Search

Background: The landscape of first-line treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy has changed remarkably after venetoclax approval. Accumulating real-world data further apprises us with more knowledgeable use. To assess the efficacy and safety challenges in the real-life setting of the combination of hypomethylated agent (HMA) and venetoclax, we conducted a multi-center retrospective study. Methods: Forty adult AML patients treated with the combination of HMA and venetoclax as a first-line treatment after full approval (2020) were included. To confirm VIALE-A results, this group was compared to a historical cohort of 17 chemotherapy-ineligible AML patients treated with HMA monotherapy before 2020. Results: The combination of HMA-venetoclax achieved a composite complete response rate of 86.8% (p < 0.001), median overall survival, and event-free survival of 33.8 and 19.7 months, respectively, in a median follow-up of 17.8 months (pos < 0.001, HR = 0.276, CI: 0.132–0.575, pEFS = 0.004, HR = 0.367, CI: 0.174–0.773). High rates of neutropenia (90%) and consequent infection rates (57.5%) were noted. Only 55% of our patients received antifungal prophylaxis, as its use remains controversial, and invasive fungal infections were presented in 7.5%. Conclusions: Evidently, venetoclax-HMA yields high response rates and profound survival benefits in real life and has changed our approach to alternative chemotherapy options. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Erdheim–Chester Disease (ECD) is a clonal non-Langerhans histiocytosis, classified as a macrophage-dendritic cell neoplasm in the 2016 WHO classification. The exact cell of origin of ECD is unknown, although some limited evidence suggests that it arises from myeloid progenitors. Case Presentation: A 43-year-old patient, diagnosed with BRAFV600E mutated ECD, developed NPM1+/FLT3+ acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with wild-type BRAF, 15 months after the initial ECD diagnosis. The patient received intensive chemotherapy plus midostaurin, followed by midostaurin maintenance. Six months into maintenance, the patient remains in complete remission with low-level measurable residual disease, whereas ECD shows a sustained partial metabolic response. Molecular karyotype at several distinct timepoints, namely ECD diagnosis, AML diagnosis, and following treatment of AML, highlighted a molecular signature, indicative of a persistent, underlying clonal hematopoiesis. Conclusion: This case report suggests that ECD and AML might represent an expansion of two distinct clones in a background of clonal hematopoiesis, indicating their shared origin. Moreover, molecular karyotype might serve as a strong, inexpensive tool for revealing clonal hematopoiesis in cases of negative targeted next-generation sequencing. Finally, the moderate response of ECD to midostaurin suggests that kinase inhibition might have a potential role in ECD treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the present study, the ability of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (BZ), an oxidative stress-inducing agent, to sensitize acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells to decitabine (Dacogen®, DAC; a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor), in terms of cell viability and differentiation, was investigated. Kasumi-1 AML (M2) cells were treated with low-dose DAC (10, 50, 100, 200 or 400 nΜ), with or without BZ (10 nM). Apoptosis and the cell cycle were evaluated after 24 h of treatment through fluorescence-assisted cell sorting (FACS) with Annexin V/propidium iodide and DAPI staining, respectively. The expression levels of CD193, CD11b, CD13, CD14, CD15, CD16 and CD117 surface differentiation markers were evaluated by FACS after 6 days of treatment. The results indicated significant alterations in cell death and cell cycle phases in Kasumi-1 cells following DAC and BZ combination treatment compared to untreated cells and cells with single treatments. Low-dose DAC/BZ combinations significantly enhanced apoptosis and decreased the population of live Kasumi-1 cells, with 100 and 200 nM of DAC and 10 nM BZ appearing to have the most potent synergistic effect according to a combination index. Furthermore, cell cycle profiling revealed that DAC/BZ treatment synergistically led to G0/G1- and G2/M-phase arrest. By contrast, DAC appeared to promote monocytic and granulocytic differentiation of Kasumi-1 cells more effectively alone than in combination with BZ. BZ acted synergistically with low-dose DAC in vitro, leading to enhanced apoptosis and G0/G1- and G2/M-phase arrest in AML cells, hence prohibiting either DNA synthesis or mitosis. Although further in vivo investigation is necessary, these results provide a strong rationale for the implementation of a combination treatment with DAC and bortezomib in AML therapy, followed by DAC alone, which may achieve better clinical responses and possibly partially overcome the frequently encountered DAC resistance of patients with AML. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]