Hui EP, Li WF, Ma BB, Lam WKJ, Chan KCA, Mo F, Ai QYH, King AD, Wong CH, Guo R, Poon DMC, Tong M, Li L, Lau TKH, Wong KCW, Lam DCM, Lo YMD, Ma J, and Chan ATC
Background: After curative radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiation (CRT), there is no validated tool to accurately identify patients for adjuvant therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Post-RT circulating plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA can detect minimal residual disease and is associated with recurrence and survival independent of TNM (tumor-lymph node-metastasis) stage. We aimed to develop and validate a risk model for stratification of NPC patients after completion of RT/CRT to observation or adjuvant therapy., Patients and Methods: The prospective multicenter 0502 EBV DNA screening cohort (Hong Kong NPC Study Group 0502 trial) enrolled from 2006 to 2015 (n = 745) was used for model development. For internal validation, we pooled independent patient cohorts from prospective clinical studies enrolled from 1997 to 2006 (n = 340). For external validation, we used retrospective cohort of NPC patients treated at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from 2009 to 2012 (n = 837). Eligible patients had histologically confirmed NPC of Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) 7th Edition stage II-IVB who completed curative RT/CRT with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy, had post-RT EBV DNA tested within 120 days after RT and received no adjuvant therapy. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). We used recursive-partitioning analysis (RPA) to classify patients into groups of low, intermediate, and high risk of death., Results: Combining post-RT EBV DNA level (0, 1-49, 50-499, and ≥500 copies/ml) and TNM stage (II, III, IVAB), RPA model classified patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups with 5-year OS of 89.4%, 78.5% and 37.2%, respectively. The RPA low-risk group had comparable OS to TNM stage II (5-year OS 88.5%) but identified more patients (64.8% versus stage II 28.1%) that could potentially be spared adjuvant therapy toxicity. The RPA model (c-index 0.712) showed better risk discrimination than either the TNM stage (0.604) or post-RT EBV DNA alone (0.675) with improved calibration and consistence. These results were validated in both internal and external cohorts., Conclusion: Combining post-RT EBV DNA and TNM stage improved risk stratification in NPC., Competing Interests: Disclosure EPH, speaker's honoraria from Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Merck Serono; consultant/advisory board from MSD. BBYM, advisory board and speaker's honorarium from Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD; research grant from Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim; WKJL holds equity in Grail; KCAC, grant support from the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong, Kadoorie Charitable Foundation and Cirina/Grail; royalties from Sequenom, Illumina, Grail/Cirina, Xcelom, DRA and Take2; holds equities of DRA and Take2; YMDL, received sponsored research agreement from Grail; research grant from Hong Kong Research Grants Council; endowed professorship: Li Ka Shing Foundation; shareholding, membership of scientific advisory board, sponsored research agreement, licensing, royalties from Grail; shareholding, licensing, royalties from Take2; consultancy to Decheng Capital: licensing, royalties from Sequenom, DRA Limited and Illumina; ATCC, received research and travel grants: MSD, Pfizer, Roche. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 European Society for Medical Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)