1. A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT KNEE ARTHROSCOPIC MEDIAL COLLATERAL LIGAMENT RELEASE TECHNIQUES IN TREATMENT OF MEDIAL MENISCUS POSTERIOR HORN INJURY
- Author
-
YANG Guodong, GUO Jia, QU Di, ZHANG Jing, FU Haitao, QI Chao
- Subjects
tibial meniscus injuries ,medial collateral ligament, knee ,arthroscopes ,joint capsule release ,analysis of variance ,Medicine - Abstract
Objective To explore the effectiveness of different knee arthroscopic medial collateral ligament release techniques in the treatment of patients with medial meniscus posterior horn injury and their prognoses. Methods A total of 54 patients with medial meniscus posterior horn injury who underwent surgical treatment at the Department of Sports Medicine in our hospital from June to August 2021 were enrolled. They were divided into group A (who underwent knee arthroscopic percutaneous outside-in, superficial release) and group B (who underwent knee arthroscopic inside-out, anteromedial release) based on the conditions and wishes of the patients. The two groups of patients were recorded and compared for surgical duration and follow-up outcomes of the following indices at 1, 3, and 12 months after surgery: local symptom duration, visual analogue score of knee pain, Lysholm score of knee joints, International Knee Documentations Committee Rating System-based score, and knee joint range of motion score. Results There was no significant difference in surgical duration between the two groups of patients (P>0.05), but the local symptom duration in group B was significantly shorter than that in group A (t=11.950,P0.05). Conclusion For patients with simple medial meniscus posterior horn injury, it is recommended to use knee arthroscopic anteromedial inside-out, superficial release if the surgeons are confident of the condition.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF