Search

In the above article , we introduced two scheduling policies and analyzed their average job latencies. With an implicit assumption that the scheduling policies provide sample-path bounds by construction, we claimed that their average job latencies serve as upper and lower bounds on that of a centralized MDS queue. In this note, we present recently discovered counterexamples, disproving the assumption. We replace the assumption with a conjecture that the average latency bounds still hold. We also provide an erratum to the original article to correct any confusing or misleading statements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In order to scale economically, data centers are increasingly evolving their data storage methods from simple data replication to more powerful erasure codes, which provide the same level of reliability as replication, but at a significantly lower storage cost. In particular, it is well known that maximum-distance-separable (MDS) codes, such as Reed–Solomon codes, can achieve a target reliability with the maximum storage efficiency. While the use of codes for providing improved reliability in archival storage systems, where data is less frequently accessed (or so-called “cold data”), is well understood, the role of codes in storing more frequently accessed and active “hot data”, where latency is the key metric, is less clear. In this paper, we study data storage systems based on MDS codes through the lens of queueing theory, and term the queueing system arising under codes as an “MDS queue.” We provide lower and upper bounds on the average job latency for both centralized and decentralized versions of MDS queues. We also provide extensive simulations to corroborate our analysis as well as obtain additional insights. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]