Search

In habitats where stressors are frequent or persistent, it can become increasingly difficult for wildlife to appropriately match their endocrine responses to these more challenging environments. The dynamic regulation of glucocorticoid (GC) hormones plays a crucial role in determining how well individuals cope with environmental changes. Amphibians exposed to agricultural stressors can dampen aspects of their GC profile (baseline, agitation, recovery, stress responsiveness, and negative feedback) to cope in these stressful environments, but this dampening can lead to reductions in an individual's reactive scope and a loss of endocrine flexibility. Organic agriculture could potentially limit some of these effects, however, little is known about how amphibians respond physiologically to organic agricultural environments. We compared GC profiles of Hyla versicolor tadpoles from three treatments: natural ponds (<5% agriculture within 500m), ponds near organic farms, and ponds near conventional farms. We hypothesized that tadpoles would cope with agricultural habitats by dampening stress responsiveness and exhibiting more efficient negative feedback and that the magnitude of these changes in response would differ based on agricultural method. We found that tadpoles from conventional and organic ponds were less likely to downregulate GCs via negative feedback after stressor exposure than tadpoles from natural ponds. For agricultural tadpoles that did downregulate GCs after the stressor, we found lower stress responsiveness and faster downregulation to baseline corticosterone than tadpoles from natural ponds. These results point to an accumulation of wear-and-tear, leading to an overall reduction in reactive scope and limited GC flexibility in our agricultural tadpoles. Regardless of agricultural method used, agricultural tadpoles exhibited the same patterns of GC response, indicating that current efforts to incentivize farmers to switch to organic farming methods may not be sufficient to address negative agricultural impacts on amphibians., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:Amanda R. Bryant reports financial support was provided by Texas State University. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Introduction: Recent three-dimensional (3D) kinematic research has revealed foot abduction is the strongest predictor of standing functional and forced turnout postures. However, it is still unknown how the internal foot joints enable a large degree of foot abduction in turnout. The primary purpose of this study was to use a dance specific multi-segment foot model to determine the lower leg and foot contributions to turnout that female university-level ballets use to accentuate their turnout., Methods: Eighteen female dance students (mean age, 18.8 ± 1.6 years) volunteered for this study. Retro-reflective markers were attached to the dancers' dominant foot. Each dancer performed three repetitions of functional turnout, forced turnout and ten consecutive sautés in first position. Repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni adjustments for the multiple comparisons were used to determine the kinematic adjustments, hindfoot eversion, midfoot and forefoot abduction, navicular drop (i.e. lowering of the medial longitudinal arch) and first metatarsophalangeal joint abduction between natural double leg up-right posture and the first position conditions., Results: Hindfoot eversion (4.6°, p  < 0.001) and midfoot abduction (2.8°, p  < 0.001) significantly increased in functional turnout compared to the natural double leg up-right posture. Thirteen dancers demonstrated increased first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) abduction in forced turnout, however no statistically significant increase was found. Navicular drop during sautés in first position significantly increased by 11 mm ( p  < 0.001) compared to the natural double leg up-right posture., Conclusion: Our findings suggest dancers do pronate, via hindfoot eversion and midfoot abduction in both functional and forced turnout, however, no immediate association was found between forced turnout and first MTPJ abduction. Foot pronation does play a role in achieving turnout. Further prospective research on in situ measures of the lower limb in turnout and injury surveillance is required to improve our understanding of the normal and abnormal dance biomechanics., Competing Interests: Not applicable.This research was approved by the Edith Cowan University Human Research Ethics, reference: 12534 HOPPER. Informed written consent was obtained from each participant prior to the study.Consent was obtained to publish unidentifiable individual participant data.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.