7 results on '"Shaw, M. Rebecca"'
Search Results
2. People have shaped most of terrestrial nature for at least 12,000 years.
- Author
-
Ellis, Erle C., Gauthier, Nicolas, Goldewijk, Kees Klein, Bird, Rebecca Bliege, Boivin, Nicole, Díaz, Sandra, Fuller, Dorian Q., Gill, Jacquelyn L., Kaplan, Jed O., Kingston, Naomi, Locke, Harvey, McMichael, Crystal N. H., Ranco, Darren, Rick, Torben C., Shaw, M. Rebecca, Stephens, Lucas, Svenning, Jens-Christian, and Watson, James E. M.
- Subjects
SPECIES diversity ,CULTURAL landscapes ,PALEOECOLOGY ,LAND use ,BIOSPHERE - Abstract
Archaeological and paleoecological evidence shows that by 10,000 BCE, all human societies employed varying degrees of ecologically transformative land use practices, including burning, hunting, species propagation, domestication, cultivation, and others that have left long-term legacies across the terrestrial biosphere. Yet, a lingering paradigm among natural scientists, conservationists, and policymakers is that human transformation of terrestrial nature is mostly recent and inherently destructive. Here, we use the most up-to-date, spatially explicit global reconstruction of historical human populations and land use to show that this paradigm is likely wrong. Even 12,000 y ago, nearly three quarters of Earth's landwas inhabited and therefore shaped by human societies, including more than 95% of temperate and 90% of tropical woodlands. Lands now characterized as "natural," "intact," and "wild" generally exhibit long histories of use, as do protected areas and Indigenous lands, and current global patterns of vertebrate species richness and key biodiversity areas are more strongly associated with past patterns of land use than with present ones in regional landscapes now characterized as natural. The current biodiversity crisis can seldom be explained by the loss of uninhabited wildlands, resulting instead from the appropriation, colonization, and intensifying use of the biodiverse cultural landscapes long shaped and sustained by prior societies. Recognizing this deep cultural connection with biodiversity will therefore be essential to resolve the crisis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Conservation opportunities across the world's anthromes.
- Author
-
Martin, Laura J., Quinn, John E., Ellis, Erle C., Shaw, M. Rebecca, Dorning, Monica A., Hallett, Lauren M., Heller, Nicole E., Hobbs, Richard J., Kraft, Clifford E., Law, Elizabeth, Michel, Nicole L., Perring, Michael P., Shirey, Patrick D., Wiederholt, Ruscena, and Bradley, Bethany
- Subjects
BIOMES ,BIODIVERSITY conservation ,BIOLOGISTS ,ECOSYSTEMS ,BIOGEOGRAPHY ,LAND use ,BIODIVERSITY - Abstract
Aim Biologists increasingly recognize the roles of humans in ecosystems. Subsequently, many have argued that biodiversity conservation must be extended to environments that humans have shaped directly. Yet popular biogeographical frameworks such as biomes do not incorporate human land use, limiting their relevance to future conservation planning. 'Anthromes' map global ecological patterns created by sustained direct human interactions with ecosystems. In this paper, we set to understand how current conservation efforts are distributed across anthromes. Location Global. Methods We analysed the global distribution of IUCN protected areas and biodiversity hotspots by anthrome. We related this information to density of native plant species and density of previous ecological studies. Potential conservation opportunities in anthromes were then identified through global analysis and two case studies. Results Protected areas and biodiversity hotspots are not distributed equally across anthromes. Less populated anthromes contain a greater proportion of protected areas. The fewest hotspots are found within densely settled anthromes and wildlands, which occur at the two extremes of human population density. Opportunities for representative protection, prioritization, study and inclusion of native species were not congruent. Main conclusions Researchers and practitioners can use the anthromes framework to analyse the distribution of conservation practices at the global and regional scale. Like biomes, anthromes could also be used to set future conservation priorities. Conservation goals in areas directly shaped by humans need not be less ambitious than those in 'natural areas'. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Climate change, wine, and conservation.
- Author
-
Hannah, Lee, Roehrdanz, Patrick R., Ikegami, Makihiko, Shepard, Anderson V., Shaw, M. Rebecca, Tabor, Gary, Lu Zhi, Marquet, Pablo A., and Hijmans, Robert J.
- Subjects
CLIMATE change ,VITICULTURE ,AGRICULTURAL productivity ,LAND use ,FRESHWATER biodiversity conservation ,WINE districts ,VINEYARDS ,PLANT conservation - Abstract
Climate change is expected to impact ecosystems directly, such as through shifting climatic controls on species ranges, and indirectly, for example through changes in human land use that may result in habitat loss. Shifting patterns of agricultural production in response to climate change have received little attention as a potential impact pathway for ecosystems. Wine grape production provides a good test case for measuring indirect impacts mediated by changes in agriculture, because viticulture is sensitive to climate and is concentrated in Mediterranean climate regions that are global biodiversity hotspots. Here we demonstrate that, on a global scale, the impacts of climate change on viticultural suitability are substantial, leading to possible conservation conflicts in land use and freshwater ecosystems. Area suitable for viticulture decreases 25% to 73% in major wine producing regions by 2050 in the higher RCP 8.5 concentration pathway and 19% to 62% in the lower RCP 4.5. Climate change may cause establishment of vineyards at higher elevations that will increase impacts on upland ecosystems and may lead to conversion of natural vegetation as production shifts to higher latitudes in areas such as western North America. Attempts to maintain wine grape productivity and quality in the face of warming may be associated with increased water use for irrigation and to cool grapes through misting or sprinkling, creating potential for freshwater conservation impacts. Agricultural adaptation and conservation efforts are needed that anticipate these multiple possible indirect effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Conserving Biodiversity Efficiently: What to Do, Where, and When.
- Author
-
Wilson, Kerrie A., Underwood, Emma C., Morrison, Scott A., Klausmeyer, Kirk R., Murdoch, William W., Reyers, Belinda, Wardell-Johnson, Grant, Marquet, Pablo A., Rundel, Phil W., McBride, Marissa F., Pressey, Robert L., Bode, Michael, Hoekstra, Jon M., Andelman, Sandy, Looker, Michael, Rondinini, Carlo, Kareiva, Peter, Shaw, M. Rebecca, and Possingham, Hugh P.
- Subjects
BIODIVERSITY ,ECOLOGICAL regions ,VERTEBRATES ,PLANT species ,LAND resource ,LAND use - Abstract
A new framework applied to 17 of the world's Mediterranean ecoregions reveals that investing in a sequence of conservation actions targeted towards specific threats will protect more species than just acquiring land for protected areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Conservation Easements: Biodiversity Protection and Private Use.
- Author
-
RISSMAN, ADENA R., LOZIER, LYNN, COMENDANT, TOSHA, KAREIVA, PETER, KIESECKER, JOSEPH M., SHAW, M. REBECCA, and MERENLENDER, ADINA M.
- Subjects
CONSERVATION easements ,BIODIVERSITY ,LAND use ,HABITATS ,FORESTS & forestry ,LANDSCAPE assessment ,SUSTAINABLE development - Abstract
Copyright of Conservation Biology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Conservation easements in context: a quantitative analysis of their use by The Nature Conservancy.
- Author
-
Kiesecker, Joseph M., Comendant, Tosha, Grandmason, Terra, Gray, Elizabeth, Hall, Christine, Hilsenbeck, Richard, Kareiva, Peter, Lozier, Lynn, Naehu, Patrick, Rissman, Adena, Shaw, M. Rebecca, and Zankel, Mark
- Subjects
HABITAT conservation ,LAND use ,NATURE reserves ,LAND trusts ,BIODIVERSITY ,LANDOWNERS ,OPEN spaces ,NATURE conservation ,HABITATS - Abstract
Conservation easements have become the principal tool used by land trusts to preserve habitat and open space. However, anecdotal evidence has led some to question whether easements actually deliver conservation value. Our analysis of data from 119 easements held by The Nature Conservancy (TNC), spanning eight states and 20 years (1984-2004), is the first study to examine temporal patterns in the stated goals of, and activities allowed under, conservation easements. We found that these easements operate in accordance with conservation principles: 96% of sampled easements have identified biological targets, 84% are within TNC priority sites, and 79% are adjacent to protected areas. Easement usage has also become more strategic; recently established easements are more likely than older easements to be large and to include a management plan that focuses on biological targets. The one shortcoming we uncovered is a lack of biological monitoring. Although 92% of sampled easements have been monitored for legal compliance in the past 3 years, only 19.8% of biological targets have been monitored quantitatively. It is clear that we cannot draw conclusions regarding easement effectiveness unless we implement more systematic monitoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.