Search

Background Leukoreduction (LR) of platelet concentrate (PC) has evolved as the standard to mitigate risks of alloimmunization, clinical refractoriness, acute transfusion reactions (ATRs), and cytomegalovirus infection, but does not prevent transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease (TA-GVHD). Amotosalen-ultraviolet A pathogen reduction (A-PR) of PC reduces risk of transfusion-transmitted infection and TA-GVHD. In vitro data indicate that A-PR effectively inactivates WBCs and infectious pathogens. Study design and methods A sequential cohort study evaluated A-PR without LR, gamma irradiation, and bacterial screening in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. The first cohort received conventional PC (control) processed without LR, but with gamma irradiation and bacterial screening. The second cohort received A-PR PC (test) processed without: LR, bacterial screening, or gamma irradiation. The primary efficacy outcome was the 1-hour corrected count increment. The primary safety outcome was treatment-emergent ATR. Secondary outcomes included clinical refractoriness, and 100-day status for engraftment, TA-GVHD, HSCT-GVHD, infections, and mortality. Results Mean corrected count increment (× 103 ) of 33 test PC recipients was similar (18.9 ± 8.8 vs. 16.6 ± 8.4; p = 0.296) to that of 31 control PC recipients. Test recipients had a reduced, but nonsignificant, incidence of ATR (test = 9.1%, Control = 19.4%; p = 0.296). The frequencies of clinical refractoriness (0 of 33 vs. 4 of 31 patients) and refractory transfusions (6.6% vs. 19.3%) were lower in the test cohort (p = 0.05 and 0.02), respectively. No patient in either cohort had TA-GVHD. Day 100 engraftment, HSCT-GVHD, mortality, and infectious disease complications were similar between cohorts. Conclusions This study indicated that A-PR PC without LR, gamma irradiation, or bacterial screening is feasible for support of HSCT.

Background The INTERCEPT Blood System pathogen reduction technology (PRT), which uses amotosalen and ultraviolet A light treatment (amotosalen/UV-PRT), inactivates pathogens in plasma and platelet components (PCs). This review summarizes data describing the inactivation efficacy of amotosalen/UVA-PRT for a broad spectrum of viruses and parasites. Methods Twenty-five enveloped viruses, six nonenveloped viruses (NEVs), and four parasites species were evaluated for sensitivity to amotosalen/UVA-PRT. Pathogens were spiked into plasma and PC at high titers. Samples were collected before and after PRT and assessed for infectivity with cell cultures or animal models. Log reduction factors (LRFs) were defined as the difference in infectious titers before and after amotosalen/UV-PRT. Results LRFs of ≥4.0 log were reported for 19 pathogens in plasma (range, ≥4.0 to ≥7.6), 28 pathogens in PC in platelet additive solution (PC-PAS; ≥4.1-≥7.8), and 14 pathogens in PC in 100% plasma (PC-100%; (≥4.3->8.4). Twenty-five enveloped viruses and two NEVs were sensitive to amotosalen/UV-PRT; LRF ranged from >2.9 to ≥7.6 in plasma, 2.4 or greater to greater than 6.9 in PC-PAS and >3.5 to >6.5 in PC-100%. Infectious titers for four parasites were reduced by >4.0 log in all PC and plasma (≥4.9 to >8.4). Conclusion Amotosalen/UVA-PRT demonstrated effective infectious titer reduction for a broad spectrum of viruses and parasites. This confirms the capacity of this system to reduce the risk of viral and parasitic transfusion-transmitted infections by plasma and PCs in various geographies.

Background and Objectives Blood Centre logistics, staffing and donor scheduling may be optimized if pathogen inactivation (PI) of platelets can be delayed until Day 1, but bacteria may rapidly grow during this time. This study evaluates bacterial PI performed 24 and 30 h after collection. Materials and Methods PAS-3 platelet units were collected on the Amicus and subsequently inoculated (3–53 CFU/unit) with 1of 5 transfusion relevant bacterial species (n = 3/organism). Units were then stored for either 24 ± 0·3 or 30 ± 0·3 h at 20–24°C with agitation, subsequently treated with amotosalen and UVA, and stored for 7 days. Samples were taken before and after inactivation, on Days 2, 5 and 7 for BacT/ALERT testing, and on Days 5 and 7 for plate counts. Results All samples from units taken prior to inactivation either demonstrated positive plate culture counts, or, in untreated positive controls, were culture-positive during storage. All contaminated units treated with amotosalen and UVA 24 after inoculation were culture-negative on all days tested. With inactivation performed 30 h following inoculation, one of 15 units (1-of-3 replicates) was culture-positive with Klebsiella pneumonia (1 × 109 CFU/ml) by Day 5. Conclusion Photochemical treatment did not inactivate 1 of 15 units to sterility in apheresis platelets stored in PAS with a 30-h delay between contamination and treatment, but did inactivate 15 of 15 units with a 24-h delay.

