Search

A running train induces a slipstream around it, which is closely related to its aerodynamic features and crucial for the safety of people and structures near the track. However, the effect of crosswinds is almost inevitable when the train runs on a bridge. In this work, an experimental study using moving model testing technology was conducted to investigate the effects of wind speeds, train speeds, and yaw angles on the aerodynamic performance of a Fuxing Hao high-speed train running on a bridge under the influence of crosswind. The results show that, for the crosswind cases, the slipstream velocities on the leeward side of the train are generally higher than those in the no-crosswind cases. Moreover, the results were compared for the cases with the same effective yaw angle of 21.8° but different wind speeds (6 m/s, 8 m/s) and train speeds (15 m/s, 20 m/s), which suggests the method of the resultant wind's yaw angle is no longer valid when the train runs on a bridge due to the aerodynamic interactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With the increase of the running speed of the high-speed train (HST), aerodynamic interference between the HST and surrounding structures becomes more and more important. Traditional wind tunnel experiments using the stationary model can not fully reveal the pulsing behavior of the aerodynamic forces on both the HST and surrounding structures. This paper numerically investigates the aerodynamic characteristics of an HST running on a bridge in cross-wind. The simulation results reveal that when there is no wind barrier, the stationary model case with the yaw angle identical to the moving model case can roughly reproduce the main flow structures around the train. However, once the train runs downstream a wind barrier, the stationary model cannot reveal its aerodynamic characteristics regardless of the yaw angle adopted. The moving model scenario successfully captures the pulsing behavior of the forces on both the train and wind barrier, which is concealed in the cases with a stationary model. The present results indicate that only the moving model method can fully reveal the aerodynamic characteristics and interactions between the train and surrounding structures, especially in evaluating their dynamic response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]