Search

Objective: To assess the incidence of serious infection (SI) and associated factors in a large juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (jSLE) retrospective cohort. Methods: All patients in the Spanish Rheumatology Society Lupus Registry (RELESSER) who meet >= 4 ACR-97 SLE criteria and disease onset = 6, 5.8%). Incidence rate was 3.7 (95%CI: 3.2-4.2) SI per 100 patient years. Respiratory location and bacterial infections were the most frequent. Higher number of SLE classification criteria, SLICC/ACR DI score and immunosuppressants use were associated to the presence of SI. Associated factors to shorter time to first infection were higher number of SLE criteria, splenectomy and immunosuppressants use. Conclusions: The risk of SI in jSLE patients is significant and higher than aSLE. It is associated to higher number of SLE criteria, damage accrual, some immunosuppressants and splenectomy. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

OBJECTIVE: Axial osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of back and neck pain, however, few studies have examined its prevalence. The aim was to estimate the prevalence and the characteristics of symptomatic axial OA in Spain. METHODS: EPISER2016 is a cross-sectional multicenter population-based study of people aged 40 years or older. Subjects were randomly selected using multistage stratified cluster sampling. Participants were contacted by telephone to complete rheumatic disease screening questionnaires. Two phenotypes were analyzed, patients with Non-exclusive axial OA (NEA-OA) and Exclusive axial OA (EA-OA). To calculate the prevalence and its 95% confidence interval (CI), the sample design was considered and weighting was calculated according to age, sex and geographic origin. RESULTS: Prevalence of NEA-OA by clinical or clinical-radiographic criteria was 19.17% (95% CI: 17.82-20.59). The frequency of NEA-OA increased with age (being 3.6 times more likely in patients aged 80 s or more than in those between 40 and 49 years) and body mass index. It was significantly more frequent in women, as well as in the center of Spain. It was less frequent in those with a higher level of education. Lumbar OA was more frequent than cervical OA. This difference grew with increasing age and was not associated with gender. It was also greater in overweight and obese subjects. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study on the prevalence of axial OA phenotypes in Europe describing the associated socio-demographic, anthropometric, and lifestyle variables.

[Abstract] Background: Treatment compliance with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) is essential to achieve the therapeutic goals in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, despite the need for good compliance, there is evidence that patients with RA frequently fail to use DMARD for the control of RA. Thus, the main objective of the OBSERVAR study is to evaluate the reasons for the lack of therapeutic adherence to synthetic DMARD in these patients. Patients and methods: A Delphi process involving 18 randomly selected Spanish rheumatologists determined the level of agreement with 66 causes of noncompliance selected from the literature in relation to synthetic DMARD in RA. Results: The reasons for noncompliance were consistent in 75.7%, although 3 reasons (4.5%) were highly consistent: 1) not knowing what to do in the case of an adverse event with DMARD; 2) not having undergone adherence screening by health personnel for early detection of "noncompliant patients"; and 3) not having undergone interventions or strategies that improve adherence. Conclusion: In order to improve adherence to RA treatment with synthetic DMARD, the patient should be adequately informed of each new treatment introduced, the patient's compliance profile should be incorporated into the clinical routine and the patient's motivation for therapeutic compliance be reinforced through the methods available to us. [Resumen] Introducción. La cumplimentación del tratamiento modificador de la enfermedad es esencial para alcanzar los objetivos terapéuticos en la artritis reumatoide (AR). Sin embargo, y a pesar de la necesidad de una buena adherencia, existe evidencia de que muchos pacientes con AR no cumplen adecuadamente con la prescripción del tratamiento indicado con fármacos moduladores de la enfermedad de acción lenta (FAME) sintéticos o convencionales. Conscientes de la importancia de este hecho, el estudio sobre observancia terapéutica en AR (estudio OBSERVAR) tiene como objetivo principal valorar los motivos de la falta de adherencia terapéutica a los FAME sintéticos en estos pacientes. Pacientes y métodos. Mediante un proceso Delphi entre 18 reumatólogos españoles seleccionados aleatoriamente se determinó el grado de acuerdo con 66 causas de incumplimiento seleccionadas de la bibliografía, en relación con los FAME sintéticos en la AR. Resultados. Los motivos de incumplimiento fueron consistentes en el 75,7%, si bien 3 razones (4,5%) destacaron como muy consistentes: 1) desconocer qué hacer cuando se sufre un acontecimiento adverso con el FAME; 2) no llevar a cabo métodos de cribado de la adherencia por el personal sanitario para detectar a los «pacientes incumplidores» de forma temprana y 3) no aplicar intervenciones o estrategias que mejoren la adherencia terapéutica. Conclusión. Para mejorar la adherencia al tratamiento de la AR con FAME sintéticos se debe informar al paciente de cada tratamiento nuevo introducido, incorporar el perfil de cumplimiento del paciente en la rutina clínica, y reforzar la motivación del paciente al cumplimiento terapéutico mediante los métodos a nuestro alcance.

Background Blocking of the Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) activity is a successful therapeutic approach for 50–60% of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. However, there are yet no biomarkers to stratify patients for anti-TNF therapy. Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic-citrullinated antibodies (anti-CCP) have been evaluated as biomarkers of response but the results have shown limited consistency. Anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) and anti-peptidylarginine deiminase type 4 (anti-PAD4) antibodies have been much less studied. Despite being linked to common immune processes, the interaction between these markers has not been evaluated yet. Our aim was to analyze the interaction between these four antibodies in relation to the response to anti-TNF therapy. Methods For this objective, a prospective cohort of n = 80 RA patients starting anti-TNF therapy was recruited. Serum determinations at baseline were performed for RF, anti-CCP, anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 antibodies using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). The clinical response to anti-TNF therapy was determined at week 12 using the change in DAS28 score. Association was performed using multivariate linear regression adjusting for baseline DAS28, sex and age. Results The interaction between pairs of antibodies was tested by the addition of an interaction term. We found two highly significant antibody interactions associated with treatment response: anti-CarP with anti-PAD4 (p = 0.0062), and anti-CCP with RF (p = 0.00068). The latter antibody interaction was replicated in an independent retrospective cohort of RA patients (n = 199, p = 0.04). Conclusions The results of this study suggest that antibody interaction effects are important factors in the response to anti-TNF therapy in RA., This project was supported by UCB Pharma. The funders had no role in the study design, data analysis, data interpretation or writing the manuscript.

