Search

The ability to handle large amounts of data automatically is essential for any major tomographic inversion. As part of this process, it is necessary to differentiate between high-quality seismograms, and those that are unusable due to noise or other errors. This quality assessment is traditionally made visually; however, the sheer quantity of data in a modern tomographic data set makes this approach unfeasible. It is therefore necessary to develop techniques for automating this quality assessment process. We demonstrate that a simple neural network, trained to recognize the frequency-domain characteristics of high- and low-quality data, can successfully distinguish the two classes in unseen data. We demonstrate that the resulting clean data sets are of sufficient quality to allow full-waveform determination of event focal mechanisms and hypocentral parameters. The process we outline allows the rapid creation of a high-quality data set for seismic tomography. Depending on application, this may be suitable for use without further refinement. In some circumstances, a further visual inspection may remain desirable to ensure the data set is noise-free; however, a significant benefit will still derive from the reduction in number of traces to be examined. This will enable full-waveform inversion using significantly larger data sets than has hitherto been possible. The selection strategy relies only on measurements made from the seismogram, and on rough estimates of hypocentral location—the final data set does not depend on any a priori assumptions regarding earth structure or wave propagation. Our focus has been on data selection for seismic tomography, but the approach is general and may find application across a wide range of seismic investigations. An automated system is of interest wherever large data sets must be handled, or where time is of the essence—such as in earthquake hazard assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To perform seismic tomography, accurate determinations of event locations and focal mechanisms are required. These are usually obtained prior to tomographic inversion; often, little attention is paid to the earth model used for their determination. We show that an imprint of this model is found in the model recovered after tomographic inversion. To reduce this problem, it is important to recalculate earthquake source parameters as the inversion proceeds; synthetic tests suggest that this yields a better correspondence between recovered and true models. However, alternate source and structure inversions lead to a slow rate of convergence, and significant errors remain. We therefore propose combining source and structure inversion into a single inverse problem, and present an efficient algorithm to do this. We demonstrate that this reduces the number of iterations required to achieve a given accuracy; in our experiments, we observe a fourfold improvement on alternate inversions. We focus on full-waveform inversions for both source and structure, although the methods presented are general and should be applicable to other techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]