Search

Numerous studies have shown reduced performance in plants that are surrounded by neighbours of the same species1,2, a phenomenon known as conspecific negative density dependence (CNDD)3. A long-held ecological hypothesis posits that CNDD is more pronounced in tropical than in temperate forests4,5, which increases community stabilization, species coexistence and the diversity of local tree species6,7. Previous analyses supporting such a latitudinal gradient in CNDD8,9 have suffered from methodological limitations related to the use of static data10-12. Here we present a comprehensive assessment of latitudinal CNDD patterns using dynamic mortality data to estimate species-site-specific CNDD across 23 sites. Averaged across species, we found that stabilizing CNDD was present at all except one site, but that average stabilizing CNDD was not stronger toward the tropics. However, in tropical tree communities, rare and intermediate abundant species experienced stronger stabilizing CNDD than did common species. This pattern was absent in temperate forests, which suggests that CNDD influences species abundances more strongly in tropical forests than it does in temperate ones13. We also found that interspecific variation in CNDD, which might attenuate its stabilizing effect on species diversity14,15, was high but not significantly different across latitudes. Although the consequences of these patterns for latitudinal diversity gradients are difficult to evaluate, we speculate that a more effective regulation of population abundances could translate into greater stabilization of tropical tree communities and thus contribute to the high local diversity of tropical forests.

Populations of forest trees exhibit large temporal fluctuations, but little is known about the synchrony of these fluctuations across space, including their sign, magnitude, causes and characteristic scales. These have important implications for metapopulation persistence and theoretical community ecology. Using data from permanent forest plots spanning local, regional and global spatial scales, we measured spatial synchrony in tree population growth rates over sub-decadal and decadal timescales and explored the relationship of synchrony to geographical distance. Synchrony was high at local scales of less than 1 km, with estimated Pearson correlations of approximately 0.6–0.8 between species' population growth rates across pairs of quadrats. Synchrony decayed by approximately 17–44% with each order of magnitude increase in distance but was still detectably positive at distances of 100 km and beyond. Dispersal cannot explain observed large-scale synchrony because typical seed dispersal distances (<100 m) are far too short to couple the dynamics of distant forests on decadal timescales. We attribute the observed synchrony in forest dynamics primarily to the effect of spatially synchronous environmental drivers (the Moran effect), in particular climate, although pests, pathogens and anthropogenic drivers may play a role for some species. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Canopy gaps are widely recognized as being crucial for maintaining the diversity of forest tree communities. But empirical studies have found mixed results because the differences in diversity between individual gaps and non‐gaps are often small and statistically undetectable. One overlooked factor, however, is how small individual gap versus non‐gap differences may accumulate across sites and potentially have a large effect on forest diversity at the plot scale. Our study investigated sapling richness, density, and composition in 124 treefall gaps, and 200 non‐gap sites in the 50‐ha tropical forest plot at Barro Colorado Island (BCI), Panama. Additionally, we analyzed species accumulation curves to understand how species richness increases with increasing stem numbers. We observed that sapling richness and density were only slightly higher in gaps 7 years after formation and statistically indistinguishable from non‐gaps after 12 years. However, species accumulation curves across multiple gaps were substantially higher than those across non‐gaps. Species composition showed small differences between individual gaps and non‐gaps but differed significantly between collections of gaps and non‐gaps. Specifically, 55 species specialized in 7‐year‐old gaps compared with 24 in non‐gaps; of these, 23 gap‐specialized species and zero non‐gap species were pioneers. Our results indicate that tree species richness is higher in gaps because of both higher stem density and the presence of gap‐specialized species. Our study has finally provided compelling evidence to support the idea that gaps enhance the overall diversity of tropical forest tree communities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To purchase or authenticate to the full-text of this article, please visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00815.x Byline: RYAN CHISHOLM (*), ROBERT TAYLOR ([dagger]) Keywords: Australian mammals; critical weight range; extinction risk; mammal body size; null-hypothesis significance testing Abstract: Abstract: The critical weight range hypothesis for Australian terrestrial mammals states that species in the intermediate size range 35-5500 g are particularly susceptible to extinction. In a 2001 study Cardillo and Bromham found no statistically significant evidence for this hypothesis and suggested that research should instead focus on why small species are resistant to extinction. We used a similar data set of body sizes of Australian mammals grouped by conservation classification, but we used test statistics (mean deviation above and below the median body size) that are more statistically powerful than those of Cardillo and Bromham (quartiles, maxima, and minima of body size distributions). We found strong evidence in favor of the critical weight range hypothesis: the body size distribution of threatened species was more clustered toward the median body size from above and below. This pattern was statistically significant at the continental scale and in the arid zone, but not in the mesic zone. Confusing statistical significance with evidence of no effect, as Cardillo and Bromham did, can have negative implications for conservation biology because it can result in failure to act when action is warranted or provision of incorrect advice that affects policy and planning decisions. Abstract (Spanish): La Prueba de Significancia de la Hipotesis Nula y el Rango de Peso Critico para Mamiferos Australianos Resumen: La hipotesis del rango de peso critico (RPC) para mamiferos australianos terrestres plantea que las especies en el rango de tamano intermedio de 35-5500 g son particularmente susceptibles a la extincion. En un estudio en 2001, Cardillo y Bromham no encontraron evidencia significativa para esta hipotesis y sugirieron que, en su lugar, la investigacion se deberia enfocar al porque las especies pequenas son resistentes a la extincion. Utilizamos un conjunto de datos de tamanos corporales de mamiferos australianos agrupados por clasificacion de conservacion, pero utilizamos pruebas estadisticas (desviacion media por encima y por debajo de la mediana del tamano corporal) que son estadisticamente mas poderosas que utilizadas por Cardillo y Bromham (cuartilas, maximos y minimos de las distribuciones de tamanos corporales). Encontramos fuerte evidencia a favor de la hipotesis RPC: la distribucion del tamano corporal de especies amenazadas estuvo mayormente agrupada hacia la mediana del tamano corporal. Este patron fue estadisticamente significativo en la escala continental y en la zona arida, pero no en la zona mesica. La confusion de la significancia estadistica con la evidencia de no efecto, como hicieron Cardillo y Bromham, puede tener implicaciones negativas para la biologia de la conservacion porque puede resultar en la falta de accion cuando se requiera o en asesoria inadecuada que afecta las decisiones politicas y de planificacion. Author Affiliation: (*)Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, U.S.A., emailchisholm@princeton.edu ([dagger])Department of Environment and Conservation, Dubbo, New South Wales 2830, Australia Article History: Paper submitted February 17, 2007; revised manuscript accepted July 2, 2007.

