6 results on '"Amioka E"'
Search Results
2. Non-medical use of loperamide in the UK and the USA.
- Author
-
Webb, N E, Wood, D M, Black, J C, Amioka, E, Dart, R C, and Dargan, P I
- Subjects
OPIOID abuse ,DRUGS ,LOPERAMIDE ,DRUG abuse - Abstract
Background Loperamide is a mu-opioid receptor agonist that is available as an over-the-counter anti-motility agent in the US and UK; recommended maximum doses of 12-16 mg/day. Anecdotal reports of non-medical use (NMU) have increased over the past decade with supra-therapeutic doses (70-800 mg/day) associated with cardiotoxicity. Little data exists on the prevalence of loperamide NMU. Aim The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of loperamide NMU in the UK and US and to describe characteristics of non-medical loperamide users. Design The Researched, Abuse, Diversion and Addiction Related Surveillance (RADARS
® ) Survey of Nonmedical Use of Prescription Drugs (NMURx) was utilized to study NMU of loperamide among the adult population in the UK and US in 2017. The RADARS® NMURx is anonymous and self-administered online. Methods A total of 40,029 completed surveys were included (10,019 from the UK and 30,010 from the US). Respondents were asked questions about medical and NMU of loperamide, frequency of and reasons for NMU, route of use problematic drug use markers, and demographics. Results Prevalence of lifetime loperamide use (95% CI) and lifetime NMU of loperamide were: UK 28.5% (27.67-29.4), and 0.66% (0.5-0.8), respectively; US 33.7% (33.1-34.2), and 5.19% (4.9-5.5), respectively. Problematic drug use markers were elevated in those who reported NMU of loperamide in both the UK and US, however high-risk use was more prevalent in the UK than in the US. Conclusion NMU of loperamide is common. In the current international environment of opioid addiction involving both therapeutic and illicit opioids, awareness of the NMU of loperamide is important. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Evaluation of Cannabis Use Among US Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic Within Different Legal Frameworks.
- Author
-
Black JC, Amioka E, Iwanicki JL, Dart RC, and Monte AA
- Subjects
- Adult, Humans, Pandemics, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, Cannabis, Medical Marijuana therapeutic use, Hallucinogens
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Non-medical use of benzodiazepines and GABA analogues in Europe.
- Author
-
Hockenhull J, Amioka E, Black JC, Forber A, Haynes CM, Wood DM, Dart RC, and Dargan PI
- Subjects
- Adult, Europe, France, Germany, Humans, Italy, Spain, Benzodiazepines, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid
- Abstract
Aims: We investigated the prevalence of non-medical use (NMU) of benzodiazepines and GABA analogues in Europe., Methods: Data were collected using the online Non-Medical Use of Prescription Drugs (NMURx) survey from France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK., Results: The study included 55 223 eligible surveys which, after post-stratification weights were applied, represented approximately 260 million European adults. Lifetime NMU of benzodiazepines was highest in Spain (6.5%, 95% CI: 6.0-7.0) and lowest in Germany (1.7%, 1.5-2.0). Lifetime NMU of GABA analogues was highest in Germany (5.4%, 5.0-5.7) and lowest in France (2.2%, 1.9-2.5) and the UK (2.2%, 1.9-2.6) While no notable difference was observed for France or the UK, there was a higher prevalence of last 12-month NMU of benzodiazepines compared to GABA analogues in Italy (2.4 times higher) and Spain (3.0 times higher) and a higher prevalence of NMU of GABA analogues compared to benzodiazepines in Germany (2.6 times higher)., Conclusion: This study shows that there is variation in NMU of benzodiazepines and GABA analogues among countries. Of particular interest is the high incidence of GABA analogue NMU in Germany and benzodiazepine NMU in Spain. Further research to identify factors and motivations responsible for the higher prevalence observed are essential to inform public health policies in those countries., (© 2020 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. An Online Survey for Pharmacoepidemiological Investigation (Survey of Non-Medical Use of Prescription Drugs Program): Validation Study.