Objective Axial osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of back and neck pain, however, few studies have examined its prevalence. The aim was to estimate the prevalence and the characteristics of symptomatic axial OA in Spain. Methods EPISER2016 is a cross-sectional multicenter population-based study of people aged 40 years or older. Subjects were randomly selected using multistage stratified cluster sampling. Participants were contacted by telephone to complete rheumatic disease screening questionnaires. Two phenotypes were analyzed, patients with Non-exclusive axial OA (NEA-OA) and Exclusive axial OA (EA-OA). To calculate the prevalence and its 95% confidence interval (CI), the sample design was considered and weighting was calculated according to age, sex and geographic origin. Results Prevalence of NEA-OA by clinical or clinical-radiographic criteria was 19.17% (95% CI: 17.82-20.59). The frequency of NEA-OA increased with age (being 3.6 times more likely in patients aged 80 s or more than in those between 40 and 49 years) and body mass index. It was significantly more frequent in women, as well as in the center of Spain. It was less frequent in those with a higher level of education. Lumbar OA was more frequent than cervical OA. This difference grew with increasing age and was not associated with gender. It was also greater in overweight and obese subjects. Conclusions This is the first study on the prevalence of axial OA phenotypes in Europe describing the associated socio-demographic, anthropometric, and lifestyle variables.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an immune-mediated inflammatory disease characterized by a defective adaptive immune receptor repertoire (AIRR) that fails to distinguish self from non-self antigens. The AIRR is vast, encompassing four T cell receptor (TCR) and three B cell receptor (BCR) chains, each of which displays an extraordinary amino acid sequence variability in the antigen-binding site. How the concerted action of T and B cell clones is associated with the development and clinical evolution of immune-mediated diseases is still not known. Using a new immunosequencing technology that allows the unbiased amplification of the seven receptor chains, we conducted an in-depth quantitative analysis of the seven-receptor chain variability in RA. Compared to healthy controls, the AIRR in RA was found to be characterized by a lower BCR diversity, the depletion of highly similar BCR clones, an isotype-specific signature as well as a skewed IGL chain and gene segment usage. A predictor based on quantitative multi-chain AIRR information was able to accurately predict disease, including the elusive seronegative subset of RA patients. AIRR features of the seven immune receptor chains were also different between patients with distinct clinically relevant phenotypes. Incorporating HLA variation data, we were able to identify the TCR clones that are specifically associated with the main disease risk variants. The longitudinal analysis of the AIRR revealed that treatment with Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) inhibitors selectively restores the diversity of B cell clones in RA patients by reducing the frequency of clones with a similar biochemical profile. The biochemical properties of the TNFi-modulated clones were also found to differ between responders and non-responders, supporting a different antigenic reactivity in the B cell compartment of these two groups of RA patients. Our comprehensive analysis of the TCR and BCR repertoire reveals a complex T and B cell architecture in RA, and provides the basis for precision medicine strategies based on the highly informative features of the adaptive immune response.

OBJECTIVES: To determine cardiovascular (CV) mortality and incidence of the first CV event (CVE) in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRD) after 5 years of follow-up. METHODS: This is an analysis of the CARdiovascular in rheMAatology (CARMA) study after 5 years of follow-up. It includes patients with RA (n = 775), AS (n = 738) and PsA (n = 721), and individuals without CIRD (n = 677) attending outpatient rheumatology clinics from 67 public hospitals in Spain. Descriptive analyses were performed for the CV mortality at 5 years. The Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) function at 5 years was calculated to determine the expected risk of CV mortality. Poisson models were used to estimate the incidence rates of the first CVE. Hazard ratios of the risk factors involved in the development of the first CVE were evaluated using the Weibull proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Overall, 2382 subjects completed the follow-up visit at 5 years. Fifteen patients died due to CVE. CV deaths observed in the CIRD cohort were lower than that predicted by SCORE risk charts. The highest incidence rate of CVE [7.39 cases per 1000 person-years (95% CI 4.63, 11.18)] was found in PsA patients. However, after adjusting for age, sex and CV risk factors, AS was the inflammatory disease more commonly associated with CVE at 5 years [hazard ratio 4.60 (P =0.02)], compared with those without CIRD. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular mortality in patients with CIRD at 5 years of follow-up is lower than estimated. Patients with AS have a higher risk of developing a first CVE after 5 years of follow-up.

Epidemiology of RMD Financiado para publicación en acceso aberto: Universidade da Coruña/CISUG [Abstract] Objective. Axial osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of back and neck pain, however, few studies have examined its prevalence. The aim was to estimate the prevalence and the characteristics of symptomatic axial OA in Spain. Methods. EPISER2016 is a cross-sectional multicenter population-based study of people aged 40 years or older. Subjects were randomly selected using multistage stratified cluster sampling. Participants were contacted by telephone to complete rheumatic disease screening questionnaires. Two phenotypes were analyzed, patients with Non-exclusive axial OA (NEA-OA) and Exclusive axial OA (EA-OA). To calculate the prevalence and its 95% confidence interval (CI), the sample design was considered and weighting was calculated according to age, sex and geographic origin. Results. Prevalence of NEA-OA by clinical or clinical-radiographic criteria was 19.17% (95% CI: 17.82–20.59). The frequency of NEA-OA increased with age (being 3.6 times more likely in patients aged 80 s or more than in those between 40 and 49 years) and body mass index. It was significantly more frequent in women, as well as in the center of Spain. It was less frequent in those with a higher level of education. Lumbar OA was more frequent than cervical OA. This difference grew with increasing age and was not associated with gender. It was also greater in overweight and obese subjects. Conclusions. This is the first study on the prevalence of axial OA phenotypes in Europe describing the associated socio-demographic, anthropometric, and lifestyle variables. Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. EPISER2016 was supported by Celgene, Gebro Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme in Spain, Pfizer, and Sanofi-Aventis, none of whom had any role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation, or writing of this manuscript. MS was financed via the Rio Hortega Contract—Health Research Fund (CM17/00101), the Sanitary Research Fund integrated in the National Plan of Scientific Program, Technological Development and Innovation 2013–2016 and funded by the ISCIII-Subdirectorate General Evaluation and Promotion of Research-European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) "A way of making Europe"

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of fibromyalgia (FM) differs depending on the population studied. The main objective of the EPISER2016 study was to estimate the prevalence of FM in adults in Spain. The secondary objective was to evaluate the association with sociodemographic and anthropometric characteristics and smoking. METHODS: This is a population-based cross-sectional multicentre study. The random selection was based on multistage stratified cluster sampling. The final sample comprised 4916 persons aged =20 years. Participants were contacted by telephone for completion of a screening survey. Investigating rheumatologists evaluated positive results (review of medical records and/or telephone interview, with medical visit if needed) to confirm the diagnosis. Prevalence and 95% confidence interval were calculated, taking into account the sample design. Weighing was applied based on age, sex, and geographic origin. Predictive models were constructed to analyse which sociodemographic, anthropometric and lifestyle variables in the call centre questionnaire were associated with the presence of FM. RESULTS: 602 subjects (12.25%) had a positive screening result for FM, of which 24 were missing (3.99%). A total of 141 cases of FM were recorded. The estimated prevalence was 2.45% (95% CI, 2.06-2.90). Female sex was the variable most associated with FM, with an odds ratio (OR) of 10.156 (95% CI, 5.068-20.352). Peak prevalence was at 60-69 years (p=0.009, OR=6.962). FM was 68% more frequent in obese individuals (OR, 1.689; 95% CI, 1.036-2.755). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of FM in adults in Spain barely changed between 2000 and 2016 and it is similar to that observed in Europe as a whole.

