Search

The current climate change context raises the demand for reducing energy and environmental impacts while keeping an economic balance and building users' comfort. Thermal insulation solutions are potential allies in ensuring the adequacy of existing buildings for challenging sustainability requirements. In this scenario, silica-aerogel-fibre-based thermal renders are innovative solutions for which integrated approaches still lack information, and they should be compared with benchmark multilayer solutions, such as those based on expanded polystyrene (EPS), extruded polystyrene (XPS), mineral wool (MW), and insulated corkboard (ICB), to evidence their prospective economic, environmental, and energy benefits. This paper quantifies the optimum insulation thicknesses, life cycle savings, payback periods, and environmental impacts of innovative thermal renders compared to conventional thermal insulation materials when applied as a retrofit in existing facade walls. The results show that cost-optimised thermal renders with sisal fibres led to the best overall performance. Higher heating needs led to higher optimum render thicknesses and life cycle savings. With a 0.02 m thickness, aerogel-fibre-based thermal renders outperformed other materials in terms of heating-degree days (HDD) from 1000 °C·day onwards; they can save approximately EUR 60∙m−2, 1000 MJ∙m−2, and 100 kg CO2 eq∙m−2 while presenting a U-value 13% lower throughout their 30-year lifetime when compared with the second-best multilayer solution with XPS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper quantifies green roofs energy savings which is a challenging topic, namely in Mediterranean climate with distinct heating and cooling seasons. The thermal behavior of a green roof case study in Lisbon, Portugal, was assessed through an experimental campaign during heating and cooling periods of the year of 2013. These experimental results were then used to calibrate a building energy simulation in EnergyPlus. After validation, the numerical model was used to compare the energy performance of intensive, semi-intensive and extensive green roofs. The three green roof types lead to similar heating energy needs but extensive green roof solution shows higher cooling energy needs than semi-intensive and intensive ones, of 2.8 and 5.9 times more, respectively. Furthermore, the performance of each type of green roof and different insulation properties was compared to traditional roof solutions. With no thermal insulation, extensive green roofs require 20% less energy use than black roofs and show a similar annual behavior than white roofs. Semi-intensive and intensive green roofs energy use is 60–70% and 45–60% lower than black and white roofs, respectively. Well insulated roofs do not take full advantage of evapotranspiration cooling effects, which is particularly noticeable when comparing with high reflective white roofs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]