Search

Progestins are capable of suppressing endogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion from the pituitary; are less expensive than GnRH analogues. This systematic review summarizes the effectiveness of progestins as compared with GnRH analogues and identifies some of the future research perspectives. Several public resources were screened with a combination of keywords related to assisted reproductive technology, progesterone, GnRH analogue and ovarian stimulation. Overall, duration of stimulation, gonadotropin consumption and oocyte yield were similar with progestins and GnRH analogues. The live birth, ongoing and clinical pregnancy rates per embryo transfer were similar with progestins and GnRH analogues. There is still a low quality of evidence. Available information is reassuring regarding obstetric and neonatal outcomes with the use of progestins. As a wider implication, progestins can present an effective option for women who do not contemplate a fresh embryo transfer, anticipated hyper responders, preimplantation genetic testing, oocyte donors, double stimulation cycles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We performed a literature review of studies comparing the effectiveness of progestins in preventing premature ovulation during ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology (ART). Five randomized trials and cohort studies involving a total of 2404 women, which compared; i) two different progestins or ii) two different doses of the same progestin were included. The primary outcome was live birth rate (LBR) per woman. Secondary outcomes were live birth or ongoing pregnancy (LB/OP) per woman and per embryo transfer (ET), ongoing pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, positive pregnancy test, numbers of oocytes and metaphase-two oocytes, duration of stimulation and gonadotropin consumption. The primary outcome was not reported in most studies however there were no differences between progestins for secondary outcomes. All progestins seem to effectively prevent premature ovulation in ART cycles. Low-quality evidence suggests that progestins can effectively prevent premature ovulation in ART cycles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine whether a flexible progestin primed ovarian stimulation (fPPOS) protocol is effective for preventing premature ovulation.Design: Retrospective cohort study.Setting: Private assisted reproduction center.Patient(s): Eighty-seven oocyte donors and 191 recipients of fresh oocytes.Intervention(s): Each donor was stimulated with a flexible gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in one cycle and with the new fPPOS protocol in the other, within a period of 6 months. FSH was started on cycle day 2-3, and 0.25 mg/day GnRH antagonist or 10 mg/day medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) was started on stimulation day 7 or when the leading follicle reached 14 mm, whichever came first.Main Outcome Measure(s): Duration of stimulation, gonadotropin consumption, duration of GnRH antagonist or MPA administration, number of metaphase II oocytes, and pregnancy rates in fresh oocyte recipients.Results: Duration of stimulation was 11 (10-11) days in both groups. Total gonadotropin consumption was similar. Pituitary suppression was started on day 7 and lasted for 5 days in each group. There were no premature ovulations in any group. The fPPOS yielded a significantly higher number of cumulus oocyte complexes than GnRH antagonist cycles (33 [21-39] vs. 26 [18-36], respectively). Likewise, the fPPOS generated significantly more metaphase II oocytes than GnRH antagonist cycles (24 [17-34] vs. 21 [15-28], respectively). Recipients of fresh oocytes from fPPOS and GnRH antagonist cycles had similar cleavage, blastulation, implantation, and live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates (50% vs. 48.6%).Conclusion(s): FPPOS with MPA seems to be an effective choice for preventing premature ovulation in women undergoing ovarian stimulation without compromising oocyte quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]