BACKGROUND Pathogen inactivation methods are increasingly used to reduce the risk of infections after transfusion of blood products. Photochemical treatment (PCT) of platelets (PLTs) and plasma with amotosalen and ultraviolet A (UVA) light inactivates pathogens and white blood cells through formation of adducts between amotosalen and nucleic acid that block replication, transcription, and translation. The same adducts block the amplification of nucleic acids using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in a manner that correlates with the number of adducts formed, providing a direct quality control (QC). Current QC measures for PCT rely on indirect methods that measure the delivered UVA dose or percent residual amotosalen after illumination, rather than directly measuring nucleic acid modification. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Endogenous mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), which is detectable in PLT and plasma units, was chosen as a target for the quantification of photochemically induced modifications. DNA was extracted from untreated or amotosalen and UVA–treated PLTs or plasma, and mtDNA fragments of variable lengths were quantified using a real-time PCR inhibition assay. RESULTS PCT induced increasing real-time PCR inhibition of mtDNA amplification for larger amplicon sizes. Amplification was unaffected by treatment with amotosalen or UVA alone, whereas up to 3 log inhibition was observed after PCT. Blinded PCR testing of a panel of 110 samples each, from PLT or plasma components prepared for routine use within a blood center, allowed 100% discrimination between untreated and treated units. CONCLUSION Our initial findings indicate that an adequately sensitive, quantitative real-time PCR inhibition assay targeting mtDNA could provide a valuable tool to confirm and monitor PCT.

Background and Objectives A photochemical treatment process (PCT) utilizing amotosalen and UVA light (INTERCEPT™ Blood System) has been developed for inactivation of viruses, bacteria, parasites and leucocytes that can contaminate blood components intended for transfusion. The objective of this study was to further characterize the safety profile of INTERCEPT-treated platelet components (PCT-PLT) administered across a broad patient population. Materials and Methods This open-label, observational haemovigilance programme of PCT-PLT transfusions was conducted in 21 centres in 11 countries. All transfusions were monitored for adverse events within 24 h post-transfusion and for serious adverse events (SAEs) up to 7 days post-transfusion. All adverse events were assessed for severity (Grade 0–4), and causal relationship to PCT-PLT transfusion. Results Over the course of 7 years in the study centres, 4067 patients received 19 175 PCT-PLT transfusions. Adverse events were infrequent, and most were of Grade 1 severity. On a per-transfusion basis, 123 (0·6%) were classified an acute transfusion reaction (ATR) defined as an adverse event related to the transfusion. Among these ATRs, the most common were chills (77, 0·4%) and urticaria (41, 0·2%). Fourteen SAEs were reported, of which 2 were attributed to platelet transfusion (

BACKGROUND With an increasing number of recognized transfusion-transmitted (TT) babesiosis cases, Babesia microti is the most frequently TT parasite in the United States. We evaluated the inactivation of B. microti in red blood cells (RBCs) prepared in Optisol (AS-5) using amustaline and glutathione (GSH) and in platelet components (PCs) in 100% plasma using amotosalen and low-energy ultraviolet A (UVA) light. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Individual RBCs and apheresis PCs were spiked with B. microti–infected hamster RBCs (iRBCs) to a final concentration of 106 iRBCs/mL and treated with the respective inactivation systems according to the manufacturer's instruction. Samples were collected before (control) and after (test) each treatment. Dilutions of the control samples to 10−6 were inoculated into hamsters, while the test samples were inoculated neat or at 10−1 dilution. At 3 and 5 weeks postinoculation, hamsters were evaluated for B. microti infection by microscopic observation of blood smears and 50% infectivity titers (ID50) were determined. Log reduction was calculated as control log ID50 minus test log ID50. RESULTS Parasitemia was detected in hamsters injected with as low as 100,000-fold diluted control samples, while no parasites were detectable in the blood smears of any hamsters receiving neat test samples. Mean log reduction was more than 5 log/mL by amustaline/GSH for RBCs and more than 4.5 log/mL by amotosalen/UVA for PCs. CONCLUSION B. microti was inactivated to the limit of detection in RBCs and PCs after the respective inactivation treatment. Complete inactivation of B. microti was achieved in this animal infectivity model, and pathogen reduction treatment inhibited transmission of infection.

Pathogen inactivation (PI) is an alternative approach to blood safety that is gaining widespread use.1 PI for platelets (PLTs) has been in use in Europe for more than 10 years and one of these systems, the INTERCEPT Blood System, was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).2 There are costs for implementing PI, but it is also likely that there will be offsetting savings. The availability of PI PLTs may have substantial economic impact both in terms of operating costs for the facilities which collect and prepare them and in the acquisition costs to hospitals. The purpose of this study was to carry out a detailed cost analysis of the operational activities that may be affected by the adoption of PI PLTs and to project those that will apply to either blood centers or hospitals. The costs will affect hospitals in different ways depending on whether they purchase all their PLTs from an outside supplier or if they produce some fraction of the PLTs. While PI PLTs may reduce the costs associated with transfusion-transmitted disease treatment those costs were not considered in this project. This study focuses on PLTs collected by apheresis because in the most recent survey in the United States, 91% of the total of 2,516,000 PLT units was collected by apheresis.3 In the United States, blood centers collected approximately 89% of the apheresis PLT supply while hospitals collected 11%.3 Collection can be done with different devices and the PLTs can be stored for up to 5 days in either donor plasma or PLT additive solution and plasma mix at room temperature. When PLTs are collected at a blood center, testing is done along with standardized whole blood testing; however, when PLTs are collected at a hospital, samples are often sent to a different facility for testing. Bacterial screening of each unit of PLTs is performed at the place of collection but when performed, point-of-release (PoR) testing is usually done at the hospital.