- Author
-
Black JC, Rockhill K, Forber A, Amioka E, May KP, Haynes CM, Dasgupta N, and Dart RC
- Subjects
- Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Internet, Male, Prescription Drugs, Prevalence, Reproducibility of Results, Cross-Sectional Studies methods, Pharmacoepidemiology methods
- Abstract
Background: In rapidly changing fields such as the study of drug use, the need for accurate and timely data is paramount to properly inform policy and intervention decisions. Trends in drug use can change rapidly by month, and using study designs with flexible modules could present advantages. Timely data from online panels can inform proactive interventions against emerging trends, leading to a faster public response. However, threats to validity from using online panels must be addressed to create accurate estimates., Objective: The objective of this study was to demonstrate a comprehensive methodological approach that optimizes a nonprobability, online opt-in sample to provide timely, accurate national estimates on prevalence of drug use., Methods: The Survey of Non-Medical Use of Prescription Drugs Program from the Researched Abuse, Diversion and Addiction Related Surveillance (RADARS) System is an online, cross-sectional survey on drug use in the United States, and several best practices were implemented. To optimize final estimates, two best practices were investigated in detail: exclusion of respondents showing careless or improbable responding patterns and calibration of weights. The approach in this work was to cumulatively implement each method, which improved key estimates during the third quarter 2018 survey launch. Cutoffs for five exclusion criteria were tested. Using a series of benchmarks, average relative bias and changes in bias were calculated for 33 different weighting variable combinations., Results: There were 148,274 invitations sent to panelists, with 40,021 who initiated the survey (26.99%). After eligibility assessment, 20.23% (29,998/148,274) of the completed questionnaires were available for analysis. A total of 0.52% (157/29,998) of respondents were excluded based on careless or improbable responses; however, these exclusions had larger impacts on lower volume drugs. Number of exclusions applied were negatively correlated to total dispensing volume by drug (Spearman ρ=-.88, P<.001). A weighting scheme including three demographic and two health characteristics reduced average relative bias by 31.2%. After weighting, estimates of drug use decreased, reflecting a weighted sample that had healthier benchmarks than the unweighted sample., Conclusions: Our study illustrates a new approach to using nonprobability online panels to achieve national prevalence estimates for drug abuse. We were able to overcome challenges with using nonprobability internet samples, including misclassification due to improbable responses. Final drug use and health estimates demonstrated concurrent validity to national probability-based drug use and health surveys. Inclusion of multiple best practices cumulatively improved the estimates generated. This method can bridge the information gap when there is a need for prompt, accurate national data., (©Joshua Curtis Black, Karilynn Rockhill, Alyssa Forber, Elise Amioka, K Patrick May, Colleen M Haynes, Nabarun Dasgupta, Richard C Dart. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 25.10.2019.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Nonmedical use of alprazolam in the UK: Results from a nationally representative survey.
- Author
-
Hockenhull J, Amioka E, Black JC, Haynes CM, Dargan PI, Dart RC, and Wood DM
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diazepam administration & dosage, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prescription Drug Misuse psychology, Prevalence, Surveys and Questionnaires statistics & numerical data, United Kingdom epidemiology, Young Adult, Alprazolam administration & dosage, Central Nervous System Stimulants administration & dosage, Motivation, Prescription Drug Misuse statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
There is concern in the UK about nonmedical use (NMU) of alprazolam (Xanax). We investigated the epidemiology of alprazolam NMU compared with diazepam using data from the Survey of Non-Medical Use of Prescription Drugs (NMURx) programme (collected 28 September-1 December 2017). The survey included 10 019 respondents and was weighted by age, sex and region to represent 52 927 659 UK adults. The estimated national prevalence of lifetime NMU of alprazolam was 0.32% (95% confidence interval: 0.19-0.46), and 1.30% (1.06-1.54) for diazepam. The prevalence of NMU in the last 90 days was significantly different when split by age category for alprazolam (P < .001), but not for diazepam (P = .262) with alprazolam NMU being more common among younger adults (age 16-24 years: 0.37%; age 25-34 years: 0.14%; 35 years or older: 0.01%). Further research is needed to fully understand the motivations of alprazolam NMU and to monitor whether the popularity of alprazolam will rise., (© 2019 The British Pharmacological Society.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.