Search

Evaluation of forest fire severity is a basis of post-fire forest management. Remote sensing-based methods enable reliable delineation of fire perimeters, however, assessments of the degree of forest damage need to be verified and adjusted through field sampling. The forest damage assessment conducted in this study is useful for practitioners to understand and justify the design of clear cuts for restoration purposes. Thus, the aim of the study is to verify the different approaches to field assessment of forest fire severity. In this paper, the authors present a site-specific assessment of large wildfires in Luhansk oblast, Ukraine occurred in 2020 using field-based burn severity indices. The Composite Burn Index (CBI) and the Geometrically Structured Composite Burn Index (GeoCBI) were used to estimate the extent of forest damage. The Burned Area Emergency Response (BAER) methodology was also tested to assess the extent of soil damage. The authors used PlanetScope images to delineate perimeters of burned areas. These perimeters were overlaid over a forest inventory database to extract forest attributes and site characteristics for all forested and unforested areas affected by fires. Within the fire perimeters, the burned area was stratified into six strata to independently account for forest damage in diverse types of land cover. In total 73 test plots were proportionally distributed among different classes of land cover to assess fire severity using CBI, GeoCBI, and BAER approaches. It was found that the fire’s footprints covered 39,782 hectares. Among that area, 21.2% were forested lands. About 78% of burned forests were pine plantations. The highest fire intensity levels were estimated within pure pine plantations that were grown in very dry sites, while the lowest ones were associated with hardwoods forests in moisture site conditions. The average estimates of fire severity using the field-based indices varied within strata (CBI>GeoCBI) which could be an issue for assessing burn severity using remote sensing-based approaches. The authors also concluded that the BAER methodology contributed less to assessing the fire intensity because soil burn severity is not directly related to vegetation damage. This work creates a foundation for further assessment of fire severity using satellite imagery. As a result of this study, a spatial data set of sample plots was proposed that can facilitate calibrating approaches used to map fire severity in the region. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]