Search

Objective To evaluate clinical efficacy of artificial perfusion combined with interception basket in ureteral calculi lithotripsy. Methods Clinical data of 151 patients with ureteral calculi who underwent surgical treatment were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into the observation group (artificial perfusion combined with interception basket) and control group (conventional perfusion pump) . The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, proportion of stone escape, stone re-intervention and complications were observed in two groups. Results There were no significant differences in operation time, intraoperative blood loss and incidence of complications between two groups (all P > 0.05) . The proportion of stone escape and stone re-intervention in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (both P < 0.05) . Conclusion Artificial low-pressure perfusion combined with interception basket in ureteral stone lithotripsy can reduce the proportion of stone escape and residual stone re-intervention and improve the stone clearance efficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer is the property of Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer is the property of Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)