, there is a lack of long-term follow-up data after VAB of high-risk lesions. The primary aim of this study was to demonstrate whether follow-up of B3 lesions is a beneficial and reliable alternative to OE in terms of long-term outcome. The secondary aim was to identify patient and lesion characteristics of B3 lesions for which OE is still necessary. METHODS This retrospective multicenter study was conducted at 8 Swiss breast centers between 2010 and 2019. A total of 278 women (mean age: 53.5 ± 10.7 years) with 286 B3-lesions who had observation only and who had at least 24 months of follow-up were included. Any event during follow-up (ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS], invasive cancer, new B3-lesion) was systematically recorded. Data from women who had an event during follow-up were compared with those who did not. The results for the different B3 lesions were analyzed using the t test and Fisher's exact test. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS The median follow-up interval was 59 months (range: 24-143 months) with 52% (148/286) having a follow-up of more than 5 years. During follow-up, in 42 women, 44 suspicious lesions occurred, with 36.4% (16/44) being invasive cancer and 6.8% (3/44) being DCIS. Thus, 6.6% (19/286) of all women developed malignancy during follow-up after a median follow-up interval of 6.5 years (range: 31-119 months). The initial histology of the B3 lesion influenced the subsequent occurrence of a malignant lesion during follow-up (p < 0.038). The highest malignancy-developing rate was observed in atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) (24%, 19/79), while all other B3-lesions had malignant findings ipsi- and contralateral betwe

Most invasive lobular breast carcinomas (ILBCs) are luminal‐type carcinomas with an HER2‐negative phenotype (ERBB2 or HER2 un‐amplified) and CDH1 mutations. Rare variants include ERBB2‐amplified subtypes associated with an unfavorable prognosis and less response to anti‐HER2 targeted therapies. We analyzed the clinicopathological and molecular features of ERBB2‐amplified ILBC and compared these characteristics with ERBB2‐unamplified ILBC. A total of 253 patients with ILBC were analyzed. Paraffin‐embedded formalin‐fixed tumor samples from 250 of these patients were added to a tissue microarray. Protein expression of prognostic, stem cell and breast‐specific markers was tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Hybrid capture‐based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) was performed for 10 ILBCs that were either fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) or IHC positive for HER2 amplification/overexpression and 10 ILBCs that were either FISH or IHC negative. Results were compared with a CGP database of 44,293 invasive breast carcinomas. The CGP definition of ERBB2 amplification was five copies or greater. A total of 17 of 255 ILBC (5%) were ERBB2 amplified. ERBB2‐amplified ILBC had higher tumor stage (p < 0.0001), more frequent positive nodal status (p = 0.00022), more distant metastases (p = 0.012), and higher histological grade (p < 0.0001), and were more often hormone receptor negative (p < 0.001) and more often SOX10 positive (p = 0.005). ERBB2 short variant sequence mutations were more often detected in ERBB2‐unamplified tumors (6/10, p = 0.027), whereas CDH1 mutations/copy loss were frequently present in both subgroups (9/10 and 7/10, respectively). Amplification of pathogenic genes were more common in HER2‐positive ILBC (p = 0.0009). CDK12 gene amplification (≥6 copies) was detected in 7 of 10 ERBB2‐amplified ILBC (p = 0.018). There were no CDK12 gene amplifications reported in 44,293 invasive breast carcinomas in the FMI Insights CGP database. ERBB2‐amplified ILBC i

Introduction: Breast lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) include atypical ductal and lobular hyperplasias, lobular carcinoma in situ, flat epithelial atypia, papillary lesions, radial scars and fibroepithelial lesions as well as other rare miscellaneous lesions. They are challenging to categorise histologically, requiring specialist training and multidisciplinary input. They may coexist with in situ or invasive breast cancer (BC) and increase the risk of subsequent BC development. Management should focus on adequate classification and management whilst avoiding overtreatment. The aim of these guidelines is to provide updated information regarding the diagnosis and management of B3 lesions, according to updated literature review evidence. Methods: These guidelines provide practical recommendations which can be applied in clinical practice which include recommendation grade and level of evidence. All sections were written according to an updated literature review and discussed at a consensus meeting. Critical appraisal by the expert writing committee adhered to the 23 items in the international Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation (AGREE) tool. Results: Recommendations for further management after core-needle biopsy (CNB) or vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) diagnosis of a B3 lesion reported in this guideline, vary depending on the presence of atypia, size of lesion, sampling size, and patient preferences. After CNB or VAB, the option of vacuum-assisted excision or surgical excision should be evaluated by a multidisciplinary team and shared decision-making with the patient is crucial for personalizing further treatment. De-escalation of surgical intervention for B3 breast lesions is ongoing, and the inclusion of vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) will decrease the need for surgical intervention in further approaches. Communication with patients may be different according to histological diagnosis, presence or absence of atypia, or risk of upgrade due to d

Molecular testing in breast cancer gained increasing attention and importance as specific molecular results can tailor not only oncological decisions on systemic adjuvant or neoadjuvant or in metastatic setting, but increasingly serve in diagnostic routine histopathological services to differentiate between morphologically overlapping or ambiguous histological pictures. Diagnostic tools involve in most cases a broad spectrum of immunohistochemical panels, followed by entity-specific in situ hybridization probes and in given cases NGS-based sequencing. Workflow of which methodology is applied and in which order depends on the specific entity resp. on the given differential diagnosis in question. Regarding prognostic/predictive molecular testing, the choice of assay and the workflow are based on clinical algorithms and on the evidence of targeted therapies following the molecular alterations. In this review paper, we aim to address the use of molecular technics in [1] the histological diagnostic setting (such as subtyping of invasive carcinomas/malignant spindle cell tumors and sarcomas and some B3 lesions) and [2] in the context of adjuvant or neoadjuvant or other clinical settings with special focus of targeted therapies.