Bark contributes approximately 20% to the total above‐ground biomass of trees, yet bark is not properly accounted for when estimating carbon sequestered by trees. Current allometric functions estimate tree volume from diameter measured over the bark, and derive bark density and carbon content from estimates for wood. As the bark density of hardwood species is 40%–50% lower than the wood density, but nearly equivalent in conifers, bark carbon is overestimated for most species. The latter is further exacerbated by variation in bark volume with bark surface morphology.Fissured bark volume is overestimated by diameter over bark measurements by up to 40%. The vacant space in fissures can be accounted for by a bark fissure index (BFI). We calculate bark carbon for Australian species from a non‐destructive and effective BFI using bark thickness measured in the field.Bark volume, and in turn bark carbon, scaled inversely with tree size (diameter) so that bark volume comprised 42% of small trees (10 cm diameter at breast height, DBH) but 23% of large trees (50 cm DBH). Our BFI method using a bark thickness gauge (BGM) yielded similar results than using the less time‐efficient contour gauge method (CM) to estimate BFI (bias BGM‐CM −1.3%, non‐significant at p = 0.72). Both BGM and CM had an error of <4% compared to digitized BFI from destructive sampled stem disks. An average of 15 bark gauge measurements per tree estimated bark thickness (and inconsequence BFI) for both fissured and unfissured bark with <20% error relative to the exact value.Using the bark gauge method, BFI can be rapidly measured from large numbers of trees needed for estimating bark carbon at the community level and modelling carbon uptake, storage and cycling in woody biomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]