Objective To assess the efficacy of abatacept (ABA) in RA patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) (RA-ILD). Methods This was an observational, multicentre study of RA-ILD patients treated with at least one dose of ABA. ILD was diagnosed by high-resolution CT (HRCT). We analysed the following variables at baseline (ABA initiation), 12 months and at the end of the follow-up: Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) scale (1-point change), forced vital capacity (FVC) or diffusion lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (improvement or worsening ≥10%), HRCT, DAS on 28 joints evaluated using the ESR (DAS28ESR) and CS-sparing effect. Results We studied 263 RA-ILD patients [150 women/113 men; mean (s.d.) age 64.6 (10) years]. At baseline, they had a median duration of ILD of 1 (interquartile range 0.25–3.44) years, moderate or severe degree of dyspnoea (MMRC grade 2, 3 or 4) (40.3%), FVC (% of the predicted) mean (s.d.) 85.9 (21.8)%, DLCO (% of the predicted) 65.7 (18.3) and DAS28ESR 4.5 (1.5). The ILD patterns were: usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) (40.3%), non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) (31.9%) and others (27.8%). ABA was prescribed at standard dose, i.v. (25.5%) or s.c. (74.5%). After a median follow-up of 12 (6–36) months the following variables did not show worsening: dyspnoea (MMRC) (91.9%); FVC (87.7%); DLCO (90.6%); and chest HRCT (76.6%). A significant improvement of DAS28ESR from 4.5 (1.5) to 3.1 (1.3) at the end of follow-up (P Conclusion ABA may be an effective and safe treatment for patients with RA-ILD.

[Resumen] Introducción. La Sociedad Española de Reumatología elaboró en el año 2000 el estudio EPISER2000 para conocer la prevalencia de la artrosis y otras enfermedades reumáticas en España. Los cambios sociodemográficos y en los hábitos de vida ocurridos en los últimos años en España justifican actualizar los datos de las enfermedades reumáticas (EPISER2016). Objetivo. Estimar la prevalencia de artrosis sintomática de columna cervical, columna lumbar, cadera, rodilla y mano, en población adulta en España. Material y métodos. Estudio transversal de base poblacional. Se realizó un muestreo aleatorizado polietápico estratificado y por conglomerados. Los participantes fueron contactados por teléfono para cumplimentar un cuestionario de cribado de artrosis. El reumatólogo confirmaba o descartaba el diagnóstico. Se utilizaron los criterios-clínicos-ACR para diagnosticar artrosis de manos y los criterios clínico-radiológicos-ACR para diagnosticar la artrosis de rodilla y cadera. Resultados. La prevalencia de artrosis en España en una o más de las localizaciones estudiadas fue de 29,35%. La prevalencia de artrosis-cervical fue del 10,10% y de artrosis-lumbar del 15,52%. Ambas son más frecuentes en mujeres y a mayor edad, así como en personas con niveles de estudios bajos y obesidad. La prevalencia de artrosis de cadera fue del 5,13% y la de artrosis de rodilla del 13,83%; estas se asocian con el sexo femenino, sobrepeso y obesidad, menor frecuencia en nivel de estudios alto y con la edad. La prevalencia de la artrosis de mano fue del 7,73%. Es más frecuente en mujeres, obesas, con bajo nivel de estudios y mayor edad. Conclusiones. El estudio EPISER2016 es el primero que analiza la prevalencia de artrosis sintomática en 5 localizaciones (columna cervical, lumbar, rodilla, cadera y manos) en España. La artrosis de la columna lumbar es la más prevalente. [Abstract] Introduction. The Spanish Society of Rheumatology carried out the EPISER2000 study in 2000 to determine the prevalence of osteoarthritis and other rheumatic diseases in the Spanish population. Recent sociodemographic changes and lifestyle habits in Spain justified updating the epidemiological data on osteoarthritis and other rheumatic diseases (EPISER2016-study). Objective. To estimate the prevalence of symptomatic osteoarthritis of the cervical spine, lumbar spine, hip, knee and hand in the adult population in Spain. Material and methods. Cross-sectional population-based study. A multistage and stratified random cluster sampling was carried out. The participants were contacted by telephone to complete an osteoarthritis screening questionnaire. A rheumatologist confirmed or discarded the diagnosis. The ACR-clinical-criteria were used to diagnose hand-osteoarthritis and the ACR-clinical-radiological criteria to diagnose knee- and hip-osteoarthritis. To estimate the prevalence and its 95% confidence interval, weights were calculated according to the probability of selection in each of the sampling stages. Results. The prevalence of osteoarthritis in Spain in one or more of the locations studied was 29.35%. The prevalence of cervical-osteoarthritis was 10.10% and of lumbar-osteoarthritis 15.52%. Both are more frequent in women and at older ages, as well as in people with low levels of education and obesity. The prevalence of hip-osteoarthritis was 5.13%, that of knee-osteoarthritis 13.83%, these are associated with female sex, overweight and obesity. The prevalence of hand osteoarthritis was 7.73%. It is more frequent in women, who are obese, with a low educational level and who are older. Conclusion. The EPISER2016 study is the first to analyse the prevalence of symptomatic osteoarthritis in 5 locations (cervical, lumbar, knee, hip and hands) in Spain. Lumbar spine osteoarthritis is the most prevalent.

[Resumen] Introducción. La Sociedad Española de Reumatología elaboró en el año 2000 el estudio EPISER2000 para conocer la prevalencia de la artrosis y otras enfermedades reumáticas en España. Los cambios sociodemográficos y en los hábitos de vida ocurridos en los últimos años en España justifican actualizar los datos de las enfermedades reumáticas (EPISER2016). Objetivo. Estimar la prevalencia de artrosis sintomática de columna cervical, columna lumbar, cadera, rodilla y mano, en población adulta en España. Material y métodos. Estudio transversal de base poblacional. Se realizó un muestreo aleatorizado polietápico estratificado y por conglomerados. Los participantes fueron contactados por teléfono para cumplimentar un cuestionario de cribado de artrosis. El reumatólogo confirmaba o descartaba el diagnóstico. Se utilizaron los criterios-clínicos-ACR para diagnosticar artrosis de manos y los criterios clínico-radiológicos-ACR para diagnosticar la artrosis de rodilla y cadera. Resultados. La prevalencia de artrosis en España en una o más de las localizaciones estudiadas fue de 29,35%. La prevalencia de artrosis-cervical fue del 10,10% y de artrosis-lumbar del 15,52%. Ambas son más frecuentes en mujeres y a mayor edad, así como en personas con niveles de estudios bajos y obesidad. La prevalencia de artrosis de cadera fue del 5,13% y la de artrosis de rodilla del 13,83%; estas se asocian con el sexo femenino, sobrepeso y obesidad, menor frecuencia en nivel de estudios alto y con la edad. La prevalencia de la artrosis de mano fue del 7,73%. Es más frecuente en mujeres, obesas, con bajo nivel de estudios y mayor edad. Conclusiones. El estudio EPISER2016 es el primero que analiza la prevalencia de artrosis sintomática en 5 localizaciones (columna cervical, lumbar, rodilla, cadera y manos) en España. La artrosis de la columna lumbar es la más prevalente. [Abstract] Introduction. The Spanish Society of Rheumatology carried out the EPISER2000 study in 2000 to determine the prevalence of osteoarthritis and other rheumatic diseases in the Spanish population. Recent sociodemographic changes and lifestyle habits in Spain justified updating the epidemiological data on osteoarthritis and other rheumatic diseases (EPISER2016-study). Objective. To estimate the prevalence of symptomatic osteoarthritis of the cervical spine, lumbar spine, hip, knee and hand in the adult population in Spain. Material and methods. Cross-sectional population-based study. A multistage and stratified random cluster sampling was carried out. The participants were contacted by telephone to complete an osteoarthritis screening questionnaire. A rheumatologist confirmed or discarded the diagnosis. The ACR-clinical-criteria were used to diagnose hand-osteoarthritis and the ACR-clinical-radiological criteria to diagnose knee- and hip-osteoarthritis. To estimate the prevalence and its 95% confidence interval, weights were calculated according to the probability of selection in each of the sampling stages. Results. The prevalence of osteoarthritis in Spain in one or more of the locations studied was 29.35%. The prevalence of cervical-osteoarthritis was 10.10% and of lumbar-osteoarthritis 15.52%. Both are more frequent in women and at older ages, as well as in people with low levels of education and obesity. The prevalence of hip-osteoarthritis was 5.13%, that of knee-osteoarthritis 13.83%, these are associated with female sex, overweight and obesity. The prevalence of hand osteoarthritis was 7.73%. It is more frequent in women, who are obese, with a low educational level and who are older. Conclusion. The EPISER2016 study is the first to analyse the prevalence of symptomatic osteoarthritis in 5 locations (cervical, lumbar, knee, hip and hands) in Spain. Lumbar spine osteoarthritis is the most prevalent. EPISER2016 ha sido financiado por Celgene, Laboratorios, Gebro Pharma, Merck Sharp and Dohme de España, Pfizer y Sanofi-Aventis. Los financiadores no han intervenido en el diseño del estudio, recogida ni análisis de datos, ni en la redacción de este artículo. IRP yMS fueron financiados con programas Miguel Servet II y Contrato Río Hortega-Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (CPII17/00026 y CM17/00101), respectivamente. El Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria, integrado en el Plan Nacional de Programa Científico, Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica 2013-2016, es financiado por el ISCIII-Subdirección General de Evaluación y Promoción de la Investigación-Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) «Una forma de hacer Europa»

INTRODUCTION: The Spanish Society of Rheumatology carried out the EPISER2000 study in 2000 to determine the prevalence of osteoarthritis and other rheumatic diseases in the Spanish population. Recent sociodemographic changes and lifestyle habits in Spain justified updating the epidemiological data on osteoarthritis and other rheumatic diseases (EPISER2016-study). OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of symptomatic osteoarthritis of the cervical spine, lumbar spine, hip, knee and hand in the adult population in Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional population-based study. A multistage and stratified random cluster sampling was carried out. The participants were contacted by telephone to complete an osteoarthritis screening questionnaire. A rheumatologist confirmed or discarded the diagnosis. The ACR-clinical-criteria were used to diagnose hand-osteoarthritis and the ACR-clinical-radiological criteria to diagnose knee- and hip-osteoarthritis. To estimate the prevalence and its 95% confidence interval, weights were calculated according to the probability of selection in each of the sampling stages. RESULTS: The prevalence of osteoarthritis in Spain in one or more of the locations studied was 29.35%. The prevalence of cervical-osteoarthritis was 10.10% and of lumbar-osteoarthritis 15.52%. Both are more frequent in women and at older ages, as well as in people with low levels of education and obesity. The prevalence of hip-osteoarthritis was 5.13%, that of knee-osteoarthritis 13.83%, these are associated with female sex, overweight and obesity. The prevalence of hand osteoarthritis was 7.73%. It is more frequent in women, who are obese, with a low educational level and who are older. CONCLUSION: The EPISER2016 study is the first to analyse the prevalence of symptomatic osteoarthritis in 5 locations (cervical, lumbar, knee, hip and hands) in Spain. Lumbar spine osteoarthritis is the most prevalent.

The prevalence of fibromyalgia (FM) differs depending on the population studied. The main objective of the EPISER2016 study was to estimate the prevalence of FM in adults in Spain. The secondary objective was to evaluate the association with sociodemographic and anthropometric characteristics and smoking.This is a population-based cross-sectional multicentre study. The random selection was based on multistage stratified cluster sampling. The final sample comprised 4916 persons aged ≥20 years. Participants were contacted by telephone for completion of a screening survey. Investigating rheumatologists evaluated positive results (review of medical records and/or telephone interview, with medical visit if needed) to confirm the diagnosis. Prevalence and 95% confidence interval were calculated, taking into account the sample design. Weighing was applied based on age, sex, and geographic origin. Predictive models were constructed to analyse which sociodemographic, anthropometric and lifestyle variables in the call centre questionnaire were associated with the presence of FM.602 subjects (12.25%) had a positive screening result for FM, of which 24 were missing (3.99%). A total of 141 cases of FM were recorded. The estimated prevalence was 2.45% (95% CI, 2.06-2.90). Female sex was the variable most associated with FM, with an odds ratio (OR) of 10.156 (95% CI, 5.068-20.352). Peak prevalence was at 60-69 years (p=0.009, OR=6.962). FM was 68% more frequent in obese individuals (OR, 1.689; 95% CI, 1.036-2.755).The prevalence of FM in adults in Spain barely changed between 2000 and 2016 and it is similar to that observed in Europe as a whole.

Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may associate with Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD). Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) or TNF alfa inhibitors (iTNF), had been involved in the ILD development as well as exacerbation of an existing one. Nowadays there is no consensus related to treatment. Objectives The aimed of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of Abatacept (ABA) treatment in patients with AR and ILD. Methods Multicentre study in patients with RA and ILD associated were treated with ABA. ILD was diagnosed by High Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT). ABA was used at dose of 10 mg/kg/4 weeks iv or 125 mg/week sc. Its efficacy was evaluated according to the following measures: a) Dyspnea classified by the Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC); Significant variability of 1 point and asymptomatic MMRC=0; b) Pulmonary function test (PFT); Significant oscillations >10% in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) >10%; c) Imaging technique (HRCT); d) Joint assessment (DAS28). Quantitative variables were expressed as mean ± SD or as median (interquartile range) and compared with (Wilcoxon test) (Test Fisher) between the baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months. Results 34 individuals were included (19 women /15 men), patients with ILD associated to RA, with a mean age of 61,4 ± 9,8 years. The median duration of RA before ADA was initiated was 4,8 [0,86–13,12] (0–25) years, and had previously received an average 1,29±0,90 DMARDs. RA was seropositive in 24 cases (71%). ILD was associated with a DMARD: MTX (n=3), Etanercept (n=3), Adalimumab (n=3) y Certolizumab (n=1). ABA was used in monotherapy in 14 patients and combined with other immunosuppressors in 20 patients: Leflunomide (LFD) (n=7), LFD and cyclosporine (n=1), Sulfasalazine (n=1), MTX (n=2), MTX with LFD (n=1), hydroxychloroquine (n=5), Hydroxychloroquine with LFD (n=2), Azathioprine (n=1). A significant improvement of dyspnea was observed; patients who didn9t have dyspnea, kept asymptomatic. FVC and HRCT showed a significant improvement during 6 to 12 months period. DLCO remained stable in the majority of the patients. RA (DAS28) activity also improved. After follow up of 12,82±7,48 months, the most significant adverse effects were: pulmonary Infection (n=2), urinary infections (n=1), infusion reactions (n=1). ABA was discontinued due to: Serious infections (n=2); join inefficacy (n=2), pulmonary inefficacy (n=1), infusion reaction (n=1). Conclusions ABA seems to be an effective and relatively safe treatment in patients with RA and associated ILD. This data should be verified again in prospective and randomized studies. Disclosure of Interest None declared

Objective To evaluate the responsiveness in terms of correlation of the Hospital Universitario La Princesa Index (HUPI) comparatively to the traditional composite indices used to assess disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to compare the performance of HUPI-based response criteria with that of the EULAR response criteria. Methods Secondary data analysis from the following studies: ACT-RAY (clinical trial), PROAR (early RA cohort) and EMECAR (pre-biologic era long term RA cohort). Responsiveness was evaluated by: 1) comparing change from baseline (Delta) of HUPI with Delta in other scores by calculating correlation coefficients; 2) calculating standardised effect sizes. The accuracy of response by HUPI and by EULAR criteria was analyzed using linear regressions in which the dependent variable was change in global assessment by physician (Delta GDA-Phy). Results Delta HUPI correlation with change in all other indices ranged from 0.387 to 0.791); HUPI's standardized effect size was larger than those from the other indices in each database used. In ACT-RAY, depending on visit, between 65 and 80% of patients were equally classified by HUPI and EULAR response criteria. However, HUPI criteria were slightly more stringent, with higher percentage of patients classified as non-responder, especially at early visits. HUPI response criteria showed a slightly higher accuracy than EULAR response criteria when using Delta GDA-Phy as gold standard. Conclusion HUPI shows good responsiveness in terms of correlation in each studied scenario (clinical trial, early RA cohort, and established RA cohort). Response criteria by HUPI seem more stringent than EULAR's., Our study was supported by grants RD16/0012/0011 and PI14/00442 from the Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (Instituto de Salud Carlos III; Spain) and cofunded by the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER). Data from ACT-RAY clinical trial were kindly provided by Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. No financial support was received from Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd Data from EMECAR and PROAR cohorts were provided by the Spanish Society of Rheumatology. No financial support was received from the Spanish Society of Rheumatology. None of these institutions played any role in the analysis or interpretation of data, nor were they involved in the writing of the manuscript. Roche and Sociedad Espanola de Reumatologia were involved in the collection of data from ACT-RAY, and EMECAR and PROAR, respectively. However, these funders had no role in study design, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Background:Giant cell arteritis (GCA) may be divided into cranial, and extracranial GCA. Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown efficacy and safety in GCA and other large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) (1-5).Objectives:To compare the efficacy of TCZ in cranial and extracranial GCA.Methods:Multicenter observational study of 312 patients with GCA treated with TCZ. They were divided into 3 groups a) only cranial (cGCA), b) only extracranial (ecGCA), c) mixed affection (mixGCA). GCA was diagnosed by a) ACR criteria, and/or b) positive temporal artery biopsy, and/or c) LVV by imaging. Remission and sustained remission was defined according to EULAR definitions (1). In ecGCA and mixGCA we also studied the improvement (complete or partial) by imaging techniques.Results:We studied 312 patients (218 females; mean age, 73.4±9.6 years). TABLE shows the main features of the 3 groups. Remission at month 6 was higher in cGCA, as well as the sustained remission at month12 (FIGURE). At 18 and 24months, were similar in the 3 groups. Improvement by imaging techniques was partial/complete at 6,12,18 and 24 months, in 50%/0%,71%/0%, 61%/15% and 67%/17% respectively, in ecGCA, and in 75%/0%,53%/18%, 64%/12% and 50%/28% in mixGCA.Table 1.Main features of 312 patients at TCZ onset.Cranial GCA(n=152)Extracranial GCA(n=49)Mixed GCA(n=111)Cranial vs Extracranial GCApAge at TCZ onset, years, mean± SD76.0±8.265.4±12.273.5±8.10.000*Sex, female/male, n (% female)105/47 (69)33/16 (67)80/31 (72)0.960Time from diagnosis to TCZ onset (months, median [IQR]6 [2-21]7 [2-20]9 [3-25]0.765Biopsy-proven GCA, n (%)87/128 (68)0 (0)50/87 (57)0.000*Systemic manifestations at TCZ onset109 (72)32 (65)84 (76)0.501Fever, n (%)18 (12)1 (2)8 (7)0.048*Constitutional syndrome, n (%)52 (34)16 (33)47 (42)0.933PmR, n (%)88 (58)29 (59)71 (64)0.999Ischemic manifestations at TCZ onset117 (77)0 (0)70 (63)0.000*Visual involvement, n (%)31 (20)0 (0)16 (14)0.000*Headache, n (%)103 (85)0 (0)63 (57)0.000*Jaw claudication, n (%)39 (26)0 (0)21 (19)0.000*Acute phase reactantsESR, mm/1st hour, median [IQR]28 [9-53]24 [10-43]28 [15-48]0.462CRP, mg/dL, median [IQR]1.2 [0.3-3.4]0.7 [0.4-1.8]1.6 [0.4-3.8]0.153Prednisone dose at TCZ onset, mean ± SD26.2±17.615.4±14.220.1±14.90.000*TCZmono/TCZcombo, n (% TCZ mono)116/36 (76)26/23 (53)69/42 (62)0.003*Follow-up (months), mean ± SD27.3±21.132.7±23.327.9±22.00.143Figure 1.Remission and sustained remission of cGCA, ecGCA and mixGCA according to EULAR (1). In the first 3 months we only could assess cGCA because in ecGCA and mixGCA a control imaging was not performedConclusion:TCZ seems to be effective in all phenotypes but it is faster in cGCA in reaching remission. However, improvement by imaging techniques was partial and very rarely complete in ecGCA and mixGCA.References:[1]Hellmich B, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020; 79: 19-30.[2]Stone JH, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377: 317-28.[3]Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2019; 49:126-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.01.003.[4]Prieto Peña D et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2020 Nov 27. PMID: 33253103.[5]Loricera J, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2016; 34:S44-53. PMID: 27050507Disclosure of Interests:Lara Sanchez-Bilbao: None declared, Javier Loricera: None declared, Vicente Aldasoro: None declared, Juan Pablo Valdivieso-Achá: None declared, Ignacio Villa-Blanco: None declared, Olga Maiz: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, Clara Moriano: None declared, Julio Sánchez: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel: None declared, Eva Perez-Pampín: None declared, Juan Ramón De Dios: None declared, Juan Carlos Nieto González: None declared, Eva Galíndez-Agirregoikoa: None declared, Patricia Moya: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, José Luis Andréu Sánchez: None declared, Valvanera Pinillos: None declared, Andrea García-Valle: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, Noelia Alvarez-Rivas: None declared, Marcelino Revenga: None declared, Sara Manrique Arija: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, Enrique Raya: None declared, Cristina Hidalgo: None declared, Ruth López-González: None declared, Cristina Campos Fernández: None declared, Antonio Juan-Mas: None declared, Beatriz Arca: None declared, Iñigo Rua-Figueroa: None declared, María Dolors Boquet: None declared, Antonio García: None declared, Adela Gallego: None declared, Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Lilly, Celgene and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD, Jansen and Roche, Ricardo Blanco Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, UCB Pharma and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD and Roche

Background:Esperanza was a multicenter national health program developed to facilitate an early diagnosis of patients with Spondyloarthritis (SpA) in Spain.Objectives:To compare the clinical evolution of patients with axial SpA (axSpA) and peripheral SpA (pSpA) included in this program.Methods:Patients from the Esperanza cohort fulfilling ASAS criteria for axSpA or pSpA and completed the 6-year follow-up were included. Patients were classified according to the predominant symptom. In case of having axSpA and pSpA, they were classified as axSpA. Clinical features, disease activity and treatment aspects at baseline and 6-year visit were evaluated.Results:From 775 patients recruited at baseline, 6-year follow-up data from 178 (83.5%) fulfilling ASAS criteria at the final visit were available: 133 (74.7%) for axSpA and 45 for pSpA (25.3%). 118 (66.3%) were males (50.6% with axSpA and 62.2%, pSpA, p=0.4). Patients with axSpA had more frequently positive HLA-B27 (90.5%) vs. (9.5%), pConclusion:The early diagnosis of recent-onset SpA achieves a significant improvement in clinical features, disease activity and quality of life in patients with axSpA and pSpA after 6 years of follow-up. Although previous publications revealed a low radiographic progression in this cohort1, the worsening of BASMI must aware clinicians of possible evolutive structural damage.Reference:[1]Fernández-Carballido et al. RMD Open. 2020 Sep;6(2):e001345Acknowledgements:The Spanish Foundation of Rheumatology received funding from Pfizer (formerly Wyeth) to develop the Esperanza Program. Later, the Program has been supported by restricted grants from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III and Fondos FEDER (FIS PI13/02034 and PI17/01840) and AbbVie.Disclosure of Interests:Carolina Tornero: None declared, Victoria Navarro-Compán: None declared, Beatriz Joven-Ibáñez: None declared, RAQUEL ALMODOVAR: None declared, Xavier Juanola-Roura: None declared, Cristina Fernández-Carballido: None declared, Juan Carlos Quevedo-Abeledo: None declared, Jose Rosas: None declared, Azucena Hernández: None declared, Carlos A. Montilla-Morales: None declared, Jose Ramón Maneiro: None declared, A. Juan-Mas: None declared, Jose Antonio Pinto Tasende: None declared, Mireia Moreno: None declared, Jesus Sanz: None declared, Teresa Ruiz Jimeno: None declared, Manuel Moreno: None declared, María Lourdes Ladehesa Pineda: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Roche, Grunental, Janssen, Sanofi., Paid instructor for: Janssen, Novartis, Roche, Consultant of: AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, Galapagos, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer.

Security is currently one of the top concerns in our society. From governmental installations to private companies and medical institutions, they all have to address directly with security issues as: access to restricted information quarantine control, or criminal tracking. As an example, identifying patients is critical in hospitals or geriatrics in order to isolate infected people, which has proven to be a non- trivial issue with the COVID-19 pandemic that is currently affecting all countries, or to locate fled patients. Face recognition is then a non-intrusive alternative for performing these tasks. Although FaceNet from Google has proved to be almost perfect, in a multi-face scenario its performance decays rapidly. In order to mitigate this loss of performance, in this paper a cluster based on the Neural Computer Stick version 2 and OpenVINO by Intel is proposed. A detailed power and runtime study is shown for two programming models, namely: multithreading and multiprocessing. Furthermore, 3 different hosts have been considered. In the most efficient configuration, an average of 6 frames per second has been achieved using the Raspberry Pi 4 as host and with a power consumption of just 11.2W, increasing by a factor of 3.3X the energy efficiency with respect to a PC-based solution in a multi-face scenario.

Background:Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) is an extra-articular complication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Conventional disease-modifying drugs (DMARDs) such as methotrexate (MTX) have been implicated in the development and exacerbation of a pre-existing ILD.Objectives:The aim of our study was to check the influence of combined MTX treatment in patients with RA-ILD treated with abatacept (ABA).Methods:National multicentre retrospective registry of 263 patients with RA-ILD treated with ABA. RA was diagnosed according to the ACR classification criteria of 1987 or by the EULAR/ACR criteria of 2010. ILD was diagnosed by high resolution computed tomography (HRCT). In this study we have done a subanalysis of the 46 patients treated with ABA in combination with MTX (ABA+MTX) vs. 217 patients treated with ABA in monotherapy or in combination with other synthetic DMARDs. Efficacy was evaluated according to the following parameters: a) Dyspnoea (MMRC) considering variations ≥ 1; b) Lung function test (LFT) considering variations ≥ 10% in FVC and a variation of DLCO ≥ 10%; c) Imaging test (HRCT) d) DAS28 score e) prednisone dose. Variables were collected at the beginning of the study and at months 3, 6, 12 and then every 12 months until a maximum of 60 months.Results:263 patients with ILD associated with RA were included in the study with mean age 64.64±10 years. RF or CCPA were positive in 235 (89.4%) and 233 (88.6%) cases, respectively, with a mean follow-up of 22.7±19.7 months. Baseline characteristics of both groups are shown in table 1, while data obtained during evolution of this complication are presented in Figure 1.Conclusion:Despite the baseline differences of both groups, the good evolution in the ABA+MTX subgroup suggests that this therapeutic strategy can be a safe combination for patients with RA-ILD.ABA with MTX (n=46)ABA w/t MTX (n=217)PSex (F/M)28/18122/950.625Age (years)65.11±10.216.2±9.80.202RF/CCPA + (%)91.3/91.389.8/90.10.810Smoking or past smoking (%)47.855.10.417Follow-up (months)22.73±18.0022.3±20.850.916DAS28 at baseline4.08±1.514.61±1.470.056DAS28 at last visit3.00±1.463.13±1.310.642Prednisone at baseline, median (IQR) (mg)5 (5-7.5)7.75 (5-15)0.008*Prednisone at the end of study, median (IQR) (mg)5 (1-5)5 (5-7.5)0.032*DLCO at baseline (%)66.85±19.0465.43±18.210.823DLCO at the end of study (%)66.05±20.9565.17±19.720.831FVC at baseline (%)90.06±17.7785.40±21.560.164FVC at the end of study (%)90.58±15,4584.21±21.490.038*Disclosure of Interests:Carlos Fernández-Díaz Speakers bureau: Brystol Meyers Squibb, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, J. Loricera: None declared, Francisco Ortiz-Sanjuán: None declared, A. Juan-Mas: None declared, Carmen Carrasco-Cubero Speakers bureau: Janssen, MSD, AbbVie, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Celgene, S, Rodriguéz-Muguruza: None declared, S. Rodrigez -Garcia: None declared, R. Castellanos-Moreira: None declared, RAQUEL ALMODOVAR Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer., CLARA AGUILERA CROS: None declared, Ignacio Villa-Blanco Consultant of: UCB, Speakers bureau: Novartis, MSD, Lilly, Sergi Ordoñez: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, C. Ojeda-Garcia: None declared, Manuel Moreno: None declared, Gemma Bonilla: None declared, I. Hernández-Rodriguez: None declared, Mireia Lopez Corbeto: None declared, José Luis Andréu Sánchez: None declared, Trinidad Pérez Sandoval: None declared, Alejandra López Robles: None declared, Patricia Carreira Grant/research support from: Actelion, Roche, MSD, Consultant of: GlaxoSmithKline, VivaCell Biotechnology, Emerald Health Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Speakers bureau: Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Natalia Mena-Vázquez: None declared, C. Peralta-Ginés: None declared, ANA URRUTICOECHEA-ARANA: None declared, Luis Marcelino Arboleya Rodríguez: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, DESEADA PALMA SANCHEZ: None declared, Olga Maiz-Alonso: None declared, J. Fernández-Leroy: None declared, I. Cabezas-Rodriguez: None declared, Ivan Castellví Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Kern Pharma, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, A. Ruibal-Escribano: None declared, JR De Dios-Jiménez Aberásturi: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, C. González-Montagut Gómez: None declared, J M Blanco: None declared, Noelia Alvarez-Rivas: None declared, N. Del-Val: None declared, M. Rodíguez-Gómez: None declared, Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, E.C. Cervantes Pérez: None declared, A. Devicente-DelMas: None declared, Blanca Garcia-Magallon Consultant of: MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Amgen, Celgene, MSD, Cristina Hidalgo: None declared, Sabela Fernández: None declared, Edilia García-Fernández: None declared, R. López-Sánchez: None declared, S. Castro: None declared, P. Morales-Garrido: None declared, Andrea García-Valle: None declared, Rosa Expósito: None declared, L. Exposito-Perez: None declared, Lorena Pérez Albaladejo: None declared, Ángel García-Aparicio: None declared, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, and MSD, Miguel A González-Gay Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD

Background:Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) is a severe complication of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Several conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) and biologic (b) DMARDs may induce or impaired ILD-RA. Abatacept (ABA) may be useful in ILD-RA (1).Objectives:To assess the efficacy and safety of ABA in a large series of ILD-RA for a long-term follow-up.Methods:Multicenter open-level study of ILD-RA treated with at least 1 dose of ABA. ILD was diagnosed by high-resolution computed tomography (HRTC). We study these outcomes: a) 1-point change Modied Medical Research Council (MMRC); b) forced vital capacity (FVC) and/or DLCO improvement or decline ≥10%; c) change in HRCT, d) change in DAS28. e) Prednisone dose. Values were collected at 0, 3, 6, 12 and then every 12 months.Results:We studied 263 patients (150 women/113 men) (mean age;64.6±10 years), with ILD-RA. At ABA-onset they were smokers or exsmoker (53.8%), positive APCC (88.6%), median [IQR] duration of ILD of 12 [3-41.25] months, mean DLCO (65.7±18.3) and FVC (85.9±21.8).The ILD-pattern were usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) (40.3%), non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) (31.9%) and others (27.8%).ABA was prescribed at standard subcutaneous (125 mg/w) in 196 (74.5%) or intravenously (10 mg/kg/4 w) in 67 (25.5%); in monotherapy (n=111) or combined with cDMARDs (n=152); especially leflunomide (n=55), MTX (n=46), or antimarials (n=21).After a mean follow-up of 22.7±19.7 months most outcomes remain stable (Figure). Moreover, DAS28 improved from 4.5±1.5 to 3.1±1.3; prednisone dose reduced from a median 7.5 [5-10] to 5 mg [5-7.5] and retention rate was 76.4%. The main adverse effects were serious infections (n=28), neoplasia (n=3), serious infusion reaction (n=1) and myocardial infarction (n=1).Conclusion:ABA seems effective and relatively safe in ILD-RA.References:[1]Fernández-Díaz C et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018; 48:22-27Disclosure of Interests:Carlos Fernández-Díaz Speakers bureau: Brystol Meyers Squibb, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, J. Loricera: None declared, Francisco Ortiz-Sanjuán: None declared, A. Juan-Mas: None declared, Carmen Carrasco-Cubero Speakers bureau: Janssen, MSD, AbbVie, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Celgene, S, Rodriguéz-Muguruza: None declared, S. Rodrigez -Garcia: None declared, R. Castellanos-Moreira: None declared, RAQUEL ALMODOVAR Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer.CLARA AGUILERA CROS: None declared, Ignacio Villa-Blanco Consultant of: UCB, Speakers bureau: Novartis, MSD, Lilly, Sergi Ordoñez: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, C. Ojeda-Garcia: None declared, Manuel Moreno: None declared, Gemma Bonilla: None declared, I. Hernández-Rodriguez: None declared, Mireia Lopez Corbeto: None declared, José Luis Andréu Sánchez: None declared, Trinidad Pérez Sandoval: None declared, Alejandra López Robles: None declared, Patricia Carreira Grant/research support from: Actelion, Roche, MSD, Consultant of: GlaxoSmithKline, VivaCell Biotechnology, Emerald Health Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Speakers bureau: Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Natalia Mena-Vázquez: None declared, C. Peralta-Ginés: None declared, ANA URRUTICOECHEA-ARANA: None declared, Luis Marcelino Arboleya Rodríguez: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, DESEADA PALMA SANCHEZ: None declared, Olga Maiz-Alonso: None declared, J. Fernández-Leroy: None declared, I. Cabezas-Rodriguez: None declared, Ivan Castellví Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Kern Pharma, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, A. Ruibal-Escribano: None declared, JR De Dios-Jiménez Aberásturi: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, C. González-Montagut Gómez: None declared, J M Blanco: None declared, Noelia Alvarez-Rivas: None declared, N. Del-Val: None declared, M. Rodíguez-Gómez: None declared, Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, E.C. Cervantes Pérez: None declared, A. Devicente-DelMas: None declared, Blanca Garcia-Magallon Consultant of: MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Amgen, Celgene, MSD, Cristina Hidalgo: None declared, Sabela Fernández: None declared, Edilia García-Fernández: None declared, R. López-Sánchez: None declared, S. Castro: None declared, P. Morales-Garrido: None declared, Andrea García-Valle: None declared, Rosa Expósito: None declared, L. Exposito-Perez: None declared, Lorena Pérez Albaladejo: None declared, Ángel García-Aparicio: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, and MSD

Background:The prevalence of joint hypermobility (JH) and Joint Hypermobility Syndrome (JHS) in patients with fibromyalgia (FM) is considerable and is much more than can be explained at random(1). Some authors propose that FM and JHS share a common pathophysiological mechanism is some patients. Currently it is accepted that Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome Hypermobility subtype (EDSh) and JHS are the same entity. We regard the subgroup of FM patients with JHS a different subtype of FM, even phenotypically similar to EDSh.Objectives:Determine the possible differences between both groups according to their body composition, bone metabolism and clinical findings.Methods:Our study is observational, descriptive, transverse cohort study in which we included 86 women with fibromyalgia recruited at the Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Unit at Parc Salut-Mar in Barcelona, Spain. The patients were grouped according to the presence or absence of JHS, following the Brighton Criteria. Diverse clinical data was collected: Pain Visual Analogue Scale (PVAS), time from pain onset, time from diagnosis, somatic symptoms, state of mind, presence of a FM trigger, concurrent medication, anxiety, quality of life, disease impact, anthropometric data, Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA), bone density test (BMD) and bone metabolism data in blood samples.Results:51 patients were included in the FM group and 35 patients in the FM-JHS group. We did not find differences between groups PVAS; time from pain onset; somatic symptoms using the Psychiatric Disorder and Somatic Pathology Scale (TOPYPS); nor Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ). Both groups scored similarly on SF-36 Health Questionnaire. The use of opioids was more common in the FM group (p0,05)Conclusion:Our work revealed that FM patients with JHS are different from FM without JHS, by manifesting differences in certain clinical, anthropometric, and bone metabolism features.References:[1]Lai S, Goldman JA, Child AH, Engel A, Lamm SH. Fibromyalgia, hypermobility, and breast implants. J Rheumatol. 2000;27(9):2237-41.[2]Malfait, F., Francomano, C., Byers, P., Belmont, J., Berglund, B., Black, J., ... & Castori, M. (2017, March). The 2017 international classification of the Ehlers–Danlos syndromes. InAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics(Vol. 175, No. 1, pp. 8-26).Disclosure of Interests: :None declared

Background:Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) is a severe extraarticular manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In this line, several radiological patterns of RA-ILD have been described: i) usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), ii) nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), iii) obliterating bronchiolitis, iv) organized pneumonia and mixed patterns. Abatacept (ABA) could be an effective and safe option for patients with RA-ILD, although the response in the different radiological patterns is not well defined.Objectives:Our aim was to assess the response to ABA in different radiological patterns of ILD.Methods:Observational retrospective multicenter study of RA-ILD treated with ABA. ILD was diagnosed by HRCT and classified by radiological patterns in 3 different subgroups of RA-ILD: a) UIP, b) NSIP and c) “other”. ABA was used sc. or iv. at standard dose. We assessed: a) Dyspnoea (MMRC scale; significant variation ≥1); b) Respiratory function tests (significant changes ≥10% in FVC and DLCO); c) HRCT imaging; d) DAS28 e)prednisone dose.Variables were collected at months 0, 3, 6, 12 months and subsequently every 12 months until a maximum of 60 months.Results:We included 263 patients: 106 UIP, 84 NSIP and 73 others (150 women / 113 men), mean age 64.64±10 years. Total patients positive for RF or CCPA were 235 (89.4%) and 233 (88.6%), respectively. In 26 out of 263 patients, the development of ILD was closely related to the administration of sDMARDs (MTX n = 11 and LFN n = 1) or bDMARDs (ETN n = 5, ADA n = 4, CZP n = 2 and IFX n = 3). Patient characteristics are shown in table 1. Figure 1 shows the evolution of the cases with available data after a mean follow-up of 22.7±19.7 months. Mean DLCO and FVC remained stable in the 3 groups without statistically significant changes, and all the groups showed a statistically significant reduction in DAS28 and prednisone dose.Conclusion:ABA could be a good choice of treatment in patients with RA-ILD independently of the radiological pattern of ILD.Disclosure of Interests:Carlos Fernández-Díaz Speakers bureau: Brystol Meyers Squibb, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, J. Loricera: None declared, Francisco Ortiz-Sanjuán: None declared, A. Juan-Mas: None declared, Carmen Carrasco-Cubero Speakers bureau: Janssen, MSD, AbbVie, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Celgene, S, Rodriguéz-Muguruza: None declared, S. Rodrigez -Garcia: None declared, R. Castellanos-Moreira: None declared, RAQUEL ALMODOVAR Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer., CLARA AGUILERA CROS: None declared, Ignacio Villa-Blanco Consultant of: UCB, Speakers bureau: Novartis, MSD, Lilly, Sergi Ordoñez: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, C. Ojeda-Garcia: None declared, Manuel Moreno: None declared, Gemma Bonilla: None declared, I. Hernández-Rodriguez: None declared, Mireia Lopez Corbeto: None declared, José Luis Andréu Sánchez: None declared, Trinidad Pérez Sandoval: None declared, Alejandra López Robles: None declared, Patricia Carreira Grant/research support from: Actelion, Roche, MSD, Consultant of: GlaxoSmithKline, VivaCell Biotechnology, Emerald Health Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Speakers bureau: Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Natalia Mena-Vázquez: None declared, C. Peralta-Ginés: None declared, ANA URRUTICOECHEA-ARANA: None declared, Luis Marcelino Arboleya Rodríguez: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, DESEADA PALMA SANCHEZ: None declared, Olga Maiz-Alonso: None declared, J. Fernández-Leroy: None declared, I. Cabezas-Rodriguez: None declared, Ivan Castellví Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Kern Pharma, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, A. Ruibal-Escribano: None declared, JR De Dios-Jiménez Aberásturi: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, C. González-Montagut Gómez: None declared, J M Blanco: None declared, Noelia Alvarez-Rivas: None declared, N. Del-Val: None declared, M. Rodíguez-Gómez: None declared, Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, E.C. Cervantes Pérez: None declared, A. Devicente-DelMas: None declared, Blanca Garcia-Magallon Consultant of: MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Amgen, Celgene, MSD, Cristina Hidalgo: None declared, Sabela Fernández: None declared, R. López-Sánchez: None declared, Edilia García-Fernández: None declared, S. Castro: None declared, P. Morales-Garrido: None declared, Andrea García-Valle: None declared, Rosa Expósito: None declared, L. Exposito-Perez: None declared, Lorena Pérez Albaladejo: None declared, Ángel García-Aparicio: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, and MSD

Background:Blocking of the Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) activity is a successful therapeutic approach for 2 out of 3 Rheumatoid Arthritis patients. Identifying the patients that will not respond to this therapeutic approach is a major translational goal in RA. Association of seropositivity to rheumatoid factor (RF) or anti-cyclic-citrullinated antibodies (anti-CCP) with anti-TNF response has proven inconclusive, suggesting that other yet unexplored biomarkers could be more informative for this goal.Objectives:We tested the association of two recently introduced biomarkers in RA: anti-carbamylated protein antibodies (anti-CarP) and anti-peptidylarginine deiminase type 4 (anti-PAD4).Methods:A prospective cohort of n=80 RA patients starting anti-TNF therapy was recruited and levels for all four autoantibodies -RF, anti-CCP, anti-CarP and anti-PAD4- were measured at baseline. The change in DAS28 score between baseline and week 12 of therapy was used as the clinical endpoint.Results:Single marker-analysis showed no significant association with drug response. However, when testing for interactions between autoantibodies, we found highly significant associations with drug response. Anti-CCP and RF showed a positive interaction with the response to anti-TNF therapy (P=0.00068), and anti-PAD4 and antiCarP titers showed a negative interaction with the clinical response at week 12 (P=0.0062). Using an independent retrospective sample (n=199 patients), we validated the interaction between anti-CCP and RF with the clinical response to anti-TNF agents. (P=0.044).Conclusion:The results of this study show that interactions between antibodies are important in the response to anti-TNF therapy and suggest potential pathogenic relationships.Acknowledgments :We would like to thank the clinical researchers and patients participating in the IMID Consortium for their collaborationDisclosure of Interests:Antonio Julià: None declared, Maria Lopez Lasanta: None declared, Francisco Blanco: None declared, Antonio Gómez: None declared, Isabel Haro: None declared, Antonio Juan Mas: None declared, Alba Erra: None declared, Mª Luz García Vivar: None declared, Jordi Monfort: None declared, Simon Sánchez Fernandez: None declared, Isidoro González-Álvaro Grant/research support from: Roche Laboratories, Consultant of: Lilly, Sanofi, Paid instructor for: Lilly, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, MSD, Roche, Lilly, Mercedes Alperi-López: None declared, Raúl Castellanos: None declared, Antonio Fernandez-Nebro: None declared, Cesar Diaz Torne: None declared, Núria Palau: None declared, Raquel M Lastra: None declared, Jordi Lladós: None declared, Raimon Sanmarti: None declared, Sara Marsal